Posted by Byakko in Everything Anime and Manga Thread (Started by ( ﾟ oﾟ) It's Urza! August 27, 2007, 02:30:58 am
G was the new Guy with the beard right? I'm not follow that stuff a lot anymore. ö.öThat's him. Don't worry, so far we've seen like 5 seconds of him.
You want to know why? Because I never said the "different governments involved had no proof.".But that has been your entire point. "No proof was presented", "everyone ran under the assumption that Assad did it", you somehow claimed they might have evidence but it was "not proof", you insist that "no investigation was completed at the time", throwing links about articles saying the investigation is being blocked and implying it can only mean they don't have proof... All of this is an attempt to throw discredit. You're trying to imply it's possible they're either wrong or lying, because you remember how it went last time the US government did the same thing.
I really don't know why people to this day make Moogen porn....Obviously because people make
I've already shown you're full of shit with the first oneNo. Nothing you showed says that the different governments involved don't have any proof as they say they have.
Also I never said "just the US said that" those were your words.That's.... That's fucking stupid. Are you pretending to misunderstand this or what ?
no proof was presented until the 6th which was a day after NPR, CNN, and NBC pundits all ran under the assumption that Assad was behind it."No proof was presented" doesn't mean they didn't already have it. You think something doesn't exist until they show it to you ?? They had it, they said "we have proof", and later they showed it to someone.
Except you're wrong. France immediately said we had proof, the UK also jumped in fast. So no, it's not just the US saying that.QuoteBy the way, it's not just the US saying that. Unlike with Iraq back then, it's everyone.That's a lie. See, if you want to play bullshit weaseling games, I can do it too.
Not saying "Animal Assad" absolutely didn't do it! Just saying it's not worth jumping to conclusions over and riling up your audiences/people before the evidence is put forwardYou're saying they have no proof he did it. But you have no proof of what they have or don't have, ergo, you're lying. You just THINK it's way too fast to have any proof, but you don't actually know who saw what and who knows what, so your claim that they have no proof is a lie.
with no actual proof or investigation having occurred at the time.That's a lie.