Is he coding it already? If not, then what the fudge is going on in the following image?Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty
-ĜӨҢ- said, March 20, 2011, 04:52:36 pmIs the quote button supposed to be there? I can't see it for eg: in this topic:http://mugenguild.com/forumx/index.php?topic=126390.0Oh, I only looked at that thread once.But anyway, this is a good idea.
Titiln said, March 25, 2011, 07:39:19 pmi know it demands time and effort but i didn't really like that this ended up in limbo like most other mod suggestions. i'd like to read a "i don't have time for this shit" "it'll be done later" or "not worth the effort" every once in a whileI do try to at least comment on all suggestions. However every mod on this forum requires continuous effort and makes forum upgrades more difficult, which is why I am a bit picky about what I actually do and what I don't.If I'm not convinced about a mod myself, waiting a while and seeing if it's brought up again usually works, once I say something people think "ok it's on his list, no more we can do".so uh, yeah, I'll probably do this in a while.
I'll ask Val about this next time I see him on google. Comic Fury has this feature and it's pretty nice. Only the poster can see who has liked and disliked their posts. No one else can (besides staff)
Prevent users from being publicly singled out by many people ganging up. Less chances of looking like there are cliques. Otherwise it's not much different than the old karma system we once had. Though if everyone wants it to be exactly like Facebook's like system that's fine with me.
Yes, but that's a paid feature. Val is also going to get into microtransactions for the site soon. You can buy the auto dislike for $0.99 a user. Though my posts are already going to be auto disliked by default
cliques were more of a thing back when this was suggested and it wasn't a concern, it shouldn't be a concern now when they're even less relevant. comparing this to the useless karma system is ridiculous. a like system highlights good posts. the reason walt suggested it in the first place is so he doesn't have to make Yes +1 posts. it's kind of pointless if nobody can see who liked what
I'm guessing that was supposed to mean that other people will see "liked x times" and the poster himself will see "liked by : {list}".I suppose that if everyone sees the full list for every post, there's a chance the screen will get cluttered fast.
DKDC said, January 29, 2014, 04:59:34 pmI'm guessing that was supposed to mean that other people will see "liked x times" and the poster himself will see "liked by : {list}".I suppose that if everyone sees the full list for every post, there's a chance the screen will get cluttered fast.yeah, i mean the names being public to everybody. the way the list is presented is an entirely different issue. i guess it should be like facebook where it lists 1-5 names, but if it gets beyond 6 likes then the list becomes a [Click Here] expandable thing.