Without stooping to the original poster's level, I cannot keep track of the hundreds of people a day that contact me on YouTube, e-mail, MSN, whatever. I am sorry I did not reply or something, but to publicly rip me like that because of things I have little control over is just plain rude. What do you wish to prove by publicly slandering me like that? I cannot change what happened, but your brash actions just marked you down in my book.

I have a life outside of MUGEN, and I cannot keep track of everything.

Did I say I promised you anything? I got them, but I have tons of other things to do and sort out. Don't put words in my mouth.

And to answer your question, I cannot host them because I have a bandwidth limit on my webhost. I try my best to help out everyone I can, but I cannot help everyone. I'm only one person.

Tee Hee Hee said, October 08, 2007, 11:26:42 am

- You just used a dirty technicality to try to defend youself.


How am I supposed to trust you after that. Those kinds of actions are just seriously uncalled for and are deceitful. If you didn't know that, pffft, hopefully now you do.

Am I supposed to remember every single thing that every person that contacts me gives me? Do you have any idea how massive my volume of mail is? You are not the only person in the community I who tries to contact me. I already apologized if I shut you out. I did not do it on purpose.

And it is not a technicality. It is a true statement.

Point is, you found another host. La-ti-dah, you should have moved on. You should have figured out after a substantial amount of time without a reply that I would not get back to you. You act as if I committed a grave sin or a felony. A lot of people I try to email or contact do not get back to me, but I do not slander them publicly. Totally no class.

This is not about trust anymore. I lost a great deal of respect for you, if not totally. And this will be the last thing I will say of this nonsense. I refuse to become part of another idiotic MUGEN drama.

To quote The Eagles: "Get over it. Get over it. All this whinin', and cryin', and pitchin' a fit? Get over it!"

However, you chose to make it a public spectacle, qwerwgrebew.

HJK, do the words "mountain out of a goddamn molehill" have any meaning to you?

I wouldn't worry about it, Sic. It would've happened anyway. If things don't go hjk's way, he acts like it's a crime against God. It's happened EVERY FUCKING TIME.

Quote

- Flaw with inappropriate Power sets due to my negligence and my decision to check-over the code after the release *which will be updated*

I don't know if that's what you meant, but :

I finally decided to test one of your AI patch, seeing that this one didn't have any mass CNS modification.


....

So Hinata can enter the state 3200 when she has power>1600 and connects, or when she has power>1800...
Once inside, the varset for var(2) comes in : we have (command!=Rasen Enbukyaku_a && command!=Rasen Enbukyaku_b) since there was absolutely no command (it's an AI), therefore we have var(2)=2 all the time Hinata enters the state 3200.
Having this value for var(2), she performs the strong version of the move, gets -3000 power... but had only 1600 (or a bit more) when she entered the state.

So, to resume :
- She'll always perform the strongest version of the super.
- She performs it while not being authorized to.

I just took the example for Rasen Enbukyaku, but it's the case for all the supers.

Not as important, but Fervicante codes the special moves more or less the same way, putting two versions of it in the same changestate in the CMD, then using a varset for var(2) once in the CNS. Therefore, the AI using no command, the var(2) is always set to 1, and Hinata always performs the strongest version of each move, removing a lot of variety from her moveset.

What you have to do to avoid this is set the value of var(2) in your changestate in the CMD, with the correct power triggers. And in the CNS, you add a var(59)=1 trigger to the varset to avoid any modification of var(2).

Good luck with your AIs.