for everytime that the people degrade awesome games to shit, so noone, besides the one who give a fuck to mag reviews, wanna buy the games they'll probably like
I really don't mind the game at the right getting a 7 or something, but god hand? a 3? That's just sad
So, your run-of-the-mill Wii shovelware game gets a score that's twice as high as God Hand's? That's just fucking sad.And yes, most Wii games are crappy shovelware titles with colorful box art.
Babies are no fun.A game about babies in unecessary and unwanted.A game about babies that party is unacceptable.At least negative gender-stereotypes are mainly enforced on the Wii.
The Wii gets a bad rep thanks to all these repetitive, unoriginal party games, so when something good actually comes out (Madworld) it gets next to no coverage and only like 1000 people buy it.
chris roper reviewed god hand http://ps2.ign.com/articles/738/738253p1.htmljoshua clark reviewed party babyz http://wii.ign.com/articles/936/936573p1.htmlthere is a good chance they're the ones that rated the games. although they both work for ign, they are different people with different opinions.
Old + different genres + different reviewers + probably true anyway.If only GH played well as much as it looks cool...
