YesNoOk
avatar

Coliseum - hjk vs Baiken (Read 71400 times)

Started by hjk, May 14, 2008, 02:06:08 am
Re: Coliseum - hjk vs zawarudo
#81  May 16, 2008, 02:12:35 am
  • ******
    • Philippines
    • moogen.piiym.net
Re: Coliseum - hjk vs zawarudo
#82  May 16, 2008, 03:00:49 am
  • ******
Quote
I asked you who the AI coder for either Yun or Kim was and you said me. I said, no I was not. You reasserted it was me
No, certainly not. I don't know how you figured that. If you told me "I didn't code the AI", then I certainly did not say "yes you did code the AI". I'm not a moron like you. The most I could've said was that you were "teaming up" with whoever qwer and MA are. If you thought I insisted that you coded it, you're really stupid, I definitely never did that.
Quote
I'll be flexible. I'll take the lame for the leak. but in all fiarness I did send in the messgae that I idn't want Yun hosted but instead it was to be private. Ask Makkah/MasterGouken what happened with haohmaru. I said host only the modified files, and that didn't happen.
Yes, I understood that, that someone "backstabbed" you after you told them not to upload the files.
Quote
Do you agree that your first posts were offensive and were the route of this argument?
I agree that my post was offensive because it was meant to be, but you're still the one who reacted all the way up to here. Somewhere along the line in this topic, you talked about "trying to calm things down", which is a flat-out contradiction.
Quote
That's a flat-out lie. Oohh, I wish MugenAbyss didn't go underground.
Yeah, I wish. Whatever I may have ever told to MA was certainly not related to what I told you, or what you thought I told you.
So if you don't say I accused you of leaking the patch, if you don't say I accused you of being qwer, what the hell are you even angry at me for ? Aside from how you apparently tought I kept saying you made this and that ai and leak. I spoke about responsibility about Yun, and you certainly had a part of responsibility ; I spoke about "the AI coder", and your post made me understand that you did it at first, so yes, I said repeated that, then you said it wasn't you. Apparently, you simply didn't explain yourself properly the very first time around (oh, what a surprise) then you backpedaled like you regularly do. I spoke about "the AI coder", and that's that. I repeat again, I said "if it's you, then you're responsible" ; the part where you say I "fell where you wanted me to fall", except you didn't understand the "IF it's you" part. I certainly never said "it's you, you're guilty", I said "if it's you, you're guilty". And you never understood the difference, and you're still saying "you said it was me".
Right here and now, do you see the difference between "if it's you, then you're responsible" and "you did it, you're guilty" ? Do you see it or not ? If you do, why did you not see it back then ? I did take precautions and avoid pointing fingers ; and I definitely didn't say "you made the AI" after you told me "I didn't do the AI". And if all you can say is "you're lying", don't even bother.
Apparently that's what triggered your grudge against me, that's why you flipped out when your name was merely mentionned in the case of Kim & co. And somewhere along the line, you figured I spoke to MA outside of that topic, which I didn't - not that it would even be relevant (by the way, what do you even think we discussed that is so important ? Why do you insist so much that I spoke to MA ? Considering I didn't accuse you back then, since I did understand, after you pointed it out back then, that qwer "backstabbed" you) And you haven't answered that.
If I struggled to the end of my determination, to the end of my way of life with my followers, if the result is ruin, then this ruin is inevitable. Grieve. Shed tears. But you cannot regret.
Last Edit: May 16, 2008, 03:25:29 am by Baiken
HJK IS A VALID TARGET AT THE MOMENT
#83  May 16, 2008, 03:32:03 am
  • ******
  • [E]
    • Mexico
Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty
Re: Coliseum - hjk vs zawarudo
#84  May 16, 2008, 04:09:31 am
  • ******
  • I'm a fuffy.
    • USA
    • www.trinitymugen.net
Goddamn.
Re: Coliseum - hjk vs zawarudo
#85  May 16, 2008, 04:19:14 am
  • ******
  • [The only one worthy of my love!]
    • USA
[E] I would've liked that post more if Claude Speed didn't run it into the ground. :(
Re: Coliseum - hjk vs zawarudo
#86  May 16, 2008, 04:58:09 am
  • ******
  • [E]
    • Mexico
what's a claude spit?
Re: Coliseum - hjk vs zawarudo
#87  May 16, 2008, 05:49:57 am
  • ******
  • [The only one worthy of my love!]
    • USA
a bad thing

hjk

Re: Coliseum - hjk vs zawarudo
#88  May 16, 2008, 07:28:13 am
  • ****
  • Watch my fro grow as you go, go, go, go, go.
    • Afghanistan
Quote
I asked you who the AI coder for either Yun or Kim was and you said me. I said, no I was not. You reasserted it was me
No, certainly not. I don't know how you figured that. If you told me "I didn't code the AI", then I certainly did not say "yes you did code the AI". I'm not a moron like you.
:rofl:
Well obviously you're not a moron like me... You are far, FAR worse. Byakko, the events did indeed happen as I said. You kept on insisting the AI coder was me even after I told you otherwise.

The most I could've said was that you were "teaming up" with whoever qwer and MA are. If you thought I insisted that you coded it, you're really stupid, I definitely never did that.
Oh I know for a fact you didn't say that.

Quote
I'll be flexible. I'll take the lame for the leak. but in all fiarness I did send in the messgae that I idn't want Yun hosted but instead it was to be private. Ask Makkah/MasterGouken what happened with haohmaru. I said host only the modified files, and that didn't happen.
Yes, I understood that, that someone "backstabbed" you after you told them not to upload the files.
Backstabbed is farther than I want to go.. Let's just say there was a a 'breakdown in communication.'

Quote
Do you agree that your first posts were offensive and were the route of this argument?
I agree that my post was offensive because it was meant to be, but you're still the one who reacted all the way up to here. Somewhere along the line in this topic, you talked about "trying to calm things down", which is a flat-out contradiction.
Byakko, go read what I said abut calming things down and then come back and reply to me in full. I already answered you on this, Please Read it. But Really Byakko, tell me why you felt the need to be insulting? 

Quote
That's a flat-out lie. Oohh, I wish MugenAbyss didn't go underground.
Yeah, I wish. Whatever I may have ever told to MA was certainly not related to what I told you, or what you thought I told you.
So if you don't say I accused you of leaking the patch, if you don't say I accused you of being qwer, what the hell are you even angry at me for ? Aside from how you apparently tought I kept saying you made this and that ai and leak. I spoke about responsibility about Yun, and you certainly had a part of responsibility ; I spoke about "the AI coder", and your post made me understand that you did it at first, so yes, I said repeated that, then you said it wasn't you. Apparently, you simply didn't explain yourself properly the very first time around (oh, what a surprise) then you backpedaled like you regularly do. I spoke about "the AI coder", and that's that. I repeat again, I said "if it's you, then you're responsible" ; the part where you say I "fell where you wanted me to fall", except you didn't understand the "IF it's you" part. I certainly never said "it's you, you're guilty", I said "if it's you, you're guilty". And you never understood the difference, and you're still saying "you said it was me". Right here and now, do you see the difference between "if it's you, then you're responsible" and "you did it, you're guilty" ? Do you see it or not ? If you do, why did you not see it back then ? I did take precautions and avoid pointing fingers ; and I definitely didn't say "you made the AI" after you told me "I didn't do the AI". And if all you can say is "you're lying", don't even bother.
You NEVER said, "If it's you" Byakko. You said initially, 'the [AI Coder] was told no by KFM and did it [leaked the patch] anyway. I'm just summing things up.' You made that post to Laxxe during the original topic. On a side KFM had already outlined that he thought I leaked the patch after I personally told him I wouldn't and that he found out about the leak while on MugenChina. That is the first reason, why your [AI Coder] could only have been me; instead of you and your BS about speaking generally. If you meant to spek generally you wouldn't have basically said the same exact words KFM did, but not use my name; minus the fact that you said "In THIS case" which means you couldn't have been speaking generally because you specified what situation you intended to post about meaning again your [AI Coder] could ONLY have been me (yeah, i took the time to memorize the important parts of your posts). SECOND, here's the big one, was during the Kim discussion, I tricked you into admitting that I was your [AI coder], just how I outlined it above, yopu got caught off guard, and didn't repeat, 'Oh hjk, I'm just speaking generally':
Quote
I never said you accused me of being qwer.
Uh ! Yes, you did. The first time around, back then. before even mentionning MugenAbyss (it's the first time I hear of him, too)
Quote
No. I did not code Yun's AI. I have told you how many times. I DID NOT CODE YUN'S AI...
Remind me how you "trapped" me into saying I accused you of leaking ? You had me say you coded it, by... telling me just that.
You are one lying little punk (how I wanted to call you a *bi--h*). I tricked you by pretending to calm the situation down, giving you a false apology, still posting for a few pages, and tehn asking you something along teh lines of, 'so what was it you were trying to say I (and yes I did use "I") did.' You fell right where I wanted you because contrary to your former posts about, "speaking generally," (which was bull-shit) you said I (hjk), I made and leaked, and your [AI-Coder] who again you did say was me in your so-called general post, disobeyed KFM (let me clarify that, you used my name synonymously with the one doing the crime, when I only used I, meaning you were saying my role was 'X' without me actually saying it was 'X'). I was telling you the entire time that I didn't code the AI, and I asked you what MY (as in MY/hjk's role was) and you gave me what you thought "I (hjk)" did. No longer do you say, the quote, unquote [AI-Coder] (which I said you obviously meant me by), you said quote "you" addressing me. I asked you (with the obviously false message not to take it seriously), "what ever happened to speaking generally," I mean since you had just identified me as the [AI Coder] of your post. You were WRONG Byakko. And I know you'll post some random Bull Shit, but hey, that's the way the cookie crumbles I guess.


Apparently that's what triggered your grudge against me, that's why you flipped out when your name was merely mentionned in the case of Kim & co. And somewhere along the line, you figured I spoke to MA outside of that topic, which I didn't - not that it would even be relevant (by the way, what do you even think we discussed that is so important ? Why do you insist so much that I spoke to MA ? Considering I didn't accuse you back then, since I did understand, after you pointed it out back then, that qwer "backstabbed" you) And you haven't answered that.
I'm so insistent because YOU SAID THAT'S THE WAY IT HAPPENED THE LAST TIME WE DISCUSSED IT. I am sure MA would have seen the posts so he could prove you wrong, here, as well. 'Considering you didn't accuse me back then,' again I repeat, FULL OF CRAP. The situation with qwer is long and complex, a tl;dr and annoyingly long read would accompany my explanation.
AND AS A MATTER OF FACT; your post about saying, 'I always accuse other people of not liking me' was complete SHIT. The funny thing is, you always accuse me of having a grudge against you and KFM, which I barely do (the last time, as I recall, you called it a quote, "vendetta") You guys are so minor to me, it isn't even funny. During this topic, who was my original post focused on, you or someone completely unrelated to you? YOU, for some odd reason (you'rean odd guy Byakko) felt the need to jump in and blindsight me, unleashing you ShinKuu Hadouken of insults when I wasn't talking to you? Did I expect you to jump in talking about jackassedness and so on? NO. This is not some vendetta, it is your constant posting of stupid insulting shit...FIRST. My problem here is that you blatantly insulted me, as you always do, when it was completely out of line, when you weren't even the subject of my post, where you decide for me that I am yelling, where you manipulate facts and post various falsities to make yourself look better, and because you fail to fess up to being wrong.
You amaze me on so many levels Byakko. It makes me wonder, is this the longest argumnt you've ever been in at the Guild?


Acknowledge the Edit and answer it please

Edit- I finally got time to read teh part of your post that I missed
Quote
Tell me, Byakko, why is it that for the past few months, a conversation like this hasn't come up?
Yeah right, tell me about the last few months, then use the Yun AI argument to support your point ! Years could pass between each argument, it would still be too often.
What teh hell are you talking about. How would I bring the Yun thing into me talking about teh last two months. I hope you posted this completely incoherent argument on purpose, because if you are serious you are just plain stupid.
I don't even have to talk about teh last few months. There are people here who can vouch for me. I know walt and jango can. Even Cybaster probably could. I still make mistakes, but you, YOU HAVE REMIANED STATIC throughout your time here.
Now, EXPLAIN YOUR OLD SIG.

Quote
I have admitted to having a language problem
Then "tell me, hjk," why are you shitting all over me when it's exactly what I've been saying from the start ? Could it be you're arguing about something that has already been resolved ? It's like you have a pair of anti-Byakko glasses and everytime I say anything, you... uh... misinterpret it. Geez, if I tell you you're misinterpreting what I write, you don't think you should listen ? I know better than you what I mean, since I'm the one who write it. But no, you want to prove me wrong, so even when I'm the one speaking, I must have gotten it wrong.
Byakko, let me just ask you this question and PLEASE answer it honestly.
Do you really feel as though by calling someone a "goddamn jackass," 'incoherent' or 'incompetant,' then having the other person reply in an unappreciative way (even in an angry way), would mean that that person is just out to get you, or that they have 'anti-Byakko' glasses on.  Byakko, people have told you you have a tendency to do this ALL OF THE TIME. Where are the Admins, where is TDS? me, if I ever did that, I would apologize, but you, YOU KEEP ON DOING IT, and you NEVER say you're sorry about it.
LOL, Caddie's the man!! ;)

I'm as real as the runnin, I just happen to rap, Nigaas London, Japan, and i'm scared of dat tap.

I suggest extending my banning, cuz when I come back, it's gonna be hell. You think I was annoying before, oh man, it's on now :)
hjk vs. 99% of MFG. I will win.

RIP Poo Bear Tell my Dead Homie isson, for the year my partner.
Last Edit: May 16, 2008, 09:12:06 am by What did you just say???
Re: Coliseum - hjk vs zawarudo
#89  May 16, 2008, 08:34:11 am
  • ******
  • I'm a fuffy.
    • USA
    • www.trinitymugen.net

hjk

Re: Coliseum - hjk vs zawarudo
#90  May 16, 2008, 08:42:43 am
  • ****
  • Watch my fro grow as you go, go, go, go, go.
    • Afghanistan
LOL, Caddie's the man!! ;)

I'm as real as the runnin, I just happen to rap, Nigaas London, Japan, and i'm scared of dat tap.

I suggest extending my banning, cuz when I come back, it's gonna be hell. You think I was annoying before, oh man, it's on now :)
hjk vs. 99% of MFG. I will win.

RIP Poo Bear Tell my Dead Homie isson, for the year my partner.
Re: Coliseum - hjk vs zawarudo
#91  May 16, 2008, 08:45:10 am
  • ******
  • I'm a fuffy.
    • USA
    • www.trinitymugen.net
Actually it just came to mind after seeing that last post of yours since that really did remind me of the way GohanSSM2 wrote.

hjk

Re: Coliseum - hjk vs zawarudo
#92  May 16, 2008, 08:49:27 am
  • ****
  • Watch my fro grow as you go, go, go, go, go.
    • Afghanistan
Actually it just came to mind after seeing that last post of yours since that really did remind me of the way GohanSSM2 wrote.
HAHA  :sugoi:
I actually put back the edit in reference to how I used to post. Jeez, as I look back on it, I'm surprised I wasn't yelled at mre often for my old style. But it's cool. walt (in particular) stuck at it with me, until I got the format down. Now I just need to get the size in order.  --;
LOL, Caddie's the man!! ;)

I'm as real as the runnin, I just happen to rap, Nigaas London, Japan, and i'm scared of dat tap.

I suggest extending my banning, cuz when I come back, it's gonna be hell. You think I was annoying before, oh man, it's on now :)
hjk vs. 99% of MFG. I will win.

RIP Poo Bear Tell my Dead Homie isson, for the year my partner.
Re: Coliseum - hjk vs zawarudo
#93  May 16, 2008, 09:37:29 am
  • ******
Quote
You kept on insisting the AI coder was me even after I told you otherwise.
Yeah, whatever, I say no, you say yes.
Quote
You said initially, 'the [AI Coder] was told no by KFM and did it [leaked the patch] anyway. I'm just summing things up.'
Yes, exactly. What problem do you have in understanding that I said it like that to avoid pointing any finger ? To avoid accusing you just in case it really wasn't your fault ? It turned out it really wasn't your fault, and for that, I'm proud of myself for not pointing the finger at you. I'm less proud of you for thinking I did when I didn't.
Quote
minus the fact that you said "In THIS case" which means you couldn't have been speaking generally
Why couldn't it have been speaking generally ? In this case where KFM specifically said not to distribute anything. Was it false ? Was it false to say that, in a case where KFM specifically said not to distribute anything, finding out that the files were distributed really was a fault ? Was it not a fault if the files were distributed when KFM said no ? WAS IT OR NOT ?
You think it was because you thought it's you I was accusing all along. And it simply wasn't the case. How you just refuse to accept that, it's beyond me. It's the reason I say you don't look at yourself before telling me to watch what I say, too. It's the reason I say you never try to think "hey what if what he says was right ?"
Quote
I tricked you into admitting that I was your [AI coder]
What's your problem in understanding that in what I was saying, the identity of the AI coder was irrelevant ? If you tricked me into saying "it's you" (by making me think it was you, what a brilliant plan), how does that make my statement about responsibility any less valid ?
Quote
AND AS A MATTER OF FACT; your post about saying, 'I always accuse other people of not liking me' was complete SHIT. The funny thing is, you always accuse me of having a grudge against you and KFM, which I barely do (the last time, as I recall, you called it a quote, "vendetta") You guys are so minor to me, it isn't even funny. During this topic, who was my original post focused on, you or someone completely unrelated to you? YOU, for some odd reason (you'rean odd guy Byakko) felt the need to jump in and blindsight me, unleashing you ShinKuu Hadouken of insults when I wasn't talking to you? Did I expect you to jump in talking about jackassedness and so on? NO. This is not some vendetta, it is your constant posting of stupid insulting shit...FIRST. My problem here is that you blatantly insulted me, as you always do, when it was completely out of line, when you weren't even the subject of my post, where you decide for me that I am yelling, where you manipulate facts and post various falsities to make yourself look better, and because you fail to fess up to being wrong.
You amaze me on so many levels Byakko. It makes me wonder, is this the longest argumnt you've ever been in at the Guild?
Blah blah blah, irrelevant. I've said that before. There's no reason for you to behave differently if it was me saying that, as long as it was true. Ignoring the "manipulating facts" and "talking for you" which is just plain retarded as we already went over that. And Cya-"your God"-nide and PotS agreed with the part where you did look like you were yelling. And that is your fault. Oh right, have you admitted that already ? I can't remember, with all the shitstorm tantrum fest you've been throwing. If you haven't aknowledged that it was your fault even after other people, including Your God, confirmed it, where's your improvement ?
Ah, found it. You agreed to it right after Cyanide confirmed it.
... Wait, if you agreed, why the hell are you still telling me about making assumptions on that ?? o_O OBJECTION ! CONTRADICTION. The suspect aknowledged it was his fault yet he still keeps attacking my client about it.
Quote
How would I bring the Yun thing into me talking about teh last two months.
You tell me about Yun, then you ask if anything happened in the last months. Why do you do that ? Why would you bring up something that happened years ago if you want to say "in the last months, nothing particular happened" ? It's OK when you bring up something that happened years ago, but it's not OK for me to look any further back than a few months ago ? It doesn't make sense, it's a CONTRADICTION.

Quote
Now, EXPLAIN YOUR OLD SIG.
This one right ?
Quote
I am the key of my computer
Keyboard is my body, and Internet is my blood.
I have posted over a thousand rants
---Not to be ever shut up
---Not to be ever understood.
Have withstood sarcasm to write down many lines
Yet those words will never mean anything
---So as I type, Wall of Text.
How does that mean whatever you think it means ?
All it means is that, yes, I've been in a number of arguments, it means that people like you never [want to] understand what I say, and that they'll never hear the end of me still. That I do these things despite whatever sarcasm you may throw at me, yet that it will never reach people like you, and will never mean anything anyway. Because all those arguments really don't mean anything in the end, but that's no reason to stop me from doing it.
It's a parody of a text in a game. You may need to know about that original text to understand the meaning of this parody. But you're a moron anyway, so whatever. I could also add that, as a parody of myself as well, it's supposed to make me look bad (you call that self-bashing, auto-criticism or self-mocking), but you didn't even point out the right thing that makes me look bad in it, so I still won't give you that either.
So, which line means I never change my point of view, never listen, and never look at myself ? Let me give you a hint : none. There's no such thing in that text. The very fact I wrote that parody of myself already proves you wrong about me not looking at myself : because I know what's wrong with me - I'm a loud jerk, what I say is useless, and the arguments I'm in never make any sense.
So, do you have as much insight as me to ridicule yourself as much as I do to myself ? Do you have the balls in takes ? Are you ever going to apology about trying to act like you knew the meaning of what I wrote better than I do even though I'm the one who wrote it ?
Quote
Do you really feel as though by calling someone a "goddamn jackass," 'incoherent' or 'incompetant,' then having the other person reply in an unappreciative way (even in an angry way), would mean that that person is just out to get you, or that they have 'anti-Byakko' glasses on.
No. I feel I say it because you're a jackass and an incompetent fool, and I back it up (you were just done admitting that you didn't explain yourself properly, that you mislabel things). You can't handle criticism (despite having said basically the same thing as me just a minute before) and you yell at me. You don't like the words I use. Why not just say it instead of denying what I say ? You're proving what I said in turning it into a shitfest. And for the records, I do apology when I use an improper wording or unnecessary insults (yes, it's happened before, just because you didn't see it doesn't mean it didn't happen). That might even be the reason I haven't been banned so far.
Quote
Byakko, people have told you you have a tendency to do this ALL OF THE TIME.
Uh ? I said I have a tendency to do that : I'm a straightforward jerk. So what ?
Quote
and you NEVER say you're sorry about it.
Is it false ? You were saying just before my post that you have a problem with explaining yourself and labeling things. How does it become false when I say it ? And if it's not false, why would I apologize about it ?

Yeah, I insulted you. because you deserve it.

OH AND YOU STILL HAVEN'T ANSWERED MY QUESTION EVEN THOUGH I BOLDED IT. RIGHT HERE AND RIGHT NOW, DO YOU SEE OR NOT THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THOSE TWO SENTENCES ?
If I struggled to the end of my determination, to the end of my way of life with my followers, if the result is ruin, then this ruin is inevitable. Grieve. Shed tears. But you cannot regret.
Last Edit: May 16, 2008, 12:37:59 pm by Baiken

hjk

Re: Coliseum - hjk vs zawarudo
#94  May 16, 2008, 03:10:34 pm
  • ****
  • Watch my fro grow as you go, go, go, go, go.
    • Afghanistan
Quote
You said initially, 'the [AI Coder] was told no by KFM and did it [leaked the patch] anyway. I'm just summing things up.'
Yes, exactly. What problem do you have in understanding that I said it like that to avoid pointing any finger ? To avoid accusing you just in case it really wasn't your fault ? It turned out it really wasn't your fault, and for that, I'm proud of myself for not pointing the finger at you. I'm less proud of you for thinking I did when I didn't.
If it isn't obvious by now, I'm trying to show you how bad your language can be. Besides the fact that in the Kim argument you identified it as me(hjk), I'm saying that looking at your post in regards to what KFM said, tthe fact that you said you were speaking generally, but fail to realize that in saying, "in this case" you are making the post specific (aka not general), added to that, the most you could have been doing (again because you said you were summing things up "in this case" was renaming 'me.' You posted foolishly, while simultaniously/all the while telling me to learn English.

Quote
minus the fact that you said "In THIS case" which means you couldn't have been speaking generally
Why couldn't it have been speaking generally ? In this case where KFM specifically said not to distribute anything. Was it false ? Was it false to say that, in a case where KFM specifically said not to distribute anything, finding out that the files were distributed really was a fault ? Was it not a fault if the files were distributed when KFM said no ? WAS IT OR NOT ?
OMG, you know that isn't the issue I'm addressing.

You think it was because you thought it's you I was accusing all along. And it simply wasn't the case. How you just refuse to accept that, it's beyond me. It's the reason I say you don't look at yourself before telling me to watch what I say, too. It's the reason I say you never try to think "hey what if what he says was right ?"
(iI explained it better above, but read this two, there is a bit extra) How many times do I have to explain this. Your post was not general, you said the same thing KFM did just renaming me as the [AI Coder] (KFM labeled me the AI coder and distributor), you said, "in this case" matching you up with what KFM was saying and both of you two turned out wrong. How can you not understand that the specific "in this case [*I'm going to repeat everything KFM said, but just rename hjk the [AI Coder]* you are just saying it was me (and yes, in teh Kim topic I caught you ff guard and you did say 'I (hjk)' was the AI Coder of whom you spoke). Since you were so wanting to speak generally, why didnt you say to KFM, 'KFM, hjk might not have been the AI coder and/or teh distributor.' You didn't disagree you, restated it. Byakko, you may have mispoke, hell I dont even thibnk you understood what you said, but my issue with you is taht you have been telling me to learn English, when you cant even identify what you said correctly... not even the simplest part about how your post couldn't have been general.

Quote
I tricked you into admitting that I was your [AI coder]
What's your problem in understanding that in what I was saying, the identity of the AI coder was irrelevant ? If you tricked me into saying "it's you" (by making me think it was you, what a brilliant plan), how does that make my statement about responsibility any less valid ?
You are such an ass. I didn't make you think it was me. I freaking asked you while you were off guard, and you wrote what you thought my role in the thing was, and zippity-doo you match me up perfectly with your [AI Coder], meaning I was right.

Let me add in more detail, I quoted your post about, 'In this case the [AI Coder] asked the representative of the creator fopr permission to release the Patch. The representative said No, and the AI coder did it anyway."  Then I put below it, 'What was it that you said I did in this post.' You, should have been able to catch that I never used my name synonymously with the [AI Coder] or distributor. Your answer should have been, that you never said 'I' had done anything. Instead your answer was, 'I was saying that you disobeyed KFM, maybe unintentionally... *dah, dah dah dah dah.*' I then asked, 'what happened to you just speaking generally?'

Is that enough detail for you, because I'll give more if need be.

Quote
AND AS A MATTER OF FACT; your post about saying, 'I always accuse other people of not liking me' was complete SHIT. The funny thing is, you always accuse me of having a grudge against you and KFM, which I barely do (the last time, as I recall, you called it a quote, "vendetta") You guys are so minor to me, it isn't even funny. During this topic, who was my original post focused on, you or someone completely unrelated to you? YOU, for some odd reason (you'rean odd guy Byakko) felt the need to jump in and blindsight me, unleashing you ShinKuu Hadouken of insults when I wasn't talking to you? Did I expect you to jump in talking about jackassedness and so on? NO. This is not some vendetta, it is your constant posting of stupid insulting shit...FIRST. My problem here is that you blatantly insulted me, as you always do, when it was completely out of line, when you weren't even the subject of my post, where you decide for me that I am yelling, where you manipulate facts and post various falsities to make yourself look better, and because you fail to fess up to being wrong.
You amaze me on so many levels Byakko. It makes me wonder, is this the longest argumnt you've ever been in at the Guild?
Blah blah blah, irrelevant. I've said that before. There's no reason for you to behave differently if it was me saying that, as long as it was true. Ignoring the "manipulating facts" and "talking for you" which is just plain retarded as we already went over that. And Cya-"your God"-nide and PotS agreed with the part where you did look like you were yelling. And that is your fault. Oh right, have you admitted that already ? I can't remember, with all the shitstorm tantrum fest you've been throwing. If you haven't aknowledged that it was your fault even after other people, including Your God, confirmed it, where's your improvement ?
Ah, found it. You agreed to it right after Cyanide confirmed it.
... Wait, if you agreed, why the hell are you still telling me about making assumptions on that ?? o_O OBJECTION ! CONTRADICTION. The suspect aknowledged it was his fault yet he still keeps attacking my client about it.
No you freaking idiot. I agreed with Cyanide because he said,
increasing your text size "did come across" as shouting.
He said it came across as shouting, unlike you who flat-out said:
Yeah, and you were "yelling" at him even when it wasn't your place. You're a jackass.
You straight out said, "you were 'yelling' at him." and were plain wrong. Do you see the difference. And tyhis is part of what I mean by you manipulating facts in order to make yourself look better.
Let's count:
- Bad sequencing of events
- Saying I always accuse people of not liking me, WHEN I NEVER HAVE BEFORE NOW.
- Putting words into my mouth (keep reading the rest of this reply)
- Saying I'm yelling at you, because it's you, instead of because you posted like an ass. Stop insulting people and subjecting them to your own interpretations and just POST.
- Equating this situation to the others (Here I made all the points I needed to in the way I meant, mind you the first thing I said was wrong, which I called out in my next post, BUT IT WAS NOT, I repeat WAS NOT, me speaking unclearly as it usually is. In the others, as it cncerns you, I don't even know. I've issued too many false apologies to you that i can't even count.

Quote
How would I bring the Yun thing into me talking about teh last two months.
You tell me about Yun, then you ask if anything happened in the last months. Why do you do that ? Why would you bring up something that happened years ago if you want to say "in the last months, nothing particular happened" ? It's OK when you bring up something that happened years ago, but it's not OK for me to look any further back than a few months ago ? It doesn't make sense, it's a CONTRADICTION.
Here you go again with your manipulative sequencing of the events.
You said:
You don't even realize that you're the one misinterpreting what you're told. And you don't even question yourself about that even though the same thing happens all the time.
To which I replied
hjk said:
What the hell Byakko. Of course I question myself, which is the reason why I APOLOGIZE TO PEOPLE. I have made genuine apologies before, as well as false ones for teh sake of ending drama. I have admitted to having a language problem, and I admit when I'm wrong. Tell me, Byakko, why is it that for the past few months, a conversation like this hasn't come up?
Then you said:
Yeah right, tell me about the last few months, then use the Yun AI argument to support your point ! Years could pass between each argument, it would still be too often.
And I said:
What teh hell are you talking about. How would I bring the Yun thing into me talking about teh last two months. I hope you posted this completely incoherent argument on purpose, because if you are serious you are just plain stupid.
I don't even have to talk about teh last few months. There are people here who can vouch for me. I know walt and jango can. Even Cybaster probably could. I still make mistakes, but you, YOU HAVE REMIANED STATIC throughout your time here.
*In other words I picked out a specific part of your post and said I hope you were being sarcastic*
Which brings us to you and your Bull Shit here:
You tell me about Yun, then you ask if anything happened in the last months. Why do you do that ? Why would you bring up something that happened years ago if you want to say "in the last months, nothing particular happened" ? It's OK when you bring up something that happened years ago, but it's not OK for me to look any further back than a few months ago ? It doesn't make sense, it's a CONTRADICTION.
Stop Fucking the events up Byakko, and actually be honest for once.

Quote
Now, EXPLAIN YOUR OLD SIG.
This one right ?
Quote
I am the key of my computer
Keyboard is my body, and Internet is my blood.
I have posted over a thousand rants
---Not to be ever shut up
---Not to be ever understood.
Have withstood sarcasm to write down many lines
Yet those words will never mean anything
---So as I type, Wall of Text.
How does that mean whatever you think it means ?
All it means is that, yes, I've been in a number of arguments, it means that people like you never [want to] understand what I say, and that they'll never hear the end of me still. That I do these things despite whatever sarcasm you may throw at me, yet that it will never reach people like you, and will never mean anything anyway. Because all those arguments really don't mean anything in the end, but that's no reason to stop me from doing it.
It's a parody of a text in a game. You may need to know about that original text to understand the meaning of this parody. But you're a moron anyway, so whatever. I could also add that, as a parody of myself as well, it's supposed to make me look bad (you call that self-bashing, auto-criticism or self-mocking), but you didn't even point out the right thing that makes me look bad in it, so I still won't give you that either.
So, which line means I never change my point of view, never listen, and never look at myself ? Let me give you a hint : none. There's no such thing in that text. The very fact I wrote that parody of myself already proves you wrong about me not looking at myself : because I know what's wrong with me - I'm a loud jerk, what I say is useless, and the arguments I'm in never make any sense.
So, do you have as much insight as me to ridicule yourself as much as I do to myself ? Do you have the balls in takes ? Are you ever going to apology about trying to act like you knew the meaning of what I wrote better than I do even though I'm the one who wrote it ?
Well first of all the sad thing is, that sig accurately depicts how you've been since your time at MFG. The Mods and Admin would agree with that assessment, no?
And yes Byakko, I apologize for not knowing what the bigger picture of meaning of your sig was. I'm actually very surprised that you'd self-bash, but its kind of funny, that within your self bashing, you never say you'll attempt to make a change. Just tell me, why is that?

Quote
Do you really feel as though by calling someone a "goddamn jackass," 'incoherent' or 'incompetant,' then having the other person reply in an unappreciative way (even in an angry way), would mean that that person is just out to get you, or that they have 'anti-Byakko' glasses on.
No. I feel I say it because you're a jackass and an incompetent fool, and I back it up (you were just done admitting that you didn't explain yourself properly, that you mislabel things). You can't handle criticism (despite having said basically the same thing as me just a minute before) and you yell at me. You don't like the words I use. Why not just say it instead of denying what I say ? You're proving what I said in turning it into a shitfest. And for the records, I do apology when I use an improper wording or unnecessary insults (yes, it's happened before, just because you didn't see it doesn't mean it didn't happen). That might even be the reason I haven't been banned so far.
Quote
Byakko, people have told you you have a tendency to do this ALL OF THE TIME.
Uh ? I said I have a tendency to do that : I'm a straightforward jerk. So what ?
Quote
and you NEVER say you're sorry about it.
Is it false ? You were saying just before my post that you have a problem with explaining yourself and labeling things. How does it become false when I say it ? And if it's not false, why would I apologize about it ?
And here you go again, manipulating facts and not reading my posts. (Mind you I am RESTATING this for the fucking 20th time because you don't like to read) In the beginning when this argument was just starting up, my language was fine, and I said exactly what I wanted to. THIS IS THE ORDER THAT YOU'VE FUCKED UP THROUGHOUT THE COURSE OF THIS THREAD.  What happened was I labeled something a "wake-up" glitch before I reviewed the video, but after I finally did review it, I mentioned in my second post that what I intentionally said was a "wake-up" glitch, was in truth a mislabel, and that it was actually a "general recover" glitch (This is contrary to what is the usual where I mean to say one thing, but my language makes it look like somthing else). BOTH OF THESE TWO POSTS CAME BEFORE YOU EVEN GOT INTO THE DISCUSSION. You come in, not even reading my post right above yours, saying I'm still labeling the "wake-up" thing a glitch, when I had already CLEARLY switched (as in stated it just above your post) what I was talking about. You deleted your post because it was made irrelevant (and wrong) by my post just above it, and I deleted my post soon thereafter. I then PMed you to tell you that I deleted my post, so there would be no drama. Instead, you saw teh PM, then posted in a blatantly insulting post, that was uncalled for. Then I replied t your stupid, uncalled for, insulting post.
Remember this post Byakko:
Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty

You're the biggest ass, in the community by far. You dont change, you don't learn, you dn't read. You don't listen. You're too goddamn arrogant.
And let's not forget, you actually have been banned for doing the same stupid shit you are now. I NEVER have been banned. Who has the better track record?



Yeah, I insulted you. because you deserve it.
Tell me what exacly makes you the decider of whether I deserved it or not?
Oh wait, tell me why I deserved it, because my explanation above, and my explanation below (quoted) bth show that you are equating this NEW situation, to one of OLD.

OH AND YOU STILL HAVEN'T ANSWERED MY QUESTION EVEN THOUGH I BOLDED IT. RIGHT HERE AND RIGHT NOW, DO YOU SEE OR NOT THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THOSE TWO SENTENCES ?
YOU NEED TO START FUCKING READING (that is, if I answered your correct bolded part)!!!
Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty
LOL, Caddie's the man!! ;)

I'm as real as the runnin, I just happen to rap, Nigaas London, Japan, and i'm scared of dat tap.

I suggest extending my banning, cuz when I come back, it's gonna be hell. You think I was annoying before, oh man, it's on now :)
hjk vs. 99% of MFG. I will win.

RIP Poo Bear Tell my Dead Homie isson, for the year my partner.
Last Edit: May 21, 2008, 11:03:49 pm by What did you just say???
Re: Coliseum - hjk vs zawarudo
#95  May 16, 2008, 03:51:09 pm
  • ******
  • ALE ALEJANDRO
Posting in a Legendary thread
"We live in a world of perpetual outrage"
Re: Coliseum - hjk vs zawarudo
#96  May 16, 2008, 03:51:17 pm
  • ******
    • www.mugenguild.com/pots/
I'd move this to all that's left, but then they'd stop. :P
Use anything you want from my works.  If you need to contact me use email, not private messages.
Re: Coliseum - hjk vs zawarudo
#97  May 16, 2008, 03:53:46 pm
  • ******
  • what a shame
    • Iran
Someone has to argue with me, i need my post count to increase.
Re: Coliseum - hjk vs zawarudo
#98  May 16, 2008, 03:55:41 pm
  • ******
Quote
OMG, you know that isn't the issue I'm addressing.
It's the issue that caused whatever issue you're addressing.
Quote
Besides the fact that in the Kim argument you identified it as me(hjk)
No. the first thing I said in that topic started by MugenAbyss was that I didn't want this patch to be online. After it was pointed out who made the AI and who uploaded it, I definitely never said it was you. I knew you got your "communication disorder" with qwer, if you want to call it like that. YOU HAD JUST EXPLAINED IT. And I definitely never insisted that you made it after you said you didn't. the only thing I said was that qwer was supposed to know, from you, that I didn't want it. But you had a communication failure with him, too bad, shit happens. You somehow figured I meant I spoke directly to qwer, or that I thought you were him or whatever, when this wasn't the case. I said that back then, I'm still saying the same thing now. You have problems understanding properly what you're told.
Quote
but fail to realize that in saying, "in this case" you are making the post specific (aka not general)
You have a problem with English. What is it that you don't understand in what I explained to you ? I don't care about what you understood back then, I'm explaining you right here and right now what it was. What do you find hard in accepting that I'm telling you, here and now, that what I said was still a general rule, "if the file, in this case the AI patch, was leaked despite the disapproval of the original author, in this case Necromancer through KFM... You're focusing on the wrong parts, isolating them and taking them out of context, to use them as a flag banner "you said 'in this case', this isn't general, it's specific". I'm the one who said that, how can you believe you know what I meant better than me ? I repeat, how can you believe you know what I meant better than me ? Regardless of what you understood back then, and regardless of what you remember. You think you were a target when this was not the point of what I was saying. Why do you think I spoke about "the AI coder" if not for that ? I repeat, why do you think I spoke about "the AI coder" if not for that ?
Quote
Then I put below it, 'What was it that you said I did in this post.'
... which is the reason I figured at that point that you were the one who did it. "Oh, you never said anything about me, you said something about the AI coder without ever mentionning my name, I responded like I felt targeted, I act like it's me you insulted, and now you think it indeed was me". WHAT GIVES ? Yes, how could I imagine that it wasn't you when you replied "what do you say I did" when I was talking about "the AI coder" ? I should be able to read your mind, this isn't normal, I should have known you came out of nowhere and felt targeted for no reason ! It's an insufferable crime that, because you acted like it was you, I indeed thought it was you !


Quote
He aid it came across as shouting, unlike you who flat-out said:
Did you notice the quotes ? And did you just ignore whatever I said afterward ? Let's see what else I said :
me said:
Now explain the font size change and caps lock everywhere. In case you don't know, that's the writing equivalent of yelling.
me said:
The way you were writing back there is what makes you look like a jackass, no matter who you are, and no matter how you thought it was.
So now what, I said the same thing as Cyanide, that it's how it "looked like" even if you didn't mean it that way. So why did you accept it when Cyanide said it and not when I said the same thing ?
Quote
- Equating this situation with the others
Uh. Cyanide's very first reply was telling you exactly that, that you always call something a bug and that we don't want to hear about it anymore. You replied to him with your "yelling" (NOTICE THE QUOTES, JACKASS) which is why I replied in turn.
Quote
Stop Fucking the events up Byakko, and actually be honest for once.
I am honest. You post like a jackass all the time. you say the last few months were quiet, but yet you come at me about the Yun and Kim problem. and you're the one lying, the first time yun came into the discussion was here :
Quote
Second lets go through you. Since my time here I HAVE NEVER seen you admit to being wrong. Not even when i explained to you that I wasn't the AI coder for Yun or Kim
this sentence is the first time the word "Yun" arrived into the discussion. You are the one who brought it up. It's to this that I replied that you brought the Yun event back from years ago. You talk about how I never admitted being wrong in the Yun and Kim case, just a few lines after telling me about "the past few months". It's in the same post. You mention how you still have something against me for not admitting of being wrong years ago, but just before saying that, you just said that all that mattered was "the last few months". so when you want to know when aws the last time you made a mistake, you don't go any furhter back than "the last few months", but if you want to know when I didn't admit I was wrong, you go back to years ago. IN THE SAME POST.
So, who's fucking up the order of events ?

Quote
Well first of all the sad thing is, that sig accurately depicts how you've been since your time at MFG. The Mods and Admin would agree with that assessment, no?
Yes, that's good, act like I care. Or better, act like it's relevant to you not understanding what you're told and then lying and throwing a tantrum and some more. Oh hey, while yuo're at it, why don't you act as if it changes the actual content of what I say ?
Quote
I'm actually very surprised that you'd self-bash, but its kind of funny, that within your self bashing, you never say you'll attempt to make a change. Just tell me, why is that?
'Cause I don't care. You need change more than I do. As long as you have bigger problems than me, as long as there's someone left who is worse than me who I haven't bashed up the skull yet, I have no reason to do anything. When I'll be the only one bastard left, when I'll be the worse guy around, I'll have no reason anymore to do it.
I'm a member of a number of other communities (7 or 8 other forums) and Guild is the only one where I act like that. I act in a somewhat similar fashion at Randomselect when some moron comes up, but other than that, I'm usually more like a clown nobody listens to, I sit in my corner speaking about things nobody cares for, or I just don't speak at all.
You want me to do the same here ? Then don't give me any reason to behave like I currently do. It's not like I like doing this more than I like being in a peaceful place. the only problem is that it's not a peaceful place with people like you. So I do this. and by God, I'll have your balls.
Quote
In the beginning when this argument was just starting up, my language was fine
no it wasn't. Your first post to which Cyanide replied where you mislabeled a bug, then your second post when you looked like you were yelling blue murder at Cyanide for ever doubting you, how could he dare hint that you might not read before posting. THIS IS NOT "A FINE LANGUAGE". This is what you don't get. You behave like you simply reworded yourself, but you did so in a manner that made people think you were yelling at Cyanide. YOU AGREED WITH THAT WHEN CYANIDE TOLD YOU JUST THAT. So who's fucking up the order of events ? Who's lying and distording facts ? This is the reason I said what I said the first time I arrived. My post was late because you indeed had just corrected yourself and posted a video, but it was still true ; yet as it was late, I deleted it. Then you posted, and I ended up reposting the same thing. Its content was still true : you behaved like a jackass, not even aware you looked like one.
Quote
Tell me what exacly makes you the decider of whether I deserved it or not?
Oh wait, tell me why I deserved it
I do. I decide what I say. I decided that you deserved being called a jackass. Cyanide confirmed that you looked like you were yelling, and you accepted it. So yes, I decided that you deserved it. I decided I would say it.
Quote
OU NEED TO START FUCKING READING (that is, if I answered your correct bolded part)!!!
What you said did not answer my bolded question. All you say is that, back then, you thought I said this and that. RIGHT HERE AND NOW, DO YOU SEE THE DIFFERENCE. NOT BACK THEN. HERE AND NOW, THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN "IF YOU ARE GUILTY, THEN BAD" AND "YOU ARE GUILTY, DIE". I don't give a rat's fart if back then you thought I said "you did it". It's a simple question, yes or no. Say "yes, right here and now, I can say it is indeed not the same thing" or say "no, right here and now, I don't see the difference between conditional and an affirmation". Don't give me crap about how you interpreted what I said back then. Just say if you see a difference.



Quote
Warning - while you were typing 4 new replies have been posted. You may wish to review your post.
Oy ! Let me post if you want the movie to continue, dudes .\/.
If I struggled to the end of my determination, to the end of my way of life with my followers, if the result is ruin, then this ruin is inevitable. Grieve. Shed tears. But you cannot regret.
Last Edit: May 16, 2008, 04:22:45 pm by Baiken

hjk

Re: Coliseum - hjk vs zawarudo
#99  May 16, 2008, 06:48:29 pm
  • ****
  • Watch my fro grow as you go, go, go, go, go.
    • Afghanistan
*Way to avoid half of my frickin' post Byakko. You even dodged the huge bolded paragraph.*

Quote
OMG, you know that isn't the issue I'm addressing.
It's the issue that caused whatever issue you're addressing.
Byakko, again you are wrong. Wow, is this the sixteenth time i'm preenting PROOF of former posts in this this thread, so you can understand order of events. First of all youi disected my post and tried to flip its meaning =, ignoring teh rest of the paragraph
I said:
You NEVER said, "If it's you" Byakko. You said initially, 'the [AI Coder] was told no by KFM and did it [leaked the patch] anyway. I'm just summing things up.' You made that post to Laxxe during the original topic. On a side KFM had already outlined that he thought I leaked the patch after I personally told him I wouldn't and that he found out about the leak while on MugenChina. That is the first reason, why your [AI Coder] could only have been me; instead of you and your BS about speaking generally. If you meant to spek generally you wouldn't have basically said the same exact words KFM did, but not use my name; minus the fact that you said "In THIS case" which means you couldn't have been speaking generally because you specified what situation you intended to post about meaning again your [AI Coder] could ONLY have been me (yeah, i took the time to memorize the important parts of your posts). SECOND, here's the big one, was during the Kim discussion, I tricked you into admitting that I was your [AI coder], just how I outlined it above, yopu got caught off guard, and didn't repeat, 'Oh hjk, I'm just speaking generally'
*Summary - You said "I" was you AI coder for so and so reasons. Specifically, your [AI Coder] culd not have been a general person, the [AI coder] in your post was synonymous with me (hjk)*
You just disected a small line of the post and attempted to change its meaning as a whole saying:
Quote
minus the fact that you said "In THIS case" which means you couldn't have been speaking generally
Why couldn't it have been speaking generally ? In this case where KFM specifically said not to distribute anything. Was it false ? Was it false to say that, in a case where KFM specifically said not to distribute anything, finding out that the files were distributed really was a fault ? Was it not a fault if the files were distributed when KFM said no ? WAS IT OR NOT ?
I replied:
OMG, you know that isn't the issue I'm addressing.
Because the issue I was addressing was that you made the [AI Coder]/Distributor synonymous with 'me.'

Quote
Besides the fact that in the Kim argument you identified it as me(hjk)
No. the first thing I said in that topic started by MugenAbyss was that I didn't want this patch to be online. After it was pointed out who made the AI and who uploaded it, I definitely never said it was you. I knew you got your "communication disorder" with qwer, if you want to call it like that. YOU HAD JUST EXPLAINED IT. And I definitely never insisted that you made it after you said you didn't. the only thing I said was that qwer was supposed to know, from you, that I didn't want it. But you had a communication failure with him, too bad, shit happens. You somehow figured I meant I spoke directly to qwer, or that I thought you were him or whatever, when this wasn't the case. I said that back then, I'm still saying the same thing now. You have problems understanding properly what you're told.
No. I started the Kim topic. It was a video showcase, and it was there that i got you to say taht I was your AI Cder. Had you actually read my last post, you would have seen this:
Let me add in more detail, I quoted your post about, 'In this case the [AI Coder] asked the representative of the creator fopr permission to release the Patch. The representative said No, and the AI coder did it anyway."  Then I put below it, 'What was it that you said I did in this post.' You, should have been able to catch that I never used my name synonymously with the [AI Coder] or distributor. Your answer should have been, that you never said 'I' had done anything. Instead your answer was, 'I was saying that you disobeyed KFM, maybe unintentionally... *dah, dah dah dah dah.*' I then asked, 'what happened to you just speaking generally?'

Is that enough detail for you, because I'll give more if need be.

Quote
but fail to realize that in saying, "in this case" you are making the post specific (aka not general)
You have a problem with English. What is it that you don't understand in what I explained to you ? I don't care about what you understood back then, I'm explaining you right here and right now what it was. What do you find hard in accepting that I'm telling you, here and now, that what I said was still a general rule, "if the file, in this case the AI patch, was leaked despite the disapproval of the original author, in this case Necromancer through KFM... You're focusing on the wrong parts, isolating them and taking them out of context, to use them as a flag banner "you said 'in this case', this isn't general, it's specific". I'm the one who said that, how can you believe you know what I meant better than me ? I repeat, how can you believe you know what I meant better than me ? Regardless of what you understood back then, and regardless of what you remember. You think you were a target when this was not the point of what I was saying. Why do you think I spoke about "the AI coder" if not for that ? I repeat, why do you think I spoke about "the AI coder" if not for that ?
No fool. I'm saying you pull that nonsense about, knowing English better than those whose first language is English. I'm telling you that you don't even understand what you said, and in any case, I did, get you to admit that I was the AI coder you mentioned in teh Yun case, in the quote of mine I just posted above.

Quote
Then I put below it, 'What was it that you said I did in this post.'
... which is the reason I figured at that point that you were the one who did it. "Oh, you never said anything about me, you said something about the AI coder without ever mentionning my name, I responded like I felt targeted, I act like it's me you insulted, and now you think it indeed was me". WHAT GIVES ? Yes, how could I imagine that it wasn't you when you replied "what do you say I did" when I was talking about "the AI coder" ? I should be able to read your mind, this isn't normal, I should have known you came out of nowhere and felt targeted for no reason ! It's an insufferable crime that, because you acted like it was you, I indeed thought it was you !
Let's go over. My previous posts in the thread said that I WAS NOT THE AI CODER. Why would I switch it at that point... which is why I called it 'a trick.' I wanted to see if you had been paying attention to what was going on, and what specifically I was saying. My post never said that I was the AI coder/distributor so, your reply, should have been (had you been paying attention), 'I wasn't talking about you here.'  Given ths response though, yes, I'll accept that you didn't know exactly what you were saying and thsi could have been an innocent mistake on your part. Did you make a mistake in saying "you[hjk]" synonymously with the AI coder?

Quote
He aid it came across as shouting, unlike you who flat-out said:
Did you notice the quotes ? And did you just ignore whatever I said afterward ? Let's see what else I said :
me said:
Now explain the font size change and caps lock everywhere. In case you don't know, that's the writing equivalent of yelling.
me said:
The way you were writing back there is what makes you look like a jackass, no matter who you are, and no matter how you thought it was.
So now what, I said the same thing as Cyanide, that it's how it "looked like" even if you didn't mean it that way. So why did you accept it when Cyanide said it and not when I said the same thing ?
YOU ARE THE BIGGEST DIMWITTED ASSHOLE EVER.
My post above explained where this whole shit started.
Holy Hell, you manipulated the order of events AGAIN:
Here is the single quote from me which you pulled ut, so you could re-ask your stupid question, out of order:
No you freaking idiot. I agreed with Cyanide because he said,
increasing your text size "did come across" as shouting.
He said it came across as shouting, unlike you who flat-out said:
Yeah, and you were "yelling" at him even when it wasn't your place. You're a jackass.
You straight out said, "you were 'yelling' at him." and were plain wrong. Do you see the difference. And tyhis is part of what I mean by you manipulating facts in order to make yourself look better.
Let's count:
- Bad sequencing of events
- Saying I always accuse people of not liking me, WHEN I NEVER HAVE BEFORE NOW.
- Putting words into my mouth (keep reading the rest of this reply)
- Saying I'm yelling at you, because it's you, instead of because you posted like an ass. Stop insulting people and subjecting them to your own interpretations and just POST.
- Equating this situation to the others (Here I made all the points I needed to in the way I meant, mind you the first thing I said was wrong, which I called out in my next post, BUT IT WAS NOT, I repeat WAS NOT, me speaking unclearly as it usually is. In the others, as it cncerns you, I don't even know. I've issued too many false apologies to you that i can't even count.
Don't you dare try to fuck taht up again. Answer thsi shit honestly instead of pulling parts out of order.


Quote
- Equating this situation with the others
Uh. Cyanide's very first reply was telling you exactly that, that you always call something a bug and that we don't want to hear about it anymore. You replied to him with your "yelling" (NOTICE THE QUOTES, JACKASS) which is why I replied in turn.
Cyanide said, he didn't want to hear about teh glitches. You said I posted in language that was unclear. My posts before you got in here all made the points I wanted them to make; again meaning they were different from teh normal situations. You fail to realize that every time I explain it; wose yet, you got into simply insulting me for a bad interpretation of my posts.

Quote
Stop Fucking the events up Byakko, and actually be honest for once.
I am honest. You post like a jackass all the time. you say the last few months were quiet, but yet you come at me about the Yun and Kim problem. and you're the one lying, the first time yun came into the discussion was here
Way to toally dodge what I said. And yesm i brought in Yun, just to sjhow how you never admit you are wrong. And yes, I remeber what i said during teh last little tuffle, but fuck that crap, because you never learn anything anyway.

Quote
Second lets go through you. Since my time here I HAVE NEVER seen you admit to being wrong. Not even when i explained to you that I wasn't the AI coder for Yun or Kim
this sentence is the first time the word "Yun" arrived into the discussion. You are the one who brought it up. It's to this that I replied that you brought the Yun event back from years ago. You talk about how I never admitted being wrong in the Yun and Kim case, just a few lines after telling me about "the past few months". It's in the same post. You mention how you still have something against me for not admitting of being wrong years ago, but just before saying that, you just said that all that mattered was "the last few months". so when you want to know when aws the last time you made a mistake, you don't go any furhter back than "the last few months", but if you want to know when I didn't admit I was wrong, you go back to years ago. IN THE SAME POST.
So, who's fucking up the order of events ?
What the fuck are you talking about.
This isn't fucking up the order of events. This is, me using all of the clearest examples of you being wrong and not admitting it. BTW, way to totally ignored the fact that I use the word "second" and started a new paragraph, implying I'm making a new point... idiot
Here'es the quote:
I am aware that I talk like a jerk and that I'm too straightforward to be polite. You don't even realize that you're the one misinterpreting what you're told. And you don't even question yourself about that even though the same thing happens all the time.
Quote
Is that right?
No.
What the hell Byakko. Of course I question myself, which is the reason why I APOLOGIZE TO PEOPLE. I have made genuine apologies before, as well as false ones for teh sake of ending drama. I have admitted to having a language problem, and I admit when I'm wrong. Tell me, Byakko, why is it that for the past few months, a conversation like this hasn't come up?
Second lets go through you. Since my time here I HAVE NEVER seen you admit to being wrong. Not even when i explained to you that I wasn't the AI coder for Yun or Kim; you could have looked, its not hard, but no; I took the road of ending the drama and said it was 'my mistake' even though I just thought you were being blindly accusitory and lazy.
Tell me Byakko, I want you to analyze your old sig for everyone to see. It prettuy much sums up that you never look at yourself.
Stop fucking shit up BYAKKO.

*I've got to go to a meeting. I'll reply to the rest (and possibly fix things up when I come back)*

Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty
LOL, Caddie's the man!! ;)

I'm as real as the runnin, I just happen to rap, Nigaas London, Japan, and i'm scared of dat tap.

I suggest extending my banning, cuz when I come back, it's gonna be hell. You think I was annoying before, oh man, it's on now :)
hjk vs. 99% of MFG. I will win.

RIP Poo Bear Tell my Dead Homie isson, for the year my partner.
Last Edit: May 17, 2008, 11:38:09 pm by What did you just say???
Re: Coliseum - hjk vs zawarudo
#100  May 16, 2008, 06:54:50 pm
  • ****
  • Humanity can be so much more
    • Jamaica
    • Skype - gouken1987
    • www.mugenguild.com/mastergouken/
Aren't y'all fingers tired? ??? Seriously, you're practically begging for carpel tunnel at this rate.