http://www.examiner.com/article/statue-of-an-elongated-head-identified-by-nasa-mars-rover-photocheck this out, a rock that looks very much like the head of a statuefound on mars and it was identified by NASA.
well anything is possible. i won't be surprised if there were life back then in mars seeing there are marks of possible gullies. and mars is still in the goldilocks zone.
a couple of my favorite anomolies found on mars.im convinced there was intelligent life there at some point in time.a broken statue?thigh bone?statue?did jesus preach on mars too?
Memo said, November 07, 2014, 02:35:39 amhttp://www.examiner.com/article/statue-of-an-elongated-head-identified-by-nasa-mars-rover-photocheck this out, a rock that looks very much like the head of a statuefound on mars and it was identified by NASA.That's just a pareoidolia(something that casually looks another thing). There's, however, another of those Martian rocks that looks EXACTLY as a cynognathus skull. Take a look.- REAL CYNOGNATHUS SKULL:- "Cynognathus" in Mars:Let's paint itLet's zoom'emI prefer thinking it's, just a coincidence. What takes my whole attention is, the presence of round and sharp stones in the same, kinda like in OUR world. Has that photo been taken in an extincted riverbed of Mars?Also, the original photo comes from NSA itself: http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/msl-raw-images/msss/00064/mcam/0064MR0285069000E1_DXXX.jpgHave a nice day!
I remember seeing that pic of the cynognathus. Very interesting stuff.I would not be surprised if the same type of mammals and reptiles here on earth inhabit other planets too. There has to be other typesof animals in other worlds that we have not seen too also.It would be cool if we found a planet inhabited by dinosaurs but i dontthink we would be able to live on that planet not because of the raptorsand t.rex but because the oxygen would be too thick for us.
It doesn't strike you as odd that the first "painted" picture looks nothing like the original image from the NASA ? Seriously, the last one and the one before that don't even look similar to each other, the last one is missing the rest of the "bones" that are behind the supposed skull. Come on.
DKDC said, November 10, 2014, 07:50:08 pmIt doesn't strike you as odd that the first "painted" picture looks nothing like the original image from the NASA ? Seriously, the last one and the one before that don't even look similar to each other, the last one is missing the rest of the "bones" that are behind the supposed skull. Come on.in that image the top of the skull is below the rest of the fossil.in the painting the skull was placed back where it would belong to complete the picture.
So... It's a few different rocks that, once put together in a specific position, look similar to something else ? And that's coming just after Felo dismissed another post as being pareidolia ?
Memo said, November 10, 2014, 07:48:59 pmI remember seeing that pic of the cynognathus. Very interesting stuff.I would not be surprised if the same type of mammals and reptiles here on earth inhabit other planets too. There has to be other typesof animals in other worlds that we have not seen too also.It would be cool if we found a planet inhabited by dinosaurs but i dontthink we would be able to live on that planet not because of the raptorsand t.rex but because the oxygen would be too thick for us.It's supposed that Mars hold life around 4000 millions years ago, then the life line(I don't know the correct word for this in English) changed its place<---Hypothesis. Maybe a meteor impacting the planet or else. I just don't know. Anyway, I don't think that "dinosaurs" would live in another planet, since Earth's biology is based in C. Also', atmosphere's composition in our planet has changed, more oxygen in the past(allowing to have meganeura an 180 cm long dragonfly aside other giantic insects/arthropodae/BUGS), our Moon is getting further year by year(in the Triasic period, days were of 23 hours); we just can't make things "simple" while speaking about life in our planet. Now imagine that in other planets with different systems. There's A LOT of factors to count... DKDC said, November 10, 2014, 07:50:08 pmIt doesn't strike you as odd that the first "painted" picture looks nothing like the original image from the NASA ? Seriously, the last one and the one before that don't even look similar to each other, the last one is missing the rest of the "bones" that are behind the supposed skull. Come on.The image(painted) and the original have those "bones" of behind. I think there's a bigger chance of the closer rock "being" a skull instead of the further; this one looks more like an earth fault, that's the main thing that strikes me more: while it's notably round, the rocks around are edgy. If you look closely, there are more faults a bit closer(behind the "skull). There's a similar thing near my town, in the forest. That's why I prefer thinking the further is just a geologicalfault, in other words, a pareidolia. Is just the closer what makes me think.Also, about the missing bones, just go to a paleonthological excavation. Sometimes you'll find that there are missing bones, parts of the skeleton that are above, or the skeleton itself is divided intwo(or more) parts because of transitional faults or else...that happens here a lot.http://www.nbcnews.com/science/science-news/duck-billed-dinosaurs-hip-tail-discovered-mexico-f6C10713860They just found the ribs and tail in that place AND you can see that there's a difference of around 50 cm of height between ribs and tail(reference: those scientists). Where are the head, and etc?--->geological faults.
Memo said, November 10, 2014, 08:00:31 pmthe fossils are seperated just like ones would be here on earth.DKDC said, November 10, 2014, 07:56:40 pmSo... It's a few different rocks that, once put together in a specific position, look similar to something else ? And that's coming just after Felo dismissed another post as being pareidolia ?Also that's not "similar to how it is on Earth". How it is on Earth is that we actually look at the real thing and study it, not through a picture, but by actually picking the thing in your hand. You can't take the conclusions we make on Earth and apply them to a single picture of some rocks.
I hate to be the asshole that burst your bubble but those simply look or are just rocks IMO... ive seen better alien shape rocks that ofcourse aren't real here on many hicking trails,, i do believe aliens existed or exist in mars but as bugs, plants and microscopic creatures, as for statues , figures and signs left in there it could be possible
Anybody here mess with 4chan? Apparently someone posted a pic of a real alien in the desert and the site when down 40 seconds later for about 20 minutes and all evidence and the original thread were deleted. Any of youSaw it? I found an alleged corrupted version of the picture and some others that look pretty awesome I'll post Them in a bitI like this one!The corrupted image of the supposed real picAnd this wtf is that??
hello everybody.very intersting,i start saying illuminatis and Mortal Kombat Ultra are conspiranoia and avoid talk about it.better talk about Mandela Effect,that is curious.
Did some diggin around and some folks say this is the originalAnd it was snapped with a trail cam, ill admit it looks moreCredible than the others. The alien actually looks like he's inThe desert and not photoshopped.
