Drex said, July 26, 2010, 08:26:55 pmI was going to post that, but JZ tried it and cried bs.Hahaha.I wonder what went wrong.
Insanius said, July 26, 2010, 08:29:54 pmIt has to be fullscreen = 1 as well.I don't think so.I don't ever run mugen fullscreen and I can record fine.
http://mugenguild.com/forumx/index.php?board=359.0;filter=68or http://mugenguild.com/forumx/index.php?board=359.0;filter=69
I'm not sure were to ask this so ill just post this here. I have a confusing question about mugen 1.0. I know that mugen 1.0 can run old characters. In the Docs and History and all that, it refers to them as 2002 versions. I know this is done by the "mugen version" parameter in the character .def. If it says 2002 instead of 1.0 this is how it recognizes that its an old character and treats it accordingly.However there are a few characters that have a 2003 date (like some of Waru's chars and some of Pots old ones before he updated). So for any that might say 2003 or anything else other than 2002 or 1.0 do i have to manually change that to 2002 so that it is treated as old and apply all the backward compatibility things. Or does the engine treats anything as old by default as long as it does not say 1.0?
Stuff works without having to do anything, most of the time.Although you should just outright change some stuff up to fix some bugs winmugen allowed and you should also add some cool cosmetic stuff like winquotes and etc.
oh ok i kind of figured things that were coded properly would work just like that i just had to make sure.That 2003 thing was really bothering me.as for the win quotes that should be amusing. Though about fixing certain things what needs manual fixing if you have something specific. Besides the things on Elecbytes site and stuff.Anyways thank you for the answer Kawaii-Desu.
Orochi Gill said, September 29, 2010, 06:46:44 pmsoulmaster1122 said, September 29, 2010, 03:11:18 pmholy ryuThis character is total shit anywayyeah i know the new stance not good i prefer that holy ken style fight
soulmaster1122 said, September 29, 2010, 07:04:12 pmOrochi Gill said, September 29, 2010, 06:46:44 pmsoulmaster1122 said, September 29, 2010, 03:11:18 pmholy ryuThis character is total shit anywayyeah i know the new stance not good i prefer that holy ken style fightbecause graphics totally equals gameplay, rite?
RicePigeon said, September 29, 2010, 07:24:28 pmsoulmaster1122 said, September 29, 2010, 07:04:12 pmOrochi Gill said, September 29, 2010, 06:46:44 pmsoulmaster1122 said, September 29, 2010, 03:11:18 pmholy ryuThis character is total shit anywayyeah i know the new stance not good i prefer that holy ken style fightbecause graphics totally equals gameplay, rite?xDxD yea and the old version of holy ryu is good but.... bad palletes any one can fix this?
soulmaster1122 said, September 29, 2010, 07:26:50 pmRicePigeon said, September 29, 2010, 07:24:28 pmsoulmaster1122 said, September 29, 2010, 07:04:12 pmOrochi Gill said, September 29, 2010, 06:46:44 pmsoulmaster1122 said, September 29, 2010, 03:11:18 pmholy ryuThis character is total shit anywayyeah i know the new stance not good i prefer that holy ken style fightbecause graphics totally equals gameplay, rite?xDxD yea and the old version of holy ryu is goodIm debating as to whether or not I should take this seriously
RicePigeon said, September 29, 2010, 07:47:39 pmIm debating as to whether or not I should take this seriouslyTake this seriously.