YesNoOk
avatar

Character of the Month: March 2011 - Nominations (Read 12085 times)

Started by RajaaBoy, April 03, 2011, 06:38:34 pm
Share this topic:
Re: Character of the Month: March 2011 - Nominations
#61  April 07, 2011, 09:50:25 pm
  • ******
  • I will absolve you of your original colors.
    • www.bluehitbox.com
If my character sucks day one, and it's not nominated because it sucks, then I improve it later during a different month by updating it, do I not deserve to have my character potentially be recognized in this contest like anyone else's character?

It is fair to allow updates. It's unfair to not allow updates. If I specified and said, "Only significant updates," then what would a significant update be? That's why it's better the way it is.

A character can win twice, meaning: If I release a character one month and it wins, then I update it another month and it wins, then that's it; no more winning for that character. This is to recognize updates. Think of it as being an American President: you can only serve two terms (I need to adjust my wording on that particular portion of the rules).

SNT

Re: Character of the Month: March 2011 - Nominations
#62  April 09, 2011, 02:18:18 am
  • avatar
  • ******
  • Sodium Nonchalance Technician
    • Australia
    • thesaltminedotcom.wordpress.com
Even if it's only to provide 1.0 compatibility?  GM's characters were already solid, it wasn't as if they were broken before.  I'm all for nominating updates, but these are just ports.
If you're hosting your stuff on 4Shared, you might as well not release it at all.