YesNoOk

Show content

This section allows you to browse the content for this member. Note that you can only see content for which you have sufficient viewing permissions.

***
Kyoudou Senna is Offline
Contact Kyoudou Senna:

Kyoudou Senna

User

Messages by Kyoudou Senna

    

Re: Worst habits a MUGEN user can have?

 July 12, 2014, 04:10:25 am View in topic context
 Posted by Kyoudou Senna  in Worst habits a MUGEN user can have? (Started by JustAGuy92 June 28, 2014, 05:02:14 pm
 Board: M.U.G.E.N Discussion

    

Re: FIFA World Cup 2014

 July 12, 2014, 02:24:46 am View in topic context
 Posted by Kyoudou Senna  in FIFA World Cup 2014 (Started by City_Hunter December 06, 2013, 06:33:31 pm
 Board: Entertainment

    

Re: Feedback to Warnings/Decisions

 July 12, 2014, 02:19:56 am View in topic context
 Posted by Kyoudou Senna  in Feedback to Warnings/Decisions (Started by Iced February 24, 2012, 09:43:26 pm
 Board: Feedback

Also note it's not the 1st time he was banned. The difference between the time he was allowed back last time and this time is that you wasn't around (active?) the last time.

It's exceptionally hard to get perma banned here. And he even came back from that!

More like minding my own business, but this went widespread, and I was feeling something suspicious about that topic from my POV since early in the night.
    

Re: Feedback to Warnings/Decisions

 July 12, 2014, 02:03:04 am View in topic context
 Posted by Kyoudou Senna  in Feedback to Warnings/Decisions (Started by Iced February 24, 2012, 09:43:26 pm
 Board: Feedback

Then, if he didn't fall for a troll, why did he agree with the op?
His ban has nothing to do with who he was agreeing with. He was banned because he gushed insults at someone just because he didn't agree. It's completely irrelevant that this happened in a particular topic, which may or may not happen to be a troll. It doesn't matter if it was a troll, and it doesn't matter that LM was agreeing with him or not. He was banned for the insults.
You're starting from calling the topic a troll, you say Mav "fell for it", and you act like it's relevant. But it's not. It has nothing to do with the fact that Mav started insulting someone for disagreeing with him, and it has nothing to do with the ban that followed those insults. It just happens to be the particular topic where it took place. But the insults are not related to the troll, and the ban is not related to the troll either, or to Mav agreeing with a potential troll. He didn't need to throw insults like that. Mav didn't get banned because of the troll. No one even cares if the topic was a troll or not.
I'm not interested on what happened in the past.
Then you're the one who don't get it, because you're completely ignoring the entire fact that he was on probation.
You say you don't care about the past, but the fact is that no one cares that you're not interested in the past because it's exactly the past that matters. And it matters a lot. If you say you're not interested in it, then you're the one who's missing the entire point of the probation. Everyone else IS interested in the past, and they're completely right to be interested in the past. If you're not, then you're wrong. Because it was the very condition for which he was allowed to come back in the first place. He broke that condition, so his right to come back is revoked, which means he's back to a permaban. If you're not interested in that, then you're just plain wrong, there's just no other way to put it.

The fact I'm not interested in his past actions that warranted him a probation doesn't mean I'm ignorant about it (don't confuse lack of interest for ignorance). Whatever he would have done after if he was unbanned wouldn't be of my interest either, if he would break his probation if he was spared after this, it's his problem. Again. I agree with him being punished, but I'm still against the idea to have turned this into a permanent ban.

I can't change the fact you believe he deserves to be perma banned for insulting Umezono. But at the same time, you can't change the fact I believe he was, at least, this time, a scapegoat and the perma ban seems too far. And I'll say it one more time. While the permanent ban is still an excessive decision, he did deserve a punishment for his actions (I still believe a short term ban would have been enough). Insulting Umezono wasn't necessary from his side.

but I'm seeing this going too far because of you guys using the past excuse. I'll say it again, since you don't seem to get it. I'm not interested on what happened in the past. I'm interested on what happened now, and I still feel he was an unwitting scapegoat for a troll's own fun
Let's sum it up :
- The whole point of the probation is that all of Maverik's actions and posts are judged based on his past actions. You can say all you want you're not interested in the past, it doesn't change the fact that everybody is judging him on his past actions, because that's how criminal justice works. You usually don't go to jail for stealing a bike. However, you can go to jail for stealing a bike if it's the 50th time you've been caught and are on probation. You can't judge someone for stealing a bike and say "I don't care that he already stole 500 other bikes ! I will only judge his present crime aka he just stole a bike, this doesn't warrant jail !!!"
- The troll thing has nothing to do with the ban. The reason Maverik is banned is because he started insulting Umezono. All the rest is secondary.

Honestly, I'm still in disagreement for how things were handled on this situation. But if that's the final word, then, I can't do anything else about it.
    

Re: Feedback to Warnings/Decisions

 July 12, 2014, 01:19:48 am View in topic context
 Posted by Kyoudou Senna  in Feedback to Warnings/Decisions (Started by Iced February 24, 2012, 09:43:26 pm
 Board: Feedback

So, if someone's fool for falling to a troll's tactic deserves to be banned permanently for that? That's a flawed logic, you know?
... What you say has absolutely nothing to do with anything that happened. He didn't fall for a troll, and he didn't get banned for siding with a troll. Don't say he's a victim of someone else, don't say he was fooled, and don't say it's why he was banned.

Quote
Besides, from what I see you just quoted for me, you didn't seem to bother to read the rest of my statement on why I consider this permaban undeserving.
That's a baseless thing to say. Just because I quote only one sentence of your post, doesn't mean I didn't read the rest. It means I'm summing it up and I don't want to quote the entirety of your post. Not to mention that the rest of your post didn't actually shed any light on that particular line I quoted, you're just questioning Rajaa's judgement and his position as a mod. Well, aside from your belief that Maverik fell for a troll, but that's just plain wrong. So like I said, just because it's what you think, doesn't mean it's true, and also, you're wrong.

Then, if he didn't fall for a troll, why did he agree with the op? For me this was mostly blame of the op for starting with the topic under the blanket of making it an innocent question. He was a troll since the beginning. Period.

I understand he deserved some punishment for insulting Umezono just because he didn't agree with his decision, but I'm seeing this going too far because of you guys using the past excuse. I'll say it again, since you don't seem to get it. I'm not interested on what happened in the past. I'm interested on what happened now, and I still feel he was an unwitting scapegoat for a troll's own fun. If you don't want to understand and keep yourself being close minded and stick to the fact he deserves to be banned for life, then, by all means.

However, don't get me wrong, I don't intend for him to be unbanned just like that (he has his own blame for insulting to begin with), but I think the ban should be of shorter length.

I'm questioning Rajaa's decision for banning him THIS TIME. Whatever he did in the past might be worth of being banned, but here, outside the fact he was warned already for insulting Umezono and getting insta ban, seems going too far.

For me, Maverik deserved a lesser punishment.
    

Re: Where is the variety ?

 July 12, 2014, 01:07:57 am View in topic context
 Posted by Kyoudou Senna  in Where is the variety ? (Started by B_____________________ July 11, 2014, 12:38:22 am
 Board: M.U.G.E.N Discussion

If isn't LM, at least is someone else
i think he meant to say "it isn't LM, at least is someone else" and just made typo
No, almost all hispanic people forgot to put "it", I've seen a lot of cases here.

"If it isn't LM, at least it is someone else"
Learn from here guys.

this community is shit anyways
I would like to know why.
Also "ban me please" is stupid, log out and never come back.

Another thing, how about you address all the stuff said in this topic and answer them in a civil manner instead of posting YOLO or swag without a reason? Because you make yourself look like a retard.

Alex... it's not "forgot", its "forget". You're using present, not past. <.<

Also, Alex, this kid is just a troll who got what he wanted. Don't give more attention to it. So, shouldn't we just move onto something else?

When am I gonna get my literal Bison with Psycho Crusher? :(

Also, unrelated, but second time I reach the 500 posts in my time on internet. Horray for me, I guess. >.>;;;;;;;;;
    

Re: Feedback to Warnings/Decisions

 July 12, 2014, 01:00:08 am View in topic context
 Posted by Kyoudou Senna  in Feedback to Warnings/Decisions (Started by Iced February 24, 2012, 09:43:26 pm
 Board: Feedback

I'm aware of the fact he was put onto probation, and yes, he did deserve some sort of punishment, Cybaster.

What I don't agree here with, and that's what irks me, its using the past card for the perma ban (a short term ban would have been more fitting here) when all the people who posted in the topic, including Umezono and Maverik were all FOOLED by the op, and Maverik ended being the scapegoat (again, I won't deny Maverik was stupid for insulting Umezono, but Umezono who had more valid reasons to punish Maverik didn't do it and instead had a better judgment (I want to believe he decided to discuss this with the rest of the staff before taking sudden actions)).

Understand I'm not justifying his past. But being permanently banned because of the past and for being a scapegoat for a troll's own fun, that seems unnecessary and kinda abusive from Rajaa.

Sorry, Cybaster, but I can't agree with choice taken here. He's not innocent, but, he was fooled by a troll who got what he wanted in the end.


That insta ban seems too excessive for me and uncalled for.
Just because you think it is, doesn't mean it actually is, and it doesn't put a bad light on whoever took the decision. And you're wrong.

It was going to happen, and anything else would only have resulted in the exact same thing happening again later down the line. You wanted a shorter ban ? Congratulation, this is happening again 7 months from now. He gets yet another tight leash to add to his collection ? 5 more months and we're all right back on the exact same spot.

It's positively terrible that people go in circles so much, so often, so easily. When does it just not happen and when does everyone else get a chance to go 7 months without this happening again ? Is it okay as long as we can still just ban him knowing he's on a tight leash ? Then that's just never going to be okay for everyone else.

What he does after that and what he did in the past is not of my interest. I'm only focused on what's happening NOW.

So, if someone's fool for falling to a troll's tactic deserves to be banned permanently for that? That's a flawed logic, you know?

Besides, from what I see you just quoted for me, you didn't seem to bother to read the rest of my statement on why I consider this permaban undeserving.

Again, MAVERIK is a special case. He was on probation, and he failed the terms of that.

I'm not denying he deserved some punishment for insulting Umezono. But I believe this could have been handled better due to the circumstances.
    

Re: Feedback to Warnings/Decisions

 July 12, 2014, 12:33:28 am View in topic context
 Posted by Kyoudou Senna  in Feedback to Warnings/Decisions (Started by Iced February 24, 2012, 09:43:26 pm
 Board: Feedback

My two cents.

I won't deny Maverik was insulting Umezono (whichever didn't understand the other person's points now goes to the toilet because Maverik was pretty much trolled by siding with a blatant troll unwillingly), but the sudden insta ban was uncalled for.

Warning or a short term ban would have been more proper here. That insta ban seems too excessive for me and uncalled for.

I'm seriously questioning Rajaa's decision for this perma ban, regardless Maverik did deserve a warning or a short term ban at worst. Maverik became a scapegoat for a troll's own fun, and you guys fell for it.

If you can't use your own judgment to research first and judge later, then, don't take such sudden actions. It questions your ability to mod a forum badly.
    

Re: Evolution 2014

 July 11, 2014, 10:48:00 pm View in topic context
 Posted by Kyoudou Senna  in Evolution 2014 (Started by c001357 July 08, 2014, 02:43:36 pm
 Board: Fighting Games

Gonna watch it mostly for Blazblue.

Just for the love of god, I don't want to see Kokonoe win this one. e_e
    

Re: Rude places around the world

 July 11, 2014, 10:41:25 pm View in topic context
 Posted by Kyoudou Senna  in Rude places around the world (Started by Iced July 11, 2014, 03:14:30 pm
 Board: All That's Left

Ah.... language, a word in a certain language means a profanity in another.

Russia's Tyumenskaya oblast is called "Vagina"... wow.

Closest city with a rude name is Wet Beaver Creek in Arizona, and that's over 2700 km away from me.

Funny, Mexico doesn't have any rude names, considering some of the toughest  foul words are from Mexico.

And the list couldn't be complete without Fucking, Austria (famous because their signs with the name of the city have been stolen by tourists of english language. Gee, wonder why. :V).
    

Re: Where is the variety ?

 July 11, 2014, 10:27:12 pm View in topic context
 Posted by Kyoudou Senna  in Where is the variety ? (Started by B_____________________ July 11, 2014, 12:38:22 am
 Board: M.U.G.E.N Discussion

Something was telling me to better for me to not answer on regards on this topic (there was something smelly on all this).

One of two, or the OP was an ignorant, or a troll, and happens to be it was the latter.

smh.

Maverik paid for the broken dishes; got banned for nothing (even if it was temporary).
    

Re: Where is the variety ?

 July 11, 2014, 11:22:13 am View in topic context
 Posted by Kyoudou Senna  in Where is the variety ? (Started by B_____________________ July 11, 2014, 12:38:22 am
 Board: M.U.G.E.N Discussion

I do kinda agree with this. It's just there's no variety for like releases or just something fresh and new. We have seen a lot of releases like Ryu, Akuma, Kula, K', Goku, Naruto, Batman, anime  school girls that we don't give a crap, Last Blade chars and so on.

Why can't they make more out of a obscure games like Fight Fever, Perfect Soldiers or any other Fighting characters, so we get to learn to more about them. That's what i call variety fighting games other then Street Fighter or Mortal Kombat.
Also no one has made a character from Battle Beast, a old pc dos fighting game. Why not them? What do you guys think of that?

1.- There haven't been many Batman's, strangely enough. e.e And Last Blade isn't as big as you might think it is (at least not on the western hemisphere).

2.- Your best bet is with japanese creators, since they're more widespread regarding obscure fighting game characters. Chances are slim, though.

3.- Also depends of the possibility to get the sprite rips, I guess.

Tell me how many Batman chars you can find in Mugen.

Besides yours?

Alucard's and its horrible. Then again, that was in 2009. e.e
    

Re: Hatsune Miku: Project MUGEN extend 4:3 Edition (640,480)

 July 11, 2014, 03:39:48 am View in topic context
 Posted by Kyoudou Senna  in Hatsune Miku: Project MUGEN extend 4:3 Edition (640,480) (Started by Dissidia June 26, 2014, 04:56:18 am
 Board: Your Releases, Mugen 1.0 +

    

Re: MUGEN Video thread

 July 11, 2014, 02:00:24 am View in topic context
 Posted by Kyoudou Senna  in MUGEN Video thread (Started by c001357 September 27, 2008, 11:24:14 am
 Board: M.U.G.E.N Discussion



Aoko's turn. o3o
    

Re: RE:

 July 09, 2014, 01:27:57 am View in topic context
 Posted by Kyoudou Senna  in FIFA World Cup 2014 (Started by City_Hunter December 06, 2013, 06:33:31 pm
 Board: Entertainment

Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty

Wow, they really worte that on the voting papers...

I... I swear I just guessed abouth this... apparent meme. e_e;
    

Re: FIFA World Cup 2014

 July 09, 2014, 12:11:34 am View in topic context
 Posted by Kyoudou Senna  in FIFA World Cup 2014 (Started by City_Hunter December 06, 2013, 06:33:31 pm
 Board: Entertainment

Point is... Argentina and Netherlands will take notes from this.

But in all honesty... Better Argentina or (preferably, Germany) win the WC. Netherlands feigned a penalty against Mexico and won cheating. They must pay for that. :/
    

Re: FIFA World Cup 2014

 July 08, 2014, 11:47:22 pm View in topic context
 Posted by Kyoudou Senna  in FIFA World Cup 2014 (Started by City_Hunter December 06, 2013, 06:33:31 pm
 Board: Entertainment

Wow. Until the minute 90. 1-7
    

Re: FIFA World Cup 2014

 July 08, 2014, 11:34:50 pm View in topic context
 Posted by Kyoudou Senna  in FIFA World Cup 2014 (Started by City_Hunter December 06, 2013, 06:33:31 pm
 Board: Entertainment

0-7!

WORST GAME EVER FROM BRAZIL!
    

Re: FIFA World Cup 2014

 July 08, 2014, 11:24:44 pm View in topic context
 Posted by Kyoudou Senna  in FIFA World Cup 2014 (Started by City_Hunter December 06, 2013, 06:33:31 pm
 Board: Entertainment

0-6

Brazil buried.

Update!

0-7!

WORST GAME EVER FROM BRAZIL!
    

Re: FIFA World Cup 2014

 July 08, 2014, 10:31:25 pm View in topic context
 Posted by Kyoudou Senna  in FIFA World Cup 2014 (Started by City_Hunter December 06, 2013, 06:33:31 pm
 Board: Entertainment

5 goals in 20 minutes... Oh, my god.