Posted by FeLo_Llop
in Conspiracies discuss here! (Started by Memo August 30, 2013, 10:00:52 pmBoard: All That's Left
I remember seeing that pic of the cynognathus. Very interesting stuff.
I would not be surprised if the same type of mammals and reptiles
here on earth inhabit other planets too. There has to be other types
of animals in other worlds that we have not seen too also.
It would be cool if we found a planet inhabited by dinosaurs but i dont
think we would be able to live on that planet not because of the raptors
and t.rex but because the oxygen would be too thick for us.
It's supposed that Mars hold life around 4000 millions years ago, then the life line(I don't know the correct word for this in English) changed its place<---Hypothesis. Maybe a meteor impacting the planet or else. I just don't know. Anyway, I don't think that "dinosaurs" would live in another planet, since Earth's biology is based in C. Also', atmosphere's composition in our planet has changed, more oxygen in the past(allowing to have meganeura an 180 cm long dragonfly aside other giantic insects/arthropodae/BUGS), our Moon is getting further year by year(in the Triasic period, days were of 23 hours); we just can't make things "simple" while speaking about life in our planet. Now imagine that in other planets with different systems. There's A LOT of factors to count...
It doesn't strike you as odd that the first "painted" picture looks nothing like the original image from the NASA ? Seriously, the last one and the one before that don't even look similar to each other, the last one is missing the rest of the "bones" that are behind the supposed skull. Come on.
The image(painted) and the original have those "bones" of behind. I think there's a bigger chance of the closer rock "being" a skull instead of the further; this one looks more like an earth fault, that's the main thing that strikes me more: while it's notably round, the rocks around are edgy. If you look closely, there are more faults a bit closer(behind the "skull). There's a similar thing near my town, in the forest. That's why I prefer thinking the further is just a geologicalfault, in other words, a pareidolia. Is just the closer what makes me think.
Also, about the missing bones, just go to a paleonthological excavation. Sometimes you'll find that there are missing bones, parts of the skeleton that are above, or the skeleton itself is divided intwo(or more) parts because of transitional faults or else...that happens here a lot.
http://www.nbcnews.com/science/science-news/duck-billed-dinosaurs-hip-tail-discovered-mexico-f6C10713860
They just found the ribs and tail in that place AND you can see that there's a difference of around 50 cm of height between ribs and tail(reference: those scientists). Where are the head, and etc?--->geological faults.
!!
Igual me da por cambiar el stand y todos los pantalones del sheet para la versión FINAL de Viper...sugerencias?
