The Mugen Fighters Guild

Art & Entertainment => Entertainment => Topic started by: Iced on July 15, 2012, 03:54:44 am

Title: Marvel Cinematic Universe: THE END (until the next movie comes out)
Post by: Iced on July 15, 2012, 03:54:44 am
Sdcc is going on and things are getting hot in there

Captain america Winter Soldier

Thor The Dark World

Antman
 : Kicking ass an inch at a time

Guardians of the Galaxy
: I would flash you my card but my hands are full of guns
(http://i.imgur.com/3JKd4.jpg)

More info as it appears.
Title: Re: Marvel movies 2012 -13
Post by: Person Man on July 15, 2012, 03:59:58 am
[avatar]http://i42.photobucket.com/albums/e315/Tiger_Stripe/discordshrug.png[/avatar]We now have a very serious question to consider:  Who should play Groot?  I vote for Patrick Warburton.
Title: Re: Marvel movies 2012 -13
Post by: Speedpreacher on July 15, 2012, 04:01:58 am
George Clooney.
Title: Re: Marvel movies 2012 -13
Post by: Iced on July 15, 2012, 04:05:28 am
http://marvel.com/news/story/19067/sdcc_2012_guardians_ant-man_films_on_the_way
Title: Re: Marvel movies 2012 -13
Post by: Jmorphman on July 15, 2012, 04:07:08 am
YES
Title: Re: Marvel movies 2012 -13
Post by: Speedpreacher on July 15, 2012, 04:11:35 am
I knew that Cap 2 would be about the Winter Soldier. There was never any doubt in my mind. But hearing it officially announced still makes me crazy excited.
Title: Re: Marvel movies 2012 -13
Post by: Joulz on July 15, 2012, 12:32:44 pm
Guardians.....holy fuck it's actually gonna happen O_O
Title: Re: Marvel movies 2012 -13
Post by: Iced on July 15, 2012, 01:13:14 pm
Damn I forgot to put up the info for Ironman.

Ironman 3- Extremis
MANDARIN COMFIRMED FOR BRAWL

Title: Sequel of the Marvels Avengers confirmed and dated
Post by: "Bad News" Hoffmann on August 16, 2012, 10:05:16 pm
Disney just announced the sequel for the Avengers

Releasedate is the 1st May 2015


The release will follow Iron Man 3’s May 3, 2013 release and Thor: The Dark World, which is set for Nov. 8, 2013.

Marvel’s 2014 releases include Captain America: The Winter Soldier (April 4, 2014) and a Guardians of the Galaxy film set for an Aug. 1, 2014 release.

Disney has released an official statement, which notably doesn't call the film The Avengers 2. Instead, it's listed as Untitled Marvel's Avengers Sequel

The movie is again directed and written by Joss Whedon. He is also developing a TV project for ABC with Marvel characters through June 2015. “He will also contribute creatively to the next phase of Marvel’s cinematic universe,” Disney promised in the statement about Avengers 2

I will update this first post when there are more infos
Title: Re: Sequel of the Marvels Avengers confirmed and dated
Post by: Jango on August 17, 2012, 02:20:54 am
Here folks have a source

http://marvel.com/news/story/19240/marvels_the_avengers_sequel_coming_may_1_2015

You're welcome!
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Joulz on August 17, 2012, 04:21:39 am
3 fucking years, daaaaaamn
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: GOH on August 17, 2012, 12:42:17 pm
 :flipout:
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Bastard Wolf on September 07, 2012, 07:30:15 pm
the marvel phase one box set release has been delayed from sep 25th to next spring.

why you ask?
Quote
A German luggage firm has filed a lawsuit alleging that the silver briefcase for the six-movie collection is too similar to one of its products.
http://insidemovies.ew.com/2012/09/06/briefcase-lawsuit-delays-marvels-phase-1-box-set-until-next-spring-breaking/

Quote
I imagine Marvel is about to have a warehouse full of awesome, light-up, Cosmic Cube-carrying briefcases they can't sell. And Loki laughs and laughs and laughs.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Joulz on September 08, 2012, 02:41:13 am
fucking germans  :haw:
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: TRUEMicah on September 08, 2012, 08:02:01 am
3 fucking years, daaaaaamn
At least Iron Man 3 and Thor 2 comes out in 2013.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Cybaster on September 10, 2012, 11:15:04 am
Releasedate is the 1st May 2015

The release will follow Iron Man 3’s May 3
First I read 1st May, 3rd May ... then I read the year. :ninja:

And LOL at all these Apple-styled lawsuits.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on September 18, 2012, 09:39:20 pm
James Gunn (director of Slither and Super, writer of Lollipop Chainsaw) has been officially confirmed to be directing Guardians of the Galaxy, (http://www.avclub.com/articles/james-gunn-confirms-hes-directing-marvels-guardian,85086/) even though everyone knew that already.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Joulz on September 19, 2012, 05:22:49 am
seeing he hasn't yet made a movie beyond a 10 million$ budget, i sure hope he will be able to handle something that huge & looks SO hard to pull off.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on September 19, 2012, 05:27:39 am
seeing he hasn't yet made a movie beyond a 10 million$ budget, i sure hope he will be able to handle something that huge & looks SO hard to pull off.
You could say the same thing about Joss Whedon, pre-Serenity at least. :P
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Joulz on September 19, 2012, 06:10:19 am
true...but then, Avengers had most of the heroes already introduced in stand-alone movies (with visual aspect of each already designed for reference)...

how will he handle a couple of other worldly creatures, a tree-looking thing and a raccoon (all in a galactic battle obviously)?
i can't wait :p
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on October 04, 2012, 05:17:23 am
Captain America: Winter Soldier news time! (http://www.avclub.com/articles/scarlett-johansson-will-be-in-the-captain-america,86159/) Scarlett Johansson will be appearing in this movie, which isn't that big of a surprise, given that she is pretty important to the original Winter Soldier arc in the comics.

There are also reports listing five different actresses in the running for Cap's love interest in this movie (which will probably be Sharon Carter, the niece of Peggy Carter aka the love interest in the first movie). One is named, I shit you not, Imogen Gay Poots. But that's not the important thing! These actresses, they're all British (OK one Australian too) except for one person: Community's Allison Brie!!!!!!!
Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty
(a quick aside, the directors of this movie are the Russo brothers, who previously directed a bunch of Community episodes)

so yeah, I guess this love interest will be British like her movie-verse aunt (I suspect they'll just change that relationship to grand-niece or granddaughter in the movie). And Allison Brie played a British person in The Five Year Engagement, and apparently her accent was pretty well done. ANNIE/CAP OTP
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Iced on October 08, 2012, 02:23:49 am
http://www.inquisitr.com/326208/arnold-schwarzenegger-top-pick-for-thanos-in-avengers-2/
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on October 08, 2012, 02:25:02 am
Holy misleading headline Batman!

Anyone remember that time when the person who thinks Ahnuld should be Thanos found out that Thanos was actually in Avengers when he saw the movie, because he has absolutely no say on the movies AT ALL?
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on October 15, 2012, 11:21:59 pm
Ant-Man will be released after Avengers 2. (http://www.avclub.com/articles/antman-gets-a-2015-release-date-allowing-for-three,86696/)

Hmm, I guess this means no Ultron, but does that necessarily mean Thanos is the big bad for Avengers 2? Is that one quote from Whedon about the sequel being smaller and more personal still relevant?
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Person Man on October 23, 2012, 02:35:58 am
Ohai Mandarin.

(http://www.blogcdn.com/www.comicsalliance.com/media/2012/10/ironman3image5.jpg)

http://www.comicsalliance.com/2012/10/22/iron-man-3-mandarin-images-poster/
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Joulz on October 23, 2012, 05:01:07 am
liked the fact they cast Kingsley for Mandarin... but he looks kind of odd on this picture (please: do not fuck up his costume please please) :-/
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Person Man on October 23, 2012, 02:14:24 pm


Aw yiss.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on October 23, 2012, 02:33:01 pm
:flipout:
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: TRUEMicah on October 25, 2012, 02:48:05 am
:flipout:
^^^My thoughts exactly. 
:swoon:
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Aldo on October 25, 2012, 03:12:48 am
I need to watch Iron-Man 2 before that month because HOLY SH*T that is looking so sexy!
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Froz on October 25, 2012, 03:16:22 am
Wow, time sure passes by real fast. :P

Can't wait to see the movie.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on October 25, 2012, 03:43:31 am
Might as well post some news about that S.H.I.E.L.D. series too.

A few weeks ago the cast list was revealed (http://www.avclub.com/articles/meet-the-first-characters-from-joss-whedons-shield,86108/), prompting Whedon fans everywhere to guess which role would be played by which recurring Whedon actor. Like those two nerdy agents, that's totally gonna be Fran Kranz and Amy Acker.

Spoiler: possible spoiler for the series? maybe? it's still just a cast member being confirmed (click to see content)

Then today Ming-Na Wen (Chun-Li from the Street Fighter movie, Mulan from Mulan, and Dr. Chen on ER) was announced to be playing another, unlisted character, an ace pilot.

So it's been kind of boring I guess but still! New Whedon show!!!
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: AerosMugen on November 16, 2012, 05:17:33 pm
First Look At THOR: THE DARK WORLD Villain ‘Malekith’ & Army of Dark Elves (http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/MarvelFreshman/news/?a=70047)



Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Joulz on November 17, 2012, 03:37:31 am
Malekith looks sick...the army behind, i'm not too sure (the masks O_O)
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Iced on November 18, 2012, 02:51:23 am
http://boingboing.net/2012/11/16/wasp-avengers-rumors.html#more-194229

wasp is getting hinted at.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: The Real Niko on November 18, 2012, 03:23:24 am
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5EjG-1U3wqA[/youtube]

Aw yiss.

WHOA WHOA WHOA WHOA WHOA WHOA WAIT. Hold the FUCK up! Is that the Mother Fucking Mandarin?!
:flipout:

ABOUT DAMN TIME! Sold.
Iron Patriot. Double Sold.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Cyanide on November 18, 2012, 03:29:31 am
First Look At THOR: THE DARK WORLD Villain ‘Malekith’ & Army of Dark Elves (http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/MarvelFreshman/news/?a=70047)
Query, Which came first. This, or this dude
http://www.games-workshop.com/gws/catalog/productDetail.jsp?catId=cat440048a&prodId=prod790890

or were they both stolen from some other piece of fantasy i haven't read yet.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Speedpreacher on November 18, 2012, 03:41:47 am
Malekith the Accursed, because I'm pretty sure the Dark Elf book didn't come out until like the mid-nineties.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: LarsAlexandersson on November 18, 2012, 05:04:53 am
Iron Man 3 > Thor: Dark World > Captain America: Winter Soldier > Ant-Man > Guardians of Galaxy > Avengers 2

Plz be in Avengers 2, Wolverine, Beast, Spider-Man, War Machine (as well as Guardians of Galaxy)

I had a feeling that Rocky's film version is 3D character. Cause a why? He's a badass small fry raccoon
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Speedpreacher on November 18, 2012, 07:01:48 am
Plz be in Avengers 2, Wolverine, Beast, Spider-Man

Nope. Different studios have the movie rights to those characters and will retain them past the date the movie is planned to come out.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: The Real Niko on November 21, 2012, 06:16:02 pm
Plz be in Avengers 2, Wolverine, Beast, Spider-Man

Nope. Different studios have the movie rights to those characters and will retain them past the date the movie is planned to come out.


Well they need to cockslap those studios and take Wolverine and Spider-Man by force.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on November 21, 2012, 06:17:40 pm
Well they need to cockslap those studios and take Wolverine and Spider-Man by force.
Great understanding of film rights, there.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: The Real Niko on November 21, 2012, 06:36:44 pm
Well they need to cockslap those studios and take Wolverine and Spider-Man by force.
Great understanding of film rights, there.

Well I'm pretty sure Marvel Studios/Paramount could just walk up to Marvel Enterprises/Fox/Columbia and just BUY the rights. Hell they should get Stan Lee to pimp smack them. Amazing Spiderman was pretty alright, but they're lucky they didn't fuck that up after Spider-Man 3. . . .hell The whole trilogy was shit from the start (from comic nerd comparing it to the source standpoint.) But oh my GOD the Wolveri---  I mean X-Men movies have been WAAAAAAY too hit and miss for me.

I really don't see why all the studios don't grow a brain and pitch in their most profitable bargaining chip in the Avengers and up the interest/profit of said property.

I mean SHIT, I've always hated Fantastic 4 and THOSE movies....*shudder*....but ANYWAY could you just IMAGINE Dr. Doom being done right in the Avengers movies? They have Thanos . . . .so this can lead to delicious Doom + Infinity Gauntlet awesome fest. Good god Thanos vs. Doctor Doom in the next movie.

NO WAIT. Just make Civil War or . . . . .

Okay okay. Take Avengers cast, then throw in Wolvie, Spidey, and a CORRECTLY portrayed Deadpool by Ryan Reynolds (Yo he was PERFECT in the beginning of Origins.) and mix it all together for delicious nerdgasms on the big screen. Shit I could keep going on and on, but I'll shut up.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Byakko on November 21, 2012, 07:19:44 pm
Well I'm pretty sure Marvel Studios/Paramount could just walk up to Marvel Enterprises/Fox/Columbia and just BUY the rights.
Buying by force something that is not for sale ? That's just getting better.
Quote
and a CORRECTLY portrayed Deadpool by Ryan Reynolds (Yo he was PERFECT in the beginning of Origins.)
Everyone's been teasing that a proper Deadpool movie was in the work, Ryan Reynolds is already in, and supposedly it shits on the Origins movie to retcon it out in a proper Deadpool fourth wall smashing way. Those who have had a hand on it, including Ryan Reynolds, have all said the movie did justice to Deadpool.
We just don't know when it's actually going to be made for real and come out. That's been going for, what, two years ? I don't think a year was even passed after Origins when they first started hinting at it. Haven't heard about it after Green Lantern was deemed a failure, even though it should make Reynolds free since there wouldn't be a GL 2.

And Deadpool in an Avengers-related movie would be bad. Way too much to throw in.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: The Real Niko on November 21, 2012, 07:31:57 pm
Remember how the Evangelion Movie was supposed to be made and released in 2010? Yeaaaaaaah.
Nah I understand the movie rights and properties. I just think Marvel/Stan Lee was fucking stupid when they decided to sell them out separately instead of a bundle deal. I bet they are kicking themselves after Avengers global sales hit and were like 'Shit...imagine what New Avengers could make...."
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Byakko on November 21, 2012, 07:35:04 pm
Hum, Marvel was getting completely broke when they sold the movie licence to Fox and Sony. They pretty much had to do it or die. And saying "they should have made a bundle deal" is just random and coming way after the facts.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: The Real Niko on November 21, 2012, 07:43:10 pm
:omg: I'm just SAYING in a 'what if' this went better for fans' scenario. I think it sucks they can't really do some of the really epic stuff because of the properties being all over the place.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on November 21, 2012, 07:52:54 pm
I just think Marvel/Stan Lee was fucking stupid when they decided to sell them out separately instead of a bundle deal. I bet they are kicking themselves after Avengers global sales hit and were like 'Shit...imagine what New Avengers could make...."
Stan Lee had no involvement with the deal, he hasn't had a say over Marvel stuff since he stepped down from being EIC. And even then he wouldn't had much say in that deal if he was EIC when the deal happened.

And the reason they didn't do a bundle deal is because the studios weren't interested in any property that wasn't A-list; no one was willing to even experiment with doing movies with characters like Iron Man or Thor.

Well I guess there was Blade but I don't even know how that happened. Some motherfuckers are always trying to ice skate uphill, I guess.

Haven't heard about it after Green Lantern was deemed a failure, even though it should make Reynolds free since there wouldn't be a GL 2.
He might be GL in the JL movie. Or not. I don't know. DC is crazy.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Joulz on November 22, 2012, 01:20:56 am
considering the major powerhouse that Disney has become now (after having bought Marvel and recently Lucasfilm), negotiating some of Marvel's characters rights back home is not something crazy anymore.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Byakko on November 22, 2012, 09:55:38 am
Unless Fox and Sony really just don't want to sell the rights back. Which is the case. They only have to keep making movies out of them, when they don't the rights revert to Marvel. But they do. (at least for one of them, I'm not sure if it was the case for both)
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Speedpreacher on November 22, 2012, 08:50:01 pm
Unless Fox and Sony really just don't want to sell the rights back. Which is the case. They only have to keep making movies out of them, when they don't the rights revert to Marvel. But they do. (at least for one of them, I'm not sure if it was the case for both)

Yeah, that's what happened (or is going to happen? I don't know if it's a done deal) with Daredevil because Fox didn't want to give up the rights to the cosmic characters it's got as part of its Fantastic Four deal. All they have to do is keep rebooting it ever 10-15 years to keep if profitable.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Joulz on November 23, 2012, 01:18:54 pm
Daredevil's rights went back to Marvel in October this year (and i doubt 1 year prior to this, people would have thought it could happen) so really, anything is possible in the future, especially after something as awful as the 2 Fantastic Four movies made (which didn't reach the heights the execs were hoping for): it "could" eventually lead to the rights reverting back to Marvel because those movies are based on characters less mainstream anyway...
i agree though: big successes like the Spiderman or Xmen movies probably won't fall into that category,as they are a very nice cow to milk for a while


      Posted: January 04, 2013, 03:04:29 am
3/01/2013 - Guardians Of The Galaxy news:
some interesting choice of casting for Star Lord, with Michael Rosenbaum (famous for his Lex Luthor role in TV's Smallville) testing!

Quote
http://m.cinemablend.com/new/Smallville-Michael-Rosenbaum-Testing-Guardians-Galaxy-34902.html

well, i like this guy!
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on January 28, 2013, 10:24:14 pm
3/01/2013 - Guardians Of The Galaxy news:
some interesting choice of casting for Star Lord, with Michael Rosenbaum (famous for his Lex Luthor role in TV's Smallville) testing!

Quote
http://m.cinemablend.com/new/Smallville-Michael-Rosenbaum-Testing-Guardians-Galaxy-34902.html

well, i like this guy!
Ooh, neat, he's great. He was also the Flash in JLU, so he'd be a good fit for Star Lord too.

Marvel's Phase Three will likely consist of Ant-Man and Dr. Strange movies. (http://www.avclub.com/articles/marvel-sortof-confirms-that-antman-and-doctor-stra,91678/) So yeah, it seems like the only reason Ant-Man is happening is because they wanted a chance to work with Wright, and that while it will be set in the MCU, “it’s also through the lens of Edgar Wright", which is gonna rock.

Dr. Strange is more troubling, because the screenwriters are the guys behind the Conan the Barbarian reboot. Hopefully they'll rewrite the script and/or get a good enough director to overcome the deficiencies.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Joulz on January 29, 2013, 02:10:39 am
although sometimes no matter how good the script is, it's the director's fault for a shitty movie, in this case (Conan reboot), both script & direction sucked balls!
scary choice
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Person Man on February 04, 2013, 03:11:46 am
[avatar]http://i42.photobucket.com/albums/e315/Tiger_Stripe/discordshades.png[/avatar]Iron Man 3 "Extended Look" (http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?v=10151448848516578)
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: GOH on February 04, 2013, 10:39:16 am
lol
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on February 05, 2013, 02:43:09 am
oh RDJ, you cad

Captain America 2's female lead has been decided, (http://www.avclub.com/articles/the-captain-america-sequel-has-found-its-female-le,91933/) it's the star of REVENNNNNNNNNNNNNGGGGGGGGGEEEEEEE*. So that means one of the contenders for said role, Alison Brie, will not be in it, which is sad because Alison Brie. And almost as sad is that one of the other contenders didn't get it either, the wonderfully named Imogen Gay Poots. Seriously, that's an amazing name.

*you are contractually obliged to pronounce it like that, preferably while in the rain and on your knees, while yelling at the sky
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Joulz on February 05, 2013, 06:43:30 am
it's at a rumor stage, yes, but jesus fucking fuck: i WANT to believe that it's actually possible....

Marvel Phase 3: Planet Hulk as a stand alone and World War Hulk as connection in Avengers 3 (http://www.aceshowbiz.com/news/view/00057664.html)
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on February 05, 2013, 07:16:09 am
I feel like the odd man out here, but I was kinda meh on Planet Hulk and really really and absolutely hated World War Hulk.

So I hope that if it does turn out to be true, they try and avoid all the stupidity in the latter.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Iced on February 05, 2013, 01:25:24 pm
Planet hulk simply doesnt work on an empty planet.

yu need at least the ff
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Joulz on February 05, 2013, 02:14:15 pm
well i really just loved the "threat too big to handle / betrayal / revenge" angle about Hulk and the superheroes "calling the shot" (like Ironman) but if this is really something they are aiming for, here's what is bothering me: in Avengers 1, Banner could already control Hulk, and was part of the team who took down the first menace on Earth...how the hell will they make it like he needs to get away from the planet, for its sake?
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on February 06, 2013, 11:19:24 pm
Chris Pratt of Parks and Recreation will be Star-Lord (http://www.avclub.com/articles/chris-pratt-will-be-the-starlord-of-guardians-of-t,92063/)

Aubrey Plaza for Gamora? :3

well i really just loved the "threat too big to handle / betrayal / revenge" angle about Hulk and the superheroes "calling the shot" (like Ironman) but if this is really something they are aiming for, here's what is bothering me: in Avengers 1, Banner could already control Hulk, and was part of the team who took down the first menace on Earth...how the hell will they make it like he needs to get away from the planet, for its sake?
Maybe he loses control? It's the Hulk, it's not out of bounds. I dunno.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: The Real Niko on February 09, 2013, 12:23:12 pm
Ugh it should just be Civil War with World War Hulk mixed into it.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Neocide on February 09, 2013, 12:57:20 pm
no civil war should not be brought into the movie universe at all. That thing was just bad. Although I can't see RDJ's Iron Man being the bad guy here (he wasn't supposed to in the comics but he totally came out that way) he's way too awesome for that.  Planet hulk was okay, but it was dragged out too much in the comics imo. WWH in the movies would be bad.

The comics he basically steamrolled everyone.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on February 12, 2013, 12:49:04 am
Ugh it should just be Civil War with World War Hulk mixed into it.
That sounds like the absolute worst idea ever.

The comics he basically steamrolled everyone.
Ugh, so so dumb. Yeah sure Black Bolt was a Skrull, fine, whatever (my man Blackagar totally would've won). But no fucking way should Hulk have stood a chance against Strange. And then the good Doctor has to summon an obscure demon he faced in the 70's because his hands are broken? God damn was that dumb...

and he still ends up losing! MY HATE FOR THIS STORYLINE WILL NEVER END DO YOU HEAR ME GREG PAK? THIS RANDOM GUY ON THE INTERNET DIDN'T LIKE WORLD WAR HULK I HOPE YOU FEEL BAD NOW

Here is some news: H. Jon Benjamin is rumored to play Rocket Raccoon. (http://movies.cosmicbooknews.com/content/h-jon-benjamin-rumored-rocket-raccoon-guardians-galaxy-movie-dwayne-johnson-drax)

Seriously Lana call Kenny Loggins cause HOLY SHIT YES

however, there is some bad news: Jim Carey and Adam Sandler were also rumored for the role :gonk:
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Neocide on February 12, 2013, 02:26:55 am
I didn't like it because it felt unnatural that all of these people would have no defense against him coming back when they had a plan to send him away.

It was just stupidly bogus to not let him have some sort of loss. it was more like "UH OH HULK" not really a war.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on February 28, 2013, 06:00:05 am
(http://cdn.uproxx.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/ironman3-posters-01.jpg)
the most interesting man(darin) in the world
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Joulz on February 28, 2013, 08:43:35 am
the fuck are those glasses? >:[
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: GOH on February 28, 2013, 12:04:20 pm
He looks like a bald Rob Zombie.

That's good.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on March 01, 2013, 02:38:31 am
He looks like a bald Rob Zombie.
But he has hair. :I
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: GOH on March 01, 2013, 11:53:06 am
Well...yeah some.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on March 01, 2013, 11:59:17 am
It's pulled back, you can see a bunch at the top of his head, in a knot.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: GOH on March 01, 2013, 12:09:08 pm
I know, I'M NOT BLIND

JUST STUPID
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Tiny-kun on March 04, 2013, 08:04:04 pm
(http://www.empireonline.com/images/image_index/hw800/69016.jpg)
http://www.empireonline.com/news/story.asp?NID=36641
http://www.empireonline.com/news/story.asp?NID=36684
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extremis_(comics)#Film
APRIL 26!!!!! :flipout:

*B-kun goes to find Iron Man's Extremis saga*
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: GOH on March 05, 2013, 02:01:17 am
It's right after my birthday :D
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Person Man on March 05, 2013, 09:42:46 pm
[avatar]http://i42.photobucket.com/albums/e315/Tiger_Stripe/discordgoody2_zps5f20c8a8.png[/avatar]http://www.comicsalliance.com/2013/03/05/new-iron-man-3-theatrical-trailer-video/ (http://www.comicsalliance.com/2013/03/05/new-iron-man-3-theatrical-trailer-video/)

:swoon:
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on March 05, 2013, 09:48:57 pm
FUCK YES
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: AerosMugen on March 05, 2013, 10:59:16 pm
 :flipout:
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: walt on March 05, 2013, 11:37:44 pm
This is all a smokescreen to hide Hugo Chavez's death >:(
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: NoZ on March 05, 2013, 11:50:33 pm
Dat Hulkbuster suit
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Person Man on March 06, 2013, 02:31:03 am
[avatar]http://i42.photobucket.com/albums/e315/Tiger_Stripe/discordwhatever.png[/avatar]And in other news, Joss Whedon says that the rumors of a Planet Hulk movie are 'nonsense.' (http://www.comicsalliance.com/2013/03/05/planet-hulk-movie-rumor-whedon-nonsense/)
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Joulz on March 06, 2013, 05:25:18 am
good, makes the anticipation even more exciting :p

and holy freaking fuck dat trailer  :dio:
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Titiln on March 15, 2013, 05:51:53 pm
Former WWE superstar Dave Bautista has officially signed on to appear in "Guardians of the Galaxy," the feature film adaptation of the Marvel Comics graphic novel. Batista will play the role of Drax.
(http://unleashthefanboy.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/batista-drax-the-destroyer-guardians-of-the-galaxy.jpg)

batista is about to powerslam some nerds
(http://5f.img.v4.skyrock.net/5f0/batista-jeff-hardy/pics/1577808468.gif) (http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a331/gnr_foo_rocks/Batista_-_Dave_Batista_37.jpg)  (http://cdn.bleacherreport.net/images_root/slides/photos/000/645/802/MasonRyan_display_image.jpg?1295347798) get hype everybody
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: GOH on March 15, 2013, 06:02:39 pm
HELL FUCKING YES
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Iced on March 21, 2013, 01:33:15 am
http://www.joblo.com/movie-news/bootleg-teaser-for-edgar-wrights-ant-man-is-here-get-it-while-its-hot
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Joulz on March 21, 2013, 05:45:47 am
we'll see how this goes, good that they are showing stuff after so long speculations
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Lord Drak-kof on April 04, 2013, 07:52:53 am
some interesting things
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: GOH on April 04, 2013, 11:09:55 am
Cool.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on April 10, 2013, 07:31:46 am
Zoe Saldana might be playing Gamora in the GotG movie. (http://www.avclub.com/articles/zoe-saldana-may-paint-herself-green-this-time-for,96088/)

also, concept art of various Phase Two projects (http://www.ign.com/articles/2013/04/03/first-pictures-of-marvels-phase-two-movies-ant-man-guardians-of-the-galaxy-thor-the-dark-world-and-captain-america-the-winter-soldier?abthid=515cc833cd6be9ac5d00002b)
(http://oyster.ignimgs.com/wordpress/stg.ign.com/2013/04/marvel_rocket_rac-610x341.jpg)
awwwwwwwwwww
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on April 11, 2013, 07:20:17 am
I forgot to mention that BATROC THE FUCKING LEAPER MIGHT BE IN CAPTAIN AMERICA 2 (http://www.comicsalliance.com/2013/03/26/captain-america-the-winter-soldier-georges-st-pierre-batroc-the-leaper-rumor/)

Now, granted, this speculation is based soley on the fact that he's French (Canadian), but... BATROC
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Neocide on April 11, 2013, 08:17:40 am
It's captain america, after red skull who interesting does he have? His rogues are horrible. That's why he works better trying to stop an oppressor or something of that nature. United a people to fight one big dictatorship. I dunno. (or in the avengers setting)

his rogues leave a lot to be desired.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on April 11, 2013, 08:52:10 am
Even more news!

Captain America 2 has an official synopsis now that's it's in production. (http://www.avclub.com/articles/captain-america-the-winter-soldier-gets-a-synopsis,96224/) I think it was mentioned earlier, somewhere, that Toby Jones (Armin Zola) was returning, but here's another confirmation, which is important, because I want a hulking robot guy with a TV face chest!

And that SHIELD pilot has a new name, Marvel’s Agents Of S.H.I.E.L.D. (http://www.avclub.com/articles/joss-whedons-shield-show-has-a-new-name-synopsis-a,96185/), (which is just unwieldy), a synopsis (Coulson returns and puts together a team of agents to take on various cases), and a cast, which is, surprisingly for a Joss Whedon show, devioid of anyone who has previously been in a Joss Whedon show.

Wait... no way... J. August Richards is also in it?!?! Gunn, from Angel!? Whoa! He'll be playing a top-secret role. Wonder if it'll be original, or an established character. Still, didn't expect Richards, I expected maybe Enver Gjokaj or Fran Kranz or Amy Acker. But he's a good actor, if under-appreciated by many.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: GOH on April 11, 2013, 12:41:10 pm
Robert Redford?

Me likey.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Joulz on April 11, 2013, 07:43:43 pm
even though GSP is one skilled MMA fighter, on top of his weight category (so far: hello Johny Hendricks!!), i don't see him in front of a camera, portraying a bad guy with a comedic vibe :s
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Lord Drak-kof on April 17, 2013, 12:29:28 am
oh Hey, its Electro
http://geektyrant.com/news/2013/4/16/more-photos-of-jamie-foxx-as-electro-in-amazing-spider-man-2.html
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on April 17, 2013, 12:36:14 am
Aww man, I thought they're be actual MCU news, not dumb ASM2 news that was already posted elsewhere. >:[

KEEP THIS THREAD PURE, MCU NEWS ONLY
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on April 18, 2013, 12:04:38 am
So Michael Rooker is gonna play Yondu in Guardians of the Galaxy, a founding member of the team. (http://www.comicsalliance.com/2013/04/17/guardians-of-the-galaxy-cast-michael-rooker-marvel-movie/) What's that? You've never heard of him? Well guess what bucko, the GotG have been around much longer than the DnA series, they were running around since almost 50 years ago! But they were also from the future!

so yeah I dunno, this is intriguing, are they gonna have an original (but still from the future while remaining the first because time travel) GotG team? Or is will they have the first team run around in the present? WHO KNOWS
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Roman55 on April 18, 2013, 12:07:26 am
They need to give him the head crest or it will be all for naught.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on April 18, 2013, 12:08:27 am
This movie is going to star a talking raccoon and a space Ent, they're gonna have the crest.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: SNT on April 23, 2013, 11:33:58 am


Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: "Bad News" Hoffmann on April 23, 2013, 11:44:25 am
oh gawd ..the loki /tom hiddletson fan girls worldwide will go crazy
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Bea on April 23, 2013, 12:17:40 pm
... Oh dear, oh dear!!!
I think I am melting. It is way too much sexyness packed on a single guy.
Loki/Tom Hiddleston looks soooooooo yummy there. ._.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: SNT on April 23, 2013, 12:37:19 pm
... So I'm the only one that sees Tommy Wiseau from The Room?
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on April 23, 2013, 08:08:42 pm
:flipout:
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: SNT on April 24, 2013, 02:35:43 pm
So Iron Man 3 was alright.  It's going to piss a few people off, though.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Speedpreacher on April 24, 2013, 03:39:32 pm
Spoiler: Spoiling this so I don't tip off Sherlockians like Titlin about the twist. (click to see content)
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: walt on April 24, 2013, 03:51:15 pm
hahaha me neither, and I don't know how to feel about it.

I'm just hoping my Tony Stark Downey Jr fix is sufficient to allow me to overlook it.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on April 24, 2013, 06:46:32 pm
I AM GOING TO PREEMPTIVELY SAY "HEY NO SPOILERS YOU JERKS" >:[

Seriously, plz. Anything that might remotely be a spoiler, but in spoiler tags. Or else I'll ban you, and the forum will run red with the blood of the innocents, and there will a weeping and gnashing of teeth.

In other news, it's official: Marvel has the Daredevil rights back! (http://www.avclub.com/articles/yep-marvel-has-the-rights-to-daredevil-again,96881/) WHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

And in other, other news, Lee Pace has been cast as the villain of Guardians of the Galaxy (http://www.superherohype.com/news/articles/176401-lee-pace-wins-villain-role-in-guardians-of-the-galaxy), with some speculating he'll be... the Collector? Umm... OK. That's a weird choice. :S
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Iced on April 25, 2013, 01:42:08 pm

And in other, other news, Lee Pace has been cast as the villain of Guardians of the Galaxy (http://www.superherohype.com/news/articles/176401-lee-pace-wins-villain-role-in-guardians-of-the-galaxy), with some speculating he'll be... the Collector? Umm... OK. That's a weird choice. :S

no, no ts not.
THANOS QUEST! THANOS QUEST! THANOS QUEST!

Alternatively
(http://clzimages.com/comic/large/66/66_14258_0_TheAvengersVol1339.jpg)
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on April 25, 2013, 07:16:37 pm
I know about the Collector's relation to Thanos. The reason why I think the Collector is a weird choice is that he's pretty lame, to be honest. They could always make him more interesting but the main bad guy of GotG being a crazy guy who collects people seems... meh, to me.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Iced on April 26, 2013, 03:05:35 am
it offers a very specific reason to have Starlord in space, collector collected him as a human specimen.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on April 26, 2013, 03:08:40 am
MEEEEEEEEEEHHHHHHHHHHHHHH >:[
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Iced on April 26, 2013, 03:16:48 am
im sure that superman fighting medieval armored zod in a spaceship fight after becoming space jesus again will be more interesting >:C
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on April 26, 2013, 03:19:25 am
I dunno, it's potentially more interesting. But we still don't know if the Collector is actually the villain, nor do we know how they'll portray him. It will likely be a Whiplash situation. (though that didn't exactly work out that well, IMO)
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Speedpreacher on April 26, 2013, 03:25:39 am
I think it's a smart way to make this more palatable if they do it right. A motley group of random aliens are collected by and escape from some weird and powerful alien. Along the way they encounter dangerous aliens that are also a part of the collection. Also the weird alien's boss is that guy at the end of Avengers. With the exception of the end, that plot could be Men in Black 4.

Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Roman55 on April 26, 2013, 04:38:49 am
In other news, it's official: Marvel has the Daredevil rights back! (http://www.avclub.com/articles/yep-marvel-has-the-rights-to-daredevil-again,96881/) WHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
Maybe this is just me, but I didn't mind the first Daredevil movie (well, the director's cut of it anyway) and really can't see the guys at Marvel finding a suitable role for Kingpin outside of the late Michael Clarke Duncan.

Still though, will be nice to have a movie closer to the source. IIRC they have the rights to Punisher again too?
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Titiln on April 26, 2013, 04:40:28 am
i saw IRON MAN 3 it was a good movie imo. i liked it better than iron man 2 (which i didn't hate)
Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on April 26, 2013, 04:49:25 am
Maybe this is just me, but I didn't mind the first Daredevil movie (well, the director's cut of it anyway) and really can't see the guys at Marvel finding a suitable role for Kingpin outside of the late Michael Clarke Duncan.
Man, Michael Clake Duncan was fantastic as Kingpin. I wish his Kingpin was in a better movie (Daredevil wasn't terrible, but it wasn't all that good either). :(

Still though, will be nice to have a movie closer to the source. IIRC they have the rights to Punisher again too?
Yes, they do. They also have the rights to Blade back.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Iced on April 26, 2013, 04:57:52 am
Man imagine a good adaptation of Daredevil Yellow, or heck even Frank Miller daredevil.

It was already scripted as if it was a movie, the treatment would be incredible.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on April 26, 2013, 05:00:44 am
I think maybe Daredevil might work better as a TV series (start as cameos on Agents of SHIELD, then, spinoff!).

Or maybe that's just my general longing for a Gotham Central TV show.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Speedpreacher on April 26, 2013, 05:10:53 am
I think maybe Daredevil might work better as a TV series

Single blind lawyer
Fighting for his clients
Using sexy walking sticks
And being self-reliant
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Lord Drak-kof on May 01, 2013, 08:03:08 pm
So I went to see Iron Man 3 today, was as expected... AWESOME.
The buddycop moments with Tony and Rhodey were great.
The Quasi-Al-Queda Mandarin I thought was well done, however a later revelation will leave some fans miffed.
I wondered how they would top the suiting up scenes from the previous movies, Avengers particularly, and man did they do a good job.

All in all, was really good. However... if you are going in expecting an Extremis storyline, don;t get your hopes up.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Iced on May 02, 2013, 12:52:55 am
Im3, It was a good movie the last bits didnt really make sense for me.
Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: GOH on May 02, 2013, 10:54:10 am
Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Loona on May 02, 2013, 03:54:19 pm
Im3, It was a good movie the last bits didnt really make sense for me.
Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty

Clearly despite everything at the end there still wasn't enough stuff on fire or exploding.

Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty

I liked how they handled the Mandarin, reminded me of how they worked in the classic Captain America outfit in the Captain's own movie. Similarly for Iron Patriot, which initially seemed like a nod to the comics, but became relevant further on.
Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty

FYI, the scene after the credits doesn't reference an incoming movie this time, but there's a nice nod to the recent past and, well, to the very beginning of the actual movie.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: AerosMugen on May 02, 2013, 06:25:32 pm
Cap news:
http://www.laineygossip.com/Anthony-Mackie-as-the-Falcon-on-the-set-of-Captain-America-The-Winter-Soldier/26702
Not a big deal, but now we know how the falcon will look.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Retro Respecter on May 08, 2013, 03:37:34 am
For the Iron Man 3 discussion: Whatever doesn't kill you will always make you stronger.

For the "Captain America: The Winter Soldier" discussion: At least it is confirmed that Falcon and Redwing will be in it.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: GOH on May 08, 2013, 10:06:15 am
For the Iron Man 3 discussion: Whatever doesn't kill you will always make you stronger.
What in God's name are you talking about.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Lord Drak-kof on May 08, 2013, 12:55:35 pm
Its Uche, just disregard whatever he posts.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: GOH on May 08, 2013, 06:49:29 pm
http://www.comingsoon.net/news/movienews.php?id=103946

Quote
A topic of discussion among many fans lately is whether Iron Man star Robert Downey Jr. will renegotiate with Marvel Studios for future appearances in their films. The Hollywood Reporter says that the actor met with Kevin Feige and many other executives last night to begin laying out the groundwork for his return. Insiders say that the negotiations looked to his return as the character in the upcoming Avengers 2 and a third "Avengers" film. A fourth Iron Man film was said to not be included in the talks as it is unclear if Downey Jr. is interested in another stand-alone feature as the character.

Beyond the news that Marvel is developing a third "Avengers" movie, THR also revealed that the studio has scripts in development for Ms. Marvel and a reboot of the character Blade (whose screenrights were recently returned to Marvel). Other films still in the pipeline at Marvel, with no production date in sight, include Doctor Strange, Iron Fist, Black Panther and The Runaways.

Furthermore, Kevin Feige spoke with Collider and said there are currently no plans to make spin-off films for the characters War Machine (played by Don Cheadle) or The Falcon (Anthony Mackie in the upcoming Captain America: The Winter Soldier).

Which of these movies do you want to see in the future? Would you rather have an Avengers 3 than Iron Man 4? Sound off below!

OH MY GOD MS MARVEL :D
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on May 08, 2013, 10:52:15 pm
Iron Man 3 almost had a sex tape subplot, for some reason. (WARNING SPOILERS IN LINK) (http://www.avclub.com/articles/iron-man-3-almost-had-a-sex-tape-subplot-somehow-d,97445/)

I'm really glad they removed it. :stare:

Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty
Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty

http://www.comingsoon.net/news/movienews.php?id=103946
MOTHERFUCKING RUNAWAYS AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

Black Panther film could be great too, let's just hope Hudlin stays away. And get Christopher Priest as a consultant or something.

Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: [[D4RK_R4V3N]] on May 08, 2013, 11:19:40 pm
 Damn I want a Deadpool movie  :(
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: GOH on May 08, 2013, 11:44:08 pm
Fox has the rights and they already butchered Deadpool in X-MEN URBARINE ORGIES
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Byakko on May 09, 2013, 12:52:39 am
A year or two after Wolverine Origins, there were various talks about that Deadpool movie, with people having read scripts (including Ryan Reynolds) noting that it backpedaled on Wolverine and made fun of it to boot with in classic Deadpool fashion, it apparently was pretty good and they learned from their mistakes. Unfortunately nothing has been heard about it since then (Green Lantern came and left and that's all)
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Aldo on May 10, 2013, 04:38:04 am
I WANT THAT DR. STRANGE MOVIE, I WANT IT!!!!!!!
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: [[D4RK_R4V3N]] on May 10, 2013, 06:11:18 pm
Dr Strange?....mmmm strange, may be worth a shot, but still I want a Deadpool movie, even cartoon would be nice
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Titiln on May 11, 2013, 03:53:32 am
(https://fbcdn-sphotos-g-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-snc6/260274_10151465336696896_648813901_n.jpg)
Are you ready for more conspiracy theories? You can get a first look at Marvel's Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. in the season finale of Once Upon a Time this Sunday at 8|7c on ABC

believe in the S.H.I.E.L.D. tv show
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Iced on May 11, 2013, 03:57:56 am
That chinese lady is fifty years old btw.
Also one of the girls is supposed to be a bubbly excitable hacker character, im having ncis flashbacks.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: GOH on May 11, 2013, 02:48:35 pm
FUCK YEAH I was asking when would the show start the other day, speak of the devil

That chinese lady is fifty years old btw.
Also one of the girls is supposed to be a bubbly excitable hacker character, im having ncis flashbacks.

I like NCIS fuck da haterz (yeah I know it's silly for the most part but pls ;___;)

Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Speedpreacher on May 11, 2013, 02:58:50 pm
I also unironically love NCIS. If Agent Coulson starts giving headslaps to the Marvel Universe and building boats in his basement this will be the most awesome show on TV.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Byakko on May 11, 2013, 03:36:48 pm
Also one of the girls is supposed to be a bubbly excitable hacker character, im having ncis flashbacks.
There's no character like that in NCIS.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Iced on May 11, 2013, 03:39:27 pm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u8qgehH3kEQ
this was my flashback
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Byakko on May 11, 2013, 03:42:09 pm
Those things happen once in a blue moon in it but I concede, I get your point :P
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on May 12, 2013, 02:56:16 am
SHIELD was officially picked up. (http://www.avclub.com/articles/abc-picks-up-new-marvel-show-shield-latest-from-aw,97629/) Yay! Do note that Joss Whedon is involved only in an executive producer capacity, and that the showrunner will be Jeffery Bell, a writer and director on Angel (his resume on that series is pretty great, he even co-wrote the finale, which is a VERY GOOD sign). And now some bad news. Some really bad, unbelievable, this-can't-be-happening news:
Jeph Loeb is going to be a producer on the show.

... I... I hurt. Why is this happening? Does the universe hate me? :qq:

Also, that Big Hero Six thing turned out to be Disney doing a CG movie of that. (http://www.avclub.com/articles/disney-chooses-big-hero-6-for-its-first-inevitable,97535/) Now, it isn't clear whether it's part of the MCU, but I think it has a strong chance at it.

You can get a first look at Marvel's Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. in the season finale of Once Upon a Time this Sunday at 8|7c on ABC
God fucking dammit, I don't want to watch that horrible show, but... SHIELD!!!

Dr Strange?....mmmm strange, may be worth a shot, but still I want a Deadpool movie, even cartoon would be nice
But wherever would they find the people who could make a cartoon for a mature audience (mature as in blood and stuff, not actually mature subject matter), who can stage great action sequences, who have a strong grasp of meta-humor and experience breaking the fourth wall, and who have a love of X-Men and related characters?
Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Speedpreacher on May 12, 2013, 04:17:43 am
Jeph Loeb is going to be a producer on the show.

... I... I hurt. Why is this happening? Does the universe hate me? :qq:

Jeph Loeb's like the television czar, though. He's probably gonna have a producer credit on everything. Make no mistake, the only threat to that show's vision is the House of Mouse, and I bet they don't make too much of a fuss on this one.

Dr Strange?....mmmm strange, may be worth a shot, but still I want a Deadpool movie, even cartoon would be nice
But wherever would they find the people who could make a cartoon for a mature audience (mature as in blood and stuff, not actually mature subject matter), who can stage great action sequences, who have a strong grasp of meta-humor and experience breaking the fourth wall, and who have a love of X-Men and related characters?
Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty

I don't know, I love Archer but I don't think that style would work on Deadpool. Now some kind of Super Team, a team of [as]-Men if you will, of Jackson Publick, Doc Hammer, Reed, Thompson, and Brendon Small...
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on May 12, 2013, 04:25:47 am
It wouldn't have to be the same style and tone; plus, Frisky Dingo starts off as a superhero riff (though of course it becomes a sprawlingly insane tale of giant ant babies, thwarted presidential campaigns, Mr. Ford, and big pants), so it's not like they're foreign to the concept.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Speedpreacher on May 12, 2013, 04:53:29 am
It's not just a matter of the animation (but let's be honest, there's no way Reed and Thompson would change the way they've been doing stuff since Sealab) or whether they can construct a set piece well. There's a manic energy and humor to the best Deadpool comics I've read that I just don't see them being able to capture. The closest equivalent I can think of IS Sealab and even that insanity isn't quite the tone I'm thinking of.

Ugh, I'm not doing a good job at this. How about this: I feel like Reed and Thompson would give me The Looney Tunes Show, and I'm looking for Looney Tunes.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on May 12, 2013, 04:57:40 am
Hrm, I think they could pull it off, but it's all hypothetical anyway.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: SNT on May 12, 2013, 08:11:43 am
Besides, if they're busy making other things, they'll be busy NOT making season five.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: PBRTODD101 on May 12, 2013, 08:28:30 am
God damn. Fucking Loeb again? How many things has he ruined? Is Marvel intentionally punishing us by giving him positions of power and authority? Either way, I still have good hopes for the show because it starts Coulson, who IMO is hard character for a writer to screw up (like Goku). Ming-Na is also welcomed by me.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: [[D4RK_R4V3N]] on May 12, 2013, 07:54:13 pm
A SHIELD TV show? wow didn't expected that... well lets see how it turns, I hope movie cast make some cameo appearances
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Takato-kun on May 13, 2013, 10:09:23 am
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ySsw-6aetys
Trailer of SHIELD series, released online :)
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Speedpreacher on May 13, 2013, 02:47:50 pm
So Gunn's a superhero, then? I wonder if he's an original creation or an already existing character.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on May 14, 2013, 05:17:42 am
He might be Luke Cage, though he might be too high-profile for Marvel to debut him on a TV show and played by an actor who is really only known for starring in Angel.

But I think J. August Richards could pull off Cage!
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Iced on May 14, 2013, 09:00:17 am
it could be the original cap, but he looks too young.


It could be Rage, but he looks too old.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on May 14, 2013, 09:53:29 am
But Cap was the original Cap; Isaiah Bradley came after. :P
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Iced on May 14, 2013, 10:52:22 am
racist
Title: Avengers: you will believe a black man can be luke cage
Post by: Iced on May 14, 2013, 11:21:35 pm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=T3T-evQZiQo
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on May 16, 2013, 07:46:36 pm
So, the guy who played Gunn is playing has some kind of implants, or something? That orange thing, I mean. What is it?
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Person Man on May 17, 2013, 09:46:36 pm
[avatar]http://i42.photobucket.com/albums/e315/Tiger_Stripe/discordpopcorn-1.png[/avatar]I haven't seen it mentioned here yet, so:

http://www.escapistmagazine.com/news/view/124126-Joss-Whedon-Explains-New-Avengers-2-Cast-Members

Quicksilver and Scarlet Witch confirmed for Avengers 2.  This could get a little tricky, what with Fox still clinging onto the movie rights to Magneto.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: GOH on May 17, 2013, 11:54:56 pm
How in the blue hell are they gonna do this? Though I'm all in for some Scarlet Witch action baybee LETS FUCK UP REALITY LETS DO EET
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on May 18, 2013, 07:21:58 am
I haven't seen it mentioned here yet, so:

http://www.escapistmagazine.com/news/view/124126-Joss-Whedon-Explains-New-Avengers-2-Cast-Members

Quicksilver and Scarlet Witch confirmed for Avengers 2.  This could get a little tricky, what with Fox still clinging onto the movie rights to Magneto.
:flipout:

How in the blue hell are they gonna do this?
Hmm, depends on whether that crossover with Fox thing is real or not. IIRC Fox and Marvel share Scarlet Witch and Quicksilver, but Marvel cannot mention they're mutants, nor can they mention their father.

I suppose they might be able to get away with making an oblique reference to Magneto, perhaps labeling him a terrorist with magnetism or something.

Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: GOH on May 18, 2013, 01:39:59 pm
The terrorist known as the Naziterromagnetmaster
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Iced on May 18, 2013, 01:52:04 pm
actually, fox rights are only over movie rights, which is why you keep getting spiderman cartoons , they make money for marvel.

So... maybe whedon can use mutants on the tv show, and will introduce magneto there.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on May 19, 2013, 01:25:37 am
I dunno, it doesn't seem all that likely that they'd want to introduce another, separate Magneto, portrayed by someone who isn't Ian McKellen. It's just way too confusing for a general audience. Plus, there's no way they could pull off his powerset on a TV budget; no one wants another Heroes situation.

There's probably some legal mumbo-jumbo that would allow Fox to sue or something to prevent another live-action depiction of Magneto on the grounds of it being too confusing for their customers or some bullshit like that.

Sigh. :(
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Iced on May 19, 2013, 01:33:53 am
fox tried to sue them when they made mutant x and lost.

edit: actually the actor familiarity might work towards whedon, just have ian mckelen show up on one episode with a cape and a helmet, menacingly hinting towards a connection between the twins and him and bam, you have magneto without having to say who he was.
this would work for wolverine too.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on May 19, 2013, 01:38:38 am
Mutant X really wasn't the same kind of thing, though. No shared characters, nothing from X-Men at all, and even the way mutants came about were different. It was a completely separate property.


      Posted: May 19, 2013, 01:41:19 am
edit: actually the actor familiarity might work towards whedon, just have ian mckelen show up on one episode with a cape and a helmet, menacingly hinting towards a connection between the twins and him and bam, you have magneto without having to say who he was.
this would work for wolverine too.
I doubt they can afford McKellan or Jackman, even for a cameo.

Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on May 19, 2013, 01:48:51 am
OK hold up, found something more interesting than boring legal issues: stuff about Coulson coming back! (http://www.icv2.com/articles/news/25760.html)

Joss Whedon said:
I’ve worked in comics, TV, and fantasy for a long time and I know there is a right way and a wrong way to do stuff like that... it’s all about earning everything, so that people don’t believe you lied, or that you put one over on them, that you have an explanation that you buy.

Seems to rule out a LMD, I guess. Or the death being staged.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Speedpreacher on May 19, 2013, 01:56:16 am
Lends credence to the old theory about him being MCU's version of the Vision.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on May 19, 2013, 01:57:45 am
But I can totally believe Coulson can cry!!!
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Iced on May 19, 2013, 02:09:36 am
well he is going to be on tele vision.


about mutant x, fox doesnt agree with you

http://articles.latimes.com/2003/mar/05/business/fi-mutant5
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on May 19, 2013, 02:18:37 am
Hmm, thinking about resurrections in Whedon shows...
Spoiler: spoilers, obviously (click to see content)
this was all off the top of my head, because I've wasted my life. And yes it's totally relevant. >:[

about mutant x, fox doesnt agree with you

http://articles.latimes.com/2003/mar/05/business/fi-mutant5
Fox sued because they felt that Mutant X was made and advertised as an "X-Men replacement," and that it was too similar to X-Men, thus infringing their rights. It's really not the same thing as using the exact same characters.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Iced on May 19, 2013, 02:25:05 am
... wouldnt him bringing back colossus be more relevant than any of that.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on May 19, 2013, 02:28:43 am
I was just doing TV shows!

...But also I cheated for the Buffy comic since unlike X-Men he got full (probably?) creative control over both the death and resurrection and Colossus's resurrection wasn't really explained all that well, I think? Just "alien technology"?
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Iced on May 19, 2013, 02:31:23 am
he just showed alive one day and they were all "but we cremated your corpse" and ord was all like "AHAHAH IT WAS A REPLICA" and they were all like "Oh ok, welcome back peter" and then Cassandra started attacking even though she was supposed to be ernst and it got weird.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on May 19, 2013, 03:44:44 am
Well, that Ernst thing was screwed up by Austen first, and...

I can't. I just... Astonishing wasn't bad by any means, but it was pretty meh. Like, Danger was a cool concept but the stuff about Xavier concealing her was dumb, and stuff.

Oh well, at least it wasn't as bad as some other "famous non-comic writer"'s major comic forays? :-\
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Iced on May 19, 2013, 03:46:44 am
Astonishing wasnt bad, it understood the premise of cyclops completely, and portrayed both him and wolverine very well.

It just had a few bad whedon moments, like unexplained ressurections, which in the long run shouldnt really affect a comic book reader much.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on May 19, 2013, 03:52:05 am
Whedon usually handles resurrections better, so it was pretty weird.

But the art, dear lord, the art. Hrrrrrrrrrrnnnnng.

what was this topic about again? how cool joss whedon is? because it should be
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Neocide on May 21, 2013, 12:08:36 pm
not sure if that meant you liked john cassady or not. his latest work on uncanny Avengers has been a let down in comparison.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on May 21, 2013, 07:30:39 pm
Yes, I love John Cassaday. He's so great.

And he directed that "The Attic" episode in Dollhouse! And that was a great episode!
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Iced on May 23, 2013, 03:16:52 am
http://uk.ign.com/articles/2013/05/15/executive-producer-jeffrey-bell-talk-agents-of-shield-and-reveals-luke-cage-is-not-the-mystery-character

so its not luke cage
Maxam?
Morbius?
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on May 23, 2013, 09:30:51 am
Jeffrey Bell said:
Well, we’re kind of hoping we’ll do kind of like we did on Angel
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

Someone mentioned on another site that Rage was in one of the panels in the Marvel logo, and that maybe it's Rage. And I dunno, that "M-" thing sounds like a misdirect.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Joulz on May 23, 2013, 11:27:52 pm
actually, fox rights are only over movie rights, which is why you keep getting spiderman cartoons , they make money for marvel.

So... maybe whedon can use mutants on the tv show, and will introduce magneto there.

when it comes to Fox rights, it seems it applies only on the characters being mentioned as "mutants"...i read somewhere that the names of X-men characters (like Scarlet or Quicksilver for example) could be used in a Marvel movie like Avengers 2, as long as they arent referred to as being actual mutants.

by the way, recent Bryan Singer tweet confirms an actor as been cast as Quicksilver in X-men Days Of Future Past (http://m.ca.ign.com/articles/2013/05/23/bryan-singer-reveals-quicksilver-is-in-x-men-days-of-future-past)

now in a perfect world, how cool would it be if both Fox & Marvel manage to finally work some kind of deal?
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: walt on May 23, 2013, 11:55:19 pm
now in a perfect world, how cool would it be if both Fox & Marvel manage to finally work some kind of deal?
Pretty damn cool if marvel could build upon that XMEN universe (you know, except X3 ... wait, what is X3? oh that's right, they never made a 3rd one!)

Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Iced on May 24, 2013, 02:00:58 am
Bryan singer just casted a Quicksilver for his next fox shitty x-men movie, so that Whedon cant use the mutant brothers in Avengers.

http://www.hitfix.com/motion-captured/why-are-fox-and-marvel-having-a-showdown-over-x-men-and-the-avengers-2
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Titiln on May 24, 2013, 02:05:54 am
djoulz already posted that
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Roman55 on May 24, 2013, 02:11:16 am
Honestly Marvel shouldn't bother unless they wrangle back the rights (which they really should). There's other characters that can be used.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Iced on May 24, 2013, 02:12:01 am
I thought his post originally ended at mutants, guess I was wrong.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: GOH on May 24, 2013, 10:42:04 am
Goddamn it Fox.
Title: Taskmaster confirmed for brawl.
Post by: Iced on May 31, 2013, 12:25:39 am
http://shieldtv.net/the-walking-dead-guest-star-joins-s-h-i-e-l-d-pilot/1884

Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Lord Drak-kof on May 31, 2013, 09:05:33 am
http://shieldtv.net/the-walking-dead-guest-star-joins-s-h-i-e-l-d-pilot/1884
Apparently the news is false


hey its Winter Soldier.... I guess
(http://i.imgur.com/zwe00yJ.jpg)
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on June 01, 2013, 12:43:41 am
That Quicksilver thing is really looking like a giant F U from Fox (http://www.avclub.com/articles/bryan-singer-adds-quicksilver-to-xmen-days-of-futu,98172/); he's only gonna be in one action scene and probably won't even be revealed to be Magneto's son. I do wonder if Marvel is gonna press ahead with him in Avengers 2, since it doesn't sound like people will grow very attached to the Days of Future Past Quicksilver. :-\

Also, interesting further reading on the Fox vs. Marvel situation.
 (http://www.hitfix.com/motion-captured/why-are-fox-and-marvel-having-a-showdown-over-x-men-and-the-avengers-2)
Lee Pace, of Pushing Daisies, might be in Guardians of the Galaxy as the main villain, the Controller. (http://www.avclub.com/articles/lee-pace-gets-to-be-in-guardians-of-the-galaxy-aft,96912/) Either that, or, as the AV Club speculates, "the fearsome Doctor Eyebrows, a character we just made up. 'I see your strategic gambit and raise—my eyebrows!' Doctor Eyebrows will shout, as his eyebrows bristle and shoot lasers or something."

Also rumored is John C. Reilly, according to a strange report. (http://www.avclub.com/articles/john-c-reilly-could-be-in-guardians-of-the-galaxy,98278/[/url) Supposedly he'll be playing the S.H.I.E.L.D. (and not S.W.O.R.D. !?!?) liason to the GotG, a sort of space-Coulson. Except... he's named after the guy who gives Richard Rider his Nova powers (and then dies because he's Marvel's Abin Sur). And there's already an existing character that would make way more sense in the role (Abigail Brand), so why go with this?

But it gets weirder, like Michael Rooker, who plays Yondu, is supposed to be the big villain and also be a space pirate, despite comics Yondu being a hero from the future who does not engage in piracy. And then Lee Pace's character will switch sides to be a hero with spin-off potential (?!?), and there's another liason and what is going on does this Hitflix guy even know what he's talking about.

Then there's this stuff about Robert Downey Jr's contract negotiations, and the problems therein. (http://deadline.com/2013/05/robert-downey-jr-avengers-marvel-negotiations-fight/) Marvel has apparently been cockblocking any attempts by Disney to give reasonable (for blockbuster movies) salaries for its stars. Kind of worrying, and not just for RDJ, because this could potentially affect everyone in the cast, sooner or later. And it all seems to be caused by the legendarily stupidly frugal, absolutely batshit insane Marvel CEO, Ike Perlmutter, who also is kind of racist, maybe. (http://www.deadline.com/2012/08/disney-and-marvel-do-damage-control-ike-perlmutter-from-media-attacks/)

Fun facts about Ike Perlmutter, courtesy of Marvel Comics: The Untold Story, by Sean Howe, AVAILABLE IN FINE BOOKSTORES EVERYWHERE:

you know, except X3 ... wait, what is X3? oh that's right, they never made a 3rd one!
What are you talking about, of course they did!

It was called X-Men: First Class!
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: walt on June 01, 2013, 12:52:37 am
you know, except X3 ... wait, what is X3? oh that's right, they never made a 3rd one!
What are you talking about, of course they did!

It was called X-Men: First Class!
Goodness Michael Fassbender Gracious. I am sorry, you are correct.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Neocide on June 01, 2013, 05:23:37 pm
lol all black people look alike. Don is like almost a foot shorter than Terrence and like semi wesley snipes compared to Terrence's mocha complexion. jeez. Cmon.

I  kinda get marvels ploy with trying to stop stars from making huge salaries, they are afraid more are gonna want bigger salaries and not take the role they'd take before a salary bump. Although you can keep this limited to big time names on creditable movies. RDJ for sure should get as much money as he wants. Seriously Marvel need to remake 616 Tony stark into the movie version
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on June 02, 2013, 04:51:01 am
GLENN MOTHERFUCKING CLOSE MIGHT BE THE LEADER OF THE NOVA CORPS (http://www.avclub.com/articles/glenn-close-fails-to-win-talking-raccoon-role-in-g,98385/)
:flipout:

I  kinda get marvels ploy with trying to stop stars from making huge salaries, they are afraid more are gonna want bigger salaries and not take the role they'd take before a salary bump.
I dunno if it's a ploy as much as it is Marvel being stupidly frugal. I mean, they didn't even let Disney pay for an Oscar campaign for the Avengers, and Disney, not Marvel would've bankrolled it! Something crazy is going on there!
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on June 04, 2013, 08:38:32 pm
More Guardians casting news! Karen Gillan of Doctor Who will be playing the lead female villain. (http://www.avclub.com/articles/doctor-whos-karen-gillan-will-also-be-in-guardians,98526/) So, right now, there are apparently three villains: Michael fucking Rooker, that guy from Pushing Daisies with the crazy eyebrows (http://media.avclub.com/images/428/428903/original/320.jpg?3170), and now this lady. It's all very confusing!

Oh, and Benicio Del Toro will be appearing as an unspecified role (http://www.avclub.com/articles/guardians-of-the-galaxy-casts-benicio-del-toro-in,98531/), so, Rocket Raccoon or Groot, probably?
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: GOH on June 04, 2013, 08:45:02 pm
The Racoon is the secret weapon!

Steady.

STEADY...
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Speedpreacher on June 06, 2013, 06:13:33 am
Benicio del Toro is the Collector, it seems. (http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/MarvelFreshman/news/?a=80940) So, um who the heck is Lee Pace going to be? Because it should be Magus, so he can also be Adam Warlock as well.

Because he should be Adam Warlock.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on June 06, 2013, 10:25:18 pm
... holy shit that makes perfect sense. Pace starts as the Magus, turns good, and gets a spin-off.

But what does this mean for Michael Rooker's character? Seems like they have enough villains, and he was rumored to be the main one, does that mean the rumors are wrong and he won't be an evil space pirate even though Yondu is a good guy?
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Iced on June 07, 2013, 01:19:25 am
He could easily be a setup. a pirate alien fighting huge armies, then cut to current time period with people talking about his exploits.

Later on the movie, when facing collector from inside his collection they find Yondu stuff and a recorded message about how he was actually a guardian of the galaxy and they take the name from him.

edit: this will make more sense if he is facing Magus church, as people wont assume the church is evil.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Person Man on June 11, 2013, 01:54:27 am
[avatar]http://i42.photobucket.com/albums/e315/Tiger_Stripe/discordgoody2_zps5f20c8a8.png[/avatar]Please oh please oh please let this mean what I think it means. (https://twitter.com/JamesGunn/status/342734995485515776)

Rocket Raccoon is going to be a real, live raccoon.  Not CG.  Please for the love of god let that be true.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: GOH on June 11, 2013, 11:01:40 am
James stahp
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Joulz on June 22, 2013, 02:42:51 am
FUCK.YE. (old news but whatever)

http://marvel.com/news/story/20786/robert_downey_jr_to_return_as_marvels_iron_man (http://marvel.com/news/story/20786/robert_downey_jr_to_return_as_marvels_iron_man)
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on July 10, 2013, 08:08:16 am
The villains of Guardians of the Galaxy may have been revealed: (http://collider.com/guardians-of-the-galaxy-del-toro-pace-gillan-roles/)

Spoiler: should this go in a spoiler? I dunno! (click to see content)
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Joulz on July 10, 2013, 09:12:07 am
how in the blue fuck will they pull this one out? so many characters, from outerspace, that are unknown for 80%+ of the population...
i'm completely excited right now
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on July 18, 2013, 10:51:47 am
Agents of SHIELD will premiere on September 24th (http://www.theverge.com/2013/7/17/4530976/marvel-agents-of-shield-abc-premiere-september-24), in a pretty valuable timeslot. ABC obviously thinks this is gonna be big, and hey, can you blame them?

Actually, here is something more important, Chris Pratt showing off his Starlord physique:
(http://blog.zap2it.com/pop2it/chris-pratt-shirtless-guardians-of-the-galaxy.jpg)
:swoon:
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Mgbenz on July 18, 2013, 03:14:14 pm
Saved!
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Bea on July 18, 2013, 03:27:44 pm
Well, that is darn nice... Oi, so nice.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Mgbenz on July 21, 2013, 05:23:51 am
(http://i.imgur.com/ovsXBL2.jpg)

http://marvel.com/images/gallery/story/20914/marvel_studios_begins_production_on_guardians_of_the_galaxy/image/957400

 :woeh:
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on July 21, 2013, 05:32:31 am
AWW LOOK AT ROCKET'S WIDDLE SUIT
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Iced on July 21, 2013, 05:41:22 am
Avengers 2 has a title.

The animation started with a slow cgi image of what looked like a robot head.
Its ultron


Age of Ultron.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: QuickFist on July 21, 2013, 05:44:53 am
Are you sure? 'cause Thanos appears in the after-credits scene
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Iced on July 21, 2013, 05:48:25 am
Im pretty sure.
Thanos will be for avengers 3, gotg will build up more on him.
http://www.comingsoon.net/news/movienews.php?id=106754
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: QuickFist on July 21, 2013, 06:18:17 am
Alright, interesting, i wonder how they'll portray Ultron, but It sure will be awesome

     Posted: July 21, 2013, 06:30:41 am
You guys know how can I see the animation?
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on July 21, 2013, 06:37:52 am
They always said Avengers 2 would be a smaller, more personal film, and so it didn't seem too likely that Thanos would appear in it. But... Ultron is pretty big. And the subtitle, is the movie gonna have crazy time travel shenanigans, like the comic Age of Ultron? Because, well, Age? That implies stuff! I DUNNO
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: QuickFist on July 21, 2013, 06:43:35 am
It sure will be epic, but something that always worries me about comic movies is the design of the characters for the film, but they did very good with Loki and other characters
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Iced on July 21, 2013, 08:21:08 am
no ultron leak yet but heres loki
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6V_PA1qoAFU
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Bea on July 21, 2013, 12:42:45 pm
no ultron leak yet but heres loki
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6V_PA1qoAFU

Excuse me while I and hundreds of thousands of Loki fan girls squee in unison.
Bloody hot and convincing actor... this is hardly fair. >:(
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: QuickFist on July 21, 2013, 07:51:35 pm
Ok that was awesome! he totally owned it!
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Iced on July 22, 2013, 11:38:50 am
I will post links later, but let me say this, because im not happy.

Josh wheddon has removed pym from the ultron storyline, Ultron is now just Jarvis.

Goddamn you Wheddon. Goddamn you to heck.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Bejeeta on July 22, 2013, 11:52:26 am
Probably Stark will create ULTRON for a safer world without superheros, Ultron turns bad and this will force Stark to be Ironman again.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Iced on July 23, 2013, 01:49:38 am
http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/JoshWildingNewsAndReviews/news/?a=83845
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Bastard Wolf on July 23, 2013, 02:25:30 am
no ultron leak yet but heres loki
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6V_PA1qoAFU
better quality & complete: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=toPstPIcGnI

SAY MY NAME!!!
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Bea on July 23, 2013, 02:34:07 am
And many panties were ruined that day...

He is... too hot. Specially when doing that. >.>
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Iced on July 23, 2013, 02:41:07 am
your lack of concern for pym is disheartening!!
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Bea on July 23, 2013, 02:42:08 am
Who?
I, like many girls out there, am too busy right now mesmerizing about Loki!
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Neocide on July 23, 2013, 09:23:48 am
fuck hank pym he sucks. They can introduce ultron with hank pym as a footnote as his creator. Hank pym is boring as shit when he's not abusing his wife, at least then he's an abusive dysfunctional asshole. As he is normally, he's just a stale boring ass character.

I don't condone spousal abuse, that sorta sounded like I did, but no, he just isn't interesting at all when there isn't something wrong with him personally.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on July 23, 2013, 09:35:29 am
There are no bad characters, only bad writers.

Josh wheddon has removed pym from the ultron storyline, Ultron is now just Jarvis.
Wait what
http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/JoshWildingNewsAndReviews/news/?a=83845
Oh. I guess the JARVIS becoming Ultron thing is just speculation. But it's not that out there, what with the "Ultron is in the house" comment. But still, that might be reading into that too literally.

But yeah, I don't think losing Pym is a big loss. They haven't even introduced Pym yet, so the whole "OH NO TRUSTED SUPERHERO CREATED A MONSTER" angle wouldn't have been pulled off too well (and if the Ant-Man movie plot of Pym being the 60's Ant-Man is still going on, it'd be even harder to do so, who cares about old people). If indeed Stark is the guy behind it, it makes the most sense from a story point of view. I just don't think the change matters too much. :-\
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Neocide on July 23, 2013, 09:46:49 am
no there are bad characters, when they are boring as shit, and hank pym has ALWAYS been boring as hell.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Iced on July 23, 2013, 12:10:15 pm
yall a bunch of losers that poop in their diapers, Pym is awesome because of these reasons
1-shutup
2-shutup
3-shutup


Also this bloats stark characterization unreasonably, even in the emh cartoon they had stark build the first body and pym make the AI based on himself. Ultron is cool because his behaviour is what pym would do with no moral qualms.

Ultron calling stark father is disgusting. >:C also the ultimate characterization of pym was bullshit.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Mgbenz on July 23, 2013, 12:55:00 pm
So apparently an alternate universe version of Hank Pym is everything about him now.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on July 25, 2013, 05:51:26 am
Also this bloats stark characterization unreasonably
Eh, I dunno about that, and Stark is pretty much the main character in the MCU, so it makes much more sense to center the whole "I'VE CREATED A MONSTER" dynamic on him and not a just-introduced new guy that nobody gives a shit about. (I'm talking about the general audience) But then again, we don't know for sure that Stark is the one who ends up creating Ultron, so who knows.

The topic title could use an update, should it be Age of Ultron or Agents of SHIELD (since it's the thing debuting soonest)?
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Neocide on July 25, 2013, 06:01:53 am
yall a bunch of losers that poop in their diapers, Pym is awesome because of these reasons
1-shutup
2-shutup
3-shutup


Also this bloats stark characterization unreasonably, even in the emh cartoon they had stark build the first body and pym make the AI based on himself. Ultron is cool because his behaviour is what pym would do with no moral qualms.

Ultron calling stark father is disgusting. >:C also the ultimate characterization of pym was bullshit.

Nerd, big giant super comic book purists nerd! :p I agree with Jmorph for many many reasons.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Iced on July 25, 2013, 09:16:21 pm
Also this bloats stark characterization unreasonably
Eh, I dunno about that, and Stark is pretty much the main character in the MCU, so it makes much more sense to center the whole "I'VE CREATED A MONSTER" dynamic on him and not a just-introduced new guy that nobody gives a shit about. (I'm talking about the general audience) But then again, we don't know for sure that Stark is the one who ends up creating Ultron, so who knows.

The topic title could use an update, should it be Age of Ultron or Agents of SHIELD (since it's the thing debuting soonest)?

I non poiltely disagree >:C

In the emh version you still had stark creating it with pym, so that's not the issue, the issue is having ultron ( who is supposed to be a strong personality) being solely stark responsability. The ultron movie didnt need to touch on pym other than references, to just claim out stark as the super duper guy that can do everything and is connected to everyone you create a bloated nexus, it doesnt allow the mcu to develop more. Imagine if tomorrow dr strange movie was announced and stark was actually dr strange , or luke cage movie come up and stark was doing the experiments that gave him steel skin. You need to let the universe properly grow imo.

Also simon pegg should be pym, just saying.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Roman55 on July 25, 2013, 09:35:36 pm
Speaking of Pym, I heard he's going to be in the Ant-Man movie.....and he'll be like 70 years old. While Scott fucking Lang is going to be the main character (if they don't change it to O'Grady at the last minute).
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Iced on July 25, 2013, 09:38:54 pm
its not clear so far.

Originaly ( before mcu become a thing ) it was going to be an adaptation of "To steal an antman" with pym as a seventy year old inventor and lang stealing his stuff.

Marvel forced them to do a rewriter, its not clear if the rewrite will keep the same tone or what.
I really hope they ditch Lang cuz he was the blandest of all antmen, his characterization was basically "HAS A DAUGHTER"
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on July 26, 2013, 09:45:22 am
There was also gonna be flashbacks of Pym being Ant-Man in the 60s, I think? But those rumors came out, what, almost a decade ago?

In the emh version you still had stark creating it with pym, so that's not the issue, the issue is having ultron ( who is supposed to be a strong personality) being solely stark responsability. The ultron movie didnt need to touch on pym other than references, to just claim out stark as the super duper guy that can do everything and is connected to everyone you create a bloated nexus, it doesnt allow the mcu to develop more.
But, uh, Stark already is a super duper guy in the movies. He already has an advanced AI developed (JARVIS) and is an expert at designing super advanced robotics. He doesn't need Pym to make the AI, if in fact Stark ends up developing Ultron in the new movie, and if it ends up with him developing it alone. If it does end up being Stark, it will likely stem from the whole Iron legion thing (I forgot the official name, sue me), which I think would be pretty interesting. A token reference to Pym would only cheapen Pym himself, I think, more so than just cutting him out.

Imagine if tomorrow dr strange movie was announced and stark was actually dr strange
But that's not even remotely the same thing. Pym is more than just the creator of Ultron (and more than just the guy who slapped his wife once). It really isn't vital to Ultron as a character and as a narrative device that he is created by a guy named Hank Pym, what is vital is that a superhero created it in an act of unthinking hubris and didn't realize the consequences of their actions. Seems like that would fit Stark to a T. And moviegoers have a deep relationship and care deeply about Stark, and not a random dude named Hank Pym, having Pym make the AI portion would basically deflect most of the responsibility for Ultron onto Pym, and not Stark. I really think it's the best, most logical choice to exclude Pym from it, and have Stark fill in.

Also simon pegg should be pym, just saying.
We don't need more Brits playing AMERICAN superheroes!!! >:[
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Iced on July 26, 2013, 12:14:06 pm
There was also gonna be flashbacks of Pym being Ant-Man in the 60s, I think? But those rumors came out, what, almost a decade ago?
Yeah pym as an old ass super hero that lang was stealing for, it was really crappy. The whole Pym as dr who thing they have got going on for the last ten years is cooler.

Quote
In the emh version you still had stark creating it with pym, so that's not the issue, the issue is having ultron ( who is supposed to be a strong personality) being solely stark responsability. The ultron movie didnt need to touch on pym other than references, to just claim out stark as the super duper guy that can do everything and is connected to everyone you create a bloated nexus, it doesnt allow the mcu to develop more.
But, uh, Stark already is a super duper guy in the movies. He already has an advanced AI developed (JARVIS) and is an expert at designing super advanced robotics. He doesn't need Pym to make the AI, if in fact Stark ends up developing Ultron in the new movie, and if it ends up with him developing it alone. If it does end up being Stark, it will likely stem from the whole Iron legion thing (I forgot the official name, sue me), which I think would be pretty interesting. A token reference to Pym would only cheapen Pym himself, I think, more so than just cutting him out.
I disagrees. Jarvis was never said to have been made by Stark. By making him the core of everything invention related you pretty much exclude all other scientists. He might as well also invent pym particles and create modok, because at this point this also makes him the inventor of vision by proxy.


Quote
Imagine if tomorrow dr strange movie was announced and stark was actually dr strange
But that's not even remotely the same thing. Pym is more than just the creator of Ultron (and more than just the guy who slapped his wife once). It really isn't vital to Ultron as a character and as a narrative device that he is created by a guy named Hank Pym, what is vital is that a superhero created it in an act of unthinking hubris and didn't realize the consequences of their actions. Seems like that would fit Stark to a T. And moviegoers have a deep relationship and care deeply about Stark, and not a random dude named Hank Pym, having Pym make the AI portion would basically deflect most of the responsibility for Ultron onto Pym, and not Stark. I really think it's the best, most logical choice to exclude Pym from it, and have Stark fill in.
You need the moviegoers to start spreading their interest by other characters, otherwise you might as well have ironman show up in guardians of the galaxy to atract moviegoers and who does th--- BEEEEEEEEEENDIS!

Quote
Also simon pegg should be pym, just saying.
We don't need more Brits playing AMERICAN superheroes!!! >:[

When the cornettos come, you will be the first against the wall.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on July 26, 2013, 12:28:52 pm
I disagrees. Jarvis was never said to have been made by Stark. By making him the core of everything invention related you pretty much exclude all other scientists. He might as well also invent pym particles and create modok, because at this point this also makes him the inventor of vision by proxy.
JARVIS just makes more sense as being made by Stark; Occam's razor and all that stuff. At the very least, he upgraded JARVIS to allow it to simultaneously pilot 40+ Iron Man suits; he's clearly no slouch at AI development. Stark developing Ultron is just one thing, it doesn't mean he should be taking over the entire movieverse. There are already plenty of scientists that have been introduced already (Dr. Selvig, Dr. Natalie Portman) that cover areas Stark has no experience in, the same would be true of Pym particles and the like.

I almost Maya Hansen and Adrian Killian, but, well, Stark was able to half-assedly fix most of their problems, so... :-X

You need the moviegoers to start spreading their interest by other characters, otherwise you might as well have ironman show up in guardians of the galaxy to atract moviegoers and who does th--- BEEEEEEEEEENDIS!
The nature of Ultron's creation requires a character that moviegoers will be very familiar with, IMO. Pym just won't do, even if he was the entire focus of the Ant-Man movie.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on July 31, 2013, 05:58:41 am
Recap of what's known about Avengers 2 and future Marvel movies. (http://www.vulture.com/2013/07/what-we-know-about-the-avengers-age-of-ultron.html) Mostly stuff that we all know but I think there are a few interesting tidbits, rumors, and the like in there.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: GOH on July 31, 2013, 01:25:58 pm
Vin Diesel as Vision

what
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: dusk112 on July 31, 2013, 01:37:14 pm
Vin Diesel as Vision is just a rumor, all that's known is that he negotiated some kinda role with Marvel.

I enjoy Scott Lang more than Hank Pym. Maybe without Hank in the Avengers movie Ultron won't be as dumb and build like 3 of his enemies. Also a good reason I can think of why Hank won't be in the movies is because it would be a PR disaster(HE SLAPPED HIS WIFE!) and no matter what you think of the scene Hank will never grow out of it whether you like him or not.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: SNT on July 31, 2013, 03:29:23 pm
This thread still No Muties Allowed?  Because I just heard about the X-Force film Fox want to do.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on August 02, 2013, 08:47:36 am
No Muties Allowed is and was the subtitle to the general Marvel thread. This is the Marvel Cinematic Universe thread, covering only Marvel's official movies (and not Sony's Spider-Man flicks, or Fox's X-Men franchise). The general entertainment news thread is where the latter go.

WE MUST KEEP THIS THREAD CLEAN FROM THE TRAITOROUS SONY AND FOX
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Neocide on August 02, 2013, 12:06:51 pm
bah, That's racists :V or something....
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: GOH on August 02, 2013, 01:58:27 pm
WE MUST KEEP THIS THREAD CLEAN FROM THE TRAITOROUS SONY AND FOX
You need help.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on August 05, 2013, 08:55:27 am
You need to lighten up.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on August 08, 2013, 08:19:59 am
Marvel has their movies planned out until 2021. (http://collider.com/marvel-movies-2021-kevin-feige/) Something something Sealab.

Also Doctor Strange was confirmed to be the one of the first Phase Three movies, after Ant-Man. Coooool.

Also Joss Whedon talks Agents of SHIELD, with some minor spoilers. (http://collider.com/joss-whedon-marvels-agents-of-shield-interview/)
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: GOH on August 09, 2013, 12:09:32 am
New Thor: Dork World trailer



You need to lighten up.
I'll light you up.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: dusk112 on August 12, 2013, 03:48:14 pm
Vin Diesel as Vision

what

http://comicsbeat.com/vin-diesel-voicing-groot/
He's a tree
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: GOH on August 12, 2013, 03:49:15 pm
 :D
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Iced on August 12, 2013, 04:06:52 pm
oh shit, best casting decision ever, dude is a tree.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Joulz on August 12, 2013, 08:06:34 pm
it's not official yet, it could be a wish from Diesel: he has been known to post shit on his Facebook page, like recently posing in front of the Issue #2 of Avengers comic book (back when he first announced the meeting with Marvel)

i think it's kind of stupid (& a waste) if his inclusion to the Marvel Cinematic Universe is reduced to voicing a tree, which by the way does not speak much -______-

Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Person Man on August 12, 2013, 08:29:41 pm
[avatar]http://i42.photobucket.com/albums/e315/Tiger_Stripe/discordlol3_zps8542f330.png[/avatar]Come on, who wouldn't want to hear Vin Diesel screaming "I AM GROOT!" over and over again?  Sounds like good times to me.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Roman55 on August 12, 2013, 08:38:18 pm
It's the perfect role.

     Posted: August 12, 2013, 10:48:56 pm
Here be trailer leak. (http://vk.com/video-28416224_165782862?hd=1)
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on August 13, 2013, 08:54:12 am
Awesome, seems like great casting.

oh shit, best casting decision ever, dude is a tree.
Hey man, c'mon. Iron fucking Giant. >:[

... admittedly that isn't exactly the most dynamic of roles, but still! SU-PER-MAN :qq:

Also WHAT WHAT WHAT Peter Serafinowicz is gonna be in Guardians of the Galaxy?!?!?! (http://www.digitalspy.com/movies/news/a500917/guardians-of-the-galaxy-casts-peter-serafinowicz.html) :flipout:
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Joulz on August 13, 2013, 09:09:09 am
can't wait to see who will play Richard Rider a.k.a. Nova
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on August 13, 2013, 09:13:38 am
Probably won't find out for a couple more years, though it definitely seems like they'd introduce him in the next one, what with all the Nova Corps buildup the first one is doing.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Joulz on August 13, 2013, 09:42:44 am
you think? considering Glen Close is playing Nova Prime leader, i would have assumed Nova could have been introduced already
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on August 13, 2013, 09:49:16 am
The casting for the role would've been announced by now if he was going to play any significant role. It's possible that he might appear in a very minor role, but I don't think it's all that likely.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: dusk112 on August 13, 2013, 10:44:33 am
it's not official yet, it could be a wish from Diesel: he has been known to post shit on his Facebook page, like recently posing in front of the Issue #2 of Avengers comic book (back when he first announced the meeting with Marvel)

i think it's kind of stupid (& a waste) if his inclusion to the Marvel Cinematic Universe is reduced to voicing a tree, which by the way does not speak much -______-



Groot spoke a lot in some books(I think it was Annihilation Conquest). An even fewer amount of people who are aware of Groot's existence know that he has 2 ways of speaking, the pompous way, and the I am Groot way.

     Posted: August 13, 2013, 11:03:47 am
Spoiler: Thor 2 related (click to see content)
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Joulz on August 14, 2013, 03:05:55 am
it's official and it's the only way Diesel could have been part of the adventure, considering his busy schedule

http://m.cinemablend.com/new/Vin-Diesel-Confirms-He-Voicing-Groot-Marvel-Guardians-Galaxy-38981.html (http://m.cinemablend.com/new/Vin-Diesel-Confirms-He-Voicing-Groot-Marvel-Guardians-Galaxy-38981.html)
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Iced on August 15, 2013, 12:39:10 am
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tVfZAIHAruo

      Posted: August 15, 2013, 11:16:44 pm
rocky racoon hype
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y1EWlR_utK4






Title: PYM HYPE
Post by: Iced on August 15, 2013, 11:19:33 pm

ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo oooooooooooooooooooooooooh shit
https://twitter.com/simonpegg/status/368113460241911808/photo/1
https://twitter.com/simonpegg/status/368113569767780352/photo/1
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: GOH on August 16, 2013, 12:31:11 am
OH WOW
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: QuickFist on August 16, 2013, 12:37:41 am
Why is he pointing at Ant-Man...?
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on August 16, 2013, 12:45:57 am
He could be hinting that he'll be playing (an?) Ant-Man.

Or maybe he'll be Rocket Raccoon!
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: QuickFist on August 16, 2013, 12:51:41 am
I could see him as Ant-Man, not Yellow Jacket but yes Ant-Man
I know it's the same character (Hank Pym) but they're doing the Ant-Man movie
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Joulz on August 16, 2013, 03:29:41 am
jesus, if it's true, that is one of the best casting after Robert Downey Jr & Mark Ruffalo 
Mahvel :heart:
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: 1Ultima on August 19, 2013, 05:09:19 pm
(http://24.media.tumblr.com/ec7cb49a35439aaf8bd3d8fe1f54faf3/tumblr_mrh483shym1qdbonwo1_400.jpg)
Get hype
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Joulz on August 19, 2013, 09:40:44 pm
that is one SICK Ultron rendering right the fuck there!!
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Roman55 on August 20, 2013, 07:25:27 am
Sure that's not just a fan made poster? A few have been making the rounds.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on August 20, 2013, 07:46:44 am
It sure doesn't look like an official one. Plus, it's pretty early for a poster to come out.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Roman55 on August 20, 2013, 07:53:44 am
There's not even the studio logo in that poster.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: 1Ultima on August 20, 2013, 10:39:57 am
Whoops
My bad.
Want me to delete the post?
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on August 20, 2013, 10:42:05 am
No?
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Iced on August 22, 2013, 01:35:38 am
thats a statue.(http://www.sideshowtoy.com/assets/products/200120-classic-ultron-on-throne/lg/200120-classic-ultron-on-throne-006.jpg)


also


(http://i.imgur.com/GUmOPVR.png)
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: QuickFist on August 22, 2013, 03:14:19 am
Ok he confuses me a little, is he gonna play AntMan or not?
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on August 22, 2013, 04:57:50 am
Nobody knows. He's probably gonna be doing something, but nobody knows anything at this point.

my theory is Rocket Raccoon
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: GOH on August 22, 2013, 10:02:51 am
I suddenly lost all interest in Avengers 2 after hearing that Antnan is in the works! :D
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Person Man on August 22, 2013, 08:27:39 pm
[avatar]http://i42.photobucket.com/albums/e315/Tiger_Stripe/discorddunno_zps297811b9.png[/avatar]
Nobody knows. He's probably gonna be doing something, but nobody knows anything at this point.

my theory is Rocket Raccoon

Maybe not, though. (http://www.cinemablend.com/new/Bradley-Cooper-Going-Voice-Rocket-Raccoon-Guardians-Galaxy-39114.html)
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on August 23, 2013, 08:50:59 am
Huh. Not sure if that's a very good choice for a voice-over role.

Also Elizabeth Olsen (of Martha Marcy May Marlene fame, fantastic actress) is in talks to play Scarlet Witch. (http://screenrant.com/bradley-cooper-elizabeth-olsen-marvel-studios-cast/)

Also, Edgar Wright explains why Ultron won't be Ant-Man (http://screenrant.com/avengers-2-age-ultron-ant-man-movie-origin-discussion/)
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Joulz on August 24, 2013, 03:19:29 am
good explanation from Wright.

on a side note, this could have been SUCH a good Ironman 3 :'(

http://www.geeksofdoom.com/2013/05/15/iron-man-3-what-should-have-happened?utm_source=zergnet.com&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=zergnet_61033 (http://www.geeksofdoom.com/2013/05/15/iron-man-3-what-should-have-happened?utm_source=zergnet.com&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=zergnet_61033)
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on August 24, 2013, 03:36:10 am
Guardians character descriptions: (http://comicsalliance.com/marvel-studios-kevin-feige-guardians-of-the-galaxy-character-descriptions/)

Quote
Rocket Raccoon (rumored to be voiced by Bradley Cooper): ”[He] has been genetically and mechanically altered, he’s an experiment from one part of the galaxy.”

Groot (rumored to be voiced by Vin Diesel): ”A species that happens to look like trees look, and is quite communicative if you can understand the different inflections in the way he says, ‘I am Groot.’”

Star-Lord (Chris Pratt): “Peter Quill left Earth in the mid ’80s, but when we meet back up with him he’s very much a citizen of the universe.”

Drax (Dave Bautista): ”[He] has one goal and one goal only, which is to kill Ronan because of a past tragedy.”

Gamora (Zoe Saldana): ”When we meet Gamora, she’s a bad guy working with Ronan and Nebula and Korath, and by extension for Thanos. Gamora doesn’t necessarily like doing that anymore, and tries to find a new path for herself. But she has a reputation as the deadliest woman in the galaxy that people aren’t greeting her with open arms.”

Feige adds that Ronan the Accuser, played by Lee Pace, is definitely the “main bad guy” of the movie with “Thanos lurking above it all.” There’s a lot more of Thanos in the movie than fans got in The Avengers, he said.
Interesting that Drax's nemesis is Ronan, and not Thanos...
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Joulz on August 24, 2013, 04:04:16 am
Quote
There’s a lot more of Thanos in the movie than fans got in The Avengers, he said.

no shit: he had like 10 sec screen presence  :inquisitive:
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Roman55 on August 29, 2013, 06:36:11 pm
Ladies and gentelmen, meet your Ultron. (http://marvel.com/news/story/21099/exclusive_avengers_age_of_ultron_casts_james_spader_as_the_films_legendary_villain#ixzz2dN5DNKH1)
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: QuickFist on August 29, 2013, 07:11:22 pm
i totally agree with that casting, his voice will be awesome as Ultron
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on August 30, 2013, 07:27:36 am
Oooh, interesting choice. I think he'll nail it.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Zaibatsu on August 30, 2013, 09:12:43 am
Hey man, c'mon. Iron fucking Giant. >:[

I remember watching The Iron Giant when I was nine. I like literally had no clue that was Vin Diesel. That's pretty awesome to know that.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Person Man on August 31, 2013, 12:37:35 am
So Bradley Cooper is officially locked in as the voice of Rocket Raccoon now. (http://comicsalliance.com/guardians-of-the-galaxy-bradley-cooper-rocket-raccoon-marvel-movie/)
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Joulz on August 31, 2013, 05:58:02 am
damn, can the casting get even bigger than that? O_O
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Xhominid on August 31, 2013, 06:07:07 am
good explanation from Wright.

on a side note, this could have been SUCH a good Ironman 3 :'(

http://www.geeksofdoom.com/2013/05/15/iron-man-3-what-should-have-happened?utm_source=zergnet.com&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=zergnet_61033 (http://www.geeksofdoom.com/2013/05/15/iron-man-3-what-should-have-happened?utm_source=zergnet.com&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=zergnet_61033)

Oh dear god yes. I would SO love that over the hot mess we got that.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on August 31, 2013, 06:16:23 am
That article's version of the movie was actually pretty terrible. I mean, killing Rhodey? No fun buddy cop stuff? No little kid banter? Having the Mandarin's rings be actual magic, instead of advanced technology that both aligns with the comic version and could be tied into all the "Asguarian magic is actually just technology" stuff? No thanks.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Joulz on August 31, 2013, 06:32:08 am
-Rhodey as a character has been useless in the MCU so far
-kid scenes could have been implemented easily
-having the magic rings as a little introduction to the eventual magic that will be involved in future movies (Dr Strange) is not a bad move (i'd take all the magical powers in the universe over some fucking burning/glowing villains, wtf!?)..plus the fake Mandarin thing could still be present
-Hulk could have easily been added in a few scenes to further explain where the fuck he was all this time

in details, yes there are some bad stuff potentially written there (it is merely just an idea after all) but i could see a way better version than what we ended up getting: wtf with that ending, seriously? Stark KNOWS there are extra-terrestrial beings in the universe but yet, he chooses to remove his very own power? what? plus, why not remove it before if the possibility was there :-/
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on August 31, 2013, 07:00:32 am
-Rhodey as a character has been useless in the MCU so far
The buddy cop scenes validate his existence!

-having the magic rings as a little introduction to the eventual magic that will be involved in future movies (Dr Strange) is not a bad move (i'd take all the magical powers in the universe over some fucking burning/glowing villains, wtf!?)
The Mandarin is the wrong person to herald the introduction of magic; his rings are tech-based. Advanced alien technology that might as well be magic yes, but specifically technology.

in details, yes there are some bad stuff potentially written there (it is merely just an idea after all) but i could see a way better version than what we ended up getting: wtf with that ending, seriously? Stark KNOWS there are extra-terrestrial beings in the universe but yet, he chooses to remove his very own power? what? plus, why not remove it before if the possibility was there :-/
He just chose to get rid of the shrapnel and arc reactor in his chest, he can still suit up as Iron Man anytime. He says he'll always be Iron Man! He just won't have a piece of metal in his heart and 42 AI-controlled suits, is all.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Xhominid on August 31, 2013, 07:05:29 am
That article's version of the movie was actually pretty terrible. I mean, killing Rhodey? No fun buddy cop stuff? No little kid banter? Having the Mandarin's rings be actual magic, instead of advanced technology that both aligns with the comic version and could be tied into all the "Asguarian magic is actually just technology" stuff? No thanks.

I never said I loved the whole thing, I just loved the idea of it.
Rhodey really do anything important in IM3, so him being killed off or atleas do something would have been far better.
the little kid banter could have easily happened after Tony got his ass whipped by The Mandarin like in the movie.
I'd rather it be a mix up of the 2, as it does give leeway to Thanos and at the same time, keep Mandarin's origins as close as possible.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on August 31, 2013, 07:12:10 am
Killing off characters just because is just not a good idea! Hmm, well, if they killed Happy off I dunno if that would've mattered all that much. It'd follow pretty much the same beats as the actual movie.

Thanos is being set up by Guardians, and isn't really all that involved with straight-up magic. In any case, I think doing set-up for him in Iron Man 3 would've been a mistake regardless; he's not gonna show up and be a major character for quite a few years, and I think there's a danger in drawing out that threat.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Xhominid on August 31, 2013, 07:48:26 am
Killing off characters just because is just not a good idea! Hmm, well, if they killed Happy off I dunno if that would've mattered all that much. It'd follow pretty much the same beats as the actual movie.

Thanos is being set up by Guardians, and isn't really all that involved with straight-up magic. In any case, I think doing set-up for him in Iron Man 3 would've been a mistake regardless; he's not gonna show up and be a major character for quite a few years, and I think there's a danger in drawing out that threat.

Then have Rhodey actually do something important then. He doesn't need to die, but he does need to do far more than the crap he did in IM3.

And while Thanos won't be used for quiet some time, actually building him up some more really won't make it harder for people to swallow since they already KNOW of Thanos, showing him being behind some of these things or looking for something that can work until he finds the Infinity Gauntlet.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on August 31, 2013, 07:52:04 am
That's pretty much what Guardians will do. And whatever comes after Avengers 2, but before 3, probably.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Xhominid on August 31, 2013, 08:36:38 am
That's pretty much what Guardians will do. And whatever comes after Avengers 2, but before 3, probably.

Then they could have done that as a setup for Guardians, problem solved.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Joulz on August 31, 2013, 08:52:20 am
i think Jmorph is right: there was really no need to introduce Thanos further before GotG as he is the biggest threat to the Avengers...if they did show him up more, it would have killed the actual buildup!
i'd rather have him go all out in Avengers 3 instead of showing up in standalone movies like IM or Thor or whatnot: GotG is the excellent way to tease us more with him
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Iced on August 31, 2013, 01:12:10 pm
this is how i would have done ironman 3

Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on August 31, 2013, 01:15:39 pm
Hmm, well, they made 3 without knowing if they'd get RDJ back, they wouldn't leave anything like that dangling.

That lab introduction should be moved back, the plane sequence is towards the very end of the movie.

And why would the Mandarin be a mere bodyguard?
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Iced on August 31, 2013, 01:23:27 pm
it could have been moved to any point before, yeah, i was just saying i wouldnt remove any of the other scenes.

Mandarin wouldnt be an actual bodyguard, seth would think he was one( or at least letting the audience think he was) . He would just be controlling the operation from within. I like villains to be ethnically diverse and I think it was a shame to make the mandarin a white dude.

(http://images4.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20111229200256/marveldatabase/images/4/45/Mandarin_%28Earth-616%29_from_Invincible_Iron_Man_Vol_1_511_cover.jpg)
The mandarin also works best when he goes between extremes. Making him feel actually threatening overall would have increased the world building aspect.

Also, I would make seth into the monster not only to thematically close in on the ptsd but because fin fang foom tatoos on seth killian were distracting as shit, it felt like a dropped plot point ever since he spit fire.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: GOH on August 31, 2013, 01:33:40 pm
I didn't know Seth Killian was in Iron Man 3. :o
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on August 31, 2013, 01:34:42 pm
That's it, let's all play NO, IRON MAN 3 SHOULD'VE GONE LIKE THIS

I think they should've just had a straight up Mandarin as the villain, no decoy, have Killian not be a very major character or appear at all (Maya Hansen could take over his scenes), get around the whole Yellow Peril business by making him a multi-ethnic guy who has adopted crazy Imperial Chinese trappings (and maybe even have Chinese doctor guy say disapprovingly how Mandy appropriated his culture), and have the movie play out pretty much the same. Maybe change the motivation of the Mandarin to be something like that one arc of the Mandarin with the Extremis virus, with him wanting to spread it around world, which would kill most everyone and stuff. Or not, I guess just power and money are fine enough. Have Rhodey fight in a suit during the final battle, more buddy cop fun times because you've got Shane Black, might as well get the most out of him. Tie up Tony's PTSD in his final battle, and if need be emphasize that Mandy's rings are Chitauri in origin to really tidy up that thread. Connect Mandy to the Ten Rings, bringing the trilogy around full circle as well, make everything conclusive.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Joulz on September 01, 2013, 05:01:10 am
dudes...why am i not seeing any fucking Hulkbuster sequence in all that ? >:-/ 3 IM movies and one 10 sec of Hulkbuster = fuck off

and of course a sequence (whatever the length of it) of Ironman flying in deep space  :'(
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on September 01, 2013, 05:04:49 am
Save the real Hulkbuster for Avengers 2/3. I don't even think the one in Iron Man 3 is officially a Hulkbuster, it's just a big strong one. And that's fine!
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: QuickFist on September 01, 2013, 05:17:25 am
No it is official HulkBuster, it's on Marvel's site
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on September 01, 2013, 05:19:13 am
It's not a Hulkbuster, it's called Igor. (http://marvel.com/images/gallery/story/20350/images_from_go_inside_iron_man_3s_hall_of_armor/image/949365) :P
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: QuickFist on September 01, 2013, 05:28:42 am
Bad memory, you win
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on September 01, 2013, 05:31:52 am
Now give me all your shares in Stark Industries.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on September 07, 2013, 04:20:48 am
Katee Sackhoff (Starbuck in the Battlestar Galactica reboot) is rumored to be playing Carol Danvers/Captain Marvel (http://comicsalliance.com/katee-sackhoff-captain-marvel-casting-rumor/), perhaps to headline a movie, because Marvel wants to do that (http://www.superherohype.com/news/articles/179099-marvel-studios-wants-a-female-led-superhero-film), and they should!

I haven't seen anything with Sackhoff in it, but I've heard she's good; anyone see her in anything?

     Posted: September 07, 2013, 04:23:42 am
oh and something about Ultron
Joss Whedon said:
As a character I love [Ultron] because he’s so pissed off
[...]
I knew right away what I wanted to do with him. He’s always trying to destroy the Avengers, goddamn it. He’s got a bee in his bonnet. He’s not a happy guy, which means he’s an interesting guy. He’s got pain. And the way that manifests is not going to be standard robot stuff. So we’ll take away some of those powers because, at some point, everybody becomes magic, and I already have someone who’s a witch.
Guess Scarlet Witch is gonna be the introduction to magic in the MCU.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: QuickFist on September 07, 2013, 05:05:11 am
I support Sackhoff as Ms. Marvel, I can easily imagine her shooting photon beams jeje
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Speedpreacher on September 07, 2013, 06:08:03 pm
Katee Sackhoff (Starbuck in the Battlestar Galactica reboot) is rumored to be playing Carol Danvers/Captain Marvel (http://comicsalliance.com/katee-sackhoff-captain-marvel-casting-rumor/), perhaps to headline a movie, because Marvel wants to do that (http://www.superherohype.com/news/articles/179099-marvel-studios-wants-a-female-led-superhero-film), and they should!

I haven't seen anything with Sackhoff in it, but I've heard she's good; anyone see her in anything?


Katee Sackhoff as a cocky, badass pilot who struggles with bad personal choices, possible alcohol addiction and receives powers that separate her from other mortals? Nah, it'd never work.

(You haven't seen Battleship Galactica, JM? DUDE, YOU SHOULD WATCH BATTLESTAR GALACTICA)
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on September 09, 2013, 03:50:44 am
(You haven't seen Battleship Galactica, JM? DUDE, YOU SHOULD WATCH BATTLESTAR GALACTICA)
I know I know I know, it's on my list!
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on September 20, 2013, 09:51:51 am
Joss Whedon was brought in to make some fixes on Thor: The Dark World (http://www.avclub.com/articles/joss-whedon-was-airlifted-in-to-fix-thor-the-dark,103090/), which... I dunno, it seems like a worrying sign, if they had to do that. :-\

But hey, Agents of SHIELD in 4 days! Who's excited?!?!
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Byakko on September 20, 2013, 10:15:08 am
it seems like a worrying sign, if they had to do that. :-\
Meh, it's just a couple of scenes they couldn't work out. I think it's like, linking events and information and action, to make sure the pace doesn't fall flat and it still makes sense when they try to connect two important scenes (they don't want to have Thor be doing something and then on the next scene show him some place else and we're wondering how he got there or who told him). I'm not too worried so far.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: GOH on September 20, 2013, 10:42:37 am
I agree with Byakko, it might specifically be something linked to the Avengers and Taylor probably didn't want any plot holes or something. Hopefully it was something like that.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on September 20, 2013, 10:44:12 am
It's just a touch worrying, is all. It's not often a good sign for the final movie when this kind of thing happens.

But hopefully Whedon used some of his sweet, sweet magic and fixed everything!
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Iced on September 20, 2013, 10:53:40 am
Joss Whedon was brought in to make some fixes on Thor: The Dark World (http://www.avclub.com/articles/joss-whedon-was-airlifted-in-to-fix-thor-the-dark,103090/), which... I dunno, it seems like a worrying sign, if they had to do that. :-\

But hey, Agents of SHIELD in 4 days! Who's excited?!?!
comic companies used to have editorial to make sure that there isnt any glaring plotholes between their stories, he was likely acting as a continuity editor.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Byakko on September 20, 2013, 10:54:31 am
The version I read yesterday http://www.bleedingcool.com/2013/09/18/joss-whedon-was-called-in-to-fix-some-scenes-in-thor-the-dark-world/ is what sounded to me more like it was a matter of the flow of events, the succession between the scenes. The AVClub article just talks about "problems" (BCool says that something wasn't working on paper, like they had something but it felt forced) so maybe it sounds more like there was something fundamentally wrong.
And we'll all be playing "Spot the Whedon" like BCool says.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on September 20, 2013, 11:00:04 am
Yeah, it doesn't sound like inter-movie continuity stuff.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: walt on September 23, 2013, 04:39:29 pm
I'm clearly no authority on the subject, but ...

... given that the Thor movie merely served the purpose of setting up a "supernatural" plot for the Marvel Cinematic Universe (and giving the gift of Shirtless Hemsworth to the world), I am not worried about the movie not being "good", as much as I wasn't expecting it to be good at all.

I'll still go watch it, but I'm in this universe only for the RDJ
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: QuickFist on September 23, 2013, 10:17:03 pm
Agents of SHIELD on wednesday! Who's gonna watch it? i won't miss it!
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Aldo on September 23, 2013, 11:36:58 pm
^ Definitely pretty interested in watching this.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: QuickFist on September 23, 2013, 11:41:24 pm
Anyone knows who's the super hero that appears first? (the guy with the hood)
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: walt on September 23, 2013, 11:47:13 pm
I thought the whole point of the show was "NO SUPERHEROES"  (?)
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: QuickFist on September 23, 2013, 11:51:46 pm
Have you seen the promo?
There's no superheroes as main character, but they deal with superheroes so...
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Iced on September 23, 2013, 11:56:27 pm
Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: QuickFist on September 23, 2013, 11:57:36 pm
Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty

Allright, who's name?
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Iced on September 24, 2013, 12:01:38 am
http://www.marvunapp.com/Appendix2/mpeterson.htm
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on September 24, 2013, 11:51:38 pm
Two more hours till the premiere!

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: QuickFist on September 24, 2013, 11:58:51 pm
Damn, it's tomorrow in my country, lucky
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Nero D. on September 25, 2013, 02:31:33 am
anybody else watching it

pretty well written in my book
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Person Man on September 25, 2013, 03:12:02 am
[avatar]http://i42.photobucket.com/albums/e315/Tiger_Stripe/discordintrigued.png[/avatar]Yeah, that was pretty good.

Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: MDI on September 25, 2013, 04:44:13 am
I liked the stupid little "With great power..." quote they did.

Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Nero D. on September 25, 2013, 05:21:59 am
it was literally written by the same people who wrote the movie


Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on September 25, 2013, 07:02:02 am
I really liked it, but I felt it kind of lost steam towards second half. But I'm not too worried, every one of Whedon's shows, bar Firefly, took a bit of time to get going, but once they did, oh boy, such wonderful magic. In fact, a pretty much all genre shows always seem to take a while to get really good.

Plus holy shit Ron Glass I didn't know he would show up! And J. August Richards better show up again!

I must confess, though, I was the happiest at the very end, when the Mutant Enemy logo showed up. Goddamn, I missed that Grr. Argh. :'(

Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Nero D. on September 25, 2013, 08:43:31 pm
yeah that logo made my heart jump a bit I new it was coming by way of the creator but I did not expect it for some reason


Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on September 25, 2013, 10:18:22 pm
Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Byakko on September 25, 2013, 10:32:11 pm
Checking the SHIELD series, and oh god the light humor.
"I don't think Thor is technically a god
- you haven't been near his arms"
"that corner was dark, I couldn't help myself - I think a light bulb's out"
"the girl you saved is dying to thank you... And possibly 'thank you'"
Would've seen it in a comedy cartoon, but in a live action, 45-minute-episode series ? Nice.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on September 25, 2013, 10:47:01 pm
It's Whedon, baby.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Byakko on September 25, 2013, 10:58:48 pm
Yeah, it worked in Firefly because Nathan Fillion, and Buffy was more of a teen saga. It's the combination of everything that surprises me, it feels new even if it's not.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Iced on September 26, 2013, 01:39:22 am
Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Xanden on September 26, 2013, 01:51:15 am
Anyone knows who's the super hero that appears first? (the guy with the hood)

I was thinking he was Bluestreak at first...
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: QuickFist on September 26, 2013, 01:54:04 am
Anyone knows who's the super hero that appears first? (the guy with the hood)

I was thinking he was Bluestreak at first...


I thought about that too LOL

     Posted: September 26, 2013, 04:49:52 am
Just watched Agents of SHIELD, really good, BTW Am I the only one who thinks Skye's hot?
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Aldo on September 26, 2013, 05:02:22 am
Pretty nice first episode, really looking forward to the next one. So far, great start.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: MDI on September 26, 2013, 06:01:45 am
Just watched Agents of SHIELD, really good, BTW Am I the only one who thinks Skye's hot?

You most definitely are not

Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: PBRTODD101 on September 26, 2013, 07:10:19 am
^Ditto.

I loved it. I anxiously wait for the next episode.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Byakko on September 26, 2013, 09:50:08 am
BTW Am I the only one who thinks Skye's hot?
What would even make you think you are ?
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Person Man on September 27, 2013, 12:19:48 am
[avatar]http://i42.photobucket.com/albums/e315/Tiger_Stripe/discordintrigued.png[/avatar]"Am I the only one" is internet shorthand for "I would like to get a lot of people to post saying that they agree with me."



Neat.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: QuickFist on September 27, 2013, 12:31:18 am
 :downsbravo: :bison:
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Tyrant Belial on September 27, 2013, 02:56:20 am
And the entire Iron man helmet turning into Ultron's face is a reference to the time Ultron possessed the iron Man armor.

With Tony in it.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: QuickFist on September 27, 2013, 05:49:34 am
Plot:
"As the US Government create a force, known as Ultron, The Avengers are told they are not needed any longer. But when Ultron turns against Humanity, it's time for The Avengers to assemble yet again for their most dangerous challenge ever."
Source: IMDB
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Joulz on September 28, 2013, 08:30:05 am
2015....this is sooooo far away :'(

btw that summer is going to be one to fucking remember in history
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on September 29, 2013, 07:01:13 am
Yeah, it worked in Firefly because Nathan Fillion, and Buffy was more of a teen saga. It's the combination of everything that surprises me, it feels new even if it's not.
It's definitely apparent that Gregg is the only main cast member who can easily and deftly dispense the Whedon-y dialogue (and the only one with a real good handle on his character save for Ming-Na) but he has an advantage in that he's been playing Coulsen for 5 years; I fully expect the rest of the cast to catch up soon, and be much more interesting than what they seem to be. I mean, who was expecting the stereotypical geek wallflower of Willow to go through her whole arc of becoming a super powerful witch, discovering her sexuality, and occasionally turning evil? Or Wesley evolving from a pratfalling buffoon only used for comic relief into a haunted, grim badass; a change so remarkably stark that it's amazing it was made to look and feel so completely natural and in-character?

So uh yeah getting back to what I was saying before I derailed myself in wankery, it'll probably take a while for everyone to get comfortable, but when they do, oh baby, I can't wait.

Plot:
"As the US Government create a force, known as Ultron, The Avengers are told they are not needed any longer. But when Ultron turns against Humanity, it's time for The Avengers to assemble yet again for their most dangerous challenge ever."
Source: IMDB
I wouldn't put a lot of stock into anything from imdb, plot-wise (or even casting-wise, honestly). Especially this early. And that teaser certainly hints at an Iron Man-Ultron connection (though nothing super concrete, either).
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Person Man on October 02, 2013, 03:05:10 am
[avatar]http://i42.photobucket.com/albums/e315/Tiger_Stripe/discordgoody2_zps5f20c8a8.png[/avatar]
Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Speedpreacher on October 02, 2013, 03:07:54 am
Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: MDI on October 02, 2013, 08:47:29 pm
Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Person Man on October 04, 2013, 10:08:06 pm
[avatar]http://i42.photobucket.com/albums/e315/Tiger_Stripe/discordpuppets.png[/avatar]Kick-Ass to appear in Avengers 2. (http://comicsalliance.com/aaron-johnson-avengers-age-of-ultron-quicksilver/)
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: QuickFist on October 04, 2013, 10:12:03 pm
Wanda and Pietro...
 :buttrox:
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on October 04, 2013, 11:47:43 pm
It was mentioned in the Quicksilver article, but I might as well link to it: Samuel L. Jackson let it slip that Elizabeth Olsen (who was fantastic in Martha Marcy May Marlene) is in the movie (http://www.avclub.com/articles/samuel-l-jackson-just-comes-right-out-and-says-eli,103698/?utm_medium=RSS&utm_campaign=feeds&utm_source=imdb) and it's pretty likely that she'll be playing Scarlet Witch.

Agents of SHIELD was good this week, Ward and Skye seemed a bit better but FitzSimmons still seem pretty annoying and drag the show down a bit.
Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty

Also some somewhat alarming news, Agenst of SHIELD lost 36% of its audience this week, and if it that drop-off doesn't stabilize the show is not gonna be long for this world. (http://www.avclub.com/articles/ratings-roundup-second-episode-of-agents-of-shield,103663/) But then again, it is the most competitive timeslot on TV, and NCIS had a big event episode, and oh god please don't cancel another Whedon show please please please
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Aldo on October 04, 2013, 11:56:32 pm
This Marvel thing is far superior than NCIS, what the hell?? I guess NCIS time in the air plays an important role in this. I would be really sad if this get cancelled, it is really good so far.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Byakko on October 05, 2013, 12:12:57 am
NCIS is good and always had good scores, and this mostly appeals to
- comic book fans
- Whedon fans
which aren't the biggest demographic for a TV show, no matter how good it is. Who knows if even the "casuals" who discovered Marvel with the movies are aware that this show is a thing ?
Hell, for anyone who isn't a comic book fan, this "investigation team-up" show has a pretty bad group dynamic, boring and way too cliché, and that kills any interest from newcomers pretty fast. I'd even go as far as saying, if it wasn't called SHIELD, even with the same dialogs and directing, you wouldn't even pay attention to it.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Aldo on October 05, 2013, 03:37:49 am
Gotta admit you nailed it with the "if it didn´t had Marvel in the title" no one or very few people would watch it, but I certainly feel this show is far more interesting than NCIS and it would be pretty sad to see this show go away due to rating stuff, gotta agree they choosed a pretty difficult hour to air the show. Is just my opinion thought, since I always found NCIS pretty uninteresting.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Just No Point on October 05, 2013, 03:44:01 am
So far the episodes have been a bit boring for me, though I thought the same of Buffy and Angel when I 1st started watching them. So I hope it lasts long enough to get through the initial boring period.

I also hope they have some side adventures that take place during Thor Dark Ages since the show will be airing while the movie is in theaters.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Nero D. on October 05, 2013, 03:48:40 am
i was the 36 percent im sorry

i was over my brother's house playing gta v and stuff forgive me jossmorphman
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: GOH on October 05, 2013, 11:58:34 am
Oh boy

You've done it now
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Cybaster on October 05, 2013, 01:27:06 pm
if it wasn't called SHIELD, even with the same dialogs and directing, you wouldn't even pay attention to it.
Yup, even though I think the show is not bad at all, you pretty much nailed it here. Sadly. :(

Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on October 05, 2013, 07:19:05 pm
Who knows if even the "casuals" who discovered Marvel with the movies are aware that this show is a thing ?
I'd say they were, given that the premiere was the highest-rated drama debut in 4 years. It just seems that a great deal of them would rather watch The Voice and NCIS.

So far the episodes have been a bit boring for me, though I thought the same of Buffy and Angel when I 1st started watching them. So I hope it lasts long enough to get through the initial boring period.
It's something common not only to Whedon shows, but to network TV in general (cable is generally better at coming out very strong out of the gate but I don't really have any idea why). Sometimes it might take a season, or even 2 seasons (Star Trek TNG) for a show to get good, for the cast to gel, and so on.

Usually a big turning point are the episodes produced after the first few episodes have started airing, because the production can finally see the results. The writers can start playing towards the actors' strengths, and avoid exposing their weaknesses; the actors get better handles on their characters, finding new depths and rhythms, and so on.

I think the closest comparison to Agents would be Dollhouse, given that two of the show-runners were intimately involved with it, and it's the most recent Whedon show. And the reception Dollhouse got was extremely chilly, much more so than Agents is getting. There were so many Whedon diehards saying the show was terrible and awful and what have you. And then episode 6 happened: Patton Oswalt's character. "There are three flowers in a vase. The third flower is green." Holy shit, this show not only can be good, it can be great!

Also, FitzSimmons reminds me of Topher from Dollhouse, in that Topher was, for the first few episodes, absolutely despised and decried as a lame Xander clone who is also in charge of mind-rapist technology. But his character developed by leaps and bounds and the actor playing him got a great handle on the role and by the end he was one of the most beloved characters. So hopefully we'll see a similar path for those two, although personally I find them to be worse than Topher ever was, even at the beginning.

i was the 36 percent im sorry

i was over my brother's house playing gta v and stuff forgive me jossmorphman
It's OK. For penance leave the episode on ABC.com while you go about your day. 5 views should do it.

Go in peace my son.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: MDI on October 09, 2013, 03:14:22 am
Lets talk about tonight's episode.

Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on October 09, 2013, 08:24:45 am
Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty

More incremental improvements, especially from Skye. FitzSimmons continue to be eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeehhhhhhhhhhhh. They need to work on their dialogue!

Loved that truth serum reveal, as it nicely shelves concerns from the pilot of "Coulson left a truth-serum'd SHIELD agent in a room with someone who posts secrets for a living".

Also, had a thought. At the beginning of the episode, Skye is once again presented as being pretty useless at helping the regular SHIELD agents get anything done, reminding me of the last episode where she was pretty useless at the temple. Of course in this episode she goes undercover and all that, and in the last episode she comes up with the plan to get rid of the hijackers, but still, it makes me wonder if this is a long-term plot or something (like, Skye starts to feel her skills are useless most of the time, and wants to quit/learn more stuff/whatever, or something like that).
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: MDI on October 09, 2013, 08:59:56 am
The most important thing is the dress she wore this episode.  :wiseguy:
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Person Man on October 09, 2013, 04:16:00 pm
[avatar]http://i42.photobucket.com/albums/e315/Tiger_Stripe/discordintrigued.png[/avatar]
Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: QuickFist on October 09, 2013, 04:18:56 pm
I'm sorry but, LMD?
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Byakko on October 09, 2013, 04:21:51 pm
Life Model Decoy.
My problem with this theory is, in this case there was no reason to bring this character, other than having the actor and the name. The LMD itself has no purpose. They even make a point to keep his presence secret.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: QuickFist on October 09, 2013, 04:22:20 pm
Like some sort of clone?
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Iced on October 09, 2013, 04:23:55 pm
life model decoy, an old shield staple, they would sometimes replace agents with robots programmed with all their memories and skills, such robots werent always aware they were robots.  they were used to simulate accidents and etc.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: QuickFist on October 09, 2013, 04:26:31 pm
I see, "it's a magical place".
I knew there was no way he could survive Loki's attack
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jarek Bachanek on October 09, 2013, 07:01:32 pm
It's something common not only to Whedon shows, but to network TV in general (cable is generally better at coming out very strong out of the gate but I don't really have any idea why). Sometimes it might take a season, or even 2 seasons (Star Trek TNG) for a show to get good, for the cast to gel, and so on.

I soo agree on that. Begginings on Whedon shows are always bit boring and all of them require little bit patience, which most viewers doesn't seem to have. maybe that's why they gets cancelled soon after it's started. Other thing is that people mostly start apperciate his shows when they already gone/ended which is sad really.

Buffy and Angel were both exceptions of that rule because they were already known characters when their shows started (Buffy from that horrible movie Whedon scripted back in 93 and Angtel from presence in Buffy Show). Buffy also had good chance because of herself as main character. Teen girl kicking ass of vamps ? That was new thing back then and she was very likeable due to Sarah Michelle Gellar cuteness and acting skills.

With SHIELD they had good idea of bringing someone known for main lead but Coulson as fine as he is, is not best choice. Too bad their didn't get Jackson for full role. That would help. They shoul get agent  Hill for full role too... I for one was dissapointed with actors. Ward is wooden amateur and look like plastic doll who doesn't look like tough guy, at all, That geek guy is irittianting too. His female partner is cute and I love her british accent but that's it. Skye is getting better with each ep but looks too pretty for hacker girl living in the van. In fact they all look too perfect, and too pretty. always have perfect makeups and hair even during fight scenes and when they are on the field. It's looks too plastic, fake and unrealistic. The bright point of cast is Ming Na who issoo cool and steal every scene she appear in. Coulson is trying but he lackis chemistry with rest of the cast

The fact that show is presented in procedural/investigating format instead long continiuos plot doesn't help. I never understood the reason behind popularity of shows like NCIS, CSI etc, they all are incredible dull and boring especially when you compare them to cable shows like Breaking Bad, The Walking Dead etc.

They also did it wrong with target audience. I know it's national TV but they should target older audience. Current audience like cable adult shows, where there is no limtations and their popularity grows each year. When they see SHIELD no wonder some of them feels dissapointed. Whole show looks like its for teens and that's not interesing for mature fans. And there is the fact that shows is strongly connected to MCU. It's hard to imagine that someone in US don't know MCU but I bet there are some and they surely won't watch this show because of that connection.

I will countinue watching it but I don't have high hopes. I'm pretty sure show would got better at season 2-3 but I have doubts if it's even gonna get to that point.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on October 09, 2013, 08:26:52 pm
Rating are in for episode 3, the drop-off has slowed greatly, and it actually came in #1 for the 8PM timeslot. (http://www.broadwayworld.com/bwwtv/article/ABCs-Marvels-Agents-of-SHIELD-Holds-Strong-in-Week-3-20131009) If it can keep these numbers up it should have a strong future.

Buffy and Angel were both exceptions of that rule because they were already known characters when their shows started (Buffy from that horrible movie Whedon scripted back in 93 and Angtel from presence in Buffy Show). Buffy also had good chance because of herself as main character. Teen girl kicking ass of vamps ? That was new thing back then and she was very likeable due to Sarah Michelle Gellar cuteness and acting skills.
TV Buffy was an pretty different character than the movie version, even in the pilot, though. Besides the fact that the movie is not in continuity with the TV show, it has a very different tone and most people who watched or are watching the show never even saw the movie.

Angel is similar to Coulsen in that he's an established character that took a while to reconfigure into a lead. And even though Cordelia (and later Wesley) were also in Buffy, he never had that many scenes with them so the writers basically had to start fresh with their interpersonal characterizations. But they got a handle on it eventually, just like they will with Agents.

They also did it wrong with target audience. I know it's national TV but they should target older audience. Current audience like cable adult shows, where there is no limtations and their popularity grows each year. When they see SHIELD no wonder some of them feels dissapointed. Whole show looks like its for teens and that's not interesing for mature fans.
That makes no sense; the Avengers wasn't targeted at just an older audience, it was targeted to everyone. They can have stuff for everyone. Expecting a prestige cable drama type deal for this property is incredibly unrealistic, especially coming from Whedon. He has his own way of doing things, and not every show needs to be a gritty show about a white middle-aged antihero to be good.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on October 15, 2013, 08:09:19 pm
Ant-Man is probably gonna be either Joseph Gordon-Levitt or Paul Rudd (http://www.avclub.com/articles/antman-is-probably-going-to-be-either-joseph-gordo,104226/)
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: GOH on October 15, 2013, 09:05:14 pm
Dear God. The puns.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on October 17, 2013, 07:58:36 pm
That was a good episode, we're almost at the point where I can say it's a good show with no reservations!

Marvel is trying to develop 5 different shows, pitched to cable networks, Amazon, and a whole bunch of other networks. (http://www.avclub.com/articles/marvel-studios-to-assemble-superteam-of-5-new-tv-s,104288/)

Dear God. The puns.
Joseph Gordon-Levitt squashes Ant-Man rumors (http://www.avclub.com/articles/joseph-gordonlevitt-squashes-antman-rumors-ha-ha-b,104305/)
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: QuickFist on October 17, 2013, 08:06:35 pm
Yeah it was nice, I felt Fitz-Simmons a bit better
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Iced on October 17, 2013, 08:53:19 pm
The episode was nice.
Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: SNT on October 18, 2013, 07:01:08 am
Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on October 18, 2013, 04:07:56 pm
Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty

also this happened
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Person Man on October 23, 2013, 01:13:27 am
[avatar]http://i42.photobucket.com/albums/e315/Tiger_Stripe/discordava.png[/avatar]Ben Kingsley working with Marvel again on secret project. (http://comicsalliance.com/ben-kingsley-marvel-secret-project)

Please oh please oh please be drunken Trevor Slattery becoming the real Mandarin with magic alien rings and shit.  Please oh please oh please.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Joulz on October 23, 2013, 01:16:58 am
holy fuck Marvel knows how to hype their stuff!!! this is great, even if there are absolutely no details
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: MDI on October 23, 2013, 12:00:12 pm
Anyone watch tonight's episode?

An entire universe of Marvel characters to use and we get some lame ass character named Scorch. Can we just get like..a single superhero or villain? Justoneplease.

Oh well. Skye in bra and panties.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: GOH on October 23, 2013, 12:16:42 pm
Oh well. Skye in bra and panties.
:swoon:

*GOH sits in front of the TV waiting*

Oh and this popped up today

(http://i.imgur.com/R5GsAEY.jpg)
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Aldo on October 24, 2013, 05:02:45 am
Anyone watch tonight's episode?

An entire universe of Marvel characters to use and we get some lame ass character named Scorch. Can we just get like..a single superhero or villain? Justoneplease.

Oh well. Skye in bra and panties.

Spoilers man

Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty

Really loving this show. Great stuff :yes: Skye in underwear, easily the best part of the episode :yeses:
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on October 24, 2013, 07:25:47 am
Hrm, that episode was a bit of a let down after last week's, hopefully things will swing upwards again. I mean it wasn't bad or anything, just not shows no improvement from the first few episodes, and this series really needs to improve to become anything more than merely competent. And I was hoping they'd avoid doing a "Rising Tide is pro-secrecy but totally misguided and actually somewhat bad, SHIELD is great even though it wiretaps and abducts people" kinda thing, but this episode was literally that. Hopefully this is the last of the Rising Tide plot line, then, because that's starting to get into weird, pro-totalitarianism places. :-\

also that scene with the Doctor getting burned to death was pretty horrifying, for an 8PM show. Surprised they got away showing that. ALSO also, those fireproof suits: those are totally AIM, right? RIGHT?!?!?!?!

An entire universe of Marvel characters to use and we get some lame ass character named Scorch. Can we just get like..a single superhero or villain? Justoneplease.
But Scorch was an existing villain!

... an exceedingly obscure one, yes, and basically shares only the name and powerset, but... c'mon!

Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: QuickFist on October 24, 2013, 07:36:42 am
In my country before commercials they show a question, the last one was, Which character from the Avengers would you like to see in the show?
So I ask that to you guys. I'd like to see, either Black Widow or Cap.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: AerosMugen on October 24, 2013, 03:03:02 pm
Justin Hammer. :P

I know he's not even on the Avengers' movie, but meh, his characterization was awesome.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jarek Bachanek on October 24, 2013, 03:35:08 pm
Black Widow or Hulk cuz they both are awesome (ok Scarlett is more awesome)
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Titiln on October 24, 2013, 07:04:17 pm

captain america: the winter soldier OR SHOULD I SAY THE "EPIC WIN"TER SOLDIER
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: QuickFist on October 24, 2013, 07:17:54 pm
Epic as hell!
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: AerosMugen on October 24, 2013, 08:05:59 pm
Oh shi...
 :flipout:
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: GOH on October 24, 2013, 10:58:54 pm
Falcon looks so fucking good!

Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa let me watch it already D:
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Nero D. on October 25, 2013, 12:44:19 am
faaaaaaaaaaaaaaallllllllllcooooooooooooooon yes

fuck yes i was wondering how they were gonna implement his gimp suit but they fucking did it kudos movie people

dope trailer overall
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: S.D. on October 25, 2013, 01:59:32 am
Why do they call him The Winter Soldier if it comes out during Spring?
YOU HAD ONE JOB MARVEL.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Joulz on October 25, 2013, 02:25:59 am
i haven't been that hyped for a movie since the first Avengers trailer came out!! good job Mahvel
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: PBRTODD101 on October 25, 2013, 05:43:49 am
Skye in underwear

I need to watch this ep ASAP
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: MDI on October 25, 2013, 05:46:39 am
Why do they call him The Winter Soldier if it comes out during Spring?
YOU HAD ONE JOB MARVEL.

Are you serious? You're not serious....are you serious?
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on October 25, 2013, 05:59:12 am
In my country before commercials they show a question, the last one was, Which character from the Avengers would you like to see in the show?
So I ask that to you guys. I'd like to see, either Black Widow or Cap.
Realistically the only actors I could see appearing on the show would be Renner or Ruffalo. And even then only in heavily promoted cameos during sweeps.

But I'll just say Renner so he can have the distinction of being on two Whedon shows:
(http://www3.images.coolspotters.com/photos/1032247/jeremy-renner-and-angel-gallery.png)
because he was in Angel as Angel's former vampire serial killer protege!!!

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EzJvPgZGfqU[/youtube]
captain america: the winter soldier OR SHOULD I SAY THE "EPIC WIN"TER SOLDIER
this trailer makes me rock hard

fuck yes i was wondering how they were gonna implement his gimp suit but they fucking did it kudos movie people
... gimp suit? For the Winter Soldier? Or Cap's Super Soldier outfit? Or the Falcon's costume? I'M CONFUSED
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Joulz on October 25, 2013, 07:10:07 am
faaaaaaaaaaaaaaallllllllllcooooooooooooooon yes

fuck yes i was wondering how they were gonna implement his gimp suit but they fucking did it kudos movie people

dope trailer overall
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Nero D. on October 25, 2013, 09:12:24 am
i think djoulz is pointing out my answer....or emphasizing his love of falcon as well with my quote, not sure


but yes i was referring to falcon
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: GOH on October 25, 2013, 10:39:02 am
It looked like Fury was in that hospital bed. He was also in that van Bucky shot.

Looks like Fury's gonna get fuked bad.

And his helicarrier.

Again. D:
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Bea on October 25, 2013, 11:07:17 am
Holy cow, that Captain America trailer. o_o
It is looking fucking epic and action packed! I will have to watch that one at the silver screen.
Title: Re: Marvel Universe discussion (no filthy muties allowed)
Post by: Iced on October 29, 2013, 09:46:54 am
http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/nailbiter111/news/?a=89219
(http://25.media.tumblr.com/e01731976575e79861e93663d768d88c/tumblr_mneh3ettZx1rj540wo1_250.gif)
About Ben kingsley recording a new short for marvel and potential spoilers in it
Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Iced on October 30, 2013, 12:14:24 am
http://www.hitfix.com/whats-alan-watching/review-whats-wrong-with-marvels-agents-of-shield
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Byakko on October 30, 2013, 12:20:00 am
*Opens the link
*Looks at the picture
"Should "Marvel's Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D." be leaning so heavily on Brett Dalton and Chloe Bennet?"
Assuming those are the people in the picture, the tough guy and the rebel girl... The show is leaning on them ? They're the same nobodies as the others. (yeah, reading on, it's right, but it doesn't feel that way when you watch it, which happens to be the point the article is making lol)
By the way, small nitpick, the previous episode and this article both try to say Coulson was stabbed through the heart ? He was still alive a few minutes later talking to Fury.
Agreed on what they're doing with Coulson and what they're trying to do with the other two. Disagreeing on the scope of the series as opposed to the movies and their urgency, I feel SHIELD is exactly supposed to be about the "everyday threat" by minor superpowered people and artifacts that don't draw the attention of the big superheroes, it's just about how SHIELD handles those. They are where the Avengers aren't, so of course there won't be any world-destroying supermenace. And that's also why it's good to see Fury just here to complain about repair bills.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on October 30, 2013, 06:09:14 am
That's a good article and sums up the problems the series is facing pretty nicely.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Joulz on October 30, 2013, 09:58:42 pm
i think it's fine so far: enough humor, decent fx/action & cheesyness...
agreed with what Byakko said: it is supposed to be about the everyday small-scale menaces & i will add that if people are expecting world-ending stuff in each episode, they can stop watching all together, not happening
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: SNT on November 01, 2013, 12:16:57 pm
Saw Thor 2 tonight.  S'not bad.  I'd feared they were going to drop the sort of goofball vibe from the first movie, but it was back in spades so that was good.  Main story itself is alright, despite a few minor issues.

Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: GOH on November 01, 2013, 12:23:51 pm
Dayum. That spoiler. D:

Gonna watch it this Saturday with some friends.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Iced on November 03, 2013, 01:56:21 am
Malekith was great.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Joulz on November 03, 2013, 06:33:11 am
Malekith was great.

perception is incredible: i have read a lot of reviews saying he was flat & not impressive
funny thing is i'd rather trust the judgement of people around here vs fucking critics
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Iced on November 03, 2013, 11:33:20 am
the story didnt exactly call him for being extremely expressively and showing a range of emotions wide as a rainbow.  He was as detailed as he needed to be, believably dangerous and his characterization/costume was great.

only downside of the movie is
Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty
but even that wasnt bad, just a plot constriction. The dark elves equipment was great.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: GOH on November 03, 2013, 08:29:41 pm
I didn't like Malekith that much.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Nero D. on November 06, 2013, 02:43:37 am
Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: MDI on November 06, 2013, 04:04:10 am
Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: QuickFist on November 07, 2013, 03:12:19 am
i loved this episode, intense, interesting, I think the show is picking up now
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: MDI on November 07, 2013, 06:08:50 am
Its hard for me to enjoy this show while I'm keeping up with Arrow simultaneously. That show has introduced the League of Assassins and mentioned Ras Al Ghul. Wheres a mention of AIM or any head villain on Agents of Shield?
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Byakko on November 07, 2013, 10:20:32 am
The guys experimenting with Extremis in that previous episode were definitely AIM, they just didn't say it but they're easily recognized.
This episode seems like they wanted to give their badge of merit to the kids and finally give us interesting characters (also with all three imitations of agent Ward or Wurd or whatever his name is). Hope it sticks.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Iced on November 07, 2013, 12:05:45 pm
The guys experimenting with Extremis in that previous episode were definitely AIM, they just didn't say it but they're easily recognized.
This episode seems like they wanted to give their badge of merit to the kids and finally give us interesting characters (also with all three imitations of agent Ward or Wurd or whatever his name is). Hope it sticks.


supposedly they only manage to start naming names after the seventh episode ( the first seven were done without an approval for fullseason so they couldnt use chars that could be used later )


with that in mind marvel has announced one thing

Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty

Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Person Man on November 07, 2013, 03:50:54 pm
Quote
Disney's Marvel and Netflix Join Forces to Develop Historic Four Series Epic plus a Mini-Series Event Based on Renowned Marvel Characters
Landmark Deal Brings Marvel’s Flawed Heroes of Hell’s Kitchen, led by "Daredevil," to the World’s Leading Internet TV Network in 2015
 
Burbank, Calif. - Nov 7, 2013—The Walt Disney Co. (NYSE: DIS) and Netflix Inc. (NASDAQ: NFLX) today announced an unprecedented deal for Marvel TV to bring multiple original series of live-action adventures of four of Marvel's most popular characters exclusively to the world's leading Internet TV Network beginning in 2015. This pioneering agreement calls for Marvel to develop four serialized programs leading to a mini-series programming event.

Led by a series focused on "Daredevil," followed by "Jessica Jones," "Iron Fist" and "Luke Cage," the epic will unfold over multiple years of original programming, taking Netflix members deep into the gritty world of heroes and villains of Hell's Kitchen, New York.  Netflix has committed to a minimum of four, thirteen episodes series and a culminating Marvel's "The Defenders" mini-series event that reimagines a dream team of self-sacrificing, heroic characters.

Produced by Marvel Television in association with ABC Television Studios, this groundbreaking deal is Marvel’s most ambitious foray yet into live-action TV storytelling.

http://marvel.com/news/story/21476/disneys_marvel_and_netflix_join_forces_to_develop_historic_four_series_epic_plus_a_mini-series_event

Neat.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on November 07, 2013, 04:12:17 pm
:flipout:
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: GOH on November 07, 2013, 06:03:58 pm
AW HELL YES

NOW WE'RE TALKIN
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Joulz on November 08, 2013, 03:01:03 am
jeez all over the keyboard
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: MDI on November 08, 2013, 04:54:11 am
I'd love to see a Daredevil series. As much as I loved Michael Clarke Duncan it would be interesting to see Kingpin played by a big white guy this time. Also, they can utilize the Stick character into his origin which they neglected to do in the film. (Although he did appear in Elektra...but..yeah.)

As long as we get to see Owl, Echo, Typhoid Mary, Bullseye (with a mask?), and The Hand we should be good!
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: GOH on November 08, 2013, 10:50:30 am
(http://i.imgur.com/lyjr84v.jpg)

gib people's champ pls

pls
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Luis Alejandro on November 08, 2013, 11:08:00 am
idris elba would make a perfect luke cage
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Lord Drak-kof on November 08, 2013, 02:28:45 pm
idris elba would make a perfect luke cage
He already plays Heimdall in the MCU...
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Iced on November 08, 2013, 02:53:12 pm
its going to be donald glover.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on November 08, 2013, 04:27:18 pm
http://i.imgur.com/lyjr84v.jpg

gib people's champ pls

pls
That poster looks awful. Also I don't think he'd be a good fit. Chiwetel Ejiofor all the way baby.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: walt on November 08, 2013, 04:34:08 pm
It's not enough that Luke Cage is black, he's supposed to kick ass. The Rock is 20K times more fitting, sorry.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on November 08, 2013, 04:39:09 pm
But Chiwetel Ejiofor can kick ass! [avatar]http://network.mugenguild.com/jmorphman/images/SignAvatar/Kamille.png[/avatar]
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: GOH on November 08, 2013, 05:53:12 pm
Spoiler: FOR JMORPHMAN (click to see content)

PS. The poster doesn't look that bad for a fake.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on November 08, 2013, 05:54:36 pm
Maybe along the way to Smackdown Hotel or whatever I'll discover some acting talent for the Rock to play someone different than the same character he plays in everything!
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: GOH on November 08, 2013, 05:56:47 pm
He can do other roles. Eg: Snitch.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Nero D. on November 08, 2013, 06:27:31 pm
tyrese could do a good luke cage


the rock could too tho, but with his range (read: ethnicity, read: ability to play someone outside of black guys) he could play anyone else in the mcu outside of luke cage



idk man cuz the rock
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Byakko on November 08, 2013, 06:28:33 pm
Maybe along the way to Smackdown Hotel or whatever I'll discover some acting talent for the Rock to play someone different than the same character he plays in everything!
Hey now, he was good in Get Smart. The comedy jock superspy flirting with everyone and their mother, who turns out to be the Big Bad.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: GOH on November 08, 2013, 06:29:59 pm
tyrese could do a good luke cage
Tyrese owns but he needs to get buff as fuck to play Luke Cage.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Nero D. on November 08, 2013, 06:56:56 pm
and that is exactly why the rock could play this role; he has all the tools but it would be too easy I guess idk


also tyrese has always been pretty buff for a mere human but to see him the rock sized buff would be crazy
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Person Man on November 09, 2013, 01:10:27 am
[avatar]http://i42.photobucket.com/albums/e315/Tiger_Stripe/discordlicious.png[/avatar]They should get the guy who played Black Dynamite to do it so they can get back to the character's true roots.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Nero D. on November 09, 2013, 03:43:35 am
michael jai white would be fucking amazing for 70s luke cage but alas, hell no cuz all his lingo would be jive turkey anachronistic slang (if he was 70s luke of course) modern day would be legit tho, no-nonsense legitimate ass-kickin and belt whippin


ps that guy was also al simmons/spawn which is apparently getting a remake by jamie foxx who would also (maybe) be a good candidate for luke
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Person Man on November 09, 2013, 03:58:26 am
[avatar]http://i42.photobucket.com/albums/e315/Tiger_Stripe/discordpopcorn-1.png[/avatar]But '70's Luke Cage is the one I want.  I want a show about the Luke Cage who flew across the entire world and punched his way through Doctor Doom's stronghold for exactly $200.

(http://30.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_l2jxj40ja71qa4q3po1_500.jpg)

This is the show that I want to watch.  It would be glorious.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on November 09, 2013, 04:01:08 am
He can do other roles. Eg: Snitch.
Hey now, he was good in Get Smart. The comedy jock superspy flirting with everyone and their mother, who turns out to be the Big Bad.
Meh. Still not seeing it; I don't think he'd be great in the role. Well, maybe if they were doing super campy 70s-esque Cage, I guess.

But oh yeah Michael Jai White would be great I wish I said him instead, he could pull off either version easy. :yeses:
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: SNT on November 11, 2013, 11:55:34 pm
Casting for Ant-Man. (http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/notyetamovie/news/?a=89887)

Quote
Young girl, aged 6 to 9 – intelligent and appealing

Asian male, 30s – huge, tough and intimidating, comic ability

Caucasian male, 30s – over 6′, dangerous and rough, comedic

Italian-American male, 50s – scary and unusual features, deadpan humour

Russian male – 30s or 40s, wiry and smart, deadpan humour

Male, 20s or 30s – Under 5’8″, smart and funny
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Byakko on November 13, 2013, 11:30:56 pm
So Coulson's got a habit of saying "it's a magical place" whenever someone talks about Tahiti and he actually can't control it. Things are moving on a couple of fronts, we'll see if it reaches a cruise speed.
I was looking something up and it seems an episode in the near future will be tied to the Thor 2 movie, with the team on clean-up duty ? I'm not really planning on seeing it so soon... But it's probably not needed to watch it I guess.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Iced on November 14, 2013, 03:49:10 am
Casting for Ant-Man. (http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/notyetamovie/news/?a=89887)

Quote
Young girl, aged 6 to 9 – intelligent and appealing
ffffuck.
Cassie lang.
Quote
Asian male, 30s – huge, tough and intimidating, comic ability

Caucasian male, 30s – over 6′, dangerous and rough, comedic

Italian-American male, 50s – scary and unusual features, deadpan humour

Russian male – 30s or 40s, wiry and smart, deadpan humour

Male, 20s or 30s – Under 5’8″, smart and funny

this could be anyone, most of those,
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on November 19, 2013, 06:52:12 am
Elizabeth Olsen is officially confirmed to play Scarlet Witch. (http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/notyetamovie/news/?a=89882) She's a great actress and will be great!

Spoiler: Thor 2 spoilers and speculations (click to see content)
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: GOH on November 19, 2013, 12:48:36 pm
Well Kevin Feige specifically said that the Tesseract is the Space Stone/Gem and he confirmed the Aether to be another but he didn't specify which type. He also said a third gem is gonna be featured in the Guardians movie.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Iced on November 19, 2013, 12:48:47 pm
I think it might be important that they called them "stones"


You know what gems are? A polished cut of a stone.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on November 19, 2013, 08:53:21 pm
Well Kevin Feige specifically said that the Tesseract is the Space Stone/Gem and he confirmed the Aether to be another but he didn't specify which type. He also said a third gem is gonna be featured in the Guardians movie.
Oh, he straight up said it was the Space gem? I heard about the rest, but not that. Cool.

I guess I didn't really need to put that in spoilers anyway, it's been 2 weeks and it's a specific thread for Marvel movies
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: MDI on November 27, 2013, 10:08:39 am
Another underwhelming episode of Shield.

Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: GOH on November 27, 2013, 11:08:19 am
rip agents of shit

2013-2013
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Aldo on November 28, 2013, 04:08:12 am
I don´t know, I liked this episode myself.

Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty

Less good than previous episode but still pretty interesting. This show still keeps me interested, good to me.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: QuickFist on November 28, 2013, 04:13:22 am
I liked it too.
Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: MDI on November 28, 2013, 09:26:27 am
Everybody that supports the show seems to have this BUT ITS GETTING SOMEWHERE reasoning, but honestly unless they introduce an actual supervillain and/or hero from the comics in the next episode coming up which is the last episode of the year btw, I just don't know.

Even those who bring up the point that the show is about SHIELD itself. Well, the show fails in that aspect too. So far it just seems to be about a fairly small and mostly inexperienced team which barely makes up SHIELD at all. The Helicarrier hasn't been in a single episode and Nick Fury only made a cameo.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Byakko on November 28, 2013, 09:35:24 pm
Coulson said in his mayday message that they are "SHIELD 6-1-6". Earth-616 ? (well I know the movies have their shared universe which is Earth-199999 but reference fanservice)
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on November 29, 2013, 05:16:24 am
I haven't watched the last two episodes. I just can't bring myself to. It's just so not good and it's depressing me. I was so hyped for this, a goddamn Marvel Cinematic Universe show by fucking Joss Whedon. Or even a goddamn Marvel show by people intimately involved with Whedon shows who were the showrunners of Dollhouse and god everyone is so boring and nothing is interesting and I hate FitzSimmons so much and why is everything so fucking bland and why does it not feel at all like it takes place in a universe with superheroes in it.

I just don't know, should I try watching the last two or just forget about it?
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: MDI on November 29, 2013, 05:55:26 am
You haven't missed much. The ONLY things that I'm interested in at this point is the possibility of AIM revealing themselves or Graviton finally emerging in future episodes.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: GOH on November 29, 2013, 10:25:40 am
I just don't know, should I try watching the last two or just forget about it?
Forget about it and focus on Mugen obviously.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: MDI on November 30, 2013, 06:43:23 am
Forget about it and watch Arrow!
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on November 30, 2013, 09:34:22 am
I refuse to believe that Arrow is a good show despite the amount of people telling me I should watch it.

I mean for fuck's sake he was called the Hood in the first season, no way. I ain't doing it. >:[
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Byakko on November 30, 2013, 11:41:04 am
It didn't know what it was going to do with itself for the first half of the season, and that included the Hood name, but halfway through it started pulling itself together and it's been going slowly up since then. Every now and then it's still dragging a bit of the angst style it started with, but on average, it's above the usual.
That being said, the Hood name isn't illogical, he never introduced himself, no one would call him the arrow, it was a guy in a hood, so it made sense. Season 2 started by saying he should change his name while looking at an arrowhead, but he still hasn't been given any name (but I don't think they're calling him the Hood anymore, they just don't call him).
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jarek Bachanek on December 01, 2013, 03:04:07 am
Jmorphan I told you few episodes ago it was very average show close to bad and you defended it woth bright optymism. I guess I was right.I just wonder what changed your mind.

Arrow is pretty good in second season but currently Person of Interest beats it in every way. I just can't believe what Johnathan Nolan did it with it and it's not even cable show. Sometimes I even wonder if its not better than 24 and everbody that 24 was best action show EVER....
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on December 01, 2013, 03:19:15 am
Jmorphan I told you few episodes ago it was very average show close to bad and you defended it woth bright optymism.
Because that was a very logical way of looking at things; every Whedon show (except Firefly) before this one had rough patches before pulling itself together, so there was every reason to think the same was gonna happen with Agents (and who knows, maybe it still will happen)

I just wonder what changed your mind.
I was gonna give it till episode 6 to impress me, and it didn't. By episode six, Dollhouse had done Man On The Street, Buffy had its premiere, Angel was well it hadn't had any standouts but it had very concrete promise and by episode 9 it had Hero. Agents of SHIELD had the eye episode and the pilot and not much else. And even then the pilot had several issues.

But what really did it was seeing the AV Club give the last two episodes D+'s. It just sapped any and all motivation to watch them. If the show had been better than I wouldn't have stopped just because of the grades, but it's just so uuuuughhhh. Maybe if the  a new episode does very well I'll start up again, but I dunno.

Arrow is pretty good in second season but currently Person of Interest beats it in every way. I just can't believe what Johnathan Nolan did it with it and it's not even cable show. Sometimes I even wonder if its not better than 24 and everbody that 24 was best action show EVER....
I haven't seen it but I'm glad they have Amy Acker on it cause she's the best.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Aldo on December 01, 2013, 03:24:10 am
This show has been pretty good, the 3 latest episodes not so much. My opinion. Worthless 2 cents of mine.

AV Club

Oh, what is this??




Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Person Man on December 01, 2013, 04:08:13 am
[avatar]http://i42.photobucket.com/albums/e315/Tiger_Stripe/discordworried2_zpsafe2dce5.png[/avatar]I've pretty much given up on the show at this point.  I really wanted to like it, because the concept is cool and Coulson was awesome in the movies.  But the more it's gone on the more I realize I can't actually bring myself to care.  All of the characters are really flat and dull and I don't care about any of them or what they're doing.  And despite the whole connection to the movie universe and all of the teasing about bigger things they still haven't really provided any reason to believe that any of it is actually going to go anywhere.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jarek Bachanek on December 01, 2013, 05:42:07 am
Last ep with "nightwing" was really lame. the thing that had me lost my faith in the show was scene with Fitz & Simmons at the end of episode 6 (when Simmons was in danger) when Simmons kissed Fitz in the CHEEK when she thanked him. In the cheek ? Really ? Similar thing happen in last episode with wooden Ward & May.
Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty
I know it's disney and it's supposed to target younger audience but come on... This show is so bad because they can't decide thier target. They should aim for adult audience but since it's ABC I should've know better. Still dissapointment kills me.... I just feel cheated because if I would want some teeny show I would watch Hannah Montana or some cartoons. 

I haven't seen it but I'm glad they have Amy Acker on it cause she's the best.

You bet. She is the best in every scene but what is really amazing, other actors are at the same level. This show is like MUST WATCH for everyone. It's sets bar so high that I'm sometimes can't describe level of awesomesss. I admit it's start as average but it's get better with each episode & each season. Last 3 episodes fucked me up so hard that it took a while to pick up pieces of my jaw from the floor.

Every procedural show like CSI, NCIS and other boring shit should take example from it because this is how it should be done.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Aldo on December 01, 2013, 06:19:41 am
I can NCIS taking some stuff from 24 after reading some reviews of certain episodes (cause I´m curious) but not CSI. NCIS and 24 seems to have some similarities. Humanity is complicated, someone would say "this is how it´s done, yes" others will say "no its not, bullshit". It´s complicated.

Will still see how this shows continues, perhaps it will get better. Perhaps not. We´ll see.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on December 01, 2013, 08:23:56 am
AV Club

Oh, what is this??
my favorite source for everything pop-culture related (http://avclub.com/), even despite the recent redesign and commenting system update

except for movies 'cause their film staff left and made their own site (http://thedissolve.com/) and the new AV Club movie people are not that great

They should aim for adult audience but since it's ABC I should've know better. Still dissapointment kills me.... I just feel cheated because if I would want some teeny show I would watch Hannah Montana or some cartoons. 
Aiming it at adults wouldn't make it any better or complex. Justice League Unlimited is a children's cartoon and yet it's infinitely more complex than Agents. And infinitely better.

I miss the DCAU :(
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: MDI on December 02, 2013, 02:11:13 am
I know we're kinda straying off topic here, but since you mention the DCAU, it did remind me of how Green Arrow was on the show. I very much enjoyed the moments that he basically stated that he fought for the little guy and wasn't some cosmic jumping superhero, and that he was genuinely afraid of the Justice League and the power they possess. I think that would be interesting if the CW's Arrow would be part of the Man of Steel continuity and played a similar role. But alas it probably won't happen.

But as for Shield, I just get this whole saturday morning cartoon feel from it. Instead of being this agency trying to keep super powered beings in check with a lot of build up and ties to the films, they're basically just high tech paranormal investigators with new cases every week. Its as if they're a modern re imagining of an old cartoon.

Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Nero D. on December 11, 2013, 02:07:52 am
oh shit yall watching aos

theyre going off of the supersoldier storyline from the first ep and making agent peterson (the black guy, first supersoldier) suit up


dont sleep on this show

     Posted: December 11, 2013, 02:29:47 am
oh do we have an arc villain in centipede??


oh shit
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: MDI on December 11, 2013, 06:57:58 am
Another lackluster episode.

Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Aldo on December 12, 2013, 04:02:54 am
So... a better episode than previous one, by a good margin. This one got me interested in seeing how things evolve. The episode was a decent set-up.

Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Byakko on December 12, 2013, 11:04:04 am
Uh, nothing shows he's dead.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on December 13, 2013, 05:21:31 pm
Don Cheadle will be in Avengers 2 (http://collider.com/avengers-2-age-of-ultron-don-cheadle/)

Marvel may or may not be positioning him to take over the Iron Man franchise because they're probably only able to get RDJ for Avengers movies.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Quasi-Tick on December 14, 2013, 02:48:35 am
I'd rather not have Cheadle take over the Iron Man franchise. Think it would be better just to let it sit for a couple years, then when RDJ gets to old bring in a new Stark. Either through recasting RDJ, or by bringing in an alternate universe Tony played by a new young actor. That I would be cool with!
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: MDI on December 14, 2013, 09:32:54 am
War Machine/Rhodey hasn't been utilized too well so the more of him the better. As if Iron Man 3 didn't piss me off enough anyways, I was pretty annoyed when none of Tony's armors were compatible with Rhodey in the final scene.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Bastard Wolf on December 14, 2013, 02:46:47 pm
didn't saw this posted here but sony is planning a venom & sinister six spinoff movies

Quote
Sony has revealed its big plans to expand the Spider-Man franchise into a larger movie universe, officially announcing spinoff movies for Venom and The Sinister Six.

Alex Kurtzman, Roberto Orci, Jeff Pinkner, Ed Solomon, and Drew Goddard will collaborate on overseeing the “developing story over several films” says Sony, saying they “have formed a franchise brain trust to expand the universe for the brand and to develop a continuous tone and thread throughout the films,” in conjunction with producers Avi Arad and Matt Tolmach and director Marc Webb (The Amazing Spider-Man, The Amazing Spider-Man 2).

Kurtzman & Orci & Solomon will write Venom, with Kurtzman directing, while Goddard will write and possibly direct Sinister Six.
http://www.ign.com/articles/2013/12/13/the-amazing-spider-man-spinoffs-venom-and-the-sinister-six-announced-by-sony?utm_campaign=fbposts&utm_source=facebook
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: GOH on December 14, 2013, 04:11:06 pm
Oh boy

You gone and done it now
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Speedpreacher on December 14, 2013, 04:35:39 pm
No Muties Allowed is and was the subtitle to the general Marvel thread. This is the Marvel Cinematic Universe thread, covering only Marvel's official movies (and not Sony's Spider-Man flicks, or Fox's X-Men franchise). The general entertainment news thread is where the latter go.

WE MUST KEEP THIS THREAD CLEAN FROM THE TRAITOROUS SONY AND FOX

I'm doing you a favor. His wrath would have been beautiful and terrible.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Bastard Wolf on December 15, 2013, 02:50:14 pm
oh.... my! well.... he'll have to catch me first!

/me ran away from battle...
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Iced on December 19, 2013, 02:26:09 am
http://www.imdb.com/news/ni56561918

Paul Rudd to play Hank Pym in "Honey I shrunk  the scientist".
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Nero D. on December 19, 2013, 02:47:37 am
if he doesnt slap wasp then fuck this movie
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on December 19, 2013, 04:16:51 am
Paul Rudd will do a great job.

oh.... my! well.... he'll have to catch me first!

/me ran away from battle...
Spider-tracer. (http://www.comicvine.com/spider-tracer/4055-55656/)
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: QuickFist on December 19, 2013, 04:00:19 pm
I don't know, I like Paul Rudd, but as Pym... I'm not sure, of course, I'm not a big Hank Pym fan so don't mind me
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Mechy on December 19, 2013, 04:17:19 pm
All I know about ant man is that he can go really big and step on people.

Which means that the movie should be alright.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on December 19, 2013, 04:43:50 pm
All I know about ant man is that he can go really big and step on people.

Which means that the movie should be alright.
It's also being directed by Edgar Wright, so it will be amazing. Nothing else really needs to be said.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Mechy on December 19, 2013, 04:57:39 pm
Im the most hyped for Guardians of the galaxy though, since it's a marvel comic I have actually read a good bit. And it's great.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Titiln on December 20, 2013, 04:08:02 am
http://www.imdb.com/news/ni56561918

Paul Rudd to play Hank Pym in "Honey I shrunk  the scientist".
now pym i can get into
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on December 20, 2013, 04:18:05 am
Apparently people reporting that he'd been cast as Pym were being a bit premature; while he has indeed been cast as the lead, it is unclear as to who the lead is. This movie has been in development for a while (Wright had been attached all the while), and an early version featured Scott Lang, the second Ant-Man, as the lead role (with Hank Pym being an old man, who was Ant-Man in the 60s, and there might've been some flashbacks to that era that were mentioned in the development but I don't remember). So he might be Pym, or Lang; either way he'll be great because he's a good actor and is funny and Edgar Wright is such a fantastic director and I'm really glad Marvel is taking risks like putting people like James Gunn and Edgar Wright in charge of these huge multimillion dollar movies.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Roman55 on December 20, 2013, 05:23:49 am
Pym not being Ant-Man in this movie would be pretty dumb if you ask me.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on December 21, 2013, 11:20:01 pm
(http://i.imgur.com/eh0xMvF.jpg)
I AM GROOT
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: QuickFist on December 21, 2013, 11:23:13 pm
Well that's looks nice (Groot, not Diesel)
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Speedpreacher on December 22, 2013, 01:37:28 am
HARD TO TELL WHO'S THE MORE WOODEN ACTOR, ISN'T IT?

*laugh track*
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Bastard Mami on December 22, 2013, 06:41:43 pm
it looks like vin diesel got a stand.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: QuickFist on December 31, 2013, 06:00:30 pm
Some pics of Winter Soldier
(http://images.fandango.com/r2.6.1//MDCsite/images/featured/201312/cap2new1%60.jpg)
(http://images.fandango.com/r2.6.1//MDCsite/images/featured/201312/capnew4main.jpg)
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Mgbenz on December 31, 2013, 06:05:30 pm
That weird angle makes Evans look like he lost a few pounds.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Byakko on December 31, 2013, 06:11:40 pm
I like that it goes back to the first Captain America movie style of realistic military uniform for Cap's costume, rather than the slightly more comic-ish one from the Avengers movie.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: QuickFist on December 31, 2013, 06:13:39 pm
Yeah, and from the trailer it looks like he uses a costume very similar to the first movie later
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Mechy on January 01, 2014, 12:29:16 am
(http://25.media.tumblr.com/4be7cc29e7728980b40b1143f1cd681a/tumblr_myovplcsbV1sdxw5qo1_r1_1280.jpg)

Quote
"From Marvel, the studio that brought you the global blockbuster franchises of Iron Man, Thor, Captain America and The Avengers, comes a new team–the Guardians of the Galaxy. An action-packed, epic space adventure, Marvel’s Guardians of the Galaxy expands the Marvel Cinematic Universe into the cosmos, where brash adventurer Peter Quill finds himself the object of an unrelenting bounty hunt after stealing a mysterious orb coveted by Ronan, a powerful villain with ambitions that threaten the entire universe. To evade the ever-persistent Ronan, Quill is forced into an uneasy truce with a quartet of disparate misfits–Rocket, a gun-toting raccoon, Groot, a tree-like humanoid, the deadly and enigmatic Gamora and the revenge-driven Drax the Destroyer. But when Peter discovers the true power of the orb and the menace it poses to the cosmos, he must do his best to rally his ragtag rivals for a last, desperate stand - with the galaxy’s fate in the balance. Marvel’s Guardians of the Galaxy is presented by Marvel Studios. The film releases August 1, 2014, and is distributed by Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures."
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: QuickFist on January 01, 2014, 06:45:59 am
Rocket Racoon looks nice!
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on January 02, 2014, 05:00:41 am
OK so

Spoiler: speculation (click to see content)
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: SNT on January 02, 2014, 07:26:51 am
More important matter: Zoe Saldana looks nice in blue AND green.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Aldo on January 02, 2014, 07:39:08 am
Spoiler: speculation (click to see content)

Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty

I´m officialy hyped for this movie. oh yes!
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: walt on January 02, 2014, 04:57:55 pm
The colors of the gems aren't consistent in color-power on the comics or games or movies. Stop trying to guess, and just enjoy the movie when you watch it.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: QuickFist on January 03, 2014, 04:21:20 am
(http://ia.media-imdb.com/images/M/MV5BMTU2NDA2MDYyOF5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTcwNDQzNDA5OQ@@._V1__SX640_SY720_.jpg)
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Aldo on January 03, 2014, 05:17:45 am
The colors of the gems aren't consistent in color-power on the comics or games or movies. Stop trying to guess, and just enjoy the movie when you watch it.

But speculations are fun D: !!
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: walt on January 03, 2014, 04:30:02 pm
OK, LET'S SPECULATE. Based on Marvel's inconsistency to show the games in the Cinematic Universe (they're not actually gems) this is my prediction of what the rest of the gems will be:

(http://i622.photobucket.com/albums/tt305/cci_walt/gems_zps612f423b.jpg)
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Neocide on January 05, 2014, 12:09:08 am
lol oh walt, you are a genius!
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: MDI on January 08, 2014, 12:29:09 am
So, Agents of Shield tonight. They're going to reveal what happened to Coulson!

Hopefully this will save the show.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jarek Bachanek on January 08, 2014, 12:40:15 am
no it won't... it's too late imo.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: MDI on January 08, 2014, 08:53:59 am
Ugh. For fucks sake.
Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty

Also, this is pure speculation but it is fun to think about. I've seen people online say that The Leader/Samuel Sterns is probably the Clairvoyant. As you may remember he was last seen in The Incredible Hulk.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Iced on January 09, 2014, 07:59:30 pm
http://www.newsarama.com/19996-1st-look-kingsleys-mandarin-back-in-all-hail-the-king-one-shot.html


Guess whos back. Back again?
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: MDI on January 10, 2014, 04:52:20 am
Ah yes I've heard of this. If only it ended with him revealing that Trevor was the false persona all along, or the real Mandarin appeared and destroyed him...maybe..? No...but one can dream.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Byakko on January 10, 2014, 10:23:00 am
I don't see a reason for Trevor being destroyed/killed, especially if he's Ben Kingsley. Either he's the false persona or he's going to decide to play his role for real, but that would be lame for a character like the Mandarin (not to mention he needs to actually get his magic).
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Person Man on January 13, 2014, 10:00:27 pm
Michael Douglas cast as Hank Pym in Ant-Man (http://www.nerdist.com/2014/01/michael-douglas-to-play-hank-pym-in-ant-man/).

So I guess Paul Rudd is playing Scott Lang after all.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: QuickFist on January 13, 2014, 10:05:39 pm
So, Catherine Zeta-Jones as Wasp?
I know, bad joke
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Roman55 on January 13, 2014, 10:07:41 pm
Quote
Rudd will be playing Scott Lang, who is a reformed thief who picks up the Ant-Mantle from Hank Pym

Laaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaame
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Bea on January 13, 2014, 10:16:53 pm
Yup... Marvel posted it on their own site: http://marvel.com/news/movies/2014/1/13/21746/michael_douglas_to_star_as_hank_pym_in_marvels_ant-man

Ain't he like... a wee bit old for the part?
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Mechy on January 13, 2014, 10:21:50 pm
Well if he is giving up the mantle for a new Ant-man, he maybe a somewhat older version of Hank Pym.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Nero D. on January 14, 2014, 01:12:07 am
if he doesnt slap wasp then fuck this movie

this absolutely stands now
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on January 14, 2014, 07:12:56 am
I don't know what's with all the negativity over the casting. Michael Douglas is a fantastic actor and the whole "old Pym, young Lang" thing has been rumored as long as the movie itself has. The dynamic here will be something that's never really been done before, outside comics, and I think it'll be great.

Plus, Michael Douglas makes a ton of sense as Pym, remember when he admitted a few years ago that he got throat cancer from HPV, which he caught because he is really into cunnilingus? Well...
Spoiler: NSFW (click to see content)
So yeah, perfect casting!!!

Rumors of an Agent Carter show are starting to heat up, and just today Howard Stark's actor mentioned it is "possibly going to happen" (http://spinoff.comicbookresources.com/2014/01/13/dominic-cooper-wants-in-on-agent-carter/), and he wants in.

Let's just hope it airs on somewhere besides ABC, and isn't a piece of shit.

The colors of the gems aren't consistent in color-power on the comics or games or movies. Stop trying to guess, and just enjoy the movie when you watch it.
Well Kevin Feige specifically said that the Tesseract is the Space Stone/Gem and he confirmed the Aether to be another but he didn't specify which type. He also said a third gem is gonna be featured in the Guardians movie.
We know that, at least! Speculation is fun! >:[

I don't see a reason for Trevor being destroyed/killed, especially if he's Ben Kingsley. Either he's the false persona or he's going to decide to play his role for real, but that would be lame for a character like the Mandarin (not to mention he needs to actually get his magic).
I really think that the most likely thing is Trevor being knocked off by the 10 Rings, with no hint towards a "real" Mandarin. It's very unlikely RDJr. is gonna do anymore Iron Man films. But even if they were to do War Machine movies or something, and wanted Trevor to become the villain as the real Mandarin, they'd have to reintroduce Trevor, establish he has become the Mandarin for real, reestablish the 10 Rings... it's just too much exposition, too much very important stuff to be relegated to a bonus feature, I think. The only other thing I can see happening is them teasing a "true" Mandarin, and Trevor still ends up dead. Or maybe ends up as a toady, I dunno.

But I think it would be best if they stood by the whole decoy Mandarin thing, and didn't try to bring in a "real" version. It was really bold and daring of them to build up the Mandarin and then shatter all expectations by revealing him to be a fake, a convenient evil foreigner who hates us for our freedom, used to justify expanded military spending. It's easily the most trenchant and biting satire of the Iron Man movies, and I think it would really undercut it all to introduce a real, bona-fide Mandarin into the mix.

But I mean, I still kinda want to see a guy with 10 magic rings who can break steel with his fists because he's that good at martial arts! :S
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: MDI on January 15, 2014, 03:09:18 am
Thoughts on tonight's episode?
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Foobs on January 15, 2014, 04:50:37 pm
I thought a Fitz-Simmons centric episode would suck. It was fairly good though, the lab duo weren't anywhere near annoying as they normaly are, and the show's finally adressing Skye's origin. I suppose we'll learn the whole thing in the season's finale. Also

Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: MDI on January 16, 2014, 04:17:42 am
In my opinion, from everything I've seen of this show I think a good episode can be defined as an episode that hints at future episodes having something worth while. So its more like, "Oh hey we might see an actual villain soon!"
Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Nero D. on January 16, 2014, 04:47:10 am
you're looking for an arc

which is what we're all looking for


but what we need, and what jw thinks we need as well, is a little more character development and said building of an arc



kinda like they did with all the marvel movies leading up to the avengers

also

Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty

Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty

Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on January 16, 2014, 09:02:37 am
Baron von Strucker has been cast for Avengers 2 (http://comicsalliance.com/avengers-age-of-ultron-baron-von-strucker-thomas-kretschmann/), and apparently he'll have something to do with Quicksilver and Scarlet Witch

Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: QuickFist on January 17, 2014, 05:45:47 pm
Maybe I'm wrong, but wasen't Magneto their father?
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Neocide on January 17, 2014, 05:47:22 pm
yes, but magneto is owned by Fox, and this is being made by marvel, So....do the math :D
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Mgbenz on January 17, 2014, 05:53:35 pm
They were in the Avengers years before they were recognized as Magneto's children.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: QuickFist on January 17, 2014, 06:20:17 pm
yes, but magneto is owned by Fox, and this is being made by marvel, So....do the math :D

Yeah, the rights stuff
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Neocide on January 17, 2014, 11:16:41 pm
They were in the Avengers years before they were recognized as Magneto's children.

what does that have to do with them being related to him though?
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on January 17, 2014, 11:27:23 pm
Well, the whole "Magneto's children" concept came about around a decade after they were created (and in fact retconned an earlier retcon that they were the children of two Golden Age heroes); it's steadily grown more and more important to their characters but I don't think it's absolutely integral to them. The more important aspect, especially in a "first time they join the Avengers" scenario is that they started as villains. Who they were hanging out with at first isn't that important, I think.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Neocide on January 17, 2014, 11:30:06 pm
No it's not,(to the last part) not in the movie verse that's for sure where all the history is still fresh.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Iced on January 17, 2014, 11:31:40 pm
when they were first introduced they were part of the brotherhood, and even tho they were there with magneto, they werent mentioned as being his kids.

I kinda think thats what they will be going for here, not literally replacing the fenris twins. Just have them be part of the hydra group that will give support to ultron and later on change alliances to help defeat ultron.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: MDI on January 18, 2014, 01:29:21 am
Sif is going to appear on Agents of Shit
http://www.superherohype.com/news/287629-jaimie-alexander-to-guest-star-as-lady-sif-on-marvels-agents-of-s-h-i-e-l-d (http://www.superherohype.com/news/287629-jaimie-alexander-to-guest-star-as-lady-sif-on-marvels-agents-of-s-h-i-e-l-d)
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Nero D. on January 22, 2014, 02:04:40 am
http://screenrant.com/agents-of-shield-season-1-finale-episodes-15-22-problems-solutions/

this may be relevant
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: MDI on January 24, 2014, 07:36:37 am
Holy shit did I call it or what?
http://www.superherohype.com/news/288657-marvels-agents-of-s-h-i-e-l-d-makes-deathlok-plans#/slide/1 (http://www.superherohype.com/news/288657-marvels-agents-of-s-h-i-e-l-d-makes-deathlok-plans#/slide/1)

Unless they randomly decide to turn him into Deathlock I'd say they should have kept him dead
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: spike on January 26, 2014, 04:24:59 am
Looking forward to these last few episodes. Despite some apprehension early on I've still stuck with the series.

I mean, how could you not watch Coulson be Coulson?
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Neocide on January 26, 2014, 08:58:37 pm
by changing the channel and watching something else?
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Speedpreacher on January 26, 2014, 11:47:39 pm
Hey, I'll say this for Agents - it got me to start watching Arrow!
Title: New cap trailer
Post by: Iced on February 03, 2014, 12:25:48 am
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7SlILk2WMTI

New cap trailer.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: MDI on February 03, 2014, 12:42:15 am
Goddamnit I can't wait to see Cap fight Lin Kuei Nathan Spencer.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: QuickFist on February 03, 2014, 01:13:44 am
Dayum! That looks so epic!
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Bea on February 03, 2014, 01:38:49 am
This is looking really good and might end up being the best Marvel film till this date.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Aldo on February 03, 2014, 01:44:27 am
Goddamn, DAT Trailer! So fucking sexy :D I´M SO HYPED.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Neocide on February 03, 2014, 01:50:40 am
wow I can't believe I'm interested in Captain America. This looks wonderful.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: AerosMugen on February 03, 2014, 02:16:01 pm
Holly Molly!
That's insanely awesome!
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: "Bad News" Hoffmann on February 03, 2014, 02:51:44 pm
Since Scott Pilgrim i always see that actor now as Evil EX #2, but that trailer is indeed awesome.

Must-watch movie in the cinema.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Iced on February 03, 2014, 02:56:07 pm
I cant believe we exist on a time where a cap america movie not only exists but it also looks decent and actually interests the major part of the audience without groans about captain america being lame.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on February 03, 2014, 03:08:40 pm
That trailer is fucking great. Only thing better would be if they had "FROM THE DIRECTORS OF THE PAINTBALL EPISODE OF COMMUNITY"

also here is a good write-up about the current state of Agents of SHIELD (http://www.avclub.com/article/marvels-agents-of-shield-at-tca-here-comes-deathlo-107261)

I cant believe we exist on a time where a cap america movie not only exists but it also looks decent and actually interests the major part of the audience without groans about captain america being lame.
Meanwhile at DC... nothing but embarrassment that they're making superhero movies
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Mechy on February 03, 2014, 05:40:29 pm
Looks great.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: drox-dj on February 03, 2014, 05:58:40 pm
cool
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: mvgnes on February 03, 2014, 08:54:32 pm
New Gardians of the Galaxy trailer leaked

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oM_OZHUCU3A
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Iced on February 03, 2014, 09:13:00 pm
Dont lie, thats the comic con spot , uploaded by you on a personal account with a fake title.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: MDI on February 05, 2014, 03:26:18 am
Anybody watch AoS tonight? I JUST missed it but shall watch it soon. Hoping (as usual) that it'll get on the right track soon.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Nero D. on February 05, 2014, 03:40:18 am
i saw it

Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty


and

Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty

personally I'm not giving up on the show cuz joss whedon and it has the potential to be awesome with some decent arcs


if it doesn't tho, oh well
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Aldo on February 05, 2014, 03:42:52 am
I´m still stucked on 10th episode, 11th tomorrow. I don´t like receiving new material each february after december break :( will watch this until the end and see how it gets.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: MDI on February 05, 2014, 03:45:45 am
OH...also, did anyone watch All Hail The King yet? The Trevor Slattery one-shot?

Edit:

Because I just watched it and..
Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: SNT on February 05, 2014, 10:13:53 pm
OH...also, did anyone watch All Hail The King yet? The Trevor Slattery one-shot?
Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Lord Drak-kof on February 05, 2014, 10:18:43 pm
Loved the one shot, especially the "Caged Heat" promo
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Iced on February 05, 2014, 10:19:54 pm
cbs failed me for the last time.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Lord Drak-kof on February 05, 2014, 10:37:42 pm
and thanks to the cbs network I'm pretty good with a handgun
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: AerosMugen on February 05, 2014, 10:43:39 pm
That line made laught a lot.
The best one shot to date.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Person Man on February 05, 2014, 11:03:23 pm
Agent Coulson says:  If you don't like Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D., then you're a loser. (http://comicsalliance.com/clark-gregg-losers-agents-of-shield-steranko/)

Quote
The actor, whose role as Agent Coulston in various films in the Marvel Cinematic Universe has led to him starring in Marvel’s Agents of SHIELD series on ABC, is aware that many critics and fans are frustrated with the show so far, with some stating that they have all but given up on it, while others are forced to watch it for our amusement. Well, if you’re one of the people who has quit on SHIELD., Gregg has a message for you. Speaking with The Salt Lake Tribune on the set of the show, Gregg had the following to say about fans, or Marvel “geeks,” who have given up on the show due to the lack of appearances by more characters from the Marvel Universe: “Those aren’t geeks. Those are losers.”

Given the fact that “geeks” like that are a huge part of why this show even exists, that position does seem ridiculous.

There seems to be a false narrative — one that I honestly find hilarious — that people who dislike the show are only mad because there aren’t more super powered characters, when in reality people are mad because they feel the show is bad and it doesn’t have more super powered characters. If you’re going to make a bad show, at least make a bad show with lots of characters who can fly and break things with their minds.

That is a surprisingly dickish stance to take on the issue.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: mariosforehead on February 05, 2014, 11:16:34 pm
I have a feeling Wolverine would appear in this movie. After watching "The Wolverine" that ending makes me think that the characters would appear in the avengers, not just work for em as the ending describes that something "bad is happening". Gives an insight on the events in the movie. Just a theory though.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Lord Drak-kof on February 05, 2014, 11:22:48 pm
Not happening while FOX has the x-men rights
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Bea on February 05, 2014, 11:33:55 pm
If Marvel somehow gets back the rights for film X-Men, I do hope that they keep Hugh Jackman as Wolverine, Sir Patrick as Professor Xavier and Ian McKellen as Magneto.
They were overall pretty good in their roles. Hugh Jackman also happens to look very, very yummy. >.>
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Byakko on February 05, 2014, 11:46:55 pm
and Ian McKellen as Magneto.
McKellen has his cunning evil plus class act alright, but in the Fox movies he's never pulled enough tyrannical ham that is closer both to the character and to the Marvel movieverse movies. Not enough action, no large and strong movements, it's just not what a Magneto would be in the Marvel movieverse. It works in the Fox movies that are closer to a real world version of the characters, but by comparison to the Marvel movies that don't hold back on the comics feel, Fox!Magneto is just a Bond villain that doesn't do much by himself other than being evil. And cunning. He's just not angry enough. I don't recall much of it but I think Doom was better in that genre in the first FFour movie.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: MDI on February 05, 2014, 11:48:53 pm
If the rights do go back, which is a big IF, it probably wouldn't be for another decade or so. I'm sure the next iteration of X-Men movies would definitely be recasted and rebooted. Until then we get to look forward to Fox's ghetto universe with the X-Men and Fantastic Four. Nothing short of an Onslaught/Franklin Richards related film could make it interesting.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Nero D. on February 05, 2014, 11:56:38 pm

hes right tho

not with the calling people geeks, but with the fact that (some) have 'all but given up on the show' because of the lack of big name cameos and whatnot
its been said, so there's proof (also, the lack of a proper arc, but thats another story for another post)


which happens to be why arrow is thriving so well, the cameo thing is working out for them, (plot and writing notwithstanding) and with the advent of the suicide squad appearance, "geeks" will fucking cream themselves, so yea


almost poetic really; dc cant make a decent movie and are trying too hard too fast to slap together a universe with no real ties and shitty backstory, but can do it awesomely in a tv series an hour a week


avengers did a fucking dope job over the span of quite a few movies (and stingers) putting together a universe properly and are getting chided because their show doesn't have 'enough' cameos (read: fanservice)



they better do something fast whatever the case, calling someone a loser aint gonna do get the job done
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on February 06, 2014, 12:02:36 am
That Mandarin one-shot was great. I wonder if this is all we'll see of Trevor, or if he'll show up at some later point

Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty

Agent Coulson says:  If you don't like Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D., then you're a loser. (http://comicsalliance.com/clark-gregg-losers-agents-of-shield-steranko/)
Huh, that article (and the Salt Lake Tribune it sources) doesn't mention that Gregg basically sort of apologized right after he made that statement. I mean it's still dickish but he backed away from it... I think? Maybe I'm just misremembering from when I read it. :-\

I mean he is being a bit unfair to some people but a lot of people are being that dumb and childish that it isn't cameo-land. I just wish he didn't sound so dickish about it.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: MDI on February 06, 2014, 12:44:11 am
I think what is unfair is people that want authentic Marvel characters on the show is apparently asking too much. People make the comparison to Arrow because they have characters from the comics, and make sure to have them recognizable as well as play a large role in the story, so that it isn't just some dumb cameo.

On AoS we can have a dozen villains and not one of them is someone we know or care about from the comics. On Arrow we have Brother Blood as the main villain, and Deathstroke pulling the strings. And you know what, it works!

I think that if the Clairvoyant is revealed to be say The Leader, or some other well-known villain, then the people complaining will sigh a breath of relief, sit back, and start to enjoy the show.

Essentially, these "cameos" or should I say use of characters that fans actually want to see help give a motivation for watching the show. A reason why we should care about the other 90% of the cast that is just some random interns that if not for the Marvel label we wouldn't give two shits about.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Aldo on February 06, 2014, 04:01:58 am
Just saw 11th episode. Pretty nice stuff, entertaining.

Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty

Looking forward to the next one.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: QuickFist on February 06, 2014, 06:01:51 pm
Just saw 11th episode. Pretty nice stuff, entertaining.

Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty

Looking forward to the next one.

Just saw it too, yeah, pretty fucked up.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jarek Bachanek on February 06, 2014, 11:09:33 pm
I saw 13 episode already and I can tell show finally starting to improve. For the first time I REALLY had alot fun while watching it and for the first time I can't wait for next one.

Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty

This is how show should looked from the start but I guess they needed to find their own pace and I think they finally did it. I mean first 12-13 episodes of Arrow were weak-average at best and it got awesome near season 1 finale and I think it will be the same with AoS. With Whedon shows it's almost always like that.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: MDI on February 06, 2014, 11:33:16 pm
I wouldn't say that the show is "there" just yet, but its on the right path. If Dethlok gets a metallic face piece, something interesting is revealed about Skye's origin and/or we finally find out how Coulson was revived, and we get one solid villain, then it'll be there.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Byakko on February 06, 2014, 11:43:33 pm
and we get one solid villain
That's the only thing I disagree with. In line with the "not all heroes are super" punchline, SHIELD operations are supposed to be more about some company like Cyberwhatever (that time delay grenade thing was wicked cool) and a cell of AIM and so on, certainly not a single big bad, that's for the big superheroes. Centipede is fine in that position, the only problem is we still see nothing moving. In fact, I still have doubt that Deathlok will play any more major role, he's just here to show us that Centipede is a serious threat that keeps pumping out those evil systems. IMO, SHIELD's enemy is Centipede, not Deathlok, Deathlok is just one of their weapon. At most I only expect him to show up here and there for specific events, but not as the real thing they go after, not the villain of the season final. Everyday hero, everyday villain.

What the series need is a better pacing and making us actually care for the various story arcs, not a single big bad. For example, instead of dumping the "Tahiti" and "Skye's parents" thing in our lap once in a while, telling us "care about this for this episode", then forgetting about it before and after, they should have both be a recurrent subject of worry, actually advancing forward each time. Like, the way Coulson realized, at the same time as us, that his "it's a magical place" response was involuntary and automatic, that was good, that was a red thread. But May repeatedly telling Coulson "Skye can never know !" is bad, because it's trying to tell us what to care about, without successfully making us care about it, just stalling.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Roman55 on February 07, 2014, 02:34:45 am
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2553450/Superhero-Paul-Bettany-signs-Marvel-party-British-actor-star-The-Vision-new-Avengers-movie-Age-Ultron.html
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: QuickFist on February 07, 2014, 02:41:33 am
OK, I think this is a perfect casting choice, the voice of Jarvis as Vision, perfect
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Foobs on February 07, 2014, 03:56:57 am
I´m still stucked on 10th episode, 11th tomorrow. I don´t like receiving new material each february after december break :( will watch this until the end and see how it gets.

lol canal sony!

...That being said, I'll watch their reruns just because my cable provider kinda sucks and ABC's reception is less than stellar.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on February 07, 2014, 05:21:23 am
JARVIS is Vision, huh? Interesting.

And more casting news: Evangeline Lilly is rumored to be playing Hank Pym's daughter. (http://www.avclub.com/article/evangeline-lilly-up-for-role-in-antman-that-isnt-a-107559) Maybe she'll eventually become the Wasp, but it'd be pretty weird if she was named Janet, but even if she was, I don't particularly care she's being shifted over to being Lang's love interest. Because dammit, Edgar fucking Wright is making the movie!

With Whedon shows it's almost always like that.
Usually there was at least one episode in the first 6 episodes that proved that the show was worth sticking with (Welcome To The Hellmouth, City Of, every Firefly episode, Man On The Street). I mean, I really want AoS to be good, and hopefully episode 13 will be their Man On The Street. But I'm still gonna wait a bit and see how the next few episodes do before jumping back in.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Nero D. on February 07, 2014, 08:24:29 am
http://comicbook.com/blog/2014/02/06/marvel-netflix-shows-to-exist-in-marvel-cinematic-universe/

hmmm
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: MDI on February 07, 2014, 08:46:38 am
Well...was there ever really any doubt?
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Roman55 on February 07, 2014, 06:24:49 pm
http://www.ign.com/articles/2014/02/07/is-ms-marvel-also-joining-avengers-age-of-ultron?abthid=52f50aa4b6102cca09000014

Ms. Marvel is in Age of Ultron too I guess.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: QuickFist on February 07, 2014, 06:26:41 pm
Now this I'm a worried about, well maybe because I don't really like Ms.Marvel, but the casting is what worries me.
Well, this is Marvel, they'll surely pick someone good
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on February 07, 2014, 06:29:55 pm
What's wrong with Katee Sackhoff?
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: QuickFist on February 07, 2014, 06:31:48 pm
It's just as rumor, if she's cast, great! I totally see her as Ms. Marvel. But it's still a rumor.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: SNT on February 07, 2014, 11:42:51 pm
So I guess this means Guardians of the Galaxy will introduce the Kree?  If those Winter Soldier rumors are true Dr Sofen will have already scored a mention.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Byakko on February 08, 2014, 04:58:15 pm
Tiny bit of info that sounds interesting.
http://www.bleedingcool.com/2014/02/05/disney/
We know from Thor 2 that Agents of SHIELD doesn't mind following through the movies, but we get a confirmation that Winter Soldier will have more impact on the series (which wasn't hard to guess considering Cap is joining SHIELD in it). I don't agree much with the article (which essentially says the ties are superficial and unnecessary), as it should give the superhero background that some people want (just the background is enough), while providing a more concrete, less evasive storyline, something more familiar, and a more thought-out continuity. As long as it helps solidifying the show's own storylines and plays into it, and isn't just eye-candy filler, of course. Apparently they already mentioned the possibility in November, but I dunno, this sounds more positive and in line with what the series needs.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: QuickFist on February 09, 2014, 06:17:53 pm
IIRC Whedon said Avengers wouldn't be a trilogy, it would end with AoU.
If that's true, it doesn't make much sense to me, I think the series should end with Thanos. But if GotG don't fight him. And it should be a trilogy, for Avengers, two movies comes up short. Or maybe that's just me
What do you guys think?
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Foobs on February 09, 2014, 06:47:32 pm
'comes up short' is both literally and idiomatically correct.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Byakko on February 09, 2014, 07:02:37 pm
There's no rule that says big movies like those should be a trilogy. It should be a trilogy only if the guys writing it have enough good plots and ideas to fill 3 movies. Hell, it could even be 6 or 12 movies as long as that still applies (except of course it's hard to keep up that long in a single series). There's no justification for making a trilogy just for the sake of making a trilogy.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on February 09, 2014, 07:06:41 pm
If Avengers 3 isn't happening then I assume they'll handle Thanos in some big-crossover of Avengers and Guardians of the Galaxy movie, as it seems like they've set him up as the ultimate antagonist in this whole series.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: QuickFist on February 09, 2014, 07:09:21 pm
There's no rule that says big movies like those should be a trilogy. It should be a trilogy only if the guys writing it have enough good plots and ideas to fill 3 movies. Hell, it could even be 6 or 12 movies as long as that still applies (except of course it's hard to keep up that long in a single series). There's no justification for making a trilogy just for the sake of making a trilogy.
I know, and it's exactly why I think it should be a trilogy, Avengers has enough material for 3 movies

If Avengers 3 isn't happening then I assume they'll handle Thanos in some big-crossover of Avengers and Guardians of the Galaxy movie, as it seems like they've set him up as the ultimate antagonist in this whole series.
That could work, maybe
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: MDI on February 11, 2014, 03:16:03 am
If Thanos isn't like THE huge villain to beat all villains in the MCU then I will go postal.

Also, this can't come soon enough.
http://www.superherohype.com/news/290773-trailer-for-guardians-of-the-galaxy-rated-and-coming-soon#/slide/1 (http://www.superherohype.com/news/290773-trailer-for-guardians-of-the-galaxy-rated-and-coming-soon#/slide/1)
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Lord Drak-kof on February 14, 2014, 10:12:46 pm
If action figures are anything to base character designs on, then is this what the final designs are?
(http://i.imgur.com/A0ekJqf.jpg)
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Byakko on February 14, 2014, 10:18:04 pm
The exact same image, but with the actual actors, is on the site in the link just above, so yeah, it should be the final design.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: MDI on February 15, 2014, 08:34:47 am
Niggas be dodgin them links dawg
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Iced on February 16, 2014, 03:30:50 am
http://stitchkingdom.tumblr.com/post/76767087788/big-blastin-rocket-raccoon-video-demo

Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Iced on February 17, 2014, 11:33:55 pm
(http://i.imgur.com/PnJ00IY.jpg)

OOga shaka intensifies.

Trailer will be out soon, usatoday has:
Trailer premiering on Jimmy Kimmel Live tomorrow night at 11:35pm EST
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: QuickFist on February 18, 2014, 07:03:04 pm
Man, Chris Pratt looks boss
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Mechy on February 18, 2014, 08:05:56 pm
HERE WE GO

(It's like 15 seconds long)

Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Person Man on February 18, 2014, 08:19:57 pm
A trailer for a trailer?  Is this seriously what the world has come to these days?  Jesus wept.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: MDI on February 18, 2014, 09:50:11 pm
So when the fuck do we get the full trailer
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Mechy on February 18, 2014, 09:53:33 pm
Quote
sure to tune into ABC's Jimmy Kimmel Live on Tuesday, February 18 starting at 11:35 p.m. EST to see the full debut trailer!
Title: Guardians of The Galaxy TRAILER!
Post by: MDI on February 18, 2014, 09:55:53 pm
Oh, I didn't read the time. I thought that mini one was the trailer to be shown on Jimmy Kimmel. Thank God.

Finally.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: GOH on February 19, 2014, 10:07:39 am
I'M HOOKED ON A FEEEEEELIIIIING
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Mechy on February 19, 2014, 10:09:39 am
Ooga chaka ooga ooga
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Iced on February 19, 2014, 05:33:38 pm
this is the most elaborated  prank i ever seen, we are going to go to the premiere and it will be revealed to be something like the wonderwoman movie and the whole promotion of a movie with a talking racoon will have been a ploy.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: walt on February 19, 2014, 05:56:35 pm
:smitten:

I'm a believer.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Iced on February 19, 2014, 09:48:14 pm
for the fan that has everything:
those are the captures of the stats and crime lists.
http://imgur.com/a/3eIwo#0

http://imgur.com/a/ERqCE#0
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Lord Drak-kof on February 19, 2014, 10:35:57 pm
I must say though, Pratt got super ripped... i mean goddamn..
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: MDI on February 20, 2014, 12:01:33 am
Gamora's creepy smile gives me a funny feeling in my nether regions.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Mechy on February 20, 2014, 12:19:23 am
Good things about space.

-Adventure
-Tree's and raccoon's can talk.
-Good music
-pew pew
-Green women
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: MDI on February 20, 2014, 04:01:05 am
Don't forget, Bert Macklin

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NGPtOqgDk34 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NGPtOqgDk34)
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on February 20, 2014, 04:02:03 am
That trailer is seriously great. I can't wait to see Chris Pratt be shirtless and ripped and also Peter Serafinowicz as a space cop!
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Iced on February 20, 2014, 09:05:56 pm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Udzfdl2xuw

IT TALKS

     Posted: February 20, 2014, 09:09:50 pm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rSnaS5BUUE0


IT DOESNT TALK

     Posted: February 20, 2014, 09:20:24 pm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aC-hhxUp1cA

HE MAKES WRESTLING FANS ANGRY

     Posted: February 20, 2014, 10:05:18 pm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dddcpkBJ3R8&l
SHES GREEN AND I DIDNT REALLY THINK THEY WOULD POST ALL OF THOSE TODAY SO I DONT HAVE ANYTHING CLEVER TO SAY

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QoNbIW69yQQ

Hes some shithead.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: GOH on February 20, 2014, 10:14:38 pm
Why does Batista make wrestling fans angry? I loved Batista back in my wrestling-nerd days.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: walt on February 20, 2014, 10:19:28 pm
Dunno, ask the guys up in arms in this thread (http://mugenguild.com/forum/topics/wrestling-62805.0.html).

Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: MDI on February 20, 2014, 11:11:16 pm
Rocket Raccoon looks amazing. I really don't mind his voice either.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on February 22, 2014, 06:21:30 am
I don't think this was posted yet:
(http://i.imgur.com/myBeM0V.jpg)
I love the tag line. :mmhmm:
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Lord Drak-kof on February 22, 2014, 12:06:09 pm
So boss
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Titiln on February 23, 2014, 01:49:39 am
Why does Batista make wrestling fans angry? I loved Batista back in my wrestling-nerd days.
because everybody wanted daniel bryan to win the royal rumble instead of the returning batista. also his promos have been trash. crowd doesn't care much for him at this point
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: GOH on February 24, 2014, 10:28:08 am
I see.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: GOH on February 28, 2014, 05:48:24 pm
Patrick Wilson joins Marvel's Ant-Man movie. Role unknown (http://www.deadline.com/2014/02/patrick-wilson-to-join-marvels-ant-man/)
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: SNT on March 03, 2014, 11:57:15 pm
Good thing they've already filmed everything they need for Age of Ultron.  Oh wait... (http://au.eonline.com/news/506867/scarlett-johansson-pregnant-actress-expecting-first-child-with-fiance-romain-dauriac)
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: QuickFist on March 04, 2014, 12:01:43 am
Then they'll have to shoot all of BW's scenes fast. On the other hand, good for her, it's wonderful
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: MDI on March 05, 2014, 03:04:46 am
AGENTS OF SHIELD (screen caps...)
Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Iced on March 05, 2014, 12:35:29 pm
AGENTS OF SHIELD (screen caps...)
Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty

well that is
Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: QuickFist on March 05, 2014, 06:18:56 pm
Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Iced on March 05, 2014, 06:23:49 pm
well I dont know if
Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty


There is also the chance that it all might be inhuman in nature, but that would be weird because how would you be able to guess THAT?


Wait wait wait... there was a couple named Mckenzie in the show...
Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Byakko on March 05, 2014, 06:25:00 pm
Well, they've been expected since that Iron Man movie that showed a map of I don't remember what, it would be about time to bring them up.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Iced on March 05, 2014, 06:31:37 pm
The ironman movie was specially unnerving because it kept showing off Oracle, and in Marvel lore, Oracle is
Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty

Oracle in the real world is a big computer house, and it was likely JUST a paid publicity stint, but it was just unnerving, it seemed so on the nose.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Bea on March 06, 2014, 10:27:13 pm


Gotta love Black Widow trying to get Cap a date.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: MDI on March 07, 2014, 12:04:41 am
I wonder if that is Peggy Carter talking in the trailer..
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Iced on March 09, 2014, 03:37:32 am
this was a stream of question answering about gotg with Feige, Pratt and Gunn

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EDGc0KAKzXY
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Nero D. on March 12, 2014, 02:08:25 am
Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: QuickFist on March 13, 2014, 03:03:30 am
Ok, just saw the episode with the blue alien, I thought the woman at the end was Enchantress until she said her name.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on March 13, 2014, 06:10:58 am
Joss Whedon directed one of the two post-credit scenes in Winter Soldier (http://www.avclub.com/article/joss-whedon-directed-post-credits-scene-new-captai-202110)

I think we all know what it's going to be teasing.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: QuickFist on March 13, 2014, 07:30:52 am
Oh hell yeah! Man I can't wait to see Ultron's design for the movie
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: GOH on March 13, 2014, 11:36:17 am
Two post-credits scenes?

GONNA NEED SOME MORE POPCORN OVER HERE

P.S. I doubt there's even a glimpse of Ultron, but I'm sure it will be something related.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: QuickFist on March 13, 2014, 04:58:48 pm
I didn't mean on those post-credits scenes, I meant when they reveal his look
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: MDI on March 14, 2014, 01:09:14 am
Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty

Show is getting a bit better
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: QuickFist on March 14, 2014, 05:23:13 am
Show is getting a bit better
Indeed
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Byakko on March 14, 2014, 10:09:36 am
I'm a little conflicted at how they're opposing the initial premise of knowing and trusting they were working for the good guys, and the fact that there's a "traitor" (not necessarily an enemy, but at least someone who was hiding something big). But at least they're just as conflicted about it as I am, so that's nice.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Iced on March 14, 2014, 12:37:42 pm
Sif episode was the first decent episode they ever had.
I kinda feel that they would need her to carry the show for them tho.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Byakko on March 14, 2014, 02:13:57 pm
Even if it was better, it felt very weird to me because it was just a complete departure from the ongoing storyline. I would have seen an episode like that around one third into the series, especially considering it's right up SHIELD's alley, but at this point it feels like it's cutting in the middle just when things start moving.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Iced on March 15, 2014, 02:26:43 am
This is barely related, but I think that anyone that is into the movies would like to know this is just coming out

Black Widow Punisher
Avengers Confidential by Madhouse
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4KVnRR5QIus
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: MDI on March 15, 2014, 04:09:30 am
That anime style looks nice...but I still wish we could see a Bruce Timm Marvel film one day..
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on March 15, 2014, 08:41:38 am
I'm still too scared to start on Agents of SHIELD again.

Kevin Feige explains how magic is gonna work in Doctor Strange (http://badassdigest.com/2014/03/13/kevin-feige-explains-how-magic-will-work-in-doctor-strange/). Key quote "Doctor Strange needs to be a Ditko/Kubrick/Miyazaki/The Matrix mind-trip," which sounds amazing!

He also talked about Marvel's responsibility to be diverse, and thoughts on a possible Captain Marvel (Carol Danvers) movie (http://badassdigest.com/2014/03/14/kevin-feige-on-marvels-responsibility-to-be-diverse-and-a-possible-captain/). It sounds like if they are planning one, it won't be until after 2016, which is too bad.

MORE: Agent Carter TV show is definitely sounding like it's going to be a thing, but probably won't be debuting until after this fall. (http://www.bleedingcool.com/2014/03/13/the-agent-carter-tv-show-will-have-a-very-particular-format-if-the-screenwriters-get-their-way/) The shortened season length and the promise of each season being one year, one story, will hopefully help it avoid some of Agents of SHIELD's problems.

And finally, Sebastian Stan has a 9 picture deal with Marvel. (http://www.bleedingcool.com/2014/03/14/sebastian-stan-has-a-nine-picture-deal-with-marvel/) I think that was the number Samuel L. Jackson signed on for, so expect him to pop up a bunch.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: GOH on March 15, 2014, 04:53:49 pm
Sebastian Stan and Scarlet Johansson interview



They also talked about Cap 3 movie released being around the same time as the Batman Vs. Superman movie
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Byakko on March 15, 2014, 04:57:36 pm
There's already a third Cap movie planned ? What storyline is it going to have ? Bucky as Cap ?
A quick look at a random point in the video, I'm starting to be pretty damn irritated by those actors who say "I don't know anything about the character or even the franchise, I prefer to come in with a clean slate and do my own thing". Fuck off then, dude, don't just apply for the fame of the name.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on March 15, 2014, 05:02:16 pm
Well, sounds like that was how he came in, and has since been educated in the backstory and stuff.

He's a really great actor, I'm sure he'll be great.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Byakko on March 15, 2014, 05:04:30 pm
Yeah, I just meant that for the first time, when he applied for Cap. At least he learned about his character before they moved into Winter Soldier. (and Bucky didn't do much in the first movie except get flung off a train on a mountain anyway :P)
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Joulz on March 16, 2014, 08:05:59 am
rumors have been floating around about Cap dying in Avengers 3 (since Chris Evans contract has 2 more movies, Cap America 3 & Avengers 3), with the news of Winter Soldier's actor having a 9 pictures deal set up..which would imply the Cap dying storyline, implying him taking over the Cap duty.
would be a killer angle, as until now, no heroes have been in real danger.
then again, same goes to Robert Downey jr character: no more movie contract after Avengers 2 so he could be the one dying too.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on March 16, 2014, 08:10:14 am
I can definitely see them doing a Bucky Cap movie. I think Evans wanted to take a break from acting but didn't rule out returning, or so the rumor goes.

(and Bucky didn't do much in the first movie except get flung off a train on a mountain anyway :P)
They just needed to include material the actor is already good at playing, perhaps Bucky can be made into a self-hating, closeted prince?
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Nestor on March 19, 2014, 05:52:17 pm
Some concept art was revealed yesterday for the remaining MCU movies:

Quicksilver and Scarlet Witch, along with some GotG & Ant Man stuff:
http://www.cinemablend.com/new/Avengers-Age-Ultron-Delivers-Concept-Art-Quicksilver-Scarlet-Witch-42148.html

And Iron Man's new armor concept:
Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty
Can't wait to see it in action :D
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: GOH on March 19, 2014, 08:07:55 pm
That Wanda looks dope
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: QuickFist on March 19, 2014, 09:53:32 pm
Wanda and Pietro look good, Ant-Man too
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Nestor on March 20, 2014, 04:53:04 am
Indeed, personally I like the costumes we're getting for the Cinematic Universe. Star-Lord looks cool IMO too, it's the design I like the most from the new concepts.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Joulz on March 23, 2014, 11:42:03 pm
have i really seen Hulkbuster VS Hulk as a concept art? O_O  cannot un-see this pure awesomness
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on March 24, 2014, 10:13:11 pm
Quicksilver and Scarlet Witch set photos:
(http://i.imgur.com/Xo9mKpK.jpg)
(http://i.imgur.com/bIp9zIE.jpg)
They look great.

Also, Patton Oswalt will guest star on Agents of SHIELD. (http://www.avclub.com/article/patton-oswalt-guest-agents-shield-202500)

The last time Patton Oswalt guested on a creatively struggling Joss Whedon show, it signaled a sudden boost in quality and creativity... but then again, that was only the sixth episode of that show, and the series hadn't set in firmly about what it was going to do, and it already had a dynamic and interesting cast.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Iced on March 24, 2014, 10:18:38 pm
SET IMAGES

so if you dont want to get spoiled dont click em

Quicksilver
Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty

Scarlet Witch
Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty

Ultron
Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: QuickFist on March 24, 2014, 10:24:35 pm
They look great indeed, Liz Olsen looks a lot better than I imagined, but I'm not sure about Pietro's hairdo.
I saw the news about Patton Oswalt in Marvel's site, looking forward to it
EDIT: Wow, ok, I don't know what to say about Ultron
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Mechy on March 24, 2014, 10:36:49 pm
Even adamantium body suffers from the perils of a chilly early spring.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on March 25, 2014, 12:18:35 am
That's not what he'll look like in the final film; it's a stand-in for the other actors to interact with. He'll be CGI'd out in post.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: QuickFist on March 25, 2014, 12:19:46 am
I know, I meant the head, it looks...meh
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: GOH on March 25, 2014, 12:22:42 am
Ultron looks perfect. I agree about Quicksilver's hair, it kinda looks like a lousy wig I hope it'll be better in the final result.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Person Man on March 25, 2014, 12:25:13 am
[avatar]http://i42.photobucket.com/albums/e315/Tiger_Stripe/discord3d_zpsf8735111.png[/avatar]Ultron's probably going to be a mix of practical and CG effects in the final cut.  That picture is most likely the bare minimum of costume they needed for whatever shot they were filming.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: QuickFist on March 25, 2014, 12:28:21 am
Ultron looks perfect. I agree about Quicksilver's hair, it kinda looks like a lousy wig I hope it'll be better in the final result.
IDK, but I'd like a little more resemblance to his comic look, but it looks good nevertheless

Ultron's probably going to be a mix of practical and CG effects in the final cut.  That picture is most likely the bare minimum of costume they needed for whatever shot they were filming.
Yeah, but man I just can't wait to hear his voice, with Spader's cynical tone...
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Byakko on March 25, 2014, 12:59:00 am
Ultron looks perfect. I agree about Quicksilver's hair, it kinda looks like a lousy wig I hope it'll be better in the final result.
IDK, but I'd like a little more resemblance to his comic look, but it looks good nevertheless
Ambiguous quote so I'm not sure if you mean Ultron or Quicksilver, but Ultron's comic-perfect helmet was seen in that Comicon teaser last year, the one where Iron Man's helmet is hammered into Ultron's.
Quicksilver looks fine to me for a second rate character.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on March 25, 2014, 01:02:37 am
Quicksilver looks fine to me for a second rate character.
Hey man, just because he's not a mutant in this movie doesn't mean that comment isn't mutant-bashing. That's hate speech, bro.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: QuickFist on March 25, 2014, 02:05:05 am
Yeah I meant Ultron, but the head seen there isn't the same as the teaser's
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: MDI on March 25, 2014, 02:39:00 am
So did anyone see an early screening of Winter Soldier and have some fun spoilers for us?
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: QuickFist on March 25, 2014, 02:41:30 am
I'll watch it in 4 days, I don't want spoilers
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Byakko on March 25, 2014, 10:00:51 am
Yeah I meant Ultron, but the head seen there isn't the same as the teaser's
The chest armor doesn't look right but it's pretty easy to guess why - either it's an early version of the prop, or it's just because Ultron is in the middle of evolving, or they're gonna CG the shit out of this. We know at least the face is different, so those are the only three logical options.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Iced on March 25, 2014, 10:19:26 am
ultron teaser head ( and comic design ) has a huge gaping maw.  I dont think its realistically possible to convey it on a  wearable faceprop with the depth of that hole.

Usually with those things the stand in for cg works so that they have the basic parameters of width and shoulders and etc so they can size the characters later on.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: AerosMugen on March 25, 2014, 03:03:26 pm
They put that kind of prop, Ultron I mean, for references when the cgi is implemented, the same way they put balls or heads to get shadow references they put that armor/stuff there to see how things reflect in that place.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Roman55 on March 26, 2014, 03:04:47 am
Close up of Ultron head

(http://i.imgur.com/gyLWri9.jpg)
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: GOH on March 26, 2014, 08:43:34 pm
http://www.avclub.com/article/house-cards-corey-stoll-joins-colony-ant-man-202613

Quote
Attracted by the ice cream bowl Edgar Wright didn’t rinse before carelessly leaving out overnight, Corey Stoll has joined the long line of Ant-Men marching toward the Marvel project, combining their super-strength in a way that can vanquish even the most formidable of crumbs. Stoll—best known for his role on House Of Cards, where he played Kevin Spacey’s doomed, manipulated Plant-Man—joins an ensemble that already includes Paul Rudd and Michael Douglas as Ant-Man, Patrick Wilson as Ant-Man, Michael Pena as Ant-Man, and Evangeline Lilly as Aunt Man, with Stoll taking on what we—as always—can only presume is the role of Ant-Man. That is, until Wright finally reveals more details about the film, which remain scant, man.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: GOH on March 28, 2014, 12:21:12 pm


Another video of Age of Ultron set filming in Italy featuring Elizabeth Olsen, Aaron Taylor-Johnson and Jeremy Renner.

Also we can see the Ultron mask at 5:26 when the actor lifts it up in the air.

Must be cold as fuck there.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: QuickFist on March 28, 2014, 03:14:38 pm
Taylor-Johnson got really buffed for this one, well, he was already buffed in Kick Ass 2.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: walt on March 28, 2014, 05:15:51 pm
It's ironic how he starred in a movie about a Superhero Wannabe, and how in time that got him to the biggest Superhero Movie yet :nice:
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: GOH on March 28, 2014, 08:31:21 pm
More pix

(http://i.imgur.com/fTTfoQz.jpg)

(http://i.imgur.com/hUiV7oq.jpg)
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: QuickFist on March 28, 2014, 08:35:12 pm
I like Haweye's coat
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: walt on March 28, 2014, 09:47:59 pm
I don't ... it doesn't make sense. Is it like a "tactical coat" of some sort, or why all the unnecessary creases, folds, textures and details?
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: MDI on March 28, 2014, 10:02:37 pm
It's ironic how he starred in a movie about a Superhero Wannabe, and how in time that got him to the biggest Superhero Movie yet :nice:

Already mentioned in the past but its also funny how the actor who played his buddy in the first Kick-Ass is playing Quicksilver in X-Men. Although different actor in Kick-Ass 2, its funny how his friend ends up trying to be a superhero too only to end up being a shitty lame ripoff of Kick-Ass (Ass Kicker). The irony just keeps building up.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: walt on March 28, 2014, 10:31:17 pm
Quicksilver in X-Men.
Poor guy :disappointed:



Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Nero D. on March 28, 2014, 11:00:30 pm
I don't ... it doesn't make sense. Is it like a "tactical coat" of some sort, or why all the unnecessary creases, folds, textures and details?

looks like a new52 coat


a few more unnecessary lines and some more unnecessary fucking piping and he can be an injustice char

seriously tho i think it's a tactical coat of some sort, or just somethin they thought looked cool
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: QuickFist on March 29, 2014, 12:28:33 am
I think it's just a traveling coat or something like that, I don't think (hope) he uses it in combat
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: walt on March 29, 2014, 01:03:31 am
a few more unnecessary lines and some more unnecessary fucking piping and he can be an injustice char
You nailed it. It's a trademark Netherrealm overdesigned hot mess.

Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Iced on March 29, 2014, 02:07:10 am
Back from the Captain america screening

spoilers in order of importance
Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty

Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty

Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty


Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty

Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty

Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty

I give it 2,50.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Titiln on March 29, 2014, 02:14:58 am
2.5 out of what
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Iced on March 29, 2014, 02:17:09 am
out of DC IS NEVER TOPPING MARVEL

Also, based
Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty
that fight was godly.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: "Bad News" Hoffmann on March 29, 2014, 02:20:54 am
Mmmmm can't wait to watch it.

This will be sooo great.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: GOH on March 29, 2014, 02:00:23 pm
I'M GONNA WATCH IT TODAY :D

Also I doubt Hawkeye will use that coat a lot in the movie, he was recording some combat scenes without it.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Foobs on March 30, 2014, 12:27:31 am
Just came back from the movie theater. Holy shit, Winter Soldier was so intense. So many pretty things blown to the ground, so much foreshadowing, so many (actually useful!) support characters, so much product placement.

A satisfied customer here.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Bea on March 30, 2014, 01:16:59 am
We ain't getting it till the 11th here. T_T
And I will only get to watch it on the 13th.

This film sounds and looks so awesome so far. I am to see it badly.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: QuickFist on March 30, 2014, 01:19:11 am
It's already here, I'm waiting for a friend to see it
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: MDI on March 30, 2014, 10:29:53 am
Freedom Prevails! Glad to hear more positive stuff regarding the film.

Oh yeah, Agents of Shield is introducing Blackout....
http://www.superherohype.com/news/296885-marvel-comics-villain-blackout-to-menace-agents-of-s-h-i-e-l-d (http://www.superherohype.com/news/296885-marvel-comics-villain-blackout-to-menace-agents-of-s-h-i-e-l-d)
But it isn't the interesting one..
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: GOH on March 30, 2014, 01:32:36 pm
Watched the Winter Soldier yesterday.

Holy. Fucking. Shit.

What an awesome movie. Everything Iced said, specially

Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty

and
Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: GOH on March 30, 2014, 05:39:17 pm


Another Avengers 2 scene shooting in South Korea featuring Captain America chasing a truck

The truck obviously has no chance
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: QuickFist on March 30, 2014, 06:36:59 pm
Seems like Cap has a new suit for AoU
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Byakko on March 30, 2014, 09:45:50 pm
Beside everything that's been said about Cap 2, I would like to add two things :
- 3D is completely useless
- this movie is a better Agents of SHIELD series than Agents of SHIELD. I mean, obviously they couldn't have done that in the series, the HYDRA infiltration and all, had to keep the plot for this movie, but come on, they could at least have used the series to bring HYDRA to the front, have some tiny hints of some random agents involved in something vaguely like that, a mere mention of the name, especially if they were going to do something so massive between SHIELD and HYDRA here. But for the series, it's just like there's absolutely nothing. Asgardian goddess visiting is the best they can do, everything else is perfectly normal.
(man, Coulson is not gonna get an answer from Fury anytime soon)
Other than that, yeah, cool and pretty good playing with today's politics adding some HYDRA in it.

Oh, and I would *not* like to be a civilian driving a car and get caught in the middle of this. That civilian body count, man (of course without a drop of blood), and Hill going all "there will be countless innocent victims" or something like that, girl there already IS countless innocent victims.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Iced on March 30, 2014, 11:18:49 pm
Stillwell ( Justin Hammer) wants to be part of the agents of shield tv show.


Who's ready for Agents of Hammer?
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: QuickFist on March 30, 2014, 11:32:10 pm
Sam Rockwell? We already know him as Hammer, he wouldn't fit there
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Iced on March 30, 2014, 11:36:01 pm
Oops, yes Rockwell.


And after the movie, he has every reason to fit, this was a plot btw also used on the comics, Hammer replaced shield, in the comics the technological genius used to lead Hammer was Osborn, here they might use Justin.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: QuickFist on March 30, 2014, 11:39:36 pm
OH! I got it all wrong, I thought he wanted to be an agent or something like that.
Yeah, that might work
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: AerosMugen on March 31, 2014, 01:51:59 am
Just coming here to say the movie is awesome, I actually think it is on par with the first Ironman.
I never thought I would say that about a Cap movie, great work marvel.

I went with a couple of friends who don't know that much about the comics or even the movies, they were clueless about who Bucky was, I actually blame that to the first Cap movie since it could have worked a bit more on the Cap-Bucky friendship.

Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: MDI on March 31, 2014, 02:12:18 am
Stillwell ( Justin Hammer) wants to be part of the agents of shield tv show.


Who's ready for Agents of Hammer?

That would be awesome!
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: QuickFist on March 31, 2014, 07:55:47 pm
Ok, gonna watch The Winter Soldier today, can't wait!
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: walt on March 31, 2014, 08:08:25 pm
Beside everything that's been said about Cap 2, I would like to add two things :
- 3D is completely useless
4DX as well :S

Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on March 31, 2014, 08:39:57 pm
Alright you dumb, unpatriotic jerks, going around trying to spoil AN AMERICAN MOVIE that hasn't even COME OUT IN AMERICA YET; time to take a break from all that because I got some news.

Amy Acker is gonna be on Agents of SHIELD!!!! (http://www.avclub.com/article/amy-acker-gets-her-inevitable-guest-spot-marvels-a-202719) She'll play the cellist Coulson was dating in The Avengers, and is being menaced by a super-powered threat from her past. I'm pretty excited and might even watch this episode because Acker is an absolutely phenomenal actress (and has made frequent appearances in Whedon projects, like Angel, Dollhouse, Cabin in the Woods, and Much Ado About Nothing).

Now, what would be perfect is if Deathlok randomly showed up in one of her scenes so we could get an Angel reuinon!

And some very sad news, some news that will make you cry out for the missed opportunity: Lindsay Lohan claims she was almost in The Avengers, (http://www.avclub.com/article/lindsay-lohan-says-she-was-almost-avengers-202865) though the specific role was unspecified. Most people are thinking Maria Hill. Boy, wouldn't it be so much better if Maria Hill was played by acclaimed thespian present day Lindsay Lohan?
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: QuickFist on April 01, 2014, 05:10:20 am
OK, just came back from the cinema, HOLY COW!!!
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Foobs on April 01, 2014, 05:43:44 am
Lol Guatemala and a bunch of insignificant overseas markets getting Winter Soldier one week before America. What the hell Marvel/Disney?
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Byakko on April 01, 2014, 10:16:14 am
It combats piracy, man.
Title: Captain America 3 Plot Might Borrow from “1950s Psychotic Cap” Storyline
Post by: GOH on April 01, 2014, 12:37:40 pm
Captain America 3 Plot Might Borrow from “1950s Psychotic Cap” Storyline (http://collider.com/captain-america-3-plot-william-burnside/)

Quote
Marvel’s much-anticipated Captain America: The Winter Soldier opens in just about two weeks, but there has already been some news about that film’s eventual follow-up. Recently, it was revealed that Captain America 3 would be opening on May 6, 2016 (the same day as WB’s Man of Steel sequel). We know that Joe and Anthony Russo will return for the third film, and that they’re currently breaking the story with returning screenwriters Christopher Markus and Stephen McFeely. While promoting the upcoming film, the screenwriters may have let slip the comics source for the framework of the plot of the next installment. Hit the jump to get a little crazy.

In an interview with Den of Geek (via BC), Markus and McFeely grudgingly shared this little plot nugget for Captain America 3:

Are you going back to the comics for the next one and plan to adapt another story, while incorporating the many threads left open at the end of this one?

McFeely: Oh yeah, you can probably predict some of the threads we would like to pick up again that we’ve laid out there. And we always go back to the comics and dive back in and look at anything we’ve missed in the last few years that might be relevant.

Markus: We’ve definitely set out on a more realistic road in the Cap movies, you know. Even more grounded than in the other MCU movies. And so it kind of rules out Cap fighting the Dinosaur Man or something like that. There are some that aren’t gonna start and other ones that — I mean there’s a couple we’re playing with right now that we really want to take elements from. Which we’ll not reveal.

Oh, come on.

Markus: All I’m saying is psychotic 1950s Cap.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: adbot5 on April 01, 2014, 03:27:06 pm
Become a movie celebrity with your amazing combo skills! Twitch tv awaits your feats! Shoryuken your life! (http://www.twitch.tv)
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jarek Bachanek on April 01, 2014, 07:38:41 pm
Amy Acker is gonna be on Agents of SHIELD!!!! (http://www.avclub.com/article/amy-acker-gets-her-inevitable-guest-spot-marvels-a-202719) She'll play the cellist Coulson was dating in The Avengers, and is being menaced by a super-powered threat from her past. I'm pretty excited and might even watch this episode because Acker is an absolutely phenomenal actress (and has made frequent appearances in Whedon projects, like Angel, Dollhouse, Cabin in the Woods, and Much Ado About Nothing).

Now, what would be perfect is if Deathlok randomly showed up in one of her scenes so we could get an Angel reuinon!

Haha you are so late Jmorphman, this news been around for like 3 days now. I'm excited too. You should pick up show again because it's much better than it was before, trust me on that. You remember my earlier posts about how much this show suck ? You can forget all of that cuz I see improvement. I'm only worried her casting can mean that she will be dropped out/reduced from Person of Interest. I will be crying from rage if that happens.  :-\

And seriously pick up Person of Interest already! You keep saying how awesome Amy Acker is and you are missing her best role. I mean I love her character there way more than I loved Illirya and that's saying alot. This show is seriously reinventing procedurals and it way better than anything you can see on regular channels like ABC, CBS, FOX, or NBC. Just check the rates of the show man..... It's so good I can;t even express. Nolan brand should convince you before so what are you waiting for ?

Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: MDI on April 02, 2014, 04:19:24 am
Tonight's episode was pretty good.

Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: SNT on April 03, 2014, 09:49:07 am
Going to see it tomorrow.  From what I've heard, though, god damn this is gonna be good.

Alright you dumb, unpatriotic jerks, going around trying to spoil AN AMERICAN MOVIE that hasn't even COME OUT IN AMERICA YET;
Cry more Amerifat.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: GOH on April 04, 2014, 10:42:25 am
Some pics of The Cap in Avengers AOU

Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty

     Posted: April 04, 2014, 03:18:24 pm
http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/nailbiter111/news/?a=97467

Some pics / videos of Cap's and Widow's stunt doubles shooting some scenes.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Iced on April 04, 2014, 03:38:01 pm
Quote

    Gunn freezes a frame of an imposing-looking villain any serious comic book fan would recognize instantly. He sits on a rocket-powered throne. Feige sees something on the screen that he doesn't like. The evildoer needs to be farther away in the frame so he looks more imperious, he says.

    "I don't know," says Gunn. "I think it's going to look cool, man."

    "You just don't want him to feel petty in that way," Feige says. "I think it's a fine line."

    "How do you think it comes off as petty here?" Gunn says.

    "He's so damn close," Feige says.

    "Yeah," concedes Gunn. "I think I'm going to have him floating in space."

    Feige is concerned about the throne, too. He points at the base. "Those don't need to be rockets," he says. "Maybe gravity disks?" Feige says he'll check back later.

    In the hallway he extracts a pledge not to name the bad guy. "That could not be a bigger spoiler," Feige says.
http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2014-04-03/kevin-feige-marvels-superhero-at-running-movie-franchises#p2

Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Joulz on April 05, 2014, 02:29:31 am
 >:)

and holy fuck that new Cap movie: already know i'm going to go see it multiple times
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: GOH on April 05, 2014, 09:25:06 pm
http://www.craveonline.com/film/interviews/670837-kevin-feige-interview-captain-america-the-avengers-2-and-dr-strange

An interview with Kevin Feige regarding Cap 2, Doctor Strange and some of the other characters like Hawkeye, The Hulk etc

SPOILERS INSIDE
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Just No Point on April 06, 2014, 12:27:36 am
Going to watch Cap 2 tomorrow night. I have so many spoiler to go back and read!!!
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: SlySuavity on April 06, 2014, 03:39:39 am
Finally got to see it, myself. It really was a great movie. Not only did it deliver on twists and the action, but it had those tender moments as well.

If you're familiar with the first Captain America,
Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty
All in all this was a fantastic film.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: K.O.D on April 06, 2014, 07:16:45 am
watched cap'n america yesterday, it was amazing. the winter soldier is one of the best marvel villains, when he appeared and the music started playing you knew shit was about to get real

Alright you dumb, unpatriotic jerks, going around trying to spoil AN AMERICAN MOVIE that hasn't even COME OUT IN AMERICA YET; time to take a break from all that because I got some news.

Amy Acker is gonna be on Agents of SHIELD!!!! (http://www.avclub.com/article/amy-acker-gets-her-inevitable-guest-spot-marvels-a-202719) She'll play the cellist Coulson was dating in The Avengers, and is being menaced by a super-powered threat from her past. I'm pretty excited and might even watch this episode because Acker is an absolutely phenomenal actress (and has made frequent appearances in Whedon projects, like Angel, Dollhouse, Cabin in the Woods, and Much Ado About Nothing).

lol @ missing her best performance in person of interest. some fan you are!
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Person Man on April 06, 2014, 01:42:55 pm
[avatar]http://i42.photobucket.com/albums/e315/Tiger_Stripe/discordpopcorn-1.png[/avatar]So yeah, Cap 2 was freaking rad, especially

Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty

Though honestly the Winter Soldier didn't feature into the plot as heavily as I thought he would have, what with the movie being named after him and everything.

Spoiler: Dat big giant plot twist (click to see content)
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Byakko on April 06, 2014, 01:46:46 pm
I don't think it really was most of it, probably people in high places and a decent portion of everyone, but more something like 50/50 of the actual headcount with the little people, maybe 65/35 at most. I think everyone in Agents of SHIELD (and the upcoming Agent 13) are a good representation of where the actual people stand. The structure has a giant issue, sure, but the right people should still be around.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Speedpreacher on April 06, 2014, 06:37:28 pm
But Agent 13

Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty

and Maria Hill

Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty

and Nick Fury

Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty

suggests to me that SHIELD
Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: GOH on April 06, 2014, 06:44:06 pm


Don Cheadle almost dies
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Byakko on April 06, 2014, 07:54:06 pm
Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on April 06, 2014, 10:58:44 pm
Spoiler: reactions (click to see content)

Oh, and I would *not* like to be a civilian driving a car and get caught in the middle of this. That civilian body count, man (of course without a drop of blood), and Hill going all "there will be countless innocent victims" or something like that, girl there already IS countless innocent victims.
Didn't seem like there was a lot of actual casualties; they kept showing people actually escaping and had stuff like Black Widow helping people evacuate during that highway fight scene. And when cars and buses were destroyed they were usually empty (specifically I'm thinking of that overturned bus that was being shot up; everyone but Cap was shown to have evacuated.

Stillwell ( Justin Hammer) wants to be part of the agents of shield tv show.


Who's ready for Agents of Hammer?
Huuuuuuuuuuuh? That kinda seems like a step down for Sam Rockwell. I mean I know TV has lost a lot of that "TV is an inferior medium for idiots" vibe has gone on for pretty much its entire history, and I know Rockwell isn't an A-list actor or anything, but still... he's been in a lot of high-profile and/or high-prestige stuff, it really does seem like a step down for him to star on a broadcast show.

But hey, seems pretty clear he loves playing Hammer, and more power to him. He's pretty fucking great!

Haha you are so late Jmorphman, this news been around for like 3 days now. I'm excited too. You should pick up show again because it's much better than it was before, trust me on that.
I just got burned so badly, after being so excited (Whedon show set in the MCU!). I'm probably gonna wait till the season ends and try sampling a few episodes, I guess.

I'm only worried her casting can mean that she will be dropped out/reduced from Person of Interest. I will be crying from rage if that happens.  :-\
Seems like it's just for a single episode; unless, I dunno, maybe her body and soul is consumed and possessed by an Old One and joins the Agents as the Old One struggles to adapt to the present day and struggles with the cellist's feelings and memories influencing it?

Cause that would be cool.

I had thought MODOK personally (rocket-powered throne) but then again it says space so who knows.

And seriously pick up Person of Interest already! You keep saying how awesome Amy Acker is and you are missing her best role. I mean I love her character there way more than I loved Illirya and that's saying alot.
lol @ missing her best performance in person of interest. some fan you are!
Hey guys, I was just listing the stuff she's done with Whedon, never said anything about not watching Person of Interest, calm down! Stop yelling at me!

... but that said I actually haven't watched it and I know I should (Michael Emerson AND Amy Acker in one show!) but there's so much good TV on today it's hard to find the time!!!

but yeah I'm having trouble imagining how her role as Illyria could be outdone >:[
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Byakko on April 06, 2014, 11:05:27 pm
Quote
And when cars and buses were destroyed they were usually empty (specifically I'm thinking of that overturned bus that was being shot up; everyone but Cap was shown to have evacuated.
You see that it was being evacuated when Cap was stuck at its end and the guy started shooting along the entire length of the bus. From what I saw, there should still have been some people inside at that time. And a lot of cars went flying and got overturned and crushed while still driving. Some people escaped after a bunch of cars crashed, but that can't have been everyone.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on April 06, 2014, 11:21:15 pm
Eh, it sure looked like they all got away to me.

I think the big difference between Cap 2 (or an even better comparison, Avengers), and say, Man of Steel, at least in terms of collateral damage, is that the heroes actually seem concerned with the damage being caused and they try to help people, and there's not an overbearing feeling of "oh boy everything's so sad and serious and please please take Superman serious see look he's brooding". It's all in the attitude, and the Marvel movies got it and DC don't.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Byakko on April 06, 2014, 11:29:02 pm
Yeah, that much is true. They were physically helping people out whenever they could even when they were being shot at.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Iced on April 06, 2014, 11:37:50 pm
I cant take a super strong alien with lots of powers and a red cape seriously unless he is brooding and angry to be relatable.


(http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-ryrZLxfXgkc/UnXFy4ksLEI/AAAAAAAACSI/lAk82yIGUXg/s1600/Thor2+Thor+Korg.jpg)

Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Foobs on April 06, 2014, 11:51:45 pm
I personally wasn't fond of the Captain-Winter Soldier relationship

Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Bea on April 07, 2014, 12:28:11 am
I can't wait for the 13th so I can finally watch The Winter Soldier.
Everyone keeps saying it is great, and from the trailers, it is indeed great.

Also, they seem to really be pushing towards a solo Black Widow film... which makes me happy... and very sad at the same time.
Black Widow is likely to lead her own film before Wonder Woman herself. This is wrong.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Byakko on April 07, 2014, 12:57:51 am
Widow's personal developments have happened through the team movies, I don't think a solo movie would happen for her, but after what happens in Cap 2 we're definitely getting more in the next team movies, at least I'm pretty sure that's what they said in some interview. I think Age of Ultron is supposed to bring that up (and it has been described as being more about the individuals, more personal, so there's definitely space for some of that).

edit - especially if AoU is about everyone wondering if they're not fucking up big time with what they're doing (Stark's going to build Ultron, Cap and what happened in this movie, Widow and her past...) it can easily work with how they described the movie.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: QuickFist on April 07, 2014, 01:01:36 am
I think Widow would have a movie but not alone, it could be with Hawkeye or something.
But I don't think she has enough in the MCU to have her own solo movie.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Just No Point on April 07, 2014, 06:06:22 am
Wow. This movie was PG 13? So many people died! Mostly agents!
Yeah, I think Cap 2 is my favorite so far. Quite a feat considering how much you guys hyped it up. I thought for sure I'd be overhyped and it wouldn't be able to reach my overblown expectations. Loved it!
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on April 07, 2014, 06:36:14 am
Team up Black Widow and Hawkeye (with Widow having more attention), maybe delve into her past. Call it Black Widow: Red Ledger or something. It'd be great!

Also, they seem to really be pushing towards a solo Black Widow film... which makes me happy... and very sad at the same time.
Black Widow is likely to lead her own film before Wonder Woman herself. This is wrong.
Well, think of it like this: would you rather have a Black Widow before a Wonder Woman movie made by the people currently in charge of DC's movies?

... God, even just thinking of what it would be like is horribly depressing
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Cazaki on April 07, 2014, 07:13:40 am
Not really an avid movie watcher but I managed to watch and love this movie. It's the 2nd best movie in the universe so far IMO but only because I thought the second half of IM1 was weak.

So far I've seen all the IMs, Avengers and this. Skipped the Thor movies, Hulk and Cap 1. Do I need to see any of those? I'm not THAT much of a fan of Thor as a character and I've heard that Hulk was lame.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Speedpreacher on April 07, 2014, 07:21:44 am
So far I've seen all the IMs, Avengers and this. Skipped the Thor movies, Hulk and Cap 1. Do I need to see any of those? I'm not THAT much of a fan of Thor as a character and I've heard that Hulk was lame.

Thor 2 was great, Thor 1 is a lot better than it gets credit for. The first half of Cap 1 is one of the best superhero movies I've seen, and the second half is one of the worst. Incredible Hulk is... not great. The only relevant thing it brought to the table is something you already know from the Avengers.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Byakko on April 07, 2014, 09:50:33 am
Thor 1 is good but not awesome IMO, Thor 2 goes bigger on battles in the same vein as Avengers, Cap 1 is a bit of a war movie, serious and all, with one superhero thrown in and a nazi guy who suddenly rips off his own face to become the Red Skull.
Hulk (the remake) was done a while back and before the whole group of movies were fully decided, it was kind of their first try. They did have some ideas since RDJ/Tony Stark comes up to Banner in that post-credit scene that started there.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: GOH on April 07, 2014, 10:29:40 am
Thor 2 was dumb
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: K.O.D on April 07, 2014, 01:45:35 pm
i ignored both the thor movies since there's too much fantasy for my liking
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Bea on April 07, 2014, 01:51:40 pm
Also, they seem to really be pushing towards a solo Black Widow film... which makes me happy... and very sad at the same time.
Black Widow is likely to lead her own film before Wonder Woman herself. This is wrong.
Well, think of it like this: would you rather have a Black Widow before a Wonder Woman movie made by the people currently in charge of DC's movies?

... God, even just thinking of what it would be like is horribly depressing

Aye... I know...
But I can't help but dream of a wonderful world where Warner too puts out good DC superhero films, one of which Wonder Woman would lead.
You know, like if the people responsible for DCAU took over DCU films and made what had to be done. :P

But let the Black Widow film come and give those DC execs a sharp bitch slap on their faces.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Mechy on April 07, 2014, 02:15:25 pm
I would still like a Black panther movie.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: QuickFist on April 07, 2014, 05:11:19 pm
I would still like a Black panther movie.

This
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: GOH on April 07, 2014, 05:29:33 pm
Survey handed out to people after watching Cap 2 gives a possibility of Iron Man 4

(http://i.imgur.com/fziK9Hl.jpg)
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Cazaki on April 07, 2014, 07:34:41 pm
why would ant man get his own movie
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: QuickFist on April 07, 2014, 07:39:53 pm
But he already has it.
And t respond to your question, he's cool and an important Avengers member.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Cazaki on April 07, 2014, 07:43:07 pm
He doesn't need a lead role in a movie though. It would flop hard as hell.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Mechy on April 07, 2014, 08:09:45 pm
Yes he does.

And the movie is already in production and everything, so a bit late for whining about it.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: GOH on April 07, 2014, 08:20:46 pm
The amazing Edgar Wright is fabricating this magical movie of wonders. So sit your ass down and shut your face.

And now there's this:

Quote
Over the weekend at the Wizard World Comic Con, Nathan Fillion teased fans that he might have a cameo in James Gunn’s Guardians of the Galaxy. When asked if he wanted a part in the film, the actor replied with, “wanting to get a part….or maybe did.” He then got fans even more excited when he said, “maybe you’ll be surprised. Maybe. Check the credits.”

Of course, this is far from official confirmation. For all we know, Fillion could just be having fun with those who were in attendance at the Firefly panel that was taking place at convention. Then again, that’s a pretty big tease and given the actor’s history with Marvel king Joss Whedon, it’s very possible that he may have a cameo in the film.

Whether he’ll actually play a significant character or role is another question entirely, but I still do think that it’s within the realm of possibility that he’ll be showing up here. I kind of hope he does, too. Fillion seems like a natural fit for the Marvel universe and I do find it a bit odd that we haven’t seen him appear in one of the studio’s films yet.

If you want to see Fillion’s Guardians of the Galaxy tease for yourself, check out the video below. The question is asked at around the 38 minute mark.



http://wegotthiscovered.com/movies/nathan-fillion-guardians-galaxy/
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: GOH on April 08, 2014, 01:21:07 am
Here's some Karen Gillian and Zoe Saldana

(http://i.imgur.com/1QYe4O5.jpg)
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: QuickFist on April 08, 2014, 02:01:43 am
Dammit Zoe! Why do you always look hot!?
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: GOH on April 08, 2014, 12:33:41 pm
Here have some totally legit MCU projects

(http://i.imgur.com/ZJ62d9h.jpg)
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Byakko on April 08, 2014, 01:44:00 pm
Should've switched the very last one with Doctor Strange 2 instead of GotG3 for Shuma.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Person Man on April 08, 2014, 05:29:01 pm
[avatar]http://i42.photobucket.com/albums/e315/Tiger_Stripe/discordpfft_zpsf2c0b989.png[/avatar]Why would there be a list that details who the main villain character is and nothing else?  And why would it be written in a Notepad file?

Dumb fake lists aside, have some more GOTG.

http://www.nerdist.com/2014/04/check-out-an-all-new-star-lord-filled-clip-from-guardians-of-the-galaxy/
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: QuickFist on April 08, 2014, 05:49:14 pm
Fake lists aside, It'd be amazing to see Dormammu.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: GOH on April 08, 2014, 06:05:51 pm
THE WINTER SOLDIER may have inspired Joss Whedon to Shoot AGE OF ULTRON in Scope (http://www.comicbookmovie.com/news/?a=97687)
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Person Man on April 08, 2014, 10:59:32 pm
[avatar]http://i42.photobucket.com/albums/e315/Tiger_Stripe/discordintrigued.png[/avatar]Matt Gerald signs on as one of the villains for Ant-Man. (http://www.nerdist.com/2014/04/ant-man-finds-one-of-its-villains-in-matt-gerald/) 

Yep, villains.  Plural.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: QuickFist on April 08, 2014, 11:06:20 pm
You know, I getting a bit worried about the Ant-Man movie.
Anyone else has a bad feeling about it?
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Mechy on April 08, 2014, 11:14:23 pm
Im a bit more worried that Hank Pym won't be that related to Ultron.

Movie itself seems great, even if we know very little at this point.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Cazaki on April 09, 2014, 12:36:10 am
What would Marvel need to do to get Fantastic Four rights back?

EDIT: Also @lolmechy I wasn't whining as much as just being confused about it
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: QuickFist on April 09, 2014, 12:38:48 am
I guess waiting till the new FF movie fails (which it probably will) and buy the rights.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on April 09, 2014, 12:59:05 am
The first half of Cap 1 is one of the best superhero movies I've seen, and the second half is one of the worst.
Well, that montage part was aces, THAT should've been the rest of the movie.

I would still like a Black panther movie.
He'd be so great.

Here have some totally legit MCU projects

http://i.imgur.com/ZJ62d9h.jpg
That's fairly old and almost certainly fake.

He doesn't need a lead role in a movie though. It would flop hard as hell.
Dude, the next Marvel movie stars a comic team that's been perpetually third-rate (until very very recently) and completely unknown to the general public, and is partly comprised of a gun-toting space raccoon and a giant walking tree alien. And they've already projected it's gonna do well enough to start planning a sequel. They know what they're doing. It's not gonna flop.

Back to Ant-Man: I wouldn't really say the character (in all his iterations, even O'Grady) deserves a solo movie, but his powerset is so potentially visually interesting that it all but demands one. And they've got Edgar Wright on it, so it's going to look absolutely gorgeous.

You know, I getting a bit worried about the Ant-Man movie.
Anyone else has a bad feeling about it?
It's Edgar goddamn Wright. You shouldn't be worried.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Nero D. on April 09, 2014, 05:43:34 am
so uh did anyone watch aos


as an avid watcher of it i never lost faith and in the wake of the reveal at the end of cap dos it's gotten a fuckton crazier and garnered a lot more fans and even gained some fair-weather fans back


fuck yall, anyway it was a dope episode
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: QuickFist on April 09, 2014, 05:48:13 am
I'm way behind you guys thanks to FUCKING SONY ENTERTAINMENT TELEVISION!
But like you, I never stopped watching it.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: GOH on April 09, 2014, 10:09:21 am
Well, that montage part was aces, THAT should've been the rest of the movie.
Dude, the montage was ass.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Lord Drak-kof on April 09, 2014, 12:58:28 pm
the clairvoyant turned out to be lame... sigh.. I really wished it would've been Dr Zola.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Mechy on April 09, 2014, 01:03:15 pm
Well, that montage part was aces, THAT should've been the rest of the movie.
Dude, the montage was ass.
The action looked great, but sadly it being a montage kinda took you out of it.

The climax was pretty routine, but actually pretty awesome. I think it kinda saved the latter half of the movie.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Iced on April 09, 2014, 01:07:12 pm
the movie "endgame" was pretty lame. Red skull plan was too focused on "america".

I think it would have made it better if he had targets all over the world instead of bombs for american cities, it would drive the point home.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: K.O.D on April 09, 2014, 01:47:13 pm
i always ask for another reboot of the punisher but im also aware they'd never make a R-rated movie set in the MCU.

MCU doesn't have enough grey characters. he could be the street-level guy who does the questionable things and fucks with the superheroes
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on April 09, 2014, 05:16:46 pm
Dude, the montage was ass.
Your face is ass and you have no taste. >:[

the movie "endgame" was pretty lame. Red skull plan was too focused on "america".

I think it would have made it better if he had targets all over the world instead of bombs for american cities, it would drive the point home.
Huh? The bombs were targeting cities around the world. They even were labeled!

I mean, IT'S BEEN a while since I saw the movie, but there was definitely like a Berlin bomb, and more. I'm almost definitely sure. I think the gunship itself was going to New York maybe, but the bombs work just as well.

i always ask for another reboot of the punisher but im also aware they'd never make a R-rated movie set in the MCU.

MCU doesn't have enough grey characters. he could be the street-level guy who does the questionable things and fucks with the superheroes
Hopefully the Netflix series will be able to do that kinda stuff; away from the standards of being on ABC, in their 8PM slot, and away from the movie execs who would want to tamp down on any moral ambiguity.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Nero D. on April 09, 2014, 06:07:18 pm
that's exactly what i was thinking; have all the "family friendly" series and movies on primetime and theatres respectfully and have the grittier characters' series (blade, if disnarvel owns him, and punisher, the same) be on netflix, where they have a bit more leeway with the violence but without making them too gritty and whatnot
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Iced on April 09, 2014, 06:13:39 pm

Huh? The bombs were targeting cities around the world. They even were labeled!

I mean, IT'S BEEN a while since I saw the movie, but there was definitely like a Berlin bomb, and more. I'm almost definitely sure. I think the gunship itself was going to New York maybe, but the bombs work just as well.


Ahahah, no. They were labeled with american cities because apparently targeting America is more important than any other target.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on April 09, 2014, 06:23:08 pm
I definitely remember them talking about targeting more than just America, and specifically Germany. Everything online is pretty vague about what his specific targets but there is a quote from the Red Skull that says he's planning to target every capital.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: K.O.D on April 09, 2014, 06:32:11 pm
i rewatched cap 1 recently, his plan was to target major cities around the world but the bombs on the plane were all american cities. maybe he wanted to start with the US first?
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on April 09, 2014, 06:33:52 pm
Well you gotta start with US first, we're the best. 8)
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: K.O.D on April 09, 2014, 06:34:40 pm
wanting to bomb a country before all the others implies something else :uhoh2:
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Mechy on April 09, 2014, 07:15:18 pm
It was to add drama I guess.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Mgbenz on April 09, 2014, 07:32:12 pm
America is the center of the universe unless it's a Japanese show, then Tokyo is the center of the universe.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: QuickFist on April 09, 2014, 07:49:48 pm
America is the center of the universe unless it's a Japanese show, then Tokyo is the center of the universe.

Exactly
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: K.O.D on April 09, 2014, 08:46:49 pm
if aliens were to invade they'd start from mozambique. mark my words
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Astro on April 09, 2014, 09:02:37 pm
Why that particular place?
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: walt on April 09, 2014, 10:57:11 pm
Isn't that where the Valley where life began is located? (Not sure)
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Byakko on April 09, 2014, 11:42:18 pm
So yeah, this AoSHIELD episode...
Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on April 10, 2014, 04:44:39 am
OK, this is just bullshit. (http://io9.com/captain-americas-catch-up-list-is-different-in-differe-1555534018) That list Cap has at the start of the movie that has all the stuff that he's missed over six decades? It changes depending on the country; the US had stuff like Berlin Wall, Steve Jobs; England had The Beatles and Sean Connery; and Australia has a bunch of weird shit like "Skippy the Bush Kangaroo" (which is clearly made up) and Stever Irwin. This is so dumb and unpatriotic >:[

So yeah, this AoSHIELD episode...
Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty
Well...
Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: QuickFist on April 10, 2014, 05:15:38 am
Guys I heard they say something about Venezuela in the film but they left it out in the version released here.
Anyone remember something?
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: SNT on April 10, 2014, 09:03:44 am
...and Australia has a bunch of weird shit like "Skippy the Bush Kangaroo" (which is clearly made up) and Stever Irwin. This is so dumb and unpatriotic >:[

It was Australia's Lassie.

But yeah, I'm not happy with the Australian list, it's hokey as fuck.  If it's supposed to be things people around him suggest I'm amazed Tony didn't recommend AC/DC.

Tim Tams are the food of the gods though and they deserve to be on the list.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: GOH on April 10, 2014, 11:15:42 am
http://www.cinemablend.com/new/10-Lingering-Questions-Marvel-Cinematic-Universe-Needs-Answer-42444.html

The Leader thing is what I find most interesting cuz it's been a while since a Hulk movie

Gib Leader pls
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Byakko on April 10, 2014, 12:19:44 pm
Yeaaah most of those questions are pretty stupid, and already have obvious answers. Wher were Hulk and Hawkeye during Cap 2 ? We already have interviews saying Avengers 2 will answer exactly that. Do big wigs care about Coulson ? Fury cares, and he's the director of SHIELD, so we already know it's a yes - and his report says he died only for a minute or so. As for Sif, it's like they didn't even watch the episode, since Coulson tells her "don't tell him, I'd like to do that myself". Vibranium ? Not enough material for SHIELD to build a fleet on it or even Stark to build whole suits, even if he can synthesize it.
Dumb site is dumb.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Cazaki on April 10, 2014, 06:45:48 pm
OK, this is just bullshit. (http://io9.com/captain-americas-catch-up-list-is-different-in-differe-1555534018) That list Cap has at the start of the movie that has all the stuff that he's missed over six decades? It changes depending on the country; the US had stuff like Berlin Wall, Steve Jobs; England had The Beatles and Sean Connery; and Australia has a bunch of weird shit like "Skippy the Bush Kangaroo" (which is clearly made up) and Stever Irwin. This is so dumb and unpatriotic >:[

I thought it was a fun touch myself
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: GOH on April 10, 2014, 09:34:18 pm
Yeaaah most of those questions are pretty stupid, and already have obvious answers. Wher were Hulk and Hawkeye during Cap 2 ?
I didn't see that question anywhere?
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Byakko on April 10, 2014, 09:39:50 pm
My bad, they didn't put it as a question, they specifically said they wouldn't --
Quote
Secondly, none of these questions will deal with the tired hand-wringing over why Captain America didn't drop into Iron Man 3, why the Hulk didn't fight The Winter Soldier, and why Hawkeye hasn't been compelled to help his Avengers buddies at all. If you need an answer, actors are expensive, so there it is.
-- except they got the completely wrong reason for that, that's why I noted it. They even have an article about Hawkeye in the sidebar on that very same question, but they're focusing on all the wrong things, like how the writers thought of throwing a quote about him but eventually cut it out - and without actually answering the question (of why he wasn't there) and not mentioning those interviews that say we'll hear about that in AoU.
So, dumb news site.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: GOH on April 15, 2014, 10:27:04 am
Here's an interview with Mary Elizabeth-Olsen regarding Avengers: Age of Ultron (and it's secrecy) and Godzilla

http://www.flaunt.com/people/elizabeth-olsen/
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on April 16, 2014, 07:44:14 am
Some Guardians of the Galaxy details, includes spoilers I guess. (http://io9.com/guardians-of-the-galaxy-details-revealed-including-lin-1562275490) But it is the director who's saying it, so I don't think it's gonna be anything major or anything.

Spoiler: quick summary (click to see content)
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Byakko on April 16, 2014, 10:04:07 pm
Wow, Agents of SHIELD went right back to being bad pretty fast, it's really only there to bridge the movies and nothing else. Can't believe how stupid Hand is looking now.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: QuickFist on April 22, 2014, 01:42:40 am
Set photos of Iron Man in AoU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tPru7GxmYXg#t=93
Reminds me of the Bleeding Age armor
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: GOH on May 07, 2014, 10:33:38 am
(http://i.imgur.com/MufYJQL.jpg)
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: QuickFist on May 07, 2014, 06:49:51 pm
Wow
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on May 10, 2014, 07:36:15 am
Agents of SHIELD was renewed. (http://www.avclub.com/article/abc-enters-mad-fury-renewal-and-pick-notices-204448) Aaaaaannnnnd

Agent Carter is officially happening. And the showrunners are gonna be the creators of Reaper, which made me pretty pumped! It will be a short-order series (I guess 13 episodes?) that will air between the two halves of season 2 of SHIELD, and somehow tie-in to that show.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: AerosMugen on May 10, 2014, 03:25:55 pm
I've lost track of AoS and then this week find me watching it, I think in Latin America is one or two episodes behind (this one was the one with the cellist) and it was great, I think I'll watch the previous episodes now that the series seems like something worth watching.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Byakko on May 10, 2014, 03:38:29 pm
that will air between the two halves of season 2 of SHIELD, and somehow tie-in to that show.
Oh ? Maybe they want to have something to talk about in AoS without waiting for the movies ?
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on May 13, 2014, 05:07:44 am
Oh ? Maybe they want to have something to talk about in AoS without waiting for the movies ?
They'll talk about Stark's private security firm PROJECT ULTRON for the entire season and you'll barely tolerate it, young man.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Nero D. on May 14, 2014, 08:11:18 am
finale was good, funny, movie quality joss whedon stuff


plus

Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty

second season is looking good if things stay in this direction
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on May 14, 2014, 09:41:46 am
This is the first episode I've seen since, jeez, the seventh. And I dunno, it was decent, I guess. I just couldn't get invested in anything, but it does seem like they know what they're doing now and are competent at it now, at least. But the set design and direction is still unbelievably bad for such an expensive, centerpiece show (the May-Ward fight scene, however, was aces). It's pretty bizarre how much money is being spent for such a cheap looking result.

Very glad to see that Ward was not redeemed by the power of love or made a heroic sacrifice or any of that bullcrap. But then again they might bring him back next year and do like a Suicide Squad-type deal or something and do the redemption arc there, and just, no, please.

"I found it guys" was indeed pure Whedon, but it was the only thing I'd call pure Whedon in the whole episode, though. :(

Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Byakko on May 14, 2014, 09:50:22 pm
But then again they might bring him back next year and do like a Suicide Squad-type deal or something and do the redemption arc there, and just, no, please.
Ward's character ran dry two minutes after his introduction in the first episode. Mr. Diversity-token-replacement had better lines and characterization in this episode alone (plus the previous one with the Howling Commando souvenirs, that was fun) than Ward in the whole season, so I'm rooting for him to keep his place in the team (he's good), screw Ward. Suicide Squad deal with on-off appearances second role (like Mike) is the most I'd take from him, they totally tried to wrap him up and get it over with him with this "need orderz" deal (and even that was weird, half of the time it felt like he was trying to screw Garret over at the last minute, and the other half he was gimme orderz so I can live, I think they just got lost on what to do with him).
Yeah, the Whedon was kind of crammed into this one episode, and stranded off in the rest of the season. That was a bit weird, like this one episode (and the previous one) was made to remind us of who's at the head and to ask us to pretty please give it a chance again in season two. It made for a good finale but the contrast was harsh.
... Come to think of it, the way Ward was wrapped up does feel Whedon too, in the sense that redeeming him one way or another would have gone against the style, so tossing him away was "close enough".
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Iced on May 14, 2014, 10:00:56 pm
It was ..hum.. interesting that they got John Garrett.
He is a cyborg in the comics.
(http://i.imgur.com/uDzwSEj.jpg)
(http://i.imgur.com/1bck2BD.jpg)

So he pretty much become his comic counterpart before the ending.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: GOH on May 16, 2014, 06:13:21 pm
Have a poster

(http://i.imgur.com/9L0FeSk.jpg)
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: QuickFist on May 16, 2014, 06:17:06 pm
Now that's pretty nice
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: GOH on May 16, 2014, 11:39:56 pm
I forgot to mention the new Guardians of the Galaxy trailer comes out this Monday
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Mechy on May 17, 2014, 10:45:47 am
http://www.dorkly.com/post/63060/the-terrible-new-poster-for-guardians-of-the-galaxy-reviewed

It's really great though. Thank you marvel.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: GOH on May 17, 2014, 12:54:38 pm
Here's a trailer for the trailer to end all trailers



Roll trailer
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: QuickFist on May 17, 2014, 04:43:36 pm
Oh dayum!
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Titiln on May 19, 2014, 08:03:24 pm
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?v=591299944318365 another trailer i guess
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: GOH on May 19, 2014, 08:07:39 pm
fuck 2slow

Here's utub anyway

Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Mgbenz on May 19, 2014, 10:10:34 pm
I AM GROOT




hype hype hype hype hype
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Iced on May 19, 2014, 10:23:06 pm
knowhere

on a movie screen jesus christ. incredible.


meanwhile at dc

"we dont think a female superhero is believable to the movie going crowd."
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Nero D. on May 22, 2014, 04:52:06 am
(http://i.kinja-img.com/gawker-media/image/upload/s--agcYMyhE--/c_fit,fl_progressive,q_80,w_636/yvuaiibjo3kstryal7uu.jpg)

heres a full view shot of hawkeye's full getup, as in, his actual hero outfit, that he will always wear when fighting crime, at all times





it looks weird as shit
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: SlySuavity on May 22, 2014, 05:20:33 am
Kind of a Remy LeBeau thing going on there.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on May 22, 2014, 05:35:51 am
I don't really see a problem with it. :-\
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Nero D. on May 22, 2014, 05:46:50 am
it's the sleeves; hawkeye with sleeves is off putting

ronin doesn't count
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Iced on May 22, 2014, 03:27:42 pm
(http://i.imgur.com/8AzLpKj.jpg)
Since no one is pointing out, the jacket ofc comes out.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Nero D. on May 22, 2014, 03:47:49 pm
good, that's good

walt, we can breathe easy now
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Titiln on May 23, 2014, 10:31:04 pm
http://www.imdb.com/news/ni57215670/
edgar wright left antman. well, shit
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on May 23, 2014, 10:31:59 pm
What? No. No no no no no.

God fucking dammit. :(
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Mechy on May 23, 2014, 10:53:36 pm
Oh dear.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Speedpreacher on May 23, 2014, 11:17:10 pm
I'm honestly not all that surprised. Wright strikes me as a guy who likes to do things his way without a lot of interference and love it or hate it that's not the Marvel Method these days.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on May 23, 2014, 11:23:10 pm
I was really hoping that, along with hiring the brothers known primarily for directing sitcom episodes for their Captain America sequel, and the very idosyncratic writer-director of Slither for their equally bonkers Guardians of the Galaxy, that Marvel had become much more open to experimentation and opened up their house style to incorporate a wide variety of creative input. But I guess that wasn't true at all. I'm really really upset by this news. :( :( :(
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Mechy on May 23, 2014, 11:26:48 pm
While it seems pretty problematic, not much detail for why this is yet so it's a bit early to judge marvel over it.

Or maybe the very safe money they made with fucking Thor 2: Loki jerkoff adventures got into their heads and that's all their movies are gonna be now. PANIC PANIC
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on May 23, 2014, 11:34:27 pm
But then again, Cap 2 did much better than Thor 2, and it has the most visible and scathing social message of any Marvel movie.

I think we'll probably just have the same pattern as always, mostly decent light-hearted with an Avengers and a Cap 2 every so often. I guess I can live with that, but it hurts so much to think about what amazing visuals Edgar Wright could've done with a hero who can shrink and grow at a moment's notice. :qq:
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: GOH on May 24, 2014, 12:21:01 pm
This sucks ass
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on May 27, 2014, 03:37:06 am
A possible explanation for Wright's depature. (http://screenrant.com/ant-man-edgar-wright-quits-explanation/) Latino Review claims that Wright was not fired, and this whole situation did not result from him not getting the movie made fast enough (which didn't really hold water in the first place because Wright has never been one to drag out productions and this was his dream project). Instead it seems like the production was repeatedly stopped by Marvel over script rewrites, with Marvel giving note after note about the "core morality of the piece" and how it must have cameos and so on. After two rewrites by Wright and Joe Cornish, Marvel then gave the script over to some of their in-house writers and it came in last week. Apparently the script was really awful, and at that point the writing was on the wall for Wright, and Marvel and Wright realized they would not be able to reconcile their creative differences.

Marvel forcing out directors (and writers, and actors) is nothing new, and it's all pretty depressing. :(

But here's some happy news, since Drew Goddard, who was going to be writing and showrunning the Daredevil series for Netflix, got hired by Sony to write and direct their Sinister Six movie, Steven S. DeKnight will take over (http://comicsalliance.com/steven-s-deknight-to-take-over-as-showrunner-for-marvels-daredevil-on-netflix/), though Goddard will remain as an executive producer and the two scripts he already wrote will be used. DeKnight wrote a few Buffy episodes, several Angel episodes (that were among the highlights of the two seasons he was on), and, more importantly, created and showran Starz's very widely acclaimed Spartucus series. So that's good.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Speedpreacher on May 27, 2014, 04:31:47 am
Yeah, DeKnight! I kind of wish he was running the Iron Fist series, but I guess since it's not close to filming yet he may just move on over to that next. Spartacus was really great, but I don't know how that would translate into something like Daredevil. Especially since I still don't know how much the Mouse will let them get away with, even on Netflix.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: QuickFist on May 28, 2014, 02:18:24 am
Matt Murdock has been cast:
http://insidetv.ew.com/2014/05/27/charlie-cox-netflix-daredevil/
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Mechy on May 28, 2014, 02:31:45 am
I know nothing about him, but if he dyes the hair and acts well I guess he should be fine.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Iced on May 29, 2014, 03:47:52 am
Some outlets are reporting Namor rights as being back with Marvel.

If this is true, it will likely mean

Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on May 29, 2014, 08:35:41 am
Despite Marvel's assurance that they would not miss the release date (and that truly is the most important thing) Ant-Man might miss it's July 17th slot. (http://screencrush.com/is-ant-man-in-danger-of-missing-its-2015-release-date/) Which, you know, fine. It probably should. It's your damn fault, now take the time to find a good director and don't rush this shit out.

I know nothing about him, but if he dyes the hair and acts well I guess he should be fine.
I've heard nothing but good things about him (although I haven't seen anything he's in) and also he's totally hot (http://24.media.tumblr.com/3b1167e307b8dab333736a494a108812/tumblr_mwt8o8shQs1svgtmvo1_500.jpg) :wub: so hopefully it all works out!
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Iced on May 30, 2014, 04:14:38 pm
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/05/30/arts/marvels-avengers-station-lets-children-play-spy.html?_r=0


Expo based around the avengers movie.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: GOH on May 30, 2014, 09:23:36 pm
Here are the directors being considered to direct Ant-Man

http://www.avclub.com/article/here-are-directors-consideration-replace-edgar-wri-205216
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Lord Drak-kof on May 30, 2014, 10:27:04 pm
so apparently
http://www.latino-review.com/news/exclusive-josh-brolin-to-play-thanos-in-guardians-of-the-galaxy
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on May 30, 2014, 10:40:32 pm
Oh, wow, that's pretty great. Josh Brolin is such a great actor!

Here are the directors being considered to direct Ant-Man

http://www.avclub.com/article/here-are-directors-consideration-replace-edgar-wri-205216
Adam McKay? That might work out, but I dunno how well it would work out with the rewritten Wright/Cornish script, though. Not without significant rewriting to make it more in tune with McKay's style (turning the movie from the tight, inventive, snappy and fast-paced movie Wright would've made into something looser and more lazily paced, like the improv-heavy style of comedies that are so popular these days).

The rest of the guys... don't really inspire a lot of confidence.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: SNT on May 31, 2014, 10:36:57 am
http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/MarvelFreshman/news/?a=101032

Bit more weight to McKay, I guess.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Person Man on May 31, 2014, 07:39:16 pm
[avatar]http://i42.photobucket.com/albums/e315/Tiger_Stripe/discordworried2_zpsafe2dce5.png[/avatar]And Adam McKay has already dropped out. (http://www.nerdist.com/2014/05/apparently-ant-man-has-a-new-director-adam-mckay/)

Quote
“Negotiations began with McKay in earnest on Friday but the director abruptly decided against directing the film, The Hollywood Reporter has learned. The decision is said to be his alone.”

That was fast.  I'm starting to get worried as to what exactly the studio is trying to do to this movie that all these really talented people are suddenly running from it like rats from a sinking ship.  :-\
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Speedpreacher on May 31, 2014, 07:52:58 pm
The script must be TERRIBLE. It's absolutely amazing that this is happening.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Nero D. on May 31, 2014, 08:32:04 pm
theyre probably trying to incorporate his alcoholic/wasp slap storylines in there in a very tasteless way, even tho that was yellowjacket but no one even knows who ant man is anyway


just a very wild guess
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: QuickFist on May 31, 2014, 10:45:00 pm
You know, I getting a bit worried about the Ant-Man movie.
Anyone else has a bad feeling about it?

Called it
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Titiln on May 31, 2014, 10:50:33 pm
the movie's been in development for like 8 years, no shit there are problems with it
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Byakko on June 01, 2014, 02:40:03 am
http://www.bleedingcool.com/2014/05/31/adam-mckay-tweets-his-reasoning-for-not-taking-the-ant-man-gig/
Quote
And yes, met w/Marvel. Kirby & Lee r my Lennon Mccartney so it was awesome. But have other projects I'm committed to.  Not sure it can work.
Just bad timing, not some massive controversial disagreement driving more and more people away, nothing to see here.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on June 01, 2014, 07:03:29 am
theyre probably trying to incorporate his alcoholic/wasp slap storylines in there in a very tasteless way, even tho that was yellowjacket but no one even knows who ant man is anyway


just a very wild guess
Nah, all the rumors seem to point towards execs wanting to shoehorn franchise characters in and the new rewritten script apparently has a bunch of really bad current pop culture references. I think Disney/Marvel is panicking because Ant-Man is such an unknown, odd (and potentially easily ridiculed) concept (which is somewhat similar but also not to Guardians of the Galaxy*) and they want to take steps to minimize any and all risk.

*apparently, Disney was pushing for Guardians to be their "Star Warsy space franchise", and was fairly excited about it, and willing to allow the weirdness inherent to the concept and the unconventional director choice of the guy who made Slither. Then it ended up that they bought Star Wars itself and Disney was basically prepared to write off GotG, even having the sets start to be torn down; when the GotG trailer hit and got so much positive buzz, however, they changed their mind and are now either open to or are actively planning a sequel. All rumors of course but something to think about.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on June 04, 2014, 12:55:07 am
Director for Doctor Strange announced: (http://variety.com/2014/film/news/marvels-dr-strange-hires-director-scott-derrickson-exclusive-1201173055/) Scott Derrickson, director of The Day The Earth Stood Still and Sinister.

... yeah >.>
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: SNT on June 04, 2014, 01:25:11 am
Did you trust the director of Zathura before he made Iron Man?  Let the dude have a shot.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on June 04, 2014, 01:28:12 am
Zathura was a better movie than any of the ones this guy directed.

Look I dunno maybe it will be great but it's not exactly great news after Wright's departure.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Speedpreacher on June 04, 2014, 01:56:07 am
Did you trust the director of Zathura before he made Iron Man?  Let the dude have a shot.

Nope, but I didn't give two shits about Iron Man. Plus I knew the writer of Swingers and the director of Elf would make it a funny movie at least.

I care more about Dr. Strange than I probably should, and someone with a sci-fi/found-footage-horror pedigree does not fill me with confidence in this being a good adaptation. But hell, I'll wait for the trailer.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: SNT on June 04, 2014, 02:00:29 am
Plus I knew the writer of Swingers and the director of Elf would make it a funny movie at least.
Elf? The Will Ferrell movie that by definition as a Will Ferrell movie is less amusing than the Rape of Nanking?
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on June 04, 2014, 02:07:29 am
Hating on Elf? C'mon now, Elf was fucking great. Favreau knows how to do comedy, and that's what Iron Man excelled at.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: AerosMugen on June 04, 2014, 06:04:34 am
Elf IS fucking great.
Nothing else to add in this conversation.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: QuickFist on June 04, 2014, 06:33:33 am
Elf IS fucking great.
Nothing else to add in this conversation.

THIS
Let's just wait to see what happens with Strange, we can't be sure it'll suck before even watching the trailer, it's not Batman V Superman....
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: GOH on June 04, 2014, 10:28:10 am
Scott Derickson also directed The Exorcism of Emily Rose but apparently nobody remembers that

It was a fucking good movie

Edit: Also

http://thisisinfamous.com/exclusive-rawson-thurber-passes-marvels-ant-man-offer/

Another one bites the dust
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on June 04, 2014, 08:58:42 pm
Yeesh, this is gonna be a trainwreck.

Marvel is rumored to want Jared Leto (who just won a freaking Oscar) for Doctor Strange. (http://www.bleedingcool.com/2014/06/03/rumour-marvel-quite-like-the-idea-of-jared-leto-as-doctor-strange/) Also rumored is James Franco, apparently?
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Mechy on June 04, 2014, 09:04:23 pm
Even outside of comics Ant-man gets no respect and this is before the movie is even fucking out.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: QuickFist on June 04, 2014, 09:08:16 pm
Yeesh, this is gonna be a trainwreck.

Marvel is rumored to want Jared Leto (who just won a freaking Oscar) for Doctor Strange. (http://www.bleedingcool.com/2014/06/03/rumour-marvel-quite-like-the-idea-of-jared-leto-as-doctor-strange/) Also rumored is James Franco, apparently?

Well, if they're going for that then it's obvious we'll have a young Dr. Strange, Leto would fit better than Franco, but I don't want any of them as Strange TBH
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Neocide on June 04, 2014, 09:49:37 pm
too bad Daniel Day lewis is too old. Otherwise he'd probably be perfect for the role of Strange.


 
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Speedpreacher on June 04, 2014, 11:37:55 pm
Whatever the name of the actor is who plays Littlefinger on Game of Thrones, he is absolutely my perfect choice for Strange. Really mad that they're going younger for this.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on June 05, 2014, 12:08:30 am
Can't have him be too old, that will scare away the four quadrants, it's same reason why you can't make a female superhero movie. Hollywood logic will never fail!

Although, Leto at least is older by a decade than most of the other Avengers (save for Robert Downey Jr.), it's just that he looks so much younger. Dude's like an ethereal elven creature or something. I'm sure he'd knock the role out of the park but a Dr. Strange who has much more of an age gap between him and the rest of the heroes is just more interesting.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Mechy on June 05, 2014, 12:21:45 am
They really oughta make a Captain Marvel movie too.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Sky79 on June 05, 2014, 02:19:44 am
too bad Daniel Day lewis is too old. Otherwise he'd probably be perfect for the role of Strange.

Lets just face it........ Johnny Depp

You hate it, I damn sure hate it, but if he wants it, they'll give it to him.

Edit:
DAMNIT!!!! (http://whatculture.com/comics/johnny-depp-talks-play-marvels-doctor-strange.php)
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Iced on June 05, 2014, 02:23:14 am
Why would anyone hate depp.

Him or Keanu reeves are my picks for Strange.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Speedpreacher on June 05, 2014, 02:50:00 am
Why would anyone hate depp.

Him or Keanu reeves are my picks for Strange.

I'll take the b8, m8

Keanu does not have the range to play Doctor Strange, plain and simple. You gotta have somebody able to take a journey from narcissistic surgeon for hire (and I'm not talking like Dr. House, who was at least willing to help if the case was interesting, I'm talking a real mercenary son of a bitch) to guy who loses it all and spends everything he has to get it back, to student relearning everything he's ever learned in life, to mystic taking his first great steps, to Sorcerer Supreme. You've got to do that story in one movie, because we can't survive without origin stories apparently. Keanu couldn't do character arc that convincing over three movies, much less one.

As for Johnny Depp, I'll take my Strange without facepaint or fake teeth or a bird on his head or whatever Depp would add to the costume because he's more interested in playing a funny looking character than actually acting these days.


EDIT: GODDAMMIT
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Sky79 on June 05, 2014, 02:57:35 am
It's to easy and they're both over-exposed Ice, I know they can do better.

Yo Disney, you got Marvel and Lucus film......Where the hell is Doc Savage?
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Neocide on June 05, 2014, 08:40:22 am
too bad Daniel Day lewis is too old. Otherwise he'd probably be perfect for the role of Strange.

Lets just face it........ Johnny Depp

You hate it, I damn sure hate it, but if he wants it, they'll give it to him.

Edit:
DAMNIT!!!! (http://whatculture.com/comics/johnny-depp-talks-play-marvels-doctor-strange.php)

Get out of my brain.....

Depp is a good actor, but he tends to like weird characters (I would say interesting, but some of his choices are just bad) And I feel Strange isn't weird enough for him and he would turn the character into something it doesn't need (like his willy wonka).

Aiden gillen(Lityle finger) would be good too (he's newsrama #1 choice). And Iced you have to be trolling if you are suggesting keanu, he is extremely dull in emotion or charisma. And would be a very flat Strange. 
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on June 06, 2014, 12:30:31 am
Why would anyone hate depp.

Him or Keanu reeves are my picks for Strange.
... those are terrible choices.

Depp doesn't act anymore, he just coasts off charisma and fancy hats and or makeup. Which actually works for something like Jack Sparrow, but a Doctor Strange movie would require actual heavy lifting and not just wacky snarky pirate guy.

And Keanu Reeves just seems like a disastrous fit for this; he has a certain range and excels at playing that (and there is no shame in doing that), but Doctor Strange is going to be a really tough role (if they do it right, at least). One has to believably play the complete and utter asshole doctor who slowly and slowly matures and becomes a defender of planet, and make that a believable and coherent transition.

Also it just doesn't seem likely that Marvel would pony up the salaries those two actors would merit; they've always gone with relative unknowns (or someone like RDJ who star had faded and wasn't really getting work). Reeves and Depp would start off with the salaries RDJ is getting now, and Marvel is notoriously stingy in that regard.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Bastard Mami on June 06, 2014, 01:49:10 am
plus, marvel does not own the iamge of deep or reeves, so haivng them become iconic marvel characters would be a big problem by itself (yes I know I phrased it horribly, but it's also related to the thing that is going on wiht the F4).
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Person Man on June 07, 2014, 03:38:01 am
[avatar]http://i42.photobucket.com/albums/e315/Tiger_Stripe/discordnom_zps6fa2e1ee.png[/avatar]Just to churn up that rumor mill a little more:  Tom Hardy and Benedict Cumberbatch may also be under consideration for the Sorcerer Supreme. (http://www.deadline.com/2014/06/marvel-starts-doctor-strange-search-tom-hardy-benedict-cumberbatch-early-wish-listers/)
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Sky79 on June 07, 2014, 04:33:59 am
Cumberbatch?.....I guess he'd work, but why not Andrew Lincoln? The dude is goooooood and his star is rising fast.

Edit:
He was in "Gangster No. 1" as Maxie King, and that TV show.....Walking......Walking somthing  :huh2:
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on June 07, 2014, 04:39:28 am
Andrew Lincoln's Southern accent is unbelievably awful and I haven't seen him do any acting besides but glare at things for about 3 years straight.

I don't want him anywhere near Strange.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Speedpreacher on June 07, 2014, 06:55:07 am
Just to churn up that rumor mill a little more:  Tom Hardy and Benedict Cumberbatch may also be under consideration for the Sorcerer Supreme. (http://www.deadline.com/2014/06/marvel-starts-doctor-strange-search-tom-hardy-benedict-cumberbatch-early-wish-listers/)

Of the two I'd prefer Hardy. The look would be all wrong, but boy could he do the role justice. Cumberbatch would have a close enough look, but I'm kind of sick of him. Willing to admit that's probably just me being mad at STD and the season finale of Sherlock.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on June 07, 2014, 08:31:23 pm
Ant-Man director announced. (http://www.comicbookresources.com/?page=article&id=53306) It's a guy known for directing a bunch of shitty rom-coms.

Fucking great. :brood:
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Mechy on June 07, 2014, 08:35:34 pm
Oh fuckdicks.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on June 08, 2014, 10:14:41 pm
He may have passed up the director's chair, but apparently Adam McCay is "contributing" to the Ant-Man script. (http://www.avclub.com/article/peyton-reed-officially-new-ant-man-director-adam-m-205525)

also Tony Stark's dad will be in Agent Carter (http://www.avclub.com/article/tony-starks-dad-will-apparently-be-marvels-agent-c-205517), which is not a surprise but it's not to have confirmation
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Sky79 on June 09, 2014, 02:15:33 am
This isn't good news, CA2 wasn't that good. The ending was silly at best, that and the budget needed for a 30-40's era weekly show will be killer.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: AerosMugen on June 09, 2014, 02:31:57 am
Winter Soldier not that good?
Are you serious?
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on June 09, 2014, 02:35:34 am
Jeez dude, your opinions are so terrible. Winter Soldier was fucking great.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Foobs on June 09, 2014, 02:39:26 am
WS ending is pretty lackluster.

But it's a great movie all around. Marvel's second best, imo.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Mechy on June 09, 2014, 02:42:20 am
This is why the forum should ban people for bad taste.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Speedpreacher on June 09, 2014, 03:14:06 am
This is why the forum should ban people for bad taste.

Eventually the only person left would be Iced and I still can't tell if he was serious about Keanu as Dr. Strange.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Sky79 on June 09, 2014, 04:08:57 am
Jeez dude, your opinions are so terrible. Winter Soldier was fucking great.

Really J? Really? Come on man,
Spoiler: warning spoilers (click to see content)
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Titiln on June 09, 2014, 04:12:07 am
thanks for the spoilers fucking shithead
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Sky79 on June 09, 2014, 04:14:37 am
Oh please, they've been talking about it.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Mechy on June 09, 2014, 04:16:58 am
It's still a fairly recent film and this topic is for other movies as well. Spoiler that shit dude.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Speedpreacher on June 09, 2014, 04:19:48 am
Oh please, they've been talking about it.

There's nowhere in this topic where we've completely spoiled relevant plot details about 2 month old movie.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Titiln on June 09, 2014, 04:20:41 am
yeah they've been talking about it under spoiler tags. you're a fucking idiot
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Sky79 on June 09, 2014, 04:25:34 am
Pfffff whatever

Lord forbid someone talk about a Marvel movie in the Marvel Cinematic Universe thread.

Spoiler: warning spoilers (click to see content)
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Mechy on June 09, 2014, 04:27:13 am
Well you can, so long as you spoiler the spoilery shit. We know you don't have terribly high brain functions, but this is not a hard thing to keep in mind.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Titiln on June 09, 2014, 04:27:47 am
nobody is saying you can't talk about the movie you dumb son of a bitch
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Speedpreacher on June 09, 2014, 04:28:17 am
Don't be a baby, Sky. You know you need to hide that stuff.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Sky79 on June 09, 2014, 04:31:37 am
Ugh......fine

Edit:
nobody is saying you can't talk about the movie you dumb son of a bitch

Love you too.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on June 09, 2014, 04:43:51 am
Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty
How does potential plot developments in future movies have any bearing on the quality of Cap 2 at all?
Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty
Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty
These are all ridiculously nitpicky and only one of them is an actual problem, barely.
Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Sky79 on June 09, 2014, 05:41:49 am
Now thats more like it, thanks J-

Spoiler: Spoilers for the 5 people who care (click to see content)
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on June 09, 2014, 06:02:21 am
Now thats more like it, thanks J-

Spoiler: Spoilers for the 5 people who care (click to see content)
Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty

Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty
Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty
Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty

Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty
Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty

Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty
Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: SNT on June 09, 2014, 11:03:31 am
Eh, I liked Yes Man.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: GOH on June 09, 2014, 12:30:01 pm
I didn't watch it but I heard it was basically Liar Liar part deux
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Sky79 on June 10, 2014, 01:45:53 am
Spoiler: CA2 ending talk (click to see content)
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Iced on June 10, 2014, 02:01:38 am
Why would anyone hate depp.

Him or Keanu reeves are my picks for Strange.
... those are terrible choices.

Depp doesn't act anymore, he just coasts off charisma and fancy hats and or makeup. Which actually works for something like Jack Sparrow, but a Doctor Strange movie would require actual heavy lifting and not just wacky snarky pirate guy.

And Keanu Reeves just seems like a disastrous fit for this; he has a certain range and excels at playing that (and there is no shame in doing that), but Doctor Strange is going to be a really tough role (if they do it right, at least). One has to believably play the complete and utter asshole doctor who slowly and slowly matures and becomes a defender of planet, and make that a believable and coherent transition.

Also it just doesn't seem likely that Marvel would pony up the salaries those two actors would merit; they've always gone with relative unknowns (or someone like RDJ who star had faded and wasn't really getting work). Reeves and Depp would start off with the salaries RDJ is getting now, and Marvel is notoriously stingy in that regard.

iced is back

from outer space

well you see, right now feige wants to put whoever goes as strange as the basis  for the next phases. He has said that he needs the strange actor to be someone to occupy the same type of space in those movies as RDJ. What this means, to me, is that whoever they approach will know how big this will be and will be demanding to be paid accordingly. As far as actors with enough star power to replace rdj that actually look like strange, I wouldnt mind Keanu. Sure there are a lot of smaller actors that might be better, but considering they will be aiming for a celebrity from the getgo, I dont think Keanu would be the worst choice of those previously rumoured.



ABOUT WINTER SOLDIER

It was a great movie with a status quo shift that allows for a good thread to be rendered for the followup movies, anyone expectng those books to be the same as the comics would probably already be angry that there wasnt a spider-man or mutants running around.


Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on June 10, 2014, 04:35:57 am
RDJ at the time of Iron Man did not have the level of star power that Depp does now. None of the leads of any of the movies made so far have. I just don't think it's that likely.

Spoiler: more Captain America boring stuff that only like 3 people care about (click to see content)
edit:fixed quote stuff
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Mechy on June 10, 2014, 10:09:00 pm
http://marvel.com/news/tv/2014/6/10/22659/vincent_donofrio_is_wilson_fisk_on_marvels_daredevil_on_netflix
Quote
Marvel and Netflix are proud to announce that acclaimed actor Vincent D’Onofrio has joined “Marvel’s Daredevil,” an all-new 13-episode series premiering on Netflix in 2015. Best known for his critically-lauded work in “Law & Order: Criminal Intent,” “Men in Black, “Full Metal Jacket” and “Homicide,”  D’Onofrio will play Wilson Fisk, a powerful businessman whose interests in the future of Hell’s Kitchen will bring him into conflict with the blind attorney Matt Murdock and his alter ego Daredevil.
He should be pretty good.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on June 10, 2014, 10:12:42 pm
Yeah, it's great casting.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Mechy on June 10, 2014, 10:17:32 pm
Bullseye is one of my fav villains so they better get the guy right. Im still unsure about DD himself since the guy I have not seen his actor in anything really.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on June 10, 2014, 10:20:50 pm
He's playing Kingpin, not Bullseye :P
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Mechy on June 10, 2014, 10:22:01 pm
Yeah I know, I meant as in I hope they get the casting right for him as well. Bad wording on my part.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: GOH on June 10, 2014, 10:52:42 pm
Vincent D'Onofrio owns

Full Metal Jacket

never forget ;____;
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Nero D. on June 10, 2014, 11:06:05 pm
gomerpin
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Sky79 on June 11, 2014, 12:03:21 am
D'Onofrio is a good choice, he has the hight, and he can be a scary SOB. I just hope he can come close to Roscoe Lee Browne's voice.

Yeah I know, but it's something to shoot for.

Spoiler: CA2 stuff (click to see content)
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Iced on June 11, 2014, 01:28:16 am
http://marvel.com/news/tv/2014/6/10/22659/vincent_donofrio_is_wilson_fisk_on_marvels_daredevil_on_netflix
Quote
Marvel and Netflix are proud to announce that acclaimed actor Vincent D’Onofrio has joined “Marvel’s Daredevil,” an all-new 13-episode series premiering on Netflix in 2015. Best known for his critically-lauded work in “Law & Order: Criminal Intent,” “Men in Black, “Full Metal Jacket” and “Homicide,”  D’Onofrio will play Wilson Fisk, a powerful businessman whose interests in the future of Hell’s Kitchen will bring him into conflict with the blind attorney Matt Murdock and his alter ego Daredevil.
He should be pretty good.
So they turned Kingpin white when he used to be a big black dude?
Way to go Marvel, really nice,  Keep racebending actors away from roles.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Mechy on June 11, 2014, 01:29:15 am
Bless Michael Clarke Duncan's soul.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on June 11, 2014, 01:43:14 am
Spoiler: Cap 2, part 4: In Space (click to see content)

So they turned Kingpin white when he used to be a big black dude?
Way to go Marvel, really nice,  Keep racebending actors away from roles.
Shut up. >.>
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Speedpreacher on June 11, 2014, 02:06:17 am
That's... actually brilliant casting. He such a good actor (especially when it comes to scenery chewing) and it doesn't hurt that he's kind of a paunchy guy.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Sky79 on June 11, 2014, 02:49:45 am
Spoiler: CA2 again (click to see content)


So they turned Kingpin white when he used to be a big black dude?
Way to go Marvel, really nice,  Keep racebending actors away from roles.

Saddly I'll bet some one actually said that.



Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Roman55 on June 13, 2014, 10:12:18 pm
http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/MarvelFreshman/news/?a=101839

Bunch of new on set images from Age of Ultron.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Mechy on June 15, 2014, 11:20:39 pm

Actually Edgar Wrights supervillain origin.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Iced on June 18, 2014, 01:01:30 am
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3CqymRQ1uUU

new gotg trailer

talking raccoon

before wonderwoman
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Bea on June 18, 2014, 01:07:50 am
...

I want to cry now.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on June 18, 2014, 01:21:06 am
That trailer was... really generic. Doesn't even come close to the other ones. I really hope that this new one is just Disney/Marvel panicking and throwing it together, hence the 10 second sequence of "HEY WE MADE IRON MAN LOVE THIS TOO". :-\
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Mechy on June 18, 2014, 01:23:26 am
The music is the big thing I think. In the previous trailers the use of old tracks was perfect, but in here we just have generic "epic" trailer music and it does not work that well.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Nero D. on June 18, 2014, 01:25:16 am
talking tree alien

before wonderwoman

there ya go
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Bea on June 18, 2014, 01:29:38 am
talking tree alien

before wonderwoman

there ya go

That is why I want to cry now.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on June 19, 2014, 02:25:31 am
The screenwriter of Doctor Strange is Jon Spaihts, who also wrote Prometheus. (http://www.avclub.com/article/marvel-hires-prometheus-jon-spaihts-write-doctor-s-205995)

OK hang on a second there, don't go berserk just yet, he wrote the early draft of Prometheus, which everyone liked and actually explained things and had people act rationally. So don't panic yet, for Doctor Strange! Continue to panic at the Ant Man situation!
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Speedpreacher on June 19, 2014, 02:32:30 am
Preemptively panicking.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on June 19, 2014, 02:35:56 am
Our panicking resources must first be fully directed towards Ant Man before we can even begin to consider Doctor Strange.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Sky79 on June 19, 2014, 04:02:28 am
(http://www.ironmanmode.com/wp-content/uploads/DEFCON-1-header.jpg)
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: GOH on June 19, 2014, 10:07:30 am
why would we panick about something that is definitely confirmed to be a disaster?

atleast there's no uncertainty we are sure that ant-man will blow so just sit back and close your eyes while the trainwreck happens

im optimistic for doc strange
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Just No Point on June 19, 2014, 01:45:23 pm
So far the worst movie to me has been the Hulk and it wasn't that bad. For now I'm optimistic until a movie comes out that actually sucks. Disney seems to be pretty good at maintaining a certain level of qualities in their movies. So for now I'm still looking forward to Antman and Dr Strange.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on June 21, 2014, 12:15:57 am
Rosario Dawson is guesting on Daredevil (http://comicsalliance.com/rosario-dawson-joins-netflixs-dardevil-cast-in-unnamed-guest-star-role-we-think-we-know-who-it-is-though/) as "a dedicated young woman whose quest to heal the wounds of Hell’s Kitchen brings Matt Murdock unexpectedly crashing into her life", which, hmm. IDK who that could be. The article suggests Milla Donovan, Matt Murdock's once erstwhile wife, but I'm not so sure they'd introduce her so soon. The role doesn't sound much like Karen Page either, and I doubt it's Elektra. I dunno!

why would we panick about something that is definitely confirmed to be a disaster?
Because Edgar Wright's Ant-Man would've been amazing and I'm not done panicking that it's not happening!
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Mechy on June 21, 2014, 12:22:40 am
Well the series won't exactly be that long, so they could be bringing in Milla early on.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Sky79 on June 28, 2014, 08:55:40 pm
Could Nathan Fillion Be DR. STRANGE? - AMC Movie News (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z5qiTQIhz3I)
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Speedpreacher on June 28, 2014, 09:50:43 pm
Absolutely not. He's probably Dick Rider.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Iced on June 28, 2014, 09:55:21 pm


Cherry bomb
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Mechy on June 28, 2014, 10:06:35 pm
Nathan Fillion would be a fine choice for Nova. Absolutely not Doc Strange.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Byakko on June 29, 2014, 12:50:24 am
I'd love to see him back in something more than a series like Castle, especially if that's for a part of the big M, but yeah, Strange gets more serious with time, Fillion should be the opposite (and it's not worth having only his voice). And he still needs to be Hal Jordan in any Green Lantern/Justice League movie. ... And be in Dr. Horrible 2.
And not to state the obvious, but that video is kind of completely random, there's nothing to associate Fillion with Strange. It's just tossing a name and a role. Random rumor.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on June 29, 2014, 12:56:13 am
I love Fillion but he is way too old for Nova. Nova is supposed to be a teenager (to start out, at least)! Marvel could use Nova as their version of Spider-Man (especially since Nova originated as a homage/updating of Spider-Man anyway).

I don't really see him doing well as Strange either.

also here's who's gonna play Foggy (http://screencrush.com/netflix-daredevil-foggy-nelson-elden-henson-marvel/)
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Speedpreacher on June 29, 2014, 01:36:16 am
I think the idea is have Rich be a predecessor/mentor to Sam (thus immortalizing Jeph Loeb's son for all time).
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on June 29, 2014, 01:44:19 am
nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on July 01, 2014, 04:27:03 am
Andy Serkis is playing someone in Age of Ultron. (http://www.avclub.com/article/andy-serkis-isnt-saying-who-hes-playing-avengers-a-206398) Who? I dunno.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Sky79 on July 01, 2014, 10:57:58 pm
Andy Serkis is playing someone in Age of Ultron. (http://www.avclub.com/article/andy-serkis-isnt-saying-who-hes-playing-avengers-a-206398) Who? I dunno.

Hulk (http://youtu.be/2Y8eHguynpA)
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on July 02, 2014, 02:32:15 am
He's helping out with Hulk, but he's doing something else. Maybe Abomination?
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Speedpreacher on July 02, 2014, 02:52:32 am
I thought Abomination was dead?
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Foobs on July 02, 2014, 03:00:55 am
Coulson said he's locked.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Iced on July 03, 2014, 09:10:29 am
http://thegalaxygetaways.com/
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: GOH on July 03, 2014, 10:22:39 am
what's this

it's asking for a login

i dont know the login

why are you so useless

edit: oh its a website for the movie
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Iced on July 03, 2014, 10:43:53 am
It doesnt ask for no login, >:C
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: GOH on July 03, 2014, 10:51:25 am
IT DOESNT NOW
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Iced on July 05, 2014, 08:56:07 pm
http://www.bleedingcool.com/2014/07/05/firewilliamshakespeare/

idiots are twitting he actor that played falcon to try to get the writer from  the captain america book fired over bullshit pretenses.

Some people just want to be deemed "good" so much they will try to do anything to rollerskate uphill.


meanwhile gunn has released the tracklist for Gotg's tapedeck

Yes, director James Gunn himself warns that the tracklist could constitute spoilers. And here it is:
Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty
http://www.mtv.com/news/1859692/guardians-of-the-galaxy-soundtrack/
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: GOH on July 06, 2014, 12:58:26 am
(http://i.imgur.com/SP0GmX2.jpg)
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: GOH on July 08, 2014, 10:45:44 am


MORE GUARDIANS
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Lord Drak-kof on July 08, 2014, 01:05:07 pm
The more I'm seeing of this movie the more my excitement is growing
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: SOLIDUS SNAKE on July 08, 2014, 04:07:59 pm
Same here for me, looking forward to the next comic flick.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: GOH on July 09, 2014, 11:21:11 am
daredevil set photos and lil' matt screaming I CAN'T SEE

http://www.latino-review.com/news/exclusive-set-photos-and-video-from-marvels-daredevil
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Iced on July 09, 2014, 03:21:20 pm
http://www.bleedingcool.com/2014/07/05/firewilliamshakespeare/

idiots are twitting he actor that played falcon to try to get the writer from  the captain america book fired over bullshit pretenses.

Some people just want to be deemed "good" so much they will try to do anything to rollerskate uphill.


followup
http://powderroom.jezebel.com/when-having-opinions-brings-rape-threats-a-captain-ame-1601900750/+burtreynoldsismyspiritguide1

jezebel reporters are angry that people are attempting to defend rememder also the person that started the campaign to fire rememder is now claiming she was threatened to be raped over it.

Quote

    I have been called a moron, a slut, an ugly bitch, a dumb cunt, a racist, and every other colorful, cruel, and sexist insult in the playbook.

    I've been threatened with rape, been told to shut up, and been told explicitly that my opinion doesn't matter.

    I've been accused of trying to ruin someone's life.

    I've been infantilized, condescended to, pat on the head and told that my money doesn't matter, that I was hysterical and irrational, that I was making too much out of nothing, that I was a prude.

    I've had to answer the question "did you actually read the book?" more times than I can count, and every time the question's asked with that cruel, invisible "sweetheart" at the end.

    I've lost an incredible amount of respect for creators whose art and writing I enjoyed.

    Been sent unsolicited pictures of stranger's genitalia (i.e. dicks) by direct message on Twitter

    Received more than one offer to "cure" me - i.e. "fix" the fact that I'm queer

    Had my personal and identifying information - including name, age, location, and photograph - posted without my consent or knowledge as the butt of a post insinuating that I'm "hysterical" and that I have a "vendetta"

    Tell me again that the glorification and excusing of rape in comics doesn't feed rape culture in real life.

    Tell me again that it's "fiction".

    Tell me fucking again.
this proves rape culture! Lets keep tweeting Mackie till they sanitize the falcon.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Byakko on July 09, 2014, 03:50:15 pm
Guys, you see, it's not statutory rape, it's consenting, she's the one who was sober enough to remember and he wasn't, there was no misleading, but we hate it because he's black and she's white and "it's rape culture" so we're going to call it rape even though we just said it wasn't rape by any legal definition.
No, we're not angry because it's a black man having sex with a white woman (that would be racist), we're angry because it perpetuates the culture of black men having sex with white wome--- I mean, it's okay if a black man has sex with a white woman if it's consensual, but it perpetuates the image of rape by a black man unto a whi--- no wait, it wasn't actually a rape, but we're calling it rape anyway becau--- ah, fuck it. We want the author fired because he showed something we don't like.

[I'm paraphrasing but this is seriously what they said]
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Speedpreacher on July 09, 2014, 04:04:05 pm
I believe the whole crux of the argument is that she's supposedly 14, even though Remender stated her age as 22-23 both implicitly and overtly. And he wrote the story arc that created the character in question. And the time jump story arc. So he'd know.

I really don't want to agree that it's a racial thing, but it's either that or she's using the politics of outrage as a promotional tool.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Iced on July 09, 2014, 04:32:52 pm
tumblr "feminists" ( note quotation marks) are moved by the teenage like wish to show themselves more moral than those that surround them, part of this is done by finding victims for their moral crusade that they attack repeatedly without any sense.

This is pretty much just a cover for doing pretty disgusting things.

Their answer to "its not rape, see its even stated there" ( I even read the book he panicks when he wakes up and she calms him down taking it as a joke) is to double down on how its rape culture because the author shouldnt have shown the daughter of a villain having sex with a african american.i still dont get why they are trying to push this onto the falcon actor, all they want is a scandal that fits their political agenda of promoting rape culture as a threat.

They even attempt to shame Gillen by supporting Remender.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Byakko on July 09, 2014, 04:40:50 pm
I believe the whole crux of the argument is that she's supposedly 14
No, they go at length to point out that yes, they read the book, and yes, they know she's 23. It's really exactly what I paraphrased, they know she's not underage, they know it's not statutory rape, but they call it rape anyway because it "promotes rape culture" just by mentioning a black guy having sex with a younger white girl. So it's not rape by any definition of the word, but they call it rape because there is even the slightest confusion. In short, "if you have to ask, then it's definitely rape" (despite both the book, the characters, and the guy who wrote it, all pointing out it's not). And the older black guy with the younger white girl simply reminds people of the rape culture of black guys on white girls, therefore it's part of it.
I'm not joking. They call it, and I quote, "firmly entrenched in the gray area of consent with a person of color" (disregarding the fact that it's not a gray area at all in the first place, the book explains why, and the article even specifically admits to it). It's because there is a doubt, and there is a black guy. That's the entirety of the problem.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on July 09, 2014, 04:42:13 pm
Here's a pretty cool fan-made timeline:
http://www.tiki-toki.com/timeline/entry/5395/A-Marvel-Cinematic-Universe-Timeline#vars!date=0590-03-16_23:35:00!

this proves rape culture! Lets keep tweeting Mackie till they sanitize the falcon.
I didn't realize rape culture needed to be proved at this point.

That article was good for one thing, though, providing a link to this, (http://www.themarysue.com/rick-remender-falcon-jet-controversy/) which is a good, level-headed summary of the actual scene.

And maaaaan, why is this even in the MCU thread, I want GotG news, not stuff about the comics that's only posted here because, uh, they're tweeting Mackie? >:[
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Sky79 on July 11, 2014, 01:21:13 am
Can we go back to talking about the movie with a talking raccoon and the tree alien that eats parts of it's shoulder?

How about some Ant-Man  (http://youtu.be/QAL6r6f6ZKQ)news eh?
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on July 16, 2014, 05:45:58 pm
Andy Serkis denies he's playing Thanos. (http://www.bleedingcool.com/2014/07/15/andy-serkis-denies-hes-playing-thanos/)
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: GOH on July 16, 2014, 05:49:57 pm
Wasn't it confirmed a while back that Josh Brolin is playing Thanos?
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Jmorphman on July 16, 2014, 05:51:29 pm
Yeah. I assume they were just talking about the mocap part.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: GotG in 2 weeks; hang on to your buns
Post by: GOH on July 16, 2014, 06:40:30 pm
(http://i.imgur.com/C340WEw.jpg)
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: GotG in 2 weeks; hang on to your buns
Post by: Nero D. on July 16, 2014, 06:48:57 pm
we wants ze precious geeems
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: GotG in 2 weeks; hang on to your buns
Post by: Mechy on July 16, 2014, 07:03:56 pm
Ultron looks cool.

Still a bit worried that Tony Stark is gonna be the one to make him. I would not like that :/
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: GotG in 2 weeks; hang on to your buns
Post by: Jmorphman on July 16, 2014, 07:08:30 pm
It's totally gonna be Tony Stark who makes him; there's no one else who it would make sense for. Heck, even if Ant Man had come out before Avengers 2 it would've made more sense for Stark to make Ultron. There's just more emotional connection to him. Only way Pym would've worked would be if Ant Man was a phase one film.

also from that issue of EW:
Spoiler: Stark's Masterplan (click to see content)
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: GotG in 2 weeks; hang on to your buns
Post by: Speedpreacher on July 16, 2014, 07:12:50 pm
Love that Cap outfit, that's what he should have been wearing in the first one.

Ultron looks cool.

Still a bit worried that Tony Stark is gonna be the one to make him. I would not like that :/

It's a done deal. Ultron and Vision are gonna be based on Jarvis, that's why the guy who voices Jarvis is playing the Vision.

EDIT: *looks at previous post* Umm, and also that apparently.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: GotG in 2 weeks; hang on to your buns
Post by: Mechy on July 16, 2014, 07:25:22 pm
Bleeeeeeegh

Well whatever. Just kind of a shame that Hank gets so little respect as usual.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: GotG in 2 weeks; hang on to your buns
Post by: GOH on July 16, 2014, 08:56:52 pm
http://www.ew.com/ew/gallery/0,,20399642_20834753,00.html

Some photos
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: GotG in 2 weeks; hang on to your buns
Post by: Sky79 on July 17, 2014, 04:35:01 am
Put the damn Hawkeye mask on already!
Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty

Seriously you, work(ed?) for S.H.E.I.L.D, you're identity's been leaked to the web, cover your face!
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: GotG in 2 weeks; hang on to your buns
Post by: GOH on July 17, 2014, 10:52:41 am
Guardian spoilers (not really)

Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: GotG in 2 weeks; hang on to your buns
Post by: Iced on July 17, 2014, 02:50:18 pm
(http://i.imgur.com/C340WEw.jpg)

why is ultron japanese
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: GotG in 2 weeks; hang on to your buns
Post by: Byakko on July 17, 2014, 02:57:53 pm
IDGI
Do you mean the eyes, looking more "Japanese manga" than the usual triangular shape ?

I'm more interested in what the world's most dangerous cartoon is, myself.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: GotG in 2 weeks; hang on to your buns
Post by: Iced on July 17, 2014, 03:50:50 pm
look to the right, there is a small word bubble over one of the ultrons

Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: GotG in 2 weeks; hang on to your buns
Post by: GOH on July 17, 2014, 06:42:06 pm
http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/live-feed/true-bloods-deborah-ann-woll-719222

Deborah Ann Woll confirmed to play Karen Page in the Daredevil TV series.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: GotG in 2 weeks; hang on to your buns
Post by: Speedpreacher on July 17, 2014, 07:23:44 pm
Yeah, okay. That'll work fine.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: GotG in 2 weeks; hang on to your buns
Post by: Iced on July 18, 2014, 11:44:10 am
Quote

    Peyton is someone that I've been a fan of for a long time. People may not remember, though probably your readers remember, that he was attached to Fantastic Four more than 10 years ago. We spent a lot of time together… and I got along with Peyton very, very well and he had awesome ideas and an awesome vision for the movie, and for various reasons he ended up leaving that movie...

    He's come in to meet on a lot of our movies over the years, in particular Guardians. He had a lot of awesome things to say on Guardians. But James [Gunn] had a slightly more solid take that was of interest to us. But Peyton was always on our lists, and so when this happened and Edgar [Wright] said 'Not for me' we met with a handful of people, but Peyton was always one that I thought would be great.

    It was not a slam-dunk that he would just step into it and do it. He wanted to be sure that he was wasn't just inheriting something or following someone else's lead. Or wasn't inheriting something that the evil studio had watered down to be something bad. I kept saying, 'You can either read what's online, or come in and talk to us and look at all this stuff.' He looked at everything, he talked with us, and he said 'Number one, I agree with the direction you're going in. And number two, I can add to it.' And he has – the movie is in as good a shape as it's ever been right now.

    It's still very much in the spirit of what Edgar's original pitch was and the entire template of the movie is what Edgar set out and originally came and pitched us maybe eight years ago now. But it's on its way to being the absolute best version of what that movie could have been.
-Feige


Quote
David Dastmalchian (Prisoners) has signed on to play some role in Ant-Man. Exactly what that role is has been kept under wraps by Marvel
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: GotG in 2 weeks; hang on to your buns
Post by: Jmorphman on July 19, 2014, 08:50:03 am
Yep. Absolute best version of that movie. Totally.

OK so the actress who is playing Karen Page is really into cosplay, and that's cool, and then this happened:
(http://37.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m77ux61IoM1r93b1wo1_1280.jpg)
She knows what's up.

I have nothing further to add.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: GotG in 2 weeks; hang on to your buns
Post by: GOH on July 19, 2014, 03:34:46 pm
Marvel confirms 5 more movie release dates until 2019.

http://marvel.com/news/movies/2014/7/18/22917/the_marvel_cinematic_universe_expands_through_2019

July 28, 2017
November 3, 2017
July 6, 2018
November 2, 2018
May 3, 2019

Let the speculation begin.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: GotG in 2 weeks; hang on to your buns
Post by: Person Man on July 19, 2014, 08:18:05 pm
[avatar]http://i42.photobucket.com/albums/e315/Tiger_Stripe/discordcamera_zpsa0291584.png[/avatar]Great Lakes Avengers
Black Panther
Squirrel Girl solo movie
Devil Dinosaur and Moon Boy
Squirrel Girl 2
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: GotG in 2 weeks; hang on to your buns
Post by: GOH on July 19, 2014, 09:51:25 pm
And Doctor Strange is already confirmed for July 8th, 2016.

http://variety.com/2014/film/news/marvel-studios-dates-five-untitled-movies-through-2019-1201264988/

Edit: Or not. Maybe.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: GotG in 2 weeks; hang on to your buns
Post by: Bea on July 22, 2014, 03:33:04 am
Well, I guess we won't be seeing Lucy Lawless, Wonder Woman:

http://www.nerdist.com/2014/07/lucy-lawless-joins-marvels-agents-of-s-h-i-e-l-d/

:'(
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: GotG in 2 weeks; hang on to your buns
Post by: GOH on July 22, 2014, 10:34:32 am
AMC Theaters interviews with GOTG cast and director

Vin Diesel (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rXWBvlLpI1A)

Zoe Saldana (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ntEt6QRqWJg)

Chris Pratt (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gvCfWiIOHbo)

James Gunn (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0sjlNnRscUw)

Dave Bautista (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Iz9h_2meec)
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: GotG in 2 weeks; hang on to your buns
Post by: Jmorphman on July 23, 2014, 10:17:53 am
Kevin Feige talks Josh Brolin playing Thanos. (http://www.bleedingcool.com/2014/07/22/kevin-feige-on-josh-brolin-playing-thanos-in-guardians-of-the-galaxy/) Of note is that Brolin also did the motion capture performance, which shuts down the possibility that Andy Serkis was doing Thanos (not that that made much sense anyway, though). I'm super pumped to see what his Thanos is gonna be like!

Also Jim Starlin, the creator of Thanos, and co-creator of Drax and Gamora saw GotG and says it might be the best Marvel movie yet. (http://www.bleedingcool.com/2014/07/22/jim-starlin-creator-of-thanos-liked-what-he-saw-last-night/)
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: GotG in 2 weeks; hang on to your buns
Post by: GOH on July 23, 2014, 10:29:30 am
http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/JoshWildingNewsAndReviews/news/?a=104099

No Psycho Cap for Cap 3.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: GotG in 2 weeks; hang on to your buns
Post by: Speedpreacher on July 23, 2014, 04:36:32 pm
I'm hoping for the Death of Cap. Maybe the quality of Winter Soldier has softened Hugo Weaving's heart a little!
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: GotG in 2 weeks; hang on to your buns
Post by: Roman55 on July 24, 2014, 02:52:25 am
(http://cdn.bloody-disgusting.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/Ant-Man-Comic-Con_612x942.jpg)
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: GotG in 2 weeks; hang on to your buns
Post by: Sky79 on July 24, 2014, 03:43:48 am
(http://cdn.bloody-disgusting.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/Ant-Man-Comic-Con_612x942.jpg)

Are they even trying here?
(http://fc03.deviantart.net/fs70/i/2013/139/9/c/kamen_rider_wizard_flame_style_by_thewman41-d65rzqe.jpg)
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: GotG in 2 weeks; hang on to your buns
Post by: Jmorphman on July 24, 2014, 08:15:26 am
Great costume; keeps the Ant-Man feel while translating into something that will work in live action.

Alright big news; Marvel has added another film to its schedule from now to 2019. (http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/marvel-snaps-up-old-spider-720776) It's all due to Sony's delaying of Amazing Spider-Man 3 to 2018 (instead of 2016, which is so weird because pumping out movies in less than 2 years was really working well for them *cough*), which necessarily delayed ASM4. So Marvel is now claiming the weekend ASM4 was going to open.

Please please please be something that doesn't star a white dude!!!

Iron Man 4 is now apparently not out of the question. (http://www.bleedingcool.com/2014/07/23/iron-man-4-not-out-of-the-question-for-robert-downey-jr/) They could probably bring back Fauxandarin and Justin Hammer, what with that Return of the King short. But who knows! I'm personally fine with no more Iron Mans for a while; I think it would be a better use of Marvel's limited time/money/release windows to promote new heroes to carry on the MCU than continue the IM franchise a bit longer. And you know, maybe sneak in a female or minority superhero movie in its place, or something? Surely that's not too much to ask for? >:[

Age of Ultron concept art:
(http://i.imgur.com/i2xbi4S.jpg)
(http://i.imgur.com/wd601M9.jpg)
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: GotG in 2 weeks; hang on to your buns
Post by: Titiln on July 24, 2014, 08:19:23 am
Please please please be something that doesn't star a white dude!!!
what
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: GotG in 2 weeks; hang on to your buns
Post by: Jmorphman on July 24, 2014, 08:20:36 am
Well you know, like a Black Panther movie, or a Captain Marvel (Carol Danvers) movie. Or Black Widow! I love seeing Scarlett Johannson fuck dudes up and I'm very confident in my homosexuality!

I mean lead role, not like, not white people at all or anything.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: GotG in 2 weeks; hang on to your buns
Post by: Iced on July 24, 2014, 09:37:24 am
Thats racist.. and I think sexist.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: GotG in 2 weeks; hang on to your buns
Post by: Jmorphman on July 24, 2014, 09:39:14 am
You'll be the first to go when the Ultron army revolts >:[
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: GotG in 2 weeks; hang on to your buns
Post by: GOH on July 24, 2014, 10:55:03 am
pic
Everybody look at me, cuz I'm standing on an ant.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: GotG in 2 weeks; hang on to your buns
Post by: SNT on July 24, 2014, 03:25:22 pm
Well you know, like a Black Panther movie, or a Captain Marvel (Carol Danvers) movie. Or Black Widow! I love seeing Scarlett Johannson fuck dudes up and I'm very confident in my homosexuality!
I remember reading a treatment for a Black Widow origin story written by David Hayter, that sat pretty well with me.

Aside from that, I'm sorta pissed to hear that Hulk's supposed to be getting rocketed into space, that puts the kibosh on what I wanted Hulk 2 to be about, him against a sleeper Hydra cell turning people into superhumans involving Agent Arachne.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: GotG in 2 weeks; hang on to your buns
Post by: Iced on July 24, 2014, 03:34:34 pm
Quote
Aside from that, I'm sorta pissed to hear that Hulk's supposed to be getting rocketed into space

as in world war hulk?
I dunno i cant see them going that way without a planet hulk.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: GotG in 2 weeks; hang on to your buns
Post by: GOH on July 24, 2014, 04:21:19 pm
I think Kevin Feige already ruled out WWHulk / Planet Hulk for the next Hulk movie.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: GotG in 2 weeks; hang on to your buns
Post by: Mechy on July 24, 2014, 05:44:42 pm
Marvel movies could use some more diversity. Black Panther would be a nice way to go and he just generally is really deserving of a movie.

I also really want live action Heroes for Hire. Getting there with Luke Cage and Iron fist, but that stuff is still gonna take a while.
(http://cdn.bloody-disgusting.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/Ant-Man-Comic-Con_612x942.jpg)
That outfits alright.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: GotG in 2 weeks; hang on to your buns
Post by: Iced on July 24, 2014, 09:12:23 pm
Quote
"I will tell you, one time I was saying to Kevin [Feige], we were sitting on set together on one of the days he visited and I said, ‘You know, I really want to make Thunderbolts,' and he said, 'James, if Guardians does well you'll be able to do whatever you want.'

http://www.superheromoviesnews.com/2014/07/james-gunn-teases-a-marvel-studios-thunderbolts-movie.html


also those marvel posters being posted are making a big ass poster

(http://i.imgur.com/sFPBPZV.jpg)
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: GotG in 2 weeks; hang on to your buns
Post by: Nero D. on July 24, 2014, 09:26:29 pm
http://cdn.bloody-disgusting.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/Ant-Man-Comic-Con_612x942.jpg

hey it's tayne
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: GotG in 2 weeks; hang on to your buns
Post by: walt on July 24, 2014, 11:42:56 pm
IGN's review is up (Top rated MCU movie to this day)
http://www.ign.com/articles/2014/07/24/guardians-of-the-galaxy-review

Forbes' Review ('Watch it in 3D, it's worth it')
http://www.forbes.com/sites/scottmendelson/2014/07/24/review-guardians-of-the-galaxy-takes-marvel-to-infinity-and-beyond/
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: GotG in 2 weeks; hang on to your buns
Post by: QuickFist on July 24, 2014, 11:52:28 pm
Another review
http://www.empireonline.com/reviews/review.asp?FID=137857
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: GotG in 2 weeks; hang on to your buns
Post by: Sky79 on July 25, 2014, 02:48:30 am
Well you know, like a Black Panther movie, or a Captain Marvel (Carol Danvers) movie. Or Black Widow! I love seeing Scarlett Johannson fuck dudes up and I'm very confident in my homosexuality!

I mean lead role, not like, not white people at all or anything.

The hell man?

 
Quote
"I will tell you, one time I was saying to Kevin [Feige], we were sitting on set together on one of the days he visited and I said, ‘You know, I really want to make Thunderbolts,' and he said, 'James, if Guardians does well you'll be able to do whatever you want.'

http://www.superheromoviesnews.com/2014/07/james-gunn-teases-a-marvel-studios-thunderbolts-movie.html


also those marvel posters being posted are making a big ass poster

(http://i.imgur.com/sFPBPZV.jpg)

Ok I'll bite, what is it?

Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: GotG in 2 weeks; hang on to your buns
Post by: Jmorphman on July 25, 2014, 02:52:07 am
I just want a few superhero movies that are about people who aren't white dudes. But I'm crazy like that! ::)
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: GotG in 2 weeks; hang on to your buns
Post by: Iced on July 25, 2014, 02:55:11 am
Quote
"I will tell you, one time I was saying to Kevin [Feige], we were sitting on set together on one of the days he visited and I said, ‘You know, I really want to make Thunderbolts,' and he said, 'James, if Guardians does well you'll be able to do whatever you want.'

http://www.superheromoviesnews.com/2014/07/james-gunn-teases-a-marvel-studios-thunderbolts-movie.html


also those marvel posters being posted are making a big ass poster

(http://i.imgur.com/sFPBPZV.jpg)

Ok I'll bite, what is it?

I dont get it, what are you asking me? What is the gunn movie? or the ultrom posters?
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: GotG in 2 weeks; hang on to your buns
Post by: Jango on July 25, 2014, 03:03:43 am
@Jmorphman: One day they'll make Extreme Ghostbusters: The Movie, and everyone will be happy that their demographics got represented.

Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: GotG in 2 weeks; hang on to your buns
Post by: Sky79 on July 25, 2014, 03:10:57 am

I dont get it, what are you asking me? What is the gunn movie? or the ultrom posters?

A bit of both really, but, I'm curious as to whats in the 1/4th of that poster, I see Thor's hammer, but what else is in there  ;)
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: GotG in 2 weeks; hang on to your buns
Post by: Iced on July 25, 2014, 03:13:17 am
Its not released yet, im guessing its quicksilver and thor for the two small posters on the left and hulk and hawkeye on the right.
They have been releasing those one by one as part of comic con promo.

No idea what Gunn would do with thunderbolts, probably use Abo and Crossbones.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: GotG in 2 weeks; hang on to your buns
Post by: Sky79 on July 25, 2014, 03:17:00 am
Good points.

I've a feeling Vision is in there myself.

Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: GotG in 2 weeks; hang on to your buns
Post by: Jmorphman on July 25, 2014, 03:22:22 am
No idea what Gunn would do with thunderbolts, probably use Abo and Crossbones.
Crossbones doesn't make any amount of sense for Thunderbolts, unless they were doing a straight ripoff of Suicide Squad. He's an unrepentant racist, and I think a Thunderbolts movie would be more likely to use for its existing characters those that could conceivably be redeemed. He's all tied up with the Captain America stuff anyways.

I dunno how a Tbolts movie would work anyways, there simply aren't enough alive villains right now. But Abomination would definitely work, as would Justin Hammer. I think you really gotta have Zemo, Songbird, and Moonstone in there as well.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: GotG in 2 weeks; hang on to your buns
Post by: Speedpreacher on July 25, 2014, 03:26:09 am
Thunderbolts would work WAY better with the Busiek crew and as a TV show. Week by week stuff, meanwhile Zemo's Big Planning in the background.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: GotG in 2 weeks; hang on to your buns
Post by: Iced on July 25, 2014, 03:32:35 am
No idea what Gunn would do with thunderbolts, probably use Abo and Crossbones.
Crossbones doesn't make any amount of sense for Thunderbolts, unless they were doing a straight ripoff of Suicide Squad. He's an unrepentant racist, and I think a Thunderbolts movie would be more likely to use for its existing characters those that could conceivably be redeemed. He's all tied up with the Captain America stuff anyways.

Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty
he was fine with Man thing on the team.
Besides mcu crossbones is still a tabula rasa, nothing sets him up as an unrepentant racist so far. he's a double agent whose face got burnt.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: GotG in 2 weeks; hang on to your buns
Post by: Jmorphman on July 25, 2014, 03:35:01 am
I know he was on the team before, but it doesn't make sense right now in the movies, from a production standpoint as well as a storytelling one. >:[

and he's totally gonna join up with Red Skull next movie, those white supremacists gotta stick together!

Thunderbolts would work WAY better with the Busiek crew and as a TV show. Week by week stuff, meanwhile Zemo's Big Planning in the background.
Yeah show makes much more sense; I mean, Zemo's backstory alone, that would take forever!

I do think you could probably fit in Songbird and Moonstone as villains at the start of a hypothetical movie (or show, even), like, have a montage of them before the credits, or something. Have em get foiled by a superhero (from offscreen, so you wouldn't have to use up one of the movies on anyone's contracts, of course), like suddenly Cap's shield whizzes by and knocks them out or something. Then off to jail, and crossover with Orange Is The New Black because Netflix!!!
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: GotG in 2 weeks; hang on to your buns
Post by: Iced on July 25, 2014, 03:41:29 am
>:C what shows him as racist in the movies? He was just with Hydra , that doesnt make him a racist! Stop letting your comic canon  muddle your movie canon.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: GotG in 2 weeks; hang on to your buns
Post by: Jmorphman on July 25, 2014, 03:43:28 am
You're just saying he's not racist in the movies because you want to bang him.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: GotG in 2 weeks; hang on to your buns
Post by: GOH on July 25, 2014, 10:29:47 am
http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/guardians_of_the_galaxy/
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: GotG in 2 weeks; hang on to your buns
Post by: Sky79 on July 25, 2014, 09:13:12 pm
(http://img2.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20140725190602/marveldatabase/images/7/70/Avengers_Age_of_Ultron_concept_art_poster_006.jpg)

Hell yeah, Vision!
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: GotG in 2 weeks; hang on to your buns
Post by: Byakko on July 25, 2014, 09:32:53 pm
I almost thought that was Magneto for a second.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: GotG in 2 weeks; hang on to your buns
Post by: walt on July 25, 2014, 09:35:37 pm
WHAT ELSE TO EXPECT? Nothing you don't know already :-/

(http://i622.photobucket.com/albums/tt305/cci_walt/Avengers2Poster_zps2b6daf99.jpg)
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: GotG in 2 weeks; hang on to your buns
Post by: Iced on July 25, 2014, 09:43:19 pm
(https://fbcdn-sphotos-a-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-xpa1/v/t1.0-9/1970676_665121143568113_5433014480235046257_n.jpg?oh=844c69918bc05252809c822b632a1dd7&oe=5436DBE2&__gda__=1414823135_5769b4df630e24c309831d8b3e579ed2)


gotcha covered.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: GotG in 2 weeks; hang on to your buns
Post by: walt on July 25, 2014, 09:44:28 pm
Ah yes, I just found the Hawkeye one at IGN.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: GotG in 2 weeks; hang on to your buns
Post by: Jmorphman on July 25, 2014, 09:48:21 pm
Pretty strong rumors that Joaquin Phoenix is playing Doctor Strange!?!?!?! (http://www.bleedingcool.com/2014/07/25/rumor-joaquin-phoenix-may-be-doctor-strange/)
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: GotG in 2 weeks; hang on to your buns
Post by: Byakko on July 25, 2014, 09:52:59 pm
You go Hawkeye, you stick those arrows in the empty eye sockets of those metal robots that are very tough to break and can replicate themselves infinitely.
P.S. try punching them too.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: GotG in 2 weeks; hang on to your buns
Post by: Jmorphman on July 25, 2014, 09:57:33 pm
He needs some trick arrows stat!
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: GotG in 2 weeks; hang on to your buns
Post by: Speedpreacher on July 25, 2014, 11:47:01 pm
Pretty strong rumors that Joaquin Phoenix is playing Doctor Strange!?!?!?! (http://www.bleedingcool.com/2014/07/25/rumor-joaquin-phoenix-may-be-doctor-strange/)

WHOA! WHOA! If this is for real, this is the best news I've heard about this film so far!
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: GotG in 2 weeks; hang on to your buns
Post by: Jmorphman on July 26, 2014, 12:04:48 am
I know, right!!!!!!!!!!!!
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: GotG in 2 weeks; hang on to your buns
Post by: Titiln on July 26, 2014, 12:06:07 am
im going to watch gotg in 6 days. Hell yea
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: GotG in 2 weeks; hang on to your buns
Post by: Sky79 on July 26, 2014, 12:16:49 am
Not a bad pick, looks wise. Good actor.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: GotG in 2 weeks; hang on to your buns
Post by: Speedpreacher on July 26, 2014, 01:41:49 am
Yes, thank heavens that he looks the part.

More to the point, Phoenix is absolutely perfect to play this role as he excels at playing guys that you can root for but also have dark sides you can be scared of. It's a shame that there's a thousand-to-one chance against him taking the role. He doesn't give two shits about money and I've always seen him as the type of guy that would only take a role if he really saw something in the character, the script or the director that he likes.

I won't believe it until he's on the poster.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: GotG in 2 weeks; hang on to your buns
Post by: Jmorphman on July 26, 2014, 09:32:14 am
James Gunn will write and direct the sequel to Guardians of the Galaxy (http://www.avclub.com/article/james-gunn-will-write-and-direct-guardians-galaxy--207391)
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: GotG in 2 weeks; hang on to your buns
Post by: Iced on July 26, 2014, 03:35:00 pm
fat neckbeard is angry about antman and wasp not appearing on avengers.




And he wants a wonderman marvel movie story.
Also he's RR Martin.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: GotG in 2 weeks; hang on to your buns
Post by: Iced on July 26, 2014, 05:52:48 pm
(http://i.imgur.com/u4CMImA.jpg)

(http://i.imgur.com/DPORPYS.jpg)
(http://i.imgur.com/Vc8uobT.jpg)
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: GotG in 2 weeks; hang on to your buns
Post by: Person Man on July 26, 2014, 06:03:08 pm
[avatar]http://i42.photobucket.com/albums/e315/Tiger_Stripe/discordballoon2_zps6530429e.png[/avatar]
fat neckbeard is angry about antman and wasp not appearing on avengers.

And he wants a wonderman marvel movie story.
Also he's RR Martin.

The same George RR Martin that said he wants to write Dr. Strange comics for Marvel (http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/GraphicCity/news/?a=67530) but only if Marvel agrees to let him retcon out everything about the character that he doesn't like and then also agrees to never, ever, ever let another writer retcon, reboot, or in any way ever deviate from anything he writes about Dr. Strange because his ideas are the only good ones there will ever be, ever.

This man should not be consulted about comic books, is what I'm saying.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: GotG in 2 weeks; hang on to your buns
Post by: Iced on July 26, 2014, 06:08:56 pm
wait till it turns out he is writing dr strange the movie.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: GotG in 2 weeks; hang on to your buns
Post by: Speedpreacher on July 26, 2014, 06:27:43 pm
He'd never be able to stick to the timeframe, it would take him 5 years to write the first draft of the screenplay.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: GotG in 2 weeks; hang on to your buns
Post by: Sky79 on July 26, 2014, 09:40:30 pm
RR did make a good point, it's just not Avengers without them, lord knows I'll take Wasp or Ms. Marvel over Widow any day.

I want my Rogue Easter egg damn it.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: GotG in 2 weeks; hang on to your buns
Post by: Iced on July 27, 2014, 01:26:04 am
watching live stream

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BtgbxgxCAAAdq7B.jpg)
(http://scontent-a.cdninstagram.com/hphotos-xpa1/t51.2885-15/10520141_1457178191200599_41785642_n.jpg)
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: GotG in 2 weeks; hang on to your buns
Post by: Iced on July 27, 2014, 03:48:06 am
(http://i.imgur.com/qZ7oeX2.jpg)
https://vine.co/v/M0wL1Otgw1m

sdcc trailer description
Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: GotG in 2 weeks; hang on to your buns
Post by: QuickFist on July 27, 2014, 05:06:04 am
Wow...
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: GotG in 2 weeks; hang on to your buns
Post by: SNT on July 27, 2014, 05:41:36 am
Quote
Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty
Not enough fucking people have seen The Prestige, it seems.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: GotG in 2 weeks; hang on to your buns
Post by: QuickFist on July 27, 2014, 06:34:09 am
Now I have no idea who he might play, at one point I thought he might be Ultron's body. But now...
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: GotG in 2 weeks; hang on to your buns
Post by: GOH on July 27, 2014, 12:34:31 pm
Quote
Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty
Not enough fucking people have seen The Prestige, it seems.
Or King Kong.

http://www.avclub.com/article/we-finally-know-who-corey-stoll-and-evangeline-lil-207399

Corey Stoll is the villain (Yellowjacket) and Evangeline Lily is Hope Pym.

They brought an Earth-982 character into the mix and placed Darren Cross as Yellowjacket? Okaay.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: GotG in 2 weeks; hang on to your buns
Post by: Mechy on July 27, 2014, 12:59:57 pm
Now that's just bizarre.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: GotG in 2 weeks; hang on to your buns
Post by: Speedpreacher on July 27, 2014, 05:52:43 pm
Hank Pym's old and Michael Douglas. Hope's his daughter with Janet who will also be old and possibly dead, and Yellowjacket will be his son or his former student or something, watch. I'm more interested that this is basically Ant-Man Beyond, with Pym giving instructions to Lang via headset.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: GotG in 2 weeks; hang on to your buns
Post by: Iced on July 27, 2014, 05:58:18 pm
The trailer had pym giving a speech about how heroes are fools, this speech is then shown to be given via helmet to Lang as Lang is running around miniaturized. he jumps onto a flying ant.
Pym mocks him by asking if they shrunk his balls too.


Darren Cross is going to be the man Pym trained to replace him as Antman , head of the dyne corporation, who is now using their technology for "evil". Pym is thus, training Lang to perform a heist on something specific.

TBH I would rather have grady for this, not Lang.

Eva is not confirmed if she's wasp or red queen, she might be part of the "villains" teaming up with yellowjacket.

If some past rumours are true, pym used to be the yellowjacket villain in the wright adaptation.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: GotG in 2 weeks; hang on to your buns
Post by: Nero D. on July 27, 2014, 08:22:13 pm
(http://i.imgur.com/ppHsBxVl.jpg)

look at that, not even in costume--well, cgi, and im already hype as fuck just because he's posing with the goddamn gauntlet correctly


#thanosreigns2014
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: GotG in 2 weeks; hang on to your buns
Post by: Jmorphman on July 27, 2014, 10:26:19 pm
Pretty disappointed nothing was announced, after all the business about the release dates for all those unknown movies, and nothing on Doctor Strange. :-\

Hope Pym is likely to be Janet in everything but name. And familiar relation to Hank Pym, natch. Probably will be donning the Wasp outfit by the end of the movie.

TBH I would rather have grady for this, not Lang.
O'Grady makes no sense for a story like this. This is a story that only works with Scott Lang, a thief seeking redemption and becoming the sanctioned successor to an superhero legacy. O'Grady is just too... irredeemable (get it? Get it???).
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: GotG in 2 weeks; hang on to your buns
Post by: Mechy on July 27, 2014, 10:29:25 pm
Just make it an Irredeemable movie, but change the Plutonian into O'Grady Ant-man. I would watch that.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: GotG in 2 weeks; hang on to your buns
Post by: Sky79 on July 27, 2014, 10:45:22 pm
If you're wanting to make an O'Grady Ant-man movie, send a draft to Michael Bay, he'd do it for free.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: GotG in 2 weeks; hang on to your buns
Post by: 【MFG】gui0007 on July 28, 2014, 01:23:10 am
fat neckbeard is angry about antman and wasp not appearing on avengers.

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PJay1xPU71s[/youtube]


And he wants a wonderman marvel movie story.
Also he's RR Martin.

I'm with him. The Avengers without Ant-Man and/or Wasp are not The Avengers.

But i hope that these sequel convince the fans (like me ;P)
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: GotG in 2 weeks; hang on to your buns
Post by: Jmorphman on July 28, 2014, 06:29:59 am
Weren't a fan of Cap's Kooky Quartet, then?
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: GotG in 2 weeks; hang on to your buns
Post by: GOH on July 28, 2014, 03:55:35 pm
(http://i.imgur.com/LTHc23Y.jpg)
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: GotG in 2 weeks; hang on to your buns
Post by: Segatron on July 28, 2014, 08:25:34 pm
where did you get this pick
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: GotG in 2 weeks; hang on to your buns
Post by: walt on July 28, 2014, 08:40:56 pm
Probably from the same place all news are being generated from this week - San Diego Comic Con 2014
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: GotG in 2 weeks; hang on to your buns
Post by: 【MFG】gui0007 on July 28, 2014, 09:29:40 pm
Weren't a fan of Cap's Kooky Quartet, then?

Kooky Quartet are awesome too Jmorph (and it's not a bad idea Marvel made a movie of them ;P). But for me, Wasp and mainly Ant-Man (Hank Pym, not Lang) are major members of the Avengers. I hope that they in the team in the third movie.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: GotG in 2 weeks; hang on to your buns
Post by: Iced on July 29, 2014, 12:53:41 am
Results are in, dc won comic con
http://www.comicbookmovie.com/convention_news/comic-con/news/?a=104668

it was rigged i tell you
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: GotG in 2 weeks; hang on to your buns
Post by: GTOAkira on July 29, 2014, 01:04:09 am
well it do not mean that much I think
just remembered that I still need to watch winter soldier
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: GotG in 2 weeks; hang on to your buns
Post by: Jmorphman on July 31, 2014, 05:31:01 am
Correction: Evangeline Lilly's character is in fact named Hope Van Dyne. (http://www.bleedingcool.com/2014/07/29/evangeline-lillys-character-in-ant-man-will-be-called-hope-van-dyne/) Which implies she's estranged with her dad (and which further implies there will be ant-related reconciliations in the movie). Also it's been confirmed that Janet is deceased in the present day as a result of a lab accident that made Hank retire (this is likely what caused said estrangement).

So, this could be pretty bad, depending on things. Killing off the founding female Avenger off-screen is pretty problematic, but it can be done correctly, I think. You'd definitely have to have Hope take on the identity of Wasp, and if they're still doing the flashbacks to the 60s, with Hank Pym as Ant Man, Janet as Wasp has definitely gotta be in there too.

and then the teaser for the end of the movie is that Jan has not in fact died but is stuck in the microverse and in the next movie the entire Ant-gang has to help her stop, I dunno, some Ant-Man villain or something from harnessing the Enigma force and conquering not only the Microverse but our own universe!!!
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: GotG in 2 weeks; hang on to your buns
Post by: Byakko on July 31, 2014, 10:29:34 am
If there's a flashback part, it could be cool to see Hank and Janet be the guys with the original idea that led Fury to his "Avengers Initiative". Just to acknowledge the whole founding members thing.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: GOH on August 01, 2014, 10:26:15 am
Marvel might be making a movie or TV thing with a dumb and useless superhero that people take seriously for some reason (http://www.avclub.com/article/marvel-might-be-doing-something-squirrel-girl-prov-207639)
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Byakko on August 01, 2014, 10:30:13 am
It can see it working if the whole series is short and the episodes are like 10 minutes or even just short skits. Web series may be preferable. Not a regular big 24 episodes, hour-long episodes series that would require character development and story development to keep people interested.
I don't really agree with the article, the movies might play it safe but Agents of SHIELD is the opposite. Not to mention it looks like they've always tried to push Ant-Man in the opposite direction too, and it might even be what drove people away if they wanted to do a hero movie, as it looks like we're getting an anti-hero's redemption story (as far as I understand, but note that I know nothing of Ant-Man).
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Iced on August 01, 2014, 11:52:17 am
more like ANT hero.


Hes more like a loser hero, marvel used to be very science pulpy so many of their first heroes are adventurers or mad scientists.  Pym is both.

he slapped his wife once mid psychotic breakdown and somehow some shitty writers kept trying to make other characters react as if that was the end of the world. The storyline where he slapped her also had him creating a giant robot to attack himself and the avengers so he could save the day by beating it and ended with him court martialed and arrested, but hey, he slapped a gurl once while half insane.

he's still a insane scientist hero, which is what makes him funny.
They seem to be going with disilusioned old hero betrayed by his protegee on the movie
Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty

powerset wise hes very interesting in the comics, he can grow, shrink, do the same to other stuff, he does cybernetics and advanced AI and he messes around with physics a lot.
he has a doorway that leads to a offworld headquarters, that he can reprogram to offload onto any doorway. And he has assumed at least four personas ( everytime he gets depressed he reinvents himself ) .
Antman
YellowJacket
GiantMan
Wasp
Hank Pym, science adventurer.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: GOH on August 01, 2014, 12:54:17 pm
AVENGERS AGE OF ULTRON TRAILER LEAKED (https://mtc.cdn.vine.co/r/videos/7F487B0F2D1105299413796052992_1fa6ae700bc.4.6540816139911313542.mp4)
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Mechy on August 01, 2014, 02:30:54 pm
I was gonna get to see Gotg today, but due to shitty bus timetables it has to wait till tmorrow. Tis a cruel world.

YellowJacket
GiantMan
Wasp
Hank Pym, science adventurer.
Also Goliath.

But yeah, Hank rocks.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: SNT on August 01, 2014, 03:57:49 pm
Well I DID get to see GotG tonight, it was off the hook.

Let me save you some time, though; the stinger isn't worth the wait.
Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Titiln on August 01, 2014, 05:31:43 pm
you have to stay for it anyway. it's marvel movie tradition. this is like the 9th marvel movie and a good amount of people still got up to leave before the credits. how does this happen
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Lord Drak-kof on August 01, 2014, 11:23:02 pm
Just got home from watching it. Omg it was awesome. Groot and Rocket are so lovable. Ronan was really well portrayed. Kinda sad Karen Gillan didnt get much screen time. I was very surprised to see a certain character actually show up in the movie... coz i dont think i read anything about him being in. Finally they are talking about the infinity gems or stones as they say in the movie.

The after credits was kinda a let down.
I will say though its definitely Marvels funniest movie to date.
Title: no spoilers no spoilers no spoilers
Post by: Jmorphman on August 02, 2014, 06:26:08 am
Alright popping in to post this then I'm gone till Sunday, after I see GotG. I don't want no spoilers!

MCU head honcho Kevin Feige recently said that he very much wants to make a female superhero movie (even going on to dismiss the tired cliche of "well female-led movies fail at the box office by citing the numerous counterexamples that outweigh the flops).  But "wanting" is as far as he goes. (http://www.avclub.com/article/marvels-kevin-feige-knows-everybody-wants-female-l-207689) He'd like to do it "sooner rather than later". Again, this is the guy in charge of everything. He goes on to explain that it's all because they have too many franchises right now and they would have to drop one of them for 4 years to do a female-led movie.

Which is... bullshit. There are six unannounced movies in the works, going up to 2019. Thor 3 and Avengers 3 will almost certainly be among those six; Ant Man and Doctor Strange sequels are probable (but not certain) as well. That leaves at least 2 slots. Surely there's room for a Captain Marvel movie in there? I mean, there's apparently working scripts for both a Blade movie and a Captain Marvel movie, and Feige has said there's a treatment for a Black Widow movie. And that was all recent, not like the probably abandoned Nick Fury movie, or the Iron Fist movie. Is he just bullshitting to hide these or something? There is a major blockbuster out right now starring a talking, gun-toting raccoon and a giant tree that only says I AM GROOT, they can take a chance on something less risky like a Black Widow or Captain Marvel movie.

It's pretty fucking sad that there hasn't been one yet.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Byakko on August 02, 2014, 12:48:52 pm
Quote
He goes on to explain that it's all because they have too many franchises right now and they would have to drop one of them for 4 years to do a female-led movie.

Which is... bullshit. There are six unannounced movies in the works, going up to 2019. Thor 3 and Avengers 3 will almost certainly be among those six; Ant Man and Doctor Strange sequels are probable (but not certain) as well. That leaves at least 2 slots. Surely there's room for a Captain Marvel movie in there?
The 6 unannounced movies are probably already determined, no... ? And none of them is based on a woman. If they wanted a movie with a woman, since they're already booked until 2019 with what they do have - and knowing that some of those will likely get sequels that aren't planned yet, another movie not related to those 6 would have to be for 2021 or 2023, or it would mean delaying one of the 6 that is already planned. And its potential sequels. AND the other movies like Avengers or whatever that this character would impact. So yeah, drop one for 4 years.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: "Bad News" Hoffmann on August 02, 2014, 01:10:52 pm
Please...let one of them be a new Punisher.
Title: Re: no spoilers no spoilers no spoilers
Post by: Sky79 on August 02, 2014, 03:21:14 pm
Which is... bullshit.

You're damn right it is, this jackass thinks that a She-hulk, Ms.Marvel or Xmen-Origins: Storm movie wouldn't make bank? Make a Mystique movie, you know people will pay to see Jennifer Lawrence's blue butt again, hell XM:DoFP might as well have been a set up for one.

The man's lying.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Byakko on August 02, 2014, 03:33:39 pm
Xmen
Fox.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Sky79 on August 02, 2014, 04:13:27 pm
So?
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: AerosMugen on August 02, 2014, 04:40:43 pm
Feige does not have any control on that.
Man, your head is really something.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Person Man on August 02, 2014, 04:45:04 pm
[avatar]http://i42.photobucket.com/albums/e315/Tiger_Stripe/discordava-4.png[/avatar]
So?

Because Marvel does not own the rights to make X-Men movies so that means Marvel can't make X-Men movies and they are talking specifically about movies that Marvel is going to make.  It is really not difficult to figure out.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Sky79 on August 02, 2014, 04:50:53 pm
My comment was to his statement, not the currant ownership.

His statement is garbage.

Edit:
Furthermore, Marvel is owned by Disney, if they really wanted the rights back, then turn around and bust out 3 new X movies, they could and they'd make every dime back, why? Because many are eager to see a Marvel Xmen movie actually done by Marvel, I know I am.

New cast, new writers no middleman
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Iced on August 02, 2014, 05:02:23 pm
You are underestimating fox.
If fox was that cooperative you would have seen those properties already return, but to them, fox, making shit movies with marvel properties is more profitable than allowing marvel to do them.

Any license returned is potentially a disaster as their other movies would have to compete with them in the theaters.

Theres no money feasible enough to exchange for that.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Sky79 on August 02, 2014, 05:16:40 pm
Fare enough, sounds like something fox would do.

Edit:
Reminds me of the ten rules of Pimpin  (http://deadspin.com/5935090/the-10-rules-of-pimping-as-written-by-an-actual-alleged-pimp)
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Byakko on August 02, 2014, 05:28:45 pm
My comment was to his statement, not the currant ownership.

His statement is garbage.
Which is... bullshit.

You're damn right it is, this jackass thinks that a She-hulk, Ms.Marvel or Xmen-Origins: Storm movie wouldn't make bank? Make a Mystique movie, you know people will pay to see Jennifer Lawrence's blue butt again, hell XM:DoFP might as well have been a set up for one.

The man's lying.
You're wrong. And you're a retard too. On every point of your posts, he's saying the opposite of what you say he's saying.

He says that he knows people want movies with a female lead (when you claim he thinks those movies would fail), and he's saying their current schedule for upcoming movies makes it impossible to slip one more movie with a female, which very clearly means he's only talking about movies Marvel, not Fox, can do.

Stop posting. Your reading comprehension is null, and you keep posting aggressively, looking for fights.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Titiln on August 02, 2014, 05:33:31 pm
almost every sky post i've seen ends up like that and it's really fucking annoying and a waste of everyone's time
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Sky79 on August 02, 2014, 05:38:19 pm
Stop posting.

Or?
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: AerosMugen on August 02, 2014, 05:38:51 pm
Pretty please?
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Byakko on August 02, 2014, 05:42:46 pm
Stop posting.
Or?
Or people will get annoyed that you keep starting fights everywhere out of ill will and bad faith and report you and you'll end up banned.
So maybe in a couple of years.
For three days.

Wanna take the chance ?
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Sky79 on August 02, 2014, 05:45:47 pm
 Kevin Feige and Fox are full of crap, J says Kevin Feige's statement is also bull$hit. Where is the problem here?

....oh wait, personal dislike, ah yes, classy boys.

edit:
The only one who keeps starting fights are posters like you kid. Get over yourself.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Titiln on August 02, 2014, 05:48:10 pm
jmorphman thinks it's bullshit for different reasons. you think it's bullshit because he thinks the movies wouldn't make money (false) and you then go on about a bunch of xmen movie ideas, showing you have no idea what you're talking about. try paying attention for once
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Byakko on August 02, 2014, 05:53:24 pm
kid
Oh, I see, you're 15. Take your teenage rebellion somewhere else.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Sky79 on August 02, 2014, 06:03:01 pm
J's statement is simply this, Kevin Feige says they're plate is full and can't work on a female Marvel property, this is a false statement as they absolutely can. A statement I agree with, and added my own reason why they should, which were---The only reason they do anything is to make money, that's the end result they shoot for in any project, the ends will justify the means.

You and others want this to turn into a fight, because you have a personal distain for me. I won't play along. Those are my reasons, no personal insults added or needed. If you agree, fine, if not, fine.

But fight? no.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Byakko on August 02, 2014, 06:08:26 pm
Kevin Feige says they're plate is full and can't work on a female Marvel property, this is a false statement as they absolutely can.
You're lying.
They have 6 upcoming movies for the next 5 years. Explain why you think they can add more.
A statement I agree with, and added my own reason why they should, which were---The only reason they do anything is to make money, that's the end result they shoot for in any project, the ends will justify the means.
You're lying. This isn't what you said.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Titiln on August 02, 2014, 06:09:32 pm
his uncle works at marvel studios and knows they have one more slot
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Roman55 on August 02, 2014, 06:34:17 pm
Marvel might be making a movie or TV thing with a dumb and useless superhero that people take seriously for some reason (http://www.avclub.com/article/marvel-might-be-doing-something-squirrel-girl-prov-207639)
No one takes her seriously.

She's a meme.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Iced on August 02, 2014, 06:45:10 pm
shes real to me damnit!


also i liked her slott issues. pretty interesting.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Sky79 on August 02, 2014, 07:13:39 pm
Marvel might be making a movie or TV thing with a dumb and useless superhero that people take seriously for some reason (http://www.avclub.com/article/marvel-might-be-doing-something-squirrel-girl-prov-207639)

(http://www.herosandwich.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/FNF-SquirrelWolvie4.jpg)

Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Titiln on August 02, 2014, 07:37:04 pm
there was a post directed at nobody but you. maybe you would like to reply to it
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: GotG in 2 weeks; hang on to your buns
Post by: Jmorphman on August 04, 2014, 03:36:19 am
I think it goes without saying that I don't agree with whatever inane bullshit Sky is saying.

If there's a flashback part, it could be cool to see Hank and Janet be the guys with the original idea that led Fury to his "Avengers Initiative". Just to acknowledge the whole founding members thing.
Yep!

Marvel might be making a movie or TV thing with a dumb and useless superhero that people take seriously for some reason (http://www.avclub.com/article/marvel-might-be-doing-something-squirrel-girl-prov-207639)
Man, fuck you. >:[

Well I DID get to see GotG tonight, it was off the hook.

Let me save you some time, though; the stinger isn't worth the wait.
Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty
It was worth it and you stink.

Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty

The 6 unannounced movies are probably already determined, no... ? And none of them is based on a woman. If they wanted a movie with a woman, since they're already booked until 2019 with what they do have - and knowing that some of those will likely get sequels that aren't planned yet, another movie not related to those 6 would have to be for 2021 or 2023, or it would mean delaying one of the 6 that is already planned. And its potential sequels. AND the other movies like Avengers or whatever that this character would impact. So yeah, drop one for 4 years.
Yeah, that's what I was saying. We can guess what movies there will be, and even if they made sequels to everything (and there's no guarantee they will) then there would still be at least two open slots to launch a new superhero franchise. And from what Feige is saying, they're decided to not go with a female superhero in either of those slots when they were planning things. Which is complete fucking bullshit.

No one takes her seriously.

She's a meme.
Squirrel Girl is fantastic; sure her fanbase is a bit whack, but who gives a shit. Like, seriously, GLA: Misassembled is one of the greatest comics of the last decade, no joke.

But I don't really see how they could sustain her in a movie or a TV show for anything more than cameos or limited series. She's not meant to be subject to long term arcs or anything, she's a comedy character who only works best in small doses, when she intrudes on other people's narratives (and makes short work of their villains and pokes fun at all of their problems). Being the center of her own narrative would probably be a disaster.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: SlySuavity on August 04, 2014, 04:41:18 am
Didn't Squirrel Girl kick Doctor Doom's ass of all people, with squirrels? :laugh:
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Jmorphman on August 04, 2014, 04:52:54 am
Her very first appearance! Drawn by Spider-Man co-creator Steve Ditko!
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: GotG in 2 weeks; hang on to your buns
Post by: Sky79 on August 04, 2014, 04:53:05 am
I think it goes without saying that I don't agree with whatever inane bullshit Sky is saying.
Lies

(http://38.media.tumblr.com/a0d01df775340db65278b036ca44794a/tumblr_n8jixqTgcV1tzb77ro1_500.gif)



Edit:
Squirrel Girl a $hit character, created to be a $hit character and loved by the 'Zoh mi gawd, daz awesome' crowd.

Off to bed.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Speedpreacher on August 04, 2014, 04:58:03 am
Didn't Squirrel Girl kick Doctor Doom's ass of all people, with squirrels? :laugh:

How could he stop them? For every one he flung away, a DOZEN MORE VEXED HIM!
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Jmorphman on August 04, 2014, 05:01:36 am
Edit:
Squirrel Girl a $hit character, created to be a $hit character and loved by the 'Zoh mi gawd, daz awesome' crowd.

Off to bed.
Nice to see you're still talking out of your ass.

Before you go, might you consider Titiln's post again?
there was a post directed at nobody but you. maybe you would like to reply to it
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Jmorphman on August 04, 2014, 06:50:05 am
Alright new page, time to talk about shit that actually matters:
Spoiler: GotG related stuff I guess (click to see content)

EDIT: also, GotG did phenomenally well at the box office, breaking the record for highest grossing debut in August. (http://www.boxofficemojo.com/news/?id=3885&p=.htm) The MCU brand is incredibly powerful now, there's really no limit to what they can sell now.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Nero D. on August 04, 2014, 09:06:20 am
yup im all for shit that matters, like this:


this is really good news (http://io9.com/marvels-got-the-blade-punisher-and-ghost-rider-movie-r-493113182/+bricken)


of course he says he's not ready to make any movies with the licenses right now, lotta projects on the plate already would be a viable excuse, but yea awesome
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Jmorphman on August 04, 2014, 09:14:38 am
Punisher and Blade seem better suited for TV shows. If the Netflix experiment is successful I figure they're probably next.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Byakko on August 04, 2014, 09:26:30 am
The 6 unannounced movies are probably already determined, no... ? And none of them is based on a woman. If they wanted a movie with a woman, since they're already booked until 2019 with what they do have - and knowing that some of those will likely get sequels that aren't planned yet, another movie not related to those 6 would have to be for 2021 or 2023, or it would mean delaying one of the 6 that is already planned. And its potential sequels. AND the other movies like Avengers or whatever that this character would impact. So yeah, drop one for 4 years.
Yeah, that's what I was saying. We can guess what movies there will be, and even if they made sequels to everything (and there's no guarantee they will) then there would still be at least two open slots to launch a new superhero franchise. And from what Feige is saying, they're decided to not go with a female superhero in either of those slots when they were planning things. Which is complete fucking bullshit.
I don't understand. What two slots ? They have 6 movies already planned until 2019, that's 6 movies in 5 years. By two more slots, are you saying they should be able to do 8 movies in 5 years ? Or do you mean after that, 8 movies in 7 years ?
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Jmorphman on August 04, 2014, 09:28:16 am
I mean there's at least two movies out of the known, unrevealed six that are definitely going to be launching new franchises. The other 4 are likely sequels.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Byakko on August 04, 2014, 09:34:09 am
But... All of those 6 movies (the 4 we can guess plus the last two) are already determined. And clearly, they don't include one with a female lead. That DOES mean that if they want to make a female led movie, they'd have to DROP one of those that are already planned (and everything that entails - the sequels to those movies replaced by sequels to the female-led movie, change the impact on the other crossover movies, etc.)
So what he says is still true. They don't have an open slot at the moment because they're fully booked with what is already planned (those we can guess AND those we can't), and if they wanted to do a female-led movie, they'd have to drop for 4 years one of those that are planned. Just because we don't know which ones the last two are, doesn't mean they're not already part of the plan, and they don't have an opening for potential sequels, and ties to the other movies, which would have to be redone if they switched them for a different, female lead.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Jmorphman on August 04, 2014, 09:36:25 am
I know they're already determined. What I said was, when they were planning out their schedule, they chose not to have a female hero in there. And that's what I'm angry about, because that's fucking bullshit.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Byakko on August 04, 2014, 09:38:07 am
Oh ! The bullshit is the decision they took back then, not the excuse he's making now. Okay, well, I find that's unproductive to be angry at what they already have and won't change (better to push it for the next wave), but I get it.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Jmorphman on August 04, 2014, 09:41:00 am
We only know about it for sure now, but I wish I could go back in time and be angry about it then!

Stop making me feel conflicted Feige! First Winter Soldier then the Wright stuff, then Guardians of the Galaxy, then this no female superhero movies business! Why can't you be like Warner or Sony and be so easy to determine if I should hate or love you?!
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Byakko on August 04, 2014, 09:55:23 am
Okay, so there's Ultron, there's a Cap 3 and a Thor 3 that are pretty obvious guesses, there's probably a GotG2 with the success of the first, then there's Ant-Man that probably SHOULD be out by 2019, and there's most likely a Doctor Strange.
I don't know about switching any of these for a new one that has no precedent. Well, personally I would say Thor 3 is not needed unless they really have a huge story idea that reaches far through all the other movies (like GotG2), but that's because I personally don't really care for Thor. There's also Ant-Man I don't care for, he could have been introduced in either Avengers movie, but he has gathered quite a mythos around his movie, so it's not happening. As for Cap 3, after Winter Soldier, of course there's a Cap 3.

The fact is, there's just too many characters they could make stuff out of. The last "switchable" slot is Doctor Strange, so should a Miss Marvel movie come out before a Doctor Strange movie ?
The movies that are planned simply reflect the comics, the female-led comics just aren't prominent compared to the movies that are planned.
Personally, the best situation I could see is one of those movies foreshadowing (or straight-up introducing) a female superhero and lead that up to a movie. That didn't happen with Ant-Man in Ultron, though, but then again they didn't have any idea what to do with him because of the whole movie fiasco.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Jmorphman on August 04, 2014, 10:06:12 am
Doctor Strange is too far in development to even consider switching out, Thor 3 is still happening according to Hemsworth (and they have a dangling plot line of Loki posing as Odin, but honestly I'm just not looking forward to another Thor at all), Avengers 3 is a no-brainer, and Ant-Man and Strange likely already have sequels planned out (which would be scrapped if they flop), because that's just how the blockbuster business works now.

Their big guns are pretty much all deployed; they've got Black Panther and I guess Punisher, Blade, Ghost Rider, and Hulk left, in terms of big names, and I don't see them jumping on any of the last four any time soon. I'm not really sure what they could put in those last 2 shots, Black Panther is a fairly strong possibility, but who knows. I'm not sure what they have planned for the other one if they went with Panther. It just seems right to put in a Captain Marvel movie there, she's certainly getting a lot of exposure by Marvel (and good on them for doing that). But it certainly doesn't look like that's going to happen. :(
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Byakko on August 04, 2014, 10:10:49 am
An Ant-Man 2 wouldn't be before 2019, and same for Avengers 3 I would think. GotG2 has a better chance of happening before them.
I would see a Captain Marvel happen before Ant-Man 2 and Av 3, but after 2019. Like, those would be the 2020-2022 batch.

I'm also thinking about how Marvel is trying very hard to dig a hole for Fantastic Four for... whoever has them (Fox or Sony I never know), they want it back, so I would imagine they want to do something for them before 2025.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Jmorphman on August 04, 2014, 10:38:52 am
They've managed to get things running smoothly enough to have sequels out every 3 years, and sometimes even in as little as 2 (Iron Man 2 and Cap 3); the Ant-Man and Avengers sequels would probably be in 2018. Doctor Strange would either be 2018 (if things go very well and they can put it out in only 2 years) or 2019. GotG 2's date was confirmed to be sometime in 2017 (there was a specific date but I don't remember it).

Of all Marvel's lost properties, they seem to be  most angry about FF, because there's just so much stuff Lee and Kirby introduced in that book that formed the spine of the Marvel universe, and Marvel Studios is really constrained by not having that stuff. Sony shares all the merchandise revenue with Marvel and it seems they're pretty cool with them, relatively speaking. And the X-Men stuff is so complicated in and of itself and isolated from the larger universe much of the time that I don't get the sense that Marvel has ever felt like it's missing a huge piece of their universe (or maybe it's just such a cash-cow that they can't basically disown the franchise like they are with FF). The disastrous-sounding FF reboot Fox is doing and the previous two they made versus their relatively good batting average with their X-Men movies might play a factor into it as well.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Iced on August 04, 2014, 04:15:42 pm
I hope its the rumoured squirrel girl production, about a girl that discovers she can talk to squirrels.

Squirrel girl would be the perfect property for a teenager hero in lieu of spider-man.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Iced on August 04, 2014, 06:03:39 pm
http://io9.com/marvel-screened-guardians-of-the-galaxy-for-the-co-crea-1615584469
Quote
****WHAT AN INCREDIBLE DAY FOR BILL MANTLO****! Marvel hooked Bill up with a PRIVATE VIEWING of "Guardians Of The Galaxy", and my wife Liz and my beloved cousin Jean assisted Bill throughout, enabling him to sit back, relax and relish in the AWESOMENESS of what is going to be, in my humble opinion, Marvel's GREATEST AND MOST SUCCESSFUL FILM EVER! Bill thoroughly enjoyed it, giving it his HIGHEST COMPLIMENT (the BIG "THUMB'S UP!"), and when the credits rolled, his face was locked into the HUGEST SMILE I HAVE EVER SEEN HIM WEAR (along with one or two tears of joy)! This was the GREATEST DAY OF THE LAST 22 YEARS for me, our family, and most importantly, BILL MANTLO!
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: AerosMugen on August 04, 2014, 06:27:10 pm
Alright new page, time to talk about shit that actually matters:
Spoiler: GotG related stuff I guess (click to see content)

Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Jmorphman on August 04, 2014, 06:36:17 pm
Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty

I hope its the rumoured squirrel girl production, about a girl that discovers she can talk to squirrels.

Squirrel girl would be the perfect property for a teenager hero in lieu of spider-man.
I think if Marvel wanted a competitor to Spider-Man they'd just use Nova. He'd connect the GotG stuff to Earth, he was made explicitly to be a homage to Spider-Man, after all (he's even got the alliterative name!)

I just don't see them doing a full movie just about Squirrel Girl; Marvel hasn't overdone her yet, they've correctly realized that the reason she works is by invading other people's stories. She has to be standing in the sidelines to poke fun at everything, after all.

But if they went with either they wouldn't be teenagers, or just a teenager for one movie (much like both Spider-Man movie series); too much time passes between movies for any actor to keep playing teen for that long (with TV, since it's more frequent, the jumps in age are much more subtle than they would be in a movie).

http://io9.com/marvel-screened-guardians-of-the-galaxy-for-the-co-crea-1615584469
Quote
****WHAT AN INCREDIBLE DAY FOR BILL MANTLO****! Marvel hooked Bill up with a PRIVATE VIEWING of "Guardians Of The Galaxy", and my wife Liz and my beloved cousin Jean assisted Bill throughout, enabling him to sit back, relax and relish in the AWESOMENESS of what is going to be, in my humble opinion, Marvel's GREATEST AND MOST SUCCESSFUL FILM EVER! Bill thoroughly enjoyed it, giving it his HIGHEST COMPLIMENT (the BIG "THUMB'S UP!"), and when the credits rolled, his face was locked into the HUGEST SMILE I HAVE EVER SEEN HIM WEAR (along with one or two tears of joy)! This was the GREATEST DAY OF THE LAST 22 YEARS for me, our family, and most importantly, BILL MANTLO!
That's really awesome of them. While we're on the subject: everyone should consider donating to help pay for Bill Mantlo's ongoing care (http://gregpak.com/love-rocket-raccoon-please-consider-donating-to-writer-bill-mantlos-ongoing-care/).
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Lord Drak-kof on August 04, 2014, 11:03:26 pm
How many did you notice?
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Sky79 on August 05, 2014, 01:18:50 am
Before you go, might you consider Titiln's post again?

If I gave a damn....yes.

I think if Marvel wanted a competitor to Spider-Man they'd just use Nova. He'd connect the GotG stuff to Earth, he was made explicitly to be a homage to Spider-Man, after all (he's even got the alliterative name!)

Agreed, He's overdue. There was an issue where both he and Spiderman took on a rebuilt Tri-Sentinel (http://cc.pbsstatic.com/l/04/1104/9781991351104.jpg), up until that point I'd never even heard of it and it blew my mind.

Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Jmorphman on August 06, 2014, 10:57:44 am
first look at Charlie Cox's Matt Murdock (http://www.bleedingcool.com/2014/08/05/meet-matt-murdock-attorney-at-law/)
(http://i.imgur.com/SVdumuX.jpg)

and here's some deleted scenes from The Winter Soldier (http://www.bleedingcool.com/2014/08/05/meet-matt-murdock-attorney-at-law/). How the hell does Sitwell outrank Maria Hill? I'm glad that's not canon! >:[
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: SNT on August 06, 2014, 01:55:26 pm
How the hell does Sitwell outrank Maria Hill? I'm glad that's not canon! >:[
Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty

Also that's the same link twice man
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Jmorphman on August 06, 2014, 04:50:36 pm
I was hoarding it for myself. (http://www.bleedingcool.com/2014/08/05/deleted-scenes-from-captain-america-the-winter-soldier/) My clever ruse has been ruined!
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Mechy on August 06, 2014, 06:33:16 pm
(http://i.imgur.com/SVdumuX.jpg)
Looking good.

Hoping the actual DD costume is not terrible shiny leather like in the movie.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: QuickFist on August 06, 2014, 11:47:40 pm
He does look good, let's hope the costume is good too.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: -Red- on August 07, 2014, 03:26:09 am
Just watched Guardians of the Galaxy. Amazing movie. I didn't give a crap about it until last week when I was like "everybody's hyped about this and it's a marvel movie so why not watch it? Can't be worse than Ironman 3!". Definitely worth the ticket.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Jmorphman on August 08, 2014, 07:56:18 pm
Kyle MacLachlan is joining Agents of SHIELD as Skye's father. (http://www.avclub.com/article/kyle-maclachlan-joins-agents-shield-207917) It has already been leaked that the midseason finale reveals that his real name is Dale Cooper, recently freed from possession, and the rest of the season is a Twin Peaks/Marvel crossover. Or at least, that's what should happen.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Nero D. on August 08, 2014, 09:27:06 pm
oh shit donald love


i hope he just disappears for no reason and leave a suitcase with no contents in a dialogue-less cutscene

end credits
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: GOH on August 09, 2014, 09:43:42 pm
https://www.facebook.com/VinDiesel/photos/a.101465923312.101581.89562268312/10152718210358313/

Quote
Vin and Marvel... you all made it happen!

I get the strange feeling that Marvel thinks I'm Inhuman... Haha.

I AM BLACK BOLT?
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: SlySuavity on August 10, 2014, 04:51:24 am
For anyone keeping close tabs on the Avengers timeline, there's a discrepancy that actually really bothers me. Any clarification is appreciated.

Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Speedpreacher on August 10, 2014, 05:04:06 am
The movies occur in the order they premiere. As for your question, you should probably get used to characters having to relearn lessons they've already learned in comic book based properties. Especially Tony Stark.

ESPECIALLY Tony Stark.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Jmorphman on August 10, 2014, 05:26:47 am
He didn't promise Pepper that he'd never do any robotics again, did he? He destroyed all his own armors, but the premise of Avengers 2 seems to point to the Ultron thing being a way for Stark to contribute to saving the world without sticking his neck on the line, or something.

And he does say at the end of the film, quite literally, that he will always be Iron Man, no matter what.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Sky79 on August 10, 2014, 05:28:42 am
He didn't promise Pepper that he'd never do any robotics again, did he? He destroyed all his own armors, but the premise of Avengers 2 seems to point to the Ultron thing being a way for Stark to contribute to saving the world without sticking his neck on the line, or something.

Agreed, they'll do the MJ "Go get'em Tiger" cliché with him AKA the easy way out
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Jmorphman on August 10, 2014, 05:29:53 am
They'll have a hell of a time doing that, given that Gwyneth Paltrow won't even be in Avengers 2. ::)
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Person Man on August 10, 2014, 05:32:25 am
[avatar]http://i42.photobucket.com/albums/e315/Tiger_Stripe/discordchocolatemilk.png[/avatar]It wouldn't be a real comic/superhero universe without massive life-changing character arcs being quietly nudged to the side and forgotten when the next big Event needs them to be.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Sky79 on August 10, 2014, 05:33:48 am
They'll have a hell of a time doing that, given that Gwyneth Paltrow won't even be in Avengers 2. ::)

Really?...you sure?....AWESOME, this is good news.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Jmorphman on August 10, 2014, 06:24:31 am
It wouldn't be a real comic/superhero universe without massive life-changing character arcs being quietly nudged to the side and forgotten when the next big Event needs them to be.
Ehhh, it really does seem like they're using IM3's conclusion as the base for Avengers 2, making it central to its plot instead of outright ignoring it.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Iced on August 12, 2014, 11:08:10 am
some antman and thanos tidbits
http://io9.com/which-female-hero-isnt-going-to-be-dead-in-ant-man-1619248096
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: GOH on August 12, 2014, 03:39:25 pm
http://www.blastr.com/2014-8-7/james-gunn-says-guardians-2-will-introduce-new-team-member
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Speedpreacher on August 12, 2014, 04:11:46 pm
Only one? Well, Adam Warlock then.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Jmorphman on August 12, 2014, 09:02:17 pm
"At least one more", hopefully that means Moondragon and Mantis could make it in too! Of all of the possibilities (besides Warlock who is obvious at this point) Moondragon seems the most likely, what with
Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Speedpreacher on August 12, 2014, 09:41:37 pm
I can see them bringing Moondragon in as a "daughter" of Thanos to give Drax a little bit more of a personal stake. I don't see Mantis making the cut with Gamora in the picture. Which is a shame because she's a vastly superior character on account of her being Space Master Shiva.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Jmorphman on August 12, 2014, 09:51:02 pm
They could make her blue or red or something (or even her original human skin tone), maybe lean more heavily on the Celestial Madonna powers or something!

I'd also like to see Phyla-Vell but jeez that backstory, I guess she could always just be a regular (pink) Kree or something, but if only they had a Captain Marvel movie in the works, ready to establish Mar-Vell as a legendary Kree hero or whatever (and then he dies to give Carol powers or whatever), and have Phyla run around as his daughter trying to live up to his legacy!
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: GOH on August 13, 2014, 01:30:30 am
Apparently Quill's father in the movie is not going to be Jason of Spartax. (http://collider.com/guardians-of-the-galaxy-2-news-peter-quill-father)

Also Inhumans movie is moving forward with a screenplay by Joe Robert Cole (http://collider.com/the-inhumans-movie-joe-robert-cole-script)
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Byakko on August 13, 2014, 01:42:38 am
Watched the Star Wars x Indiana Jones crossover
The story was really straightforward with little surprise, point-A-to-point-B stuff (where even Avengers still branched off between each character in their own direction), but it didn't need anything else, the on-the-spot fun was enough to build it all. The characters seemed very cliché before I saw it, but they each turned up very developed, very human, pretty cool. Groot so OP.
A Nova movie would make so much sense, after showing all the Nova-related stuff. If they're going to keep building on the cosmic stuff for Guardians 2, and with this quote from the above article that "Thanos will show up if it helps or not at all if it doesn't help", an interaction between a Nova series and a Guardians series would be on the same level as the Earth-based groups that led to the Avengers. To make their own stuff in their corner of space. Hell, Nova could even further the ties between the Guardians side of the universe and the Avengers side.

Oh, also, I was thinking that it might not be that good to have all the movies cross over. I'm not sure I want to see the Guardians barge in Avengers 3 against Thanos, for example, if there's also going to be more new faces in the middle : it'll end up like the Expendables, where they share a name on the poster, but a bunch of them only show up for 12 seconds and one line of dialog. I don't think the Guardians need to team up with the Avengers. They already had a hard enough time making Avengers in the first place.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Speedpreacher on August 13, 2014, 02:07:36 am
The way that the Novas were portrayed in the film changed my expectation of how a Nova movie would work though.

Spoiler: Potential minor spoilers (click to see content)

Apparently Quill's father in the movie is not going to be Jason of Spartax. (http://collider.com/guardians-of-the-galaxy-2-news-peter-quill-father)

There are theories that it may be Eros of Titan (also known by a far less easy to trademark name (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Starfox_%28comics%29)). I can get behind that for consolidation reasons.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Byakko on August 13, 2014, 02:16:00 am
The way that the Novas were portrayed in the film changed my expectation of how a Nova movie would work though.
Very true. They were all pretty regular soldiers, so a Nova-centered movie would have to make a single Nova be human-sized in powers, to keep up with this rendition. I've always thought of Nova as an equivalent to Green Lantern anyway, it seems like they're supposed to have crazy powers, but they can easily be shown on the scale of a single human, not taking on warships or moons on their own. ... Basically, show a Nova in the same way the Guardians and Yondu were portrayed. ... I guess that all of a sudden, a lot of the interest would vanish...
On the other hand, if they can say that the battle ships we saw and the formation they used was actually the Nova Force used in stead of technology, it would jump the relevance to impressive levels. Like, we thought what they did was technology and it was pretty basic, but it was actually the Nova Force at work, that would be a bit cool, and it would give enough margin to go for a Nova movie and keep cool powers.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Speedpreacher on August 13, 2014, 02:25:37 am
Ah, and the helmet and gauntlets and greaves are possibly a prototype to channel that energy as a response to what happened in the movie? Yes, that could work.

In fact, the more I think about it, the more I like it.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: -Red- on August 13, 2014, 02:28:27 am
3 years feels like a lot of time to wait for a sequel. Damn you Marvel movies :doom:
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Jmorphman on August 13, 2014, 02:35:31 am
I figured they'd take a bunch of cues from Annihilation and have the main Nova of the movies the last one, who has all the power of the Nova corps in a prototype suit or something (I was assuming the Nova Force was the power behind their ships, and that they hadn't miniaturized that technology yet). And have it all mostly be on Earth so you get do the teenage hero thing like Spider-Man (because, after all, Nova was created to be another Spider-Man type hero) but have a bridge between cosmic and Earth stuff. IDK how an Earth teenager would end up with the most advanced weapon in the universe, but I ain't no scriptwriter!

But yeah, that all seems like it would be best done later, after Avengers 3 or something. There's no room for it! Not if they can't fit in one fucking female led movie >:[

3 years feels like a lot of time to wait for a sequel. Damn you Marvel movies :doom:
2 years cuts it a bit too close most times, unless everyone is really in synch and can move that fast (which is why I'm not super worried about Cap 3); 3 years is pretty fast as it is for a major blockbuster, all things considered.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Speedpreacher on August 13, 2014, 02:45:26 am
IDK how an Earth teenager would end up with the most advanced weapon in the universe, but I ain't no scriptwriter!

They debut the prototype in the fight against Thanos when he comes to Earth in Avengers 3, the soldier gets killed or fatally wounded, teenager finds him (gotta keep that Green Lantern allusion!) and gets the gear. Boom!
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: AerosMugen on August 13, 2014, 04:21:49 am
I can totally see that ^ working.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: GOH on August 13, 2014, 01:31:52 pm
There are theories that it may be Eros of Titan (also known by a far less easy to trademark name (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Starfox_%28comics%29)). I can get behind that for consolidation reasons.
That would make Thanos his uncle.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Iced on August 13, 2014, 01:53:47 pm
four likely candidates

in the comics his father was an alien called j'son but hes a relatively normal alien eve if hes a jackass.
gunn already said he wont be following the dad from the comics.

so we have

STARFOX: or eros, the pelvic dance master, a real asshole. He is Thanos brother, they are both Eternals.

STARHAWK: also an asshole, he and yondu were a team in the comics, Hawk has wings and looks like an angel.

ADAM WARLOCK: he is connected ot the gems
Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty
  He and Thanos are rival/friends, frenemies.

CAPTAIN MAR VELL, he has the negabands and is a legendary kree captain that in the comics betrays the kree for the sake of earth after falling in love with earth, he dies of cancer caused by his negaband powered artifacts.

One hinted by gunn and spoilerish
Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty



Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Byakko on August 13, 2014, 02:01:00 pm
Two points I thought were of interest are, the fact that Yondu called the father an asshole (plus it seems like they know where he is right now since they still discuss bringing Peter to him), and then the fact that the Xandarians didn't recognize where the non-human part of Peter was from.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Iced on August 13, 2014, 02:05:59 pm
Most of my examples actually DO fit in that description.

Mar Vell is a kree so he doesnt.
Starfox and Thanos are eternals, a race that was manufactured by the celestials ( they interfered with most races developments and are the "reason" why most races are humanoid )

Starfox is a really huge womanizing asshole.

Star hawk origin was also all mystical in nature.

Adam is a god prototype created by religious fanatics with ADN manipulation.

My last one is supposed to hail from an alternate dimension which would make him unrecognizable.


the movie kindof tricked me into thinking yondu was the dad at first, because he started describing himself as an angel at one point.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Cazaki on August 13, 2014, 06:10:19 pm
Wasn't the Celestials shown at one point during the movie too?
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Byakko on August 13, 2014, 06:11:41 pm
There's Knowhere, and there's the exposition from the Collector, yes.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Speedpreacher on August 13, 2014, 06:21:55 pm
There are theories that it may be Eros of Titan (also known by a far less easy to trademark name (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Starfox_%28comics%29)). I can get behind that for consolidation reasons.
That would make Thanos his uncle.

Exactly, consolidation. Also it would, in my opinion, he would be the easiest to point to and say "like father, like son" what with the womanizing asshole bit.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Jmorphman on August 13, 2014, 09:17:11 pm
I think, of all those possibilities, Starfox is the only one that really makes sense. They need to explain who Thanos is and where he came from in time for Avengers 3, and tying him into Star-Lord makes a great deal of sense. The others, not so much. Sure, Mar-Vell could always be made into some other species, but why bother? What would they do that requires Mar-Vell? Better to save him for later, no? Starhawk is the same way, except, ehhhhhh who cares about Starhawk. Adam Warlock seems like a totally different thing and I don't imagine Yondu was talking about bringing Star-Lord to meet a big cocoon inside Space Liberace's Space Zoo. And there's the whole "ancient DNA" thing, which doesn't really fit Warlock; of course, that could always be changed, and I actually think his origin will be significantly changed to be less complicated (I imagine him to be perhaps an avatar of the Soul gem, or at least it's guardian for centuries, or something)
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Just No Point on August 13, 2014, 09:33:50 pm
I think a big crossover of Guardians and Avengers would be a good idea. But it shouldn't be 1 movie. I think they could make either a trilogy out of Thanos. Or make a few different movies that are taking place at the same time as each other. Stuff happening on Earth and in space.

Think of the battle against Thanos as one of those big multi comic cross overs. I would hope they don't just have 1 movie to deal with him and the infinity gauntlet and be done with it. This has been building up since the start of the MCU. It should be bigger than Avengers.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Byakko on August 13, 2014, 09:39:20 pm
Or make a few different movies that are taking place at the same time as each other. Stuff happening on Earth and in space.
I'd see that work. Thanos is doing stuff on Earth and in space, and the Avengers take care of what happens on Earth while the Guardians are out in space, and both maybe catch a glimpse of the others, without necessarily understanding what's going on, but both events being relevant to the same issue as a whole. It couldn't be the big final though, since one of the movies would have to come out after the other. IMO there's still going to be only one side of the universe that gets to deal the finishing blow to Thanos, so what the other team gets can't be the second knives of the big final. I'd give the final honor to the Guardians myself (or Nova or whatever), although an intervention from the likes of Odin can work (that is, if he's still available and not replaced by Loki of course).
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Jmorphman on August 13, 2014, 10:16:51 pm
Thanos and the Infinity Gauntlet is probably only going to be one movie, and that's Avengers 3. The realities of movie development and release dates means that it pretty much has to be confined to a single movie. Avengers 3 will be sometime in 2018, after 10 years of the MCU; it's the grand finale of everything. It's almost certainly going to be the swan song for RDJ, and probably will be the same for the rest of the original Avengers. Whether they all get recast right away or put on a shelf for a bit is another story (and if that shelf lasts long enough before Warner Bros and Sony crash the super hero movie market is an entirely separate story as well), but I don't see most of them signing on for another 10 years. Marvel's already trying to push new franchises to take over their current stable, after all.

As for GotG and Avengers teaming up, I could see Guardians of the Galaxy 2 ending with Thanos heading to Earth with said Gauntlet. Pretty much every hero would get in on the action, even the Guardians, although not in substantial roles, more cameos, I guess.

At least, that's how I picture it all!

Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Jmorphman on August 13, 2014, 11:04:24 pm
OK, well... this changes things (http://www.bleedingcool.com/2014/08/13/james-gunn-talks-guardians-of-the-galaxy-2-and-who-is-star-lords-daddy/)
James Gunn said:
I will say that I do not feel beholden to having to use Thanos in Guardians 2. He will show up if he helps our story and he will not show up at all if he is not. Thanos is not the most important thing in Guardians 2, that’s for damn sure. There’s the Guardians themselves and other threats the Guardians are going to be facing that are not Thanos.
I don't even know now. Surely they wouldn't wait even longer to do the big Thanos story? They can't cocktease us that long! I want my Infinity Gauntlet movie before the superhero market falls out!!!
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Byakko on August 13, 2014, 11:09:57 pm
Yeah, they had that quote in that article
Apparently Quill's father in the movie is not going to be Jason of Spartax. (http://collider.com/guardians-of-the-galaxy-2-news-peter-quill-father)
(I responded to it in my post below)
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Jmorphman on August 13, 2014, 11:11:16 pm
Well it wasn't in the url so it doesn't count! It would only count if GOH posted that stuff here! >:[
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Speedpreacher on August 13, 2014, 11:16:58 pm
That just drives home that Avengers 3 is where this needs to go down, and that it'd be a good idea to give a little backstory on Thanos at some point prior. Even if we ignore the superhero movie bubble possibly bursting, I just don't think it's feasible to keep stringing along an enemy set up in 2012. That'd be a long time to wait for any story arc in any medium to pay off.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Byakko on August 13, 2014, 11:23:38 pm
Speaking of the Thanos issue, so far we've seen, what, three or four gems and the Tesseract, and all of them were stored away. So what, we're going to see a massive break-in simultaneously as the introduction to Avengers 3 ? It seems a bit weird IMO.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Jmorphman on August 13, 2014, 11:27:20 pm
They definitely need to make him do something threatening on screen, because he hasn't actually done anything besides sit, smirk, and in his two appearances he's been betrayed, and either lost two gems, or worse, he had one already, but gave it away to get another, and ended up losing both, and just now lost another one (depends on whether Loki's staff was an Infinity gem/stone).

Marvel needs to step it up in his next appearance if they want him to be their final boss.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Byakko on August 14, 2014, 12:38:33 am
Oh, I'm not so much worried about him looking like a fool losing the stones one after the other, if they show well enough that he doesn't give a shit because he's -- how old is he supposed to be ? Centuries or something like that, I assume ? So he wouldn't care if a stone gets stored away for a while, all that matters is that he finds out where they are, and he'll do something when the time comes. Well, I guess it would be fine to go with a "massive simultaneous break-in" if they emphasize that aspect, one day he just stands up and says "okay, I've decided it would be today, let's wrap it up before tea time, folks" and he blows up everything and takes them one by one, because he goddamn can. And have that triggered by something related to his pursue of Death.
I suppose it could be at the end of Guardians 2, if G2 shows the last stone, it ends up saved, but then Thanos shows up and says "this is mine now, kthxbye". Cue Avengers 3 lead-in.

After all, he's not some James Bond villain, going "don't disappoint me" and wanting things done in five seconds, then getting pissed that his plans failed. He almost seemed unphased when Ronan betrayed him (back when he teased him on the piece of rock, and then on the hologram, though that lasted like 10 seconds), just a bit annoyed at the betrayal itself more than how much of a setback it was. We saw his face for like 2 seconds before Ronan turned it off, but it felt to me like he was just going "here we go again".
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Jmorphman on August 14, 2014, 12:53:10 am
It's not so worrying right now, but if the same pattern continues then it would be a problem, I think. He's only appeared twice, and only in a speaking role once, so they still have time to build him up.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Iced on August 14, 2014, 12:57:15 am
They need to do Thanos Quest.

A super hero movie all from the perspective of the villain.

The whole movie is him breaking through shit and retrieving the gems, as Adam Warlock ( im sorry surfer but your continuity is in another castle) is in a mad race to stop him.


The movie would start with Glenn close surrounded by Novas blasting away as thanos casually walks through them and through the vault to retrieve his Power gem.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Cazaki on August 14, 2014, 02:13:46 am
I thought Guardians 2 was coming out after A3? Or was it after A2? Either way, they have like 3-4 years to unveil Thanos' origin and have him take all the gems, and I don't think it would've happened in Guardians 2.

However, there IS a Dr. Strange movie coming out and I think that's their best bet, though that might end up toning down the amount of time they could spend on Strange himself along with whomever will be the villain of that movie (I'd assume Mephisto/Dormammu)

edit: this would be the perfect time for a Fantastic Four movie if Marvel had the rights smh
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Jmorphman on August 14, 2014, 02:15:39 am
GotG comes out in 2017. Avengers 3 will likely be 2018.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Cazaki on August 14, 2014, 02:17:52 am
Yeah so they could squeeze that in there I guess. Strange isn't really the go-to place for events that happen in the cosmic marvel universe but they might have to do it in order to introduce all of the gems and disclose their locations.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Byakko on August 14, 2014, 02:32:02 am
Despite the Guardians craze, I don't think there will be so much happening in space. I expect another cosmic series (I'm shooting for Nova) but that's all I see happening in space. Lets not forget that the Avengers are still a thing, and they, including Strange, will stay on Earth, Strange probably showing us alternate dimensions with Dormammu. For the gems, we've had a few on Earth with the Chitauri invasion, and then Thor in the other realms, I don't think Strange needs to show anything from space for us to see more.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Cazaki on August 14, 2014, 02:36:48 am
But not all of them have been shown and I don't think it would be in Marvel's best interests to have Thanos gather them all (along with the Gauntlet) off-screen. Then again a lot of the artifacts are in Asgard IIRC so it could be done in a Thor movie too
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: GOH on August 14, 2014, 06:31:10 pm
No Falcon as Captain America and no Modok for Cap 3 (http://edit.hollywoodreporter.com/heat-vision/captain-america-writers-no-falcon-725365)
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Iced on August 14, 2014, 06:46:15 pm
WHAT?!
FUCK THAT! I WANT MODOK!
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Speedpreacher on August 14, 2014, 06:54:38 pm
There's only room for one giant head in Cap 3 and that's the head of Arnim Zola!
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Iced on August 14, 2014, 06:59:01 pm
step 1: AIM is trying to create a super soldier of the twenty first century

step 2: AIM main guy announces that they are not beasts that rely on force, that there are more important stuff in a super soldier


step 3: repeat the some experiences similar to the super serum from the first movie but applied to  aim leader,  instead of the body the vita rays and all the rest are applied to his head.


step 4 he steps out of the chamber with a larger craniun, his inteligence is massive etc

then as the movie progresses have cuts of him and everytime he has gotten a slighty larger head
his body starts shriveling as his head is becoming more and more massive

he finally has to sit on the modok throne, with a head support for his now monstruous head, tubes and circuitry are added to his body and head.

The super soldier of the twenty first century is all brains and no brawn. Modok, mental organism designed only for Killing.

Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Jmorphman on August 14, 2014, 09:38:37 pm
Honestly I don't think they should use MODOK in the third Cap at all; they should be bringing back Red Skull (hopefully with a new actor who gives a shit) and Zola. Crossbones is definitely coming back, at least, and I don't want MODOK to be a minor threat who gets crowded out by the other villains! Put MODOK in the War Machine movie or something, AIM is Iron Man connected anyways.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Sky79 on August 14, 2014, 10:47:09 pm
Red Skull

It's overdue, Skull's the #1 guy in his rogues gallery and he's been downgraded to a minion.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Jmorphman on August 14, 2014, 10:51:20 pm
What the fuck are you even talking about. Do you even watch or read anything any more or do you just complain based on snippets of what other people are saying?

like, seriously, Jesus fucking Christ. That shit is nonsensical.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Sky79 on August 14, 2014, 10:52:56 pm
The hell? I'm agreeing with you're statement J, Red Skull should be in Cap3.........that's all.

You testy today?
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Byakko on August 14, 2014, 10:54:02 pm
Red Skull hasn't been downgraded to a minion. He was the big bad of the first movie ffs.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Jmorphman on August 14, 2014, 10:54:40 pm
Downgraded to a minion doesn't make any goddamn sense. He was the main villain of Cap 1. He did not appear in Cap 2. That's not exactly minion material. Criminy .
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Speedpreacher on August 14, 2014, 11:37:43 pm
Honestly I don't think they should use MODOK in the third Cap at all; they should be bringing back Red Skull (hopefully with a new actor who gives a shit)

Hugo Weaving was soooo good at it, though. I'm hoping by the time Cap 3 starts filming he'll either have done some "serious" work and gotten it out of his system or he'll have done so little work he needs the money or exposure
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Sky79 on August 14, 2014, 11:42:47 pm
Oh stop it J, you know what I mean, Hugo Weaving didn't bring his 'A-Game' and you know it.

Nothing about him screams big bad. I want my Red to ooz evil on screen, I want him to say things that make my skin crawl, that was the a typical "Mwahaha" villain. Red Skull is the most evil character in the marvel universe, he's the one villain other villains in the MCU that gives them the chills.

Now think of  'The Jew Hunter'  (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EUZv6bn7Hwg) in Inglourious Basterds.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Byakko on August 14, 2014, 11:45:39 pm
But Weaving's performance as the Red Skull has absolutely nothing to do with calling the role of his character a minion. He was the big bad of the movie regardless of whether he made your skin crawl or not.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Jmorphman on August 14, 2014, 11:48:47 pm
And I'm sure that was what he meant all along, and not something he just jumped upon after seeing Speedpreacher's post. I really should stop even bothering to engage him. Ugh.

Hugo Weaving was soooo good at it, though. I'm hoping by the time Cap 3 starts filming he'll either have done some "serious" work and gotten it out of his system or he'll have done so little work he needs the money or exposure
I wasn't sure if it was the script of his performance but it felt a little off to me. It has been a while, though, so I'm not sure I trust my judgement anyway. Like, I just saw this clip the other day:

and I could barely remember this being in the movie at all. And it's so, so good! I think I should rewatch Cap 1 and reevaluate it!
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Sky79 on August 14, 2014, 11:50:42 pm
But Weaving's performance as the Red Skull has absolutely nothing to do with calling the role of his character a minion. He was the big bad of the movie regardless of whether he made your skin crawl or not.


and in my eyes, he failed
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Roman55 on August 14, 2014, 11:54:28 pm
Like, I just saw this clip the other day:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DxRKwKJI_uI

and I could barely remember this being in the movie at all. And it's so, so good! I think I should rewatch Cap 1 and reevaluate it!
How could you forget the Star Spangled Man With a Plan song
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Jmorphman on August 14, 2014, 11:56:59 pm
I don't knooooooooooooooooooooowwwwwww D:
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: TheHateThatHateMade on August 15, 2014, 12:15:36 am
They really do need to have Thanos start getting the gems but i seem to recall The Collector having one, honestly i figure his entire purpose in the cinematic universe was to collect them for Thanos behind the scenes. Thanos is a master stroke type villain so it could end up that all of this was planned, even his seemingly blundered plans.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Byakko on August 15, 2014, 12:20:55 am
Spoiler: Guardians spoiler, in response to the above (click to see content)
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Bea on August 15, 2014, 12:23:33 am
Like, I just saw this clip the other day:
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DxRKwKJI_uI[/youtube]
and I could barely remember this being in the movie at all. And it's so, so good! I think I should rewatch Cap 1 and reevaluate it!

This part was the best thing of the film.
I LOVED every second of it. It was so, sooooooo good.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Iced on August 15, 2014, 12:34:45 am
#wheresgamora
is a new trend, women are gathering to complain about how the toys for the movie dont have any gamoras avaliable and how women need super heroes too.

http://www.bleedingcool.com/2014/08/10/has-disneymarvel-dropped-the-ball-folks-ask-wheresgamora/

They are demanding Disney and Marvel to answer why theres no toys for gamora like this

(http://marveltoynews.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/20140216-155205.jpg)

or this

(http://cdn3.volusion.com/ondfq.dtexo/v/vspfiles/photos/HASMV56501-2.jpg) ( cant get groot without that leg)

or this one where shes packed with starlord

(http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-Vpv6wTD4Q98/UwRGr6zbKuI/AAAAAAAAbPI/q2spO8GZErw/s1600/TOY_FAIR_2014_HASBRO_GUARDIANS_OF_THE_GALAXY_DISPLAY_BATTLE_GEAR_2-PACK_STAR-LORD_&_GAMORA_PACKAGED_01.jpg)


or even this one where she drives the milano
(https://farm8.staticflickr.com/7370/13624567173_06fe0d68fe.jpg)

or maybe an infinity piece
(http://i.kinja-img.com/gawker-media/image/upload/s--SmmNORnk--/c_fit,fl_progressive,q_80,w_636/ydx8tciwcq4zv9jeuwvy.png)

or shit, i dunno, some kind of thing like those groot gloves
http://www.amazon.com/Rubies-Guardians-Galaxy-Costume-Make-Up/dp/B00HA4WLLU/ref=sr_1_11?ie=UTF8&qid=1407712553&sr=8-11&keywords=gamora

or this one for the adult colector ( seriously shes expensive )
(http://www.actionfigurefury.com/wp-content/uploads/My-top-5-things-displayed-Hot-Toys-SDCC-2014-5.jpg)


At the end of the day the question remains, why does Marvel hate women and refuses to do merch for them?

( more seriously, this seems to be about a couple of  people complaining that the toys are hard to find and then a bunch of other people co opted it to complain about something they have no clue about )
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: TheHateThatHateMade on August 15, 2014, 12:36:54 am
Spoiler: Guardians spoiler, in response to the above (click to see content)

True.  Starting to piss me off, Thanos is my favorite Marvel villain of all time. I don't want to admit it but he is beginning to look like an ass in the cinematic universe.  I haven't been this upset since Diet Drax Yamcha'd him, a la Dr Gero hand through the chest.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Jmorphman on August 15, 2014, 12:43:04 am
Apparently the source of all this was Diamond replacing the minimates series Nebula and Gamora with Yondu, with the former only being available at specialty shops. Which is... odd.

The other uproar seemed to be more focused on clothing, I think. Like there was a shirt or mug or something that weirdly left out Gamora from the GotG lineup and had multiple versions of the other characters to fill in, which is again, pretty weird!
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Jmorphman on August 15, 2014, 09:13:05 am
OK, so looking back on the full version of that interview with the Captain America screenwriters, it really sounds like all that not being able to do MODOK stuff was in reference to Cap 2, (http://www.sfx.co.uk/2014/08/13/exclusive-marvel-screenwriters-talk-winter-soldier-and-captain-america-3/) because adding him in would require major restructuring the way that say, Zola didn't. So hey, maybe MODOK's not off the table!

But then again, that whole "Cap 3 is an amalgam of 1 and 2" makes me think present day spy thriller with flashbacks to WWII, and wouldn't it be nice if Cap could face a villain in the past while dealing with their descendant(s) in the future? Perhaps some sort of perpetually masked German scientist? (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baron_Zemo)
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: QuickFist on August 16, 2014, 01:18:25 am
Oh...Zemo would be sooooo gooood!
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Cazaki on August 16, 2014, 05:59:46 am
Zemo would absolutely be the best choice.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Jmorphman on August 19, 2014, 10:13:13 am
Feige recently hinted very very heavily towards solo Black Panther and Captain Marvel movies (http://comicbook.com/blog/2014/08/19/marvel-studios-head-says-black-panther-and-captain-marvel-are-ab/)

goddammit just do it, announce it now, there was nothing at Comic-Con, we still haven't seen the Age of Ultron trailer, Warner Brothers seems like it's trying to cause a superhero movie crash, Sony might be making a movie out of Stunner (http://www.comicvine.com/stunner/4005-11116/) of all people, I need some goddamn good news >:[
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Byakko on August 19, 2014, 10:28:16 am
Captain Marvel ? The guy one, then, after what they said last time ? At least that would give an opening for a woman-led movie as a sequel.
If Thanos is the big bad of Avengers 3, I could see a Captain Marvel movie in space with the Guardians ending up on Earth and then connecting into Avengers 3 with Carol. It wouldn't feel as bloated as the whole Guardians team crossing over.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Jmorphman on August 19, 2014, 10:31:09 am
He seemed to be talking about Carol Danvers.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Byakko on August 19, 2014, 10:33:09 am
Oh, hadn't clicked on the link yet. Eh, if it's just him saying they're "Absolutely Characters He Would Like To Give Solo Films", then it's not the same as saying they already got the okay.
But if Captain Marvel isn't already decided as the next movie in space, he can still show up in the same way I described in a Nova film instead with the same result :P (also it would feel a bit less of a "woman inheriting a man's mantle" sequel if the male Mar Vell isn't the star of his movie)
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Jmorphman on August 19, 2014, 10:39:57 am
This time was different from the last time, the hints were much stronger; it almost seemed like he was right on the verge of announcing them. He also said this:
Kevin Feige said:
But in this particular case, I think [the fan movement towards the Marvel movies having more diverse heroes] is a groundswell. And I think it does…I think it means something substantial.”
so, who knows.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Iced on August 19, 2014, 11:09:24 am
But Carol only really has Moonstone.

and Black Panther has Klaw and White Gorilla and I dont really think they would use white gorilla.

Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Jmorphman on August 19, 2014, 11:17:12 am
And Iron Man only really has Mandarin. It's really, really not an issue.

They're not limited to just mainstay villains, I would imagine a Captain Marvel movie would basically just focus on the Kree, Black Panther definitely Klaw. After that, why not use some unaffiliated villains? MODOK, Madame Hydra (I have to imagine she's in the same boat as Quicksilver and Scarlet Witch), maybe even Monica Rappaccini if you still wanna use AIM but not MODOK, and hell why not Marcus or something, that'd be hilarious (in that you would have Carol beating the shit out of that stupid, stupid storyline, metaphorically). Same thing with Panther, Marvel's got a bunch of villains that aren't super strongly attached to any one hero, why not put them to work?
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: GOH on August 19, 2014, 07:28:13 pm
http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/live-feed/agents-shield-enlists-adrianne-palicki-726118

Adrianne Palicki has been cast as Bobbi Morse (Mockingbird).
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Iced on August 21, 2014, 07:24:33 pm
http://gawker.com/nice-guy-chris-pratt-played-star-lord-for-a-bunch-of-ho-1625005175


Hey look who it is
(http://i.kinja-img.com/gawker-media/image/upload/s--IF825R9c--/c_fit,fl_progressive,q_80,w_636/a59os92yswrvn289tuzp.jpg)
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: QuickFist on August 21, 2014, 07:30:54 pm
Yes!
So she IS going to play Wasp (hopefully)
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Foobs on August 21, 2014, 07:34:58 pm
Quote
nice-guy-chris-pratt-played-star-lord-for-a-bunch-of-ho-


I expected something less noble from that url :P
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Jmorphman on August 21, 2014, 09:09:31 pm
Was it "Nice guy Chris Pratt played Star Lord for a bunch of hopeful fans by changing their tire after they got a flat"? :D
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: walt on August 21, 2014, 09:22:30 pm
hahahahaha cyan paul
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Jmorphman on August 21, 2014, 09:24:04 pm
GotG concept art (http://io9.com/guardians-concept-art-shows-how-rocket-could-have-looke-1624377227). Really, really glad they chose the designs in the final film, especially for Rocket, cause the alternatives ain't pretty.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: walt on August 21, 2014, 09:47:26 pm
wow, some of those are pretty straight forward Star Wars stuff
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Mechy on August 21, 2014, 09:58:30 pm
I like the Nova Corp designs.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Sky79 on August 22, 2014, 01:12:20 am
http://gawker.com/nice-guy-chris-pratt-played-star-lord-for-a-bunch-of-ho-1625005175


Hey look who it is
(http://i.kinja-img.com/gawker-media/image/upload/s--IF825R9c--/c_fit,fl_progressive,q_80,w_636/a59os92yswrvn289tuzp.jpg)

This pleases me.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Nero D. on August 22, 2014, 01:42:43 am
GotG concept art (http://io9.com/guardians-concept-art-shows-how-rocket-could-have-looke-1624377227). Really, really glad they chose the designs in the final film, especially for Rocket, cause the alternatives ain't pretty.


most of those aren't bad, tho in hindsight they wouldn't have fit the aesthetic that the movie was going for, some of them anyway


that top rocky picture is way unsettling tho what the hell
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Foobs on August 22, 2014, 04:05:26 am
wow, some of those are pretty straight forward Star Wars stuff

Wocket Wookie.

I kinda like some of those Gamoras a bit more than the final product. Can't say the same for the rest,  though.

Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Bastard Mami on August 22, 2014, 06:09:42 pm
http://gawker.com/nice-guy-chris-pratt-played-star-lord-for-a-bunch-of-ho-1625005175


Hey look who it is
(http://i.kinja-img.com/gawker-media/image/upload/s--IF825R9c--/c_fit,fl_progressive,q_80,w_636/a59os92yswrvn289tuzp.jpg)
nureru!
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Sky79 on August 23, 2014, 02:38:07 am
Ok, I give up, whats the actress's name?
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: 【MFG】gui0007 on August 23, 2014, 04:03:46 am
Ok, I give up, whats the actress's name?

Evangeline Lilly
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Sky79 on August 23, 2014, 05:57:30 am
Wait Wait Wait... :shocked2: You mean this  (http://celebmafia.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/evangeline-lilly-men-s-health-magazine-january-february-2014-issue_1.jpg)Evangeline Lilly?!?

I approve!!!  :thumbsup:

First Hulkbuster is in, then Gwyneth Paltrow is out of A2 and now this? Marvel, Why are you so nice lately?
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Jmorphman on August 23, 2014, 08:26:36 am
Interview with Vincient D'Onofrio about playing Kingpin. (http://comicsalliance.com/daredevil-vincent-donofrio-interview-kingpin-exclusive/)
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Speedpreacher on August 23, 2014, 08:37:53 am
Oh man, I'm legit excited to see D'Onofrio crush some heads and do some scenery chewing.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Jmorphman on August 24, 2014, 07:55:12 am
Agents of SHIELD casts its Absorbing Man (http://www.avclub.com/article/agents-shield-soaks-absorbing-man-208433)

hopefully he'll have a better showing that Graviton!!!
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: YO SOY GROOT
Post by: Sky79 on August 24, 2014, 03:36:35 pm
As long as Nick Nolte stays away, I'm cool with it.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Avengers sequel due in 2015
Post by: Iced on August 25, 2014, 12:41:56 pm
seeing he hasn't yet made a movie beyond a 10 million$ budget, i sure hope he will be able to handle something that huge & looks SO hard to pull off.


oh ye of little faith

http://io9.com/guardians-of-the-galaxy-reclaims-pole-position-at-the-b-1626195289
Quote

Marvel's big gamble continues to deliver. Guardians of the Galaxy moved back into the #1 spot at the U.S. box office this weekend, having finished the last two weekends in second place to Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles.

Guardians of the Galaxy pulled in an estimated $17.6-million this weekend (to TMNT's $16.8-million), bringing its total U.S. gross to an estimated $251.88-million. In doing so, GotG has become the highest grossing summer movie of 2014, and the third-highest grossing film of the year; still in its sights are The Lego Movie (currently in the #2 position for 2014, with a total gross of $257.75-million) and frontrunner Captain America: The Winter Soldier (which closed this weekend at $259.77-million).


http://io9.com/the-first-official-dancing-groot-toy-has-arrived-1625978100
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Ants in your pants edition
Post by: Jmorphman on August 26, 2014, 08:51:45 am
The head of Netflix talks about the 5 upcoming Marvel series. (http://www.bleedingcool.com/2014/08/25/netflixs-ted-sarandos-talks-about-upcoming-marvel-series/) They're casting Jessica Jones right now (I guess that will be next, after Daredevil), and that together, the shows should run together close together (I guess the gap would be at most 13 weeks, but since all of Netflix's shows have all their episodes released at once, maybe the gaps will be shorter?).

Also, Jack Huston is being rumored for Doctor Strange (http://screenrant.com/doctor-strange-movie-casting-jack-huston/), which is... what? No. C'mon. He's so goddamn young! And he's British, they keep stealing our superhero roles! And half his face is shot off and he has to wear a tin mask to cover it!

... I'm being told that Jack Huston does not in fact have to wear a tin mask shaped like the left side of his face to cover up his war injuries, but that was in fact something his character on Boardwalk Empire did. Nevertheless!!! He's like 31, that's too young, he'd be younger than Cap and Thor and that's just wrong! Strange has to be old! >:[
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Ants in your pants edition
Post by: Sky79 on August 27, 2014, 01:12:29 am
Hell no! not  Jon Spaihts 'The Darkest Hour ' Sucked! Keep him away!  :bigcry:

Big Edit:

You know, I had my issues with the Avengers movie, something didn't smell right, Edward Norton is a fantastic actor, and honestly loves the Hulk character dearly, he wanted to play Banner again, thus, I didn't pay to see it, then there's the Antman movie problems and hiring a writer (James Gun) with no less then two Rasi Awards. Jon Spaihts is a first rate hack, The Hell? .........Now I understand (http://confusedmatthew.com/matthews-marvel-madness.html) <---NSFW
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Ants in your pants edition
Post by: Iced on August 31, 2014, 03:22:50 am
http://io9.com/guardians-of-the-galaxy-is-now-the-highest-grossing-mov-1628832126/+Fahey

Gotg highest grossing movie of 2014.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Ants in your pants edition
Post by: Jmorphman on August 31, 2014, 07:34:00 am
Enver Gjokaj is joining Agent Carter. (http://www.avclub.com/article/chad-michael-murray-and-dollhouses-enver-gjokaj-jo-208709) YESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS I'M FREAKING OUT

(he was in Joss Whedon's last show, Dollhouse, and was utterly fantastic. I have no goddamn idea why he isn't a bigger star, he's got the looks and the talent! Also he was in Avengers as a cop so they'll probably make that character the grandson of his Agent Carter character or something)
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Ants in your pants edition
Post by: Jmorphman on September 01, 2014, 05:55:20 am
Wesley Snipes might be doing another Blade movie? (http://www.bleedingcool.com/2014/08/31/rumors-of-wesley-snipes-returning-as-blade/)

I'm putting this here, because Marvel has gotten back the film rights to Blade, and thus, any Blade sequel would have to be done by them. Since the previous Blade movies were done by New Line, they might not be able to use anything from those movies, besides Blade himself. But jeez, is there anything left that anyone would want to come back? Ryan Reynolds's shitty rendition of Hannibal King? Abigail Whistler and her vampire killing iPod playlist? No thanks! If Marvel wanted to make it part of the MCU, they could always do it like Incredible Hulk and have the previous movies sort of vaguely happen (and hopefully everything from Blade Trinity besides Parker Posey gets erased) and have him run around in the backround, killing vampires (and maybe other critters?)

As long as Snipes is actually interested in playing the character, and not just sitting there refusing to act and having most of his role be played by his stand-in (http://blogs.indiewire.com/theplaylist/patton-oswalt-has-some-pretty-awesome-wesley-snipes-stories-from-blade-trinity-20121119), I think it could be pretty cool.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Ants in your pants edition
Post by: Sky79 on September 01, 2014, 03:43:51 pm
Recast, Snipes is a burn out and would bring unnecessary negative attention to the film.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Ants in your pants edition
Post by: Jmorphman on September 02, 2014, 02:31:30 am
Right, that's why Expendables was had a disastrous filming and garnered major negative attention, all because of Wesley Snipes. :megaeyes:

Stan Lee might've accidentally let slip that Black Panther is in development. (http://www.bleedingcool.com/2014/09/01/did-stan-lee-let-the-black-panther-out-of-the-bag/) Not exactly a surprise at this point, given his importance to the Marvel universe at large, (and there are rumors of Wakanda being mentioned in Avengers 2), but also as Marvel's most prominent black hero... that they have the film rights too. Storm is probably still a bigger deal than Black Panther, right?
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Ants in your pants edition
Post by: Neocide on September 02, 2014, 02:34:19 am
yes she is. Panther has been very secondary in everything. I wouldn't mind snipes back as blade. I mean can you blame him for not wanting to be in half of blade trinity? that movie was shit.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Ants in your pants edition
Post by: Speedpreacher on September 02, 2014, 02:53:00 am
Snipes has had as big, if not bigger, an impact on Blade than RDJ has on Iron Man. It's already been proven that nobody's really interested in a Blade TV show, so if he's not involved they're not going to do a lot with the property.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Ants in your pants edition
Post by: Jmorphman on September 02, 2014, 03:09:39 am
yes she is. Panther has been very secondary in everything.
I thought it might have shifted a bit (at least from a mainstream perspective) since Storm has been so marginalized in the movies and Black Panther had that cartoon and it's only been recently that Storm's been given an ongoing. But even with her slight presence in the movies its more exposure than Panther, I guess.

I wouldn't mind snipes back as blade. I mean can you blame him for not wanting to be in half of blade trinity? that movie was shit.
Words can't describe how shitty it was, but it might've been improved slightly if Snipes gave a shit. I mean, Parker Posey at least made her scenes amazing, Snipes might've been able to do the same for his, maybe.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Ants in your pants edition
Post by: Neocide on September 02, 2014, 03:37:15 am
he was too busy not paying his taxes :p

I think with a reboot he'll obviously do the role justice again. he's a extremely perfect fit for blade, other than Michael Jai White (who I think would be better, but snipes name is more known.)
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Ants in your pants edition
Post by: TheHateThatHateMade on September 02, 2014, 04:43:57 am
While Snipes did a excellent job in the first Blade and the second one was decent, he's too old if they are going to do anything but a one off. I love Michael Jai White and while he is a little younger than snipes (46) he doesnt fit the role enough in my mind but i would accept him and we could do a lot worse. In a perfect world i would be able to put what Wesley Snipes did in the first Blade into Marrese Crump.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Ants in your pants edition
Post by: Iced on September 02, 2014, 11:32:43 am
http://kevjenkins.blogspot.co.uk/2014/08/guardians-of-galaxy.html?_sm_au_=ivrKzjbKWTRZkHLV

Snipes is boring give me Glover for Blade.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Ants in your pants edition
Post by: Jmorphman on September 02, 2014, 11:41:38 am
Danny Glover? Isn't he too old?

ok, but for real, I've only seen Donald Glover in comedic stuff, and I'm not sure how good he'd be as a super serious, brooding vampire slayer.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Ants in your pants edition
Post by: Neocide on September 02, 2014, 11:51:21 am
he has to be kidding, glover as blade would be a horrible choice.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Ants in your pants edition
Post by: Sky79 on September 02, 2014, 04:09:32 pm
Danny Glover? Isn't he too old?

ok, but for real, I've only seen Donald Glover in comedic stuff, and I'm not sure how good he'd be as a super serious, brooding vampire slayer.
I think he means Donald Glover the rap star/Actor on 30 rock
 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_Glover)
However, the Danny Glover you're thinking about would make a great T'Chaka, his voice alone makes him perfect for the roll.
 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eEnqzPIyxlU)
negative attention, all because of Wesley Snipes. :megaeyes:
You seriously don't see a problem here?
he was too busy not paying his taxes :p
See J? Panther deserves a fresh start without the past garbage casting Snipes would bring........ Snipes is 'to old for this $hit'  ::)
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Ants in your pants edition
Post by: Jmorphman on September 02, 2014, 04:27:30 pm
... I don't even know where to begin with that, Jesus Christ. I guess I'll go point-by-point:

- I know who Donal Glover is. I talk about him in the same goddamn post you're quoting, directly after making a Danny Glover joke. holy fucking shit what is wrong with you

- Snipes did fine in Expendables 3. There was no major outcry that he was cast in the film, and his presence didn't cause it to flop (the movie did however do fairly poorly at the box office, however not because of Snipes, but because it was leaked online weeks in advance of its release at the box office)

- Snipes isn't doing Black Panther, he was rumored to reprise his role of Blade, the character he almost single-handedly took from being a relatively obscure Tomb of Dracula character to a widely successful character supporting a trilogy of movies. If he wants to do another Blade movie, and actually acts in it? I don't really see the problem.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Ants in your pants edition
Post by: Iced on September 02, 2014, 04:43:49 pm
I was joking with Donald Glover but i rather have a younger actor than Snipes solely because i dont trust Snipes to act.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Ants in your pants edition
Post by: Jmorphman on September 02, 2014, 04:47:15 pm
Apparently he did well in Expendables 3, maybe his time in prison got his head straightened out?
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Ants in your pants edition
Post by: GOH on September 02, 2014, 05:47:03 pm
lol you're still replying to Sky79
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Ants in your pants edition
Post by: Person Man on September 02, 2014, 06:10:31 pm
Disney Exec says no, there will not be a Disney/Pixar animated movie set in the MCU. (http://comicsalliance.com/disney-animated-marvel-movie-expectations/)
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Ants in your pants edition
Post by: Sky79 on September 02, 2014, 06:15:17 pm
- Snipes did fine in Expendables 3. There was no major outcry that he was cast in the film,---

And that means what? Dude 'The Expendables' was designed to be just was it is, a brain-dead action movie franchise.

Is that what Blade is to you?
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Ants in your pants edition
Post by: Jmorphman on September 02, 2014, 06:40:03 pm
Blade is not exactly a deep character. None of his movies are anything other than dumb action films, and there is absolutely nothing wrong with that, provided that the movie is good. And the first two Blade movies succeeded at exactly that.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Ants in your pants edition
Post by: walt on September 02, 2014, 08:00:50 pm
lol you're still replying to Sky79

Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Ants in your pants edition
Post by: Sky79 on September 02, 2014, 10:34:12 pm
Blade is not exactly a deep character. None of his movies are anything other than dumb action films, and there is absolutely nothing wrong with that, provided that the movie is good. And the first two Blade movies succeeded at exactly that.

There is no such animal.

Your lunch with Megan Fox, Joel Schumacher and Michael Bay still on?

Edit:

Ok-ok I'll admit, "dumb action films" have their place, they are a 'guilty pleasure' for me at times, but dammit I know Blade is more then that, if they can make a guy that tells a story while waiting for a bus or a guy who dresses in black rubber to beat up a clown Oscar worthy, we can do better then Wesley Snipes.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Ants in your pants edition
Post by: QuickFist on September 02, 2014, 11:39:49 pm
Please, just, stop.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Ants in your pants edition
Post by: Jmorphman on September 03, 2014, 12:43:09 am
I would never in a million years call Michael Bay's movies dumb action films (well, a few, but not really anything post-Armageddon), because you still need a brain to be dumb. And a heart, a soul, wit, the ability to shoot action scenes, and the wisdom to not put racist robots in your movie, and...

"Dumb" might sound overly pejorative, but I'm not sure what a better term would be. Not all movies should be about exploring deep themes or feature elaborate character studies, some movie should just go nuts and have fun; variety is the spice of life, after all. And of course some movies do a little of both, like most of the Marvel movies, for instance; but they can never go as deep as a purely cerebral one, because they've still got explosions and shit to do! I can't really say Blade has tried to do the latter, whether it be in comics or film, unless... I will now attempt a redemptive reading of the Blade films and try to discern some deeper meaning from them:

Blade: a working class black man fights against the white, entrenched power structure of the upper class who parasitically feed off on the 99%; Blade faces off against both old and new money, finding them both lacking and equally as despicable. Thus, he injects their crazy blood god thing with this serum that makes blood explode and then he says "Some motherfuckers are always trying to ice-skate uphill", reflecting the futility of their self destructive behavior in the long run.

Blade II: builds on the themes of the first one by providing an opportunity for Blade to unite with the elite against a common enemy; however, he knows they are not to be trusted and sure enough, they betray him, confirming that tearing down the establishment is the only way to achieve material social progress.

Blade Trinity: Blade teams up with Van Wilder and iPod Lady to fight shitty, boring Dracula. Also, Patton Oswalt is there.

well that was a fun diversion from all this stupidity, I guess! Pretty much the only reason why I replied, to be honest.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Ants in your pants edition
Post by: Sky79 on September 03, 2014, 03:43:09 am
Again with race?
Blade: a working class black man fights against the white, entrenched power structure of the upper class who parasitically feed off on the 99%

 :uhoh: I'm glad you're joking about that....I mean WTF.

Ultimately, Blade is a horror/thriller franchise,  'Vampires control everything in the shadows' is just the setting. They need to get back to it, fight scenes are suppose to be story driven, not the other way around. 
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Ants in your pants edition
Post by: Iced on September 03, 2014, 12:02:21 pm
http://io9.com/all-of-tom-hiddlestons-marvel-footage-edited-into-one-l-1629316103

Loki, the story of the Ice prince.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Ants in your pants edition
Post by: Iced on September 06, 2014, 04:53:16 pm
(http://i.imgur.com/ibtKzBx.png)
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Ants in your pants edition
Post by: Segatron on September 06, 2014, 05:11:45 pm
Is the purple Guy Vision and Where the hell is Scarlet Witch and Quick Silver
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Ants in your pants edition
Post by: Speedpreacher on September 06, 2014, 09:26:49 pm
Yes.

Probably behind that dude.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Ants in your pants edition
Post by: Sky79 on September 07, 2014, 12:35:45 am
(http://i.imgur.com/ibtKzBx.png)

Vision looks.......Good, I'm honestly surprised  :sugoi:

Thank you Marvel
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Ants in your pants edition
Post by: GOH on September 07, 2014, 11:36:23 pm
(http://i.imgur.com/a91n1YY.jpg)
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Ants in your pants edition
Post by: Iced on September 08, 2014, 05:33:33 pm
(http://i.kinja-img.com/gawker-media/image/upload/vyzml84lrndz0piyno3y.jpg)
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Ants in your pants edition
Post by: QuickFist on September 08, 2014, 08:41:37 pm
I like it, I like it very much
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Ants in your pants edition
Post by: Sky79 on September 09, 2014, 12:49:57 am
Very pleased, I'll miss the diamond on the chest, but the casting and iconic poses so far are perfect!  :sugoi:
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Ants in your pants edition
Post by: Bea on September 09, 2014, 11:57:43 am
http://comicbook.com/2014/09/08/guardians-of-the-galaxy-passes-man-of-steel-at-the-domestic-box-/

It seems that the public likes talking raccoons and dancing trees better than men of mass murder and destruction.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Ants in your pants edition
Post by: Person Man on September 09, 2014, 01:32:11 pm
[avatar]http://i42.photobucket.com/albums/e315/Tiger_Stripe/discordworried2_zpsafe2dce5.png[/avatar]RDJ confirms that Marvel has no plans for an Iron Man 4. (http://www.escapistmagazine.com/news/view/137310-Marvel-Has-No-Plans-for-More-Iron-Man-Movies)
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Ants in your pants edition
Post by: 【MFG】gui0007 on September 09, 2014, 05:33:31 pm
(http://i.kinja-img.com/gawker-media/image/upload/vyzml84lrndz0piyno3y.jpg)

OMG!! Vision looks nice!!

http://comicbook.com/2014/09/08/guardians-of-the-galaxy-passes-man-of-steel-at-the-domestic-box-/

It seems that the public likes talking raccoons and dancing trees better than men of mass murder and destruction.

 :laugh:

RDJ confirms that Marvel has no plans for an Iron Man 4. (http://www.escapistmagazine.com/news/view/137310-Marvel-Has-No-Plans-for-More-Iron-Man-Movies)

Sadly, as i expected. I mean, Downey Jr, contract expired after Avengers 3 and I guess (I GUESS!) that Marvel / Disney / Paramount will not afford a lease renewal.
Title: Re: Marvel Cinematic Universe: Ants in your pants edition
Post by: Byakko on September 09, 2014, 05:44:47 pm
On the other hand it looks like they've done a lot with the character. They renewed him at a time where no one cared for him anymore in the comics (beside Civil War), and maybe they still don't have that many ideas of what to do. There's the "real Mandarin" that was expected at some point with the King one-shot, but they haven't said a word about it since then.
Hell, even Cap still has more to do than Iron Man : Cap 1 had him find his place during the war, Avengers had him lost on what to do and find himself as a de facto leader but without the co