This looks fantastic. I'm curious about the hardware to run it though. It's probably not even available to the public atm.Hopefully this project goes through till the end, it looks amazing.
Yeah me too it was so much better when everything in games looked like it was made of used toilet paper.
GBK667 said, August 02, 2011, 03:19:16 pmYou are too young to talk like that, boy.How so? I started with a PS1 and it had graphics that looked like absolute ass.
And today the games are better because better graphics, right?And every single Playstation 1 games had graphics which "looked like absolute ass" My god. TemPest is absolutly right. I better just stop that "jaded old school gamer" shit
This isn't even what the topic is about really. The games were just used as test footage.It's more about the advancements in graphic capabilities and processing, rather than the videogames who use it or not.Let's just focus on the subject here, k?
Is it me or is the comparison videos he tried to do with Crysis looks like the console version? No Seriously...And im not really too excited about this, I mean it looks like it would be helpful if you need to do a complex object but I dont see anything I could jump out of my seat. When they actually animate it and add some dynamic lighting then I'll be impressed.
GBK667 said, August 02, 2011, 03:41:58 pmAnd today the games are better because better graphics, right?No. But good graphics are a good thing. I never implied anything else.Not that games were generally any better 15 years ago. Thats just nostalgia blinding you people.GBK667 said, August 02, 2011, 03:41:58 pmAnd every single Playstation 1 games had graphics which "looked like absolute ass" Not all. Just most.
games were not better, but gaming is.GBK667 said, August 02, 2011, 03:41:58 pmAnd today the games are better because better graphics, right?And every single Playstation 1 games had graphics which "looked like absolute ass" My god. TemPest is absolutly right. I better just stop that "jaded old school gamer" shitnah, just don't forget youa re arguign with 15 year old kids, trying to treat them like adults is a headache.
And i am 31..which makes me a glorious fantastic something old-school gamer freaknerdwhatsoever who lives in his past and wants that everything is like it was when he was 17.;-)beside that. the PS1 rules.
Saw this yesterday.I'm surprised they made progress. Not really excited about graphics, but rather interested if it means processing graphics faster than polygons as it may lower minimum specs for high-end graphics.I will give them until they make a fully animated demo running on low hardware, otherwise no reason for me to be excited.
I stand by my theory. Good graphics on a good game adds to the quality of said good game. Bad graphics on a good game does not affect the quality of said game. With that said the Euclideon engine looks like what Elder Scrolls VI should use in 2014 or some shit. I doubt the next generation of consoles will be able to support this, maybe the generation after that, though.
But good graphics are more fo a question of design adn artistic ability that hardware, just look at the amount of games that look like shades of gray.
Doesn't matter, if the graphics are good, then they will make a game better. If they are just a "shade of gray" then the game probably doesn't have good graphics. Good graphics are in the eye of the beholder yes but the beholder thinks they are good then they will add to the quality. A common cliche nowadays is that people feel that graphics that are more advanced make games worse, but that is not the case. Look at Mega Man 2, then look at Mega Man 7, people say the graphics are what made 7 bad, but really it's just the changed gameplay mechanics that people dislike. If Mega Man 7's graphics were pasted onto Mega Man 2, there would be much less complaining.
