All the political media channels are fake anyway...well, in this way. Every single one of those shows uses teleprompters. Not only for the hosts, but for the guests as well. Look next time when they start talking and listen to them and watch how quickly they start blinking. Also, look for their flesh colored ear pieces. So, who writes these teleprompters? They run the same few stories over and over again throughout the day and both the hosts and guests, usually alternating, throw in some keywords that they were no doubt told to say. An example is when the current administration changed their view on gay marriage, they used the phrase "President Obama evolved on gay marriage". Over and over again. When talking about the current house, they say that the Republicans hold the house because of "gerrymandered redistricting".

I've seen this countless times and I wish I kept a list of all of the different phrases that they did this with to jam these concepts into your head. So who are the "strategists" who basically tell everyone that appears on these shows what to say and how far does it go? They all have the same 10-20 or so guests and that's being generous, along with a few congresspeople and governors, over and over again. When the host has a day off they bring in a replacement who say the same things the other host would say, has the same interviews with the same opinions, and they even talk the same, with their voice going up and down in the same places that the host would have. This says to me that they are all replaceable and are only used as a tv personality not for their opinions. Their faces, voices, and presence are the only thing they are used for. They're actors reading lines.

These news organizations are nothing but chess games played by a few individuals, used to jam us with opinions that aren't our own about issues that THEY care about. News stories are used as pieces in their game. And the bottom line, the reason for all of this, is money. Do any of you really think that global warming was about the environment? The environment was used by both sides in an issue that ultimately was about selling and marketing 'green' products versus old style products. I guarantee that this gun issue is related to gun sales and that both sides have their own benefits involved, whether it's money directly or their jobs and positions of power. We've all played into it to. I know I have positions and opinions influenced by the "news".

The goal of life is to fuck bitches while playing video games

Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty

and smoking trees.

I want a Pikachu in Pokemon X and Y!

Isn't interspecies sex normal for mammals?

Dragonball GT: Final Bout was pretty bad. The flight controls were stupid, and you could pretty much always win if you picked either Pan or (if you unlocked him) SSJ4 Goku aice their auto-combos lasted FOREVER. Also 6 of the characters were different forms of Goku, and 3 were Trunks. IIRC only 7 characters weren't clones and one of those was Vegito.

It did have some cool concepts though, like the meteo smash system, which would be fun to incorporate into a character.

And ClayFighter 63 1/3 (and Sculptor's Cut)... and Mortal Kombat Trilogy

Goku is superior to Superman in terms of martial arts, so you migth assume he has the better offensive, but Superman is the guy with the endurance... we just won't know who'll win or why until we see the fight as a whole.