I dunno where it said they're teenagers. I mean they're bigger, yeah, but that doesn't necessarily mean that they're teenagers. They could be in like 4th grade or something, and the victim is in 1st grade. SOMETHING LIKE THAT I dunno.

Also tried brightening that image. Nothing. Looked in the source code. Nothing. This sure looks final-hahahaha yeah right.

Scott's always been weird about the animatronic sizes and proportions in the video cameras. In the the first FNaF, at one angle, Chica is HUGE and inconsistent with everything else. Just to give you an idea, I overlayed two shots from the same camera, one with Chica in it, and one with Bonnie.

That makes sense, but I just find it weird that that particular animatronic is slumped down like Golden Freddy, yet has his ear is in place and his eyes have illumination, where one even looks like there's an eyeball there. Maybe it's meant to symbolize something that happens in FNaF 4?

Well, all we know is that the bullies are large than the kid you play as. It doesn't mean they're teenagers. Even so, the bodies were never found. If you chop up a body, you can fit it anywhere. Those kids are smaller than adults too, which appear to be significantly taller. Just look at purple guy in the easter egg.

BaganSmashBros said, August 03, 2015, 03:34:20 pm

Purple guy was in the background with another adult in a suit, so, hard to tell. But after some more size comparisons, Fredbear is pretty small (makes sense since its a springlock suit thing) and they aren't teenagers. Whoops. I completly forgot about that kind of animatronics, so, i assumed it was big like others.
You can chop up the body, but it won't reduce amount of space they will take. But that doesn't matters now since they aren't that big and i just fucked up. Urgh...

I don't want to get into the science of dismembering people, but that's exactly why anyone would chop up a person; that and to destroy evidence, but I digress. Ever watch an episode of The Sopranos? Anyways, you could easily chop up the kids and stuff them in the suits. It would be nasty as hell, but hey, we don't have any evidence that it wasn't the case.

You know there are other ways to get rid of bodies

Well if we take Phone Guy's Night 4 phonecall in FNaF1 into consideration, he tells you to check inside the suits if you get a chance, and wonders what's inside "all those empty heads," so yeah, they're probably in the suits and empty replacement heads. And knowing how badly the company keeps trying to sweep shit under the rug, I guess that's not the weirdest thing they could do.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e9FrNYjr3L4
Matpat.....again

While this thread is revived for a bit, Scott said no keys for the chest.
http://kotaku.com/five-nights-at-freddys-creator-says-not-a-single-person-1726365438
Im fine with that. It always was like this (Scott gives us pieces while we combine them and assemble the story), so, no point in changing how things are done.

Also, i might have explanation on how there are toy animatronics' toys in 4 even though they don't appear here in any other way. Its simple - those are toys (official or just chinese knock-offs) that were later (in 1987) used for Freddy and co's redesigns or they were once toys that later became their own characters. Mangle doesn't looks like a pirate and Toy Chica has "Let's Party" bib while original one had "Let's Eat" and looked more fitting for that too.
...does this makes sense?

BaganSmashBros said, September 03, 2015, 09:47:58 pm

While this thread is revived for a bit, Scott said no keys for the chest.
http://kotaku.com/five-nights-at-freddys-creator-says-not-a-single-person-1726365438
Im fine with that. It always was like this (Scott gives us pieces while we combine them and assemble the story), so, no point in changing how things are done.

Also, i might have explanation on how there are toy animatronics' toys in 4 even though they don't appear here in any other way. Its simple - those are toys (official or just chinese knock-offs) that were later (in 1987) used for Freddy and co's redesigns or they were once toys that later became their own characters. Mangle doesn't looks like a pirate and Toy Chica has "Let's Party" bib while original one had "Let's Eat" and looked more fitting for that too.
...does this makes sense?

Mangle doesn't look like a pirate because we didn't see the entirety of the outfit. The only thing we have to go by is the zoom-in on her face in the picture. The kids disassembled her and the staff gave up on reassembling her long before the player takes the job, so while it's a possibility, it's not really set in stone.

Toy Chica, I believe, is a parody of all those fast food restaurants that started trying to reduce emphasis on eating pizza and focus on making kids lose weight and work out, so it would make sense for her to have a form-fitting bib that emphasizes partying. Among all the other problems the company has, they want to avoid being associated with childhood obesity, so they have generally slimmer animatronics and one that promotes partying over eating.

Interesting theory on the toys being the fourth game though.

As much as I can make it FNAF 4 is hindrance in overall story.....