YesNoOk
avatar

Fergurson-missouri (Read 21600 times)

Started by Iced, August 14, 2014, 12:53:22 pm
Share this topic:
Re: Fergurson-missouri
#281  December 05, 2014, 03:56:51 am
  • avatar
  • *
    • Anguilla
    • beeschen.belson@yandex.com
I guarantee you the reason he's free is because of the witness that claimed Trayvon was ontop of Zimmerman.
I understand that, but the prosecution should have been able to drive home the point that even if Trayvon had been on top of him, Trayvon would reasonably have done so while intending to defend himself because Zimmerman was clearly following him as Trayvon mentioned in the phone call to his friend.

Take these scenarios:
- A person follows you in a city for about half an hour and you know they're following you. You duck behind buildings and that person keeps tailing you. You shoot that stranger precisely because you fear for your life and have no idea why that person has been following you. A jury could reasonably find you not guilty precisely because that person was following you making you fear for your life.

- A person follows you for 20 minutes and you know they're following you. You hide behind a pillar and the pursuit continues. You eventually stand off with then fight the the person following you. If you're arrested and charged with assault you could reasonably be acquitted because the person was following you making you fear for your life.

The added element that makes Trayvon's case so bad is that, He was visiting his step-dad who lived there, Trayvon was extremely familiar with the neighborhood and had been there many times before, to which I'm like come on!
Last Edit: December 05, 2014, 04:03:45 am by GentleOne
Re: Fergurson-missouri
#282  December 05, 2014, 05:39:46 am
  • ******
  • Christmas isn't about getting into clubs, Zorak!
    • USA
    • network.mugenguild.com/jmorphman
Re: Fergurson-missouri
#283  December 05, 2014, 05:43:28 am
  • ******
  • [E]
    • Mexico
I guarantee you the reason he's free is because of the witness that claimed Trayvon was ontop of Zimmerman.
I understand that, but the prosecution should have been able to drive home the point that even if Trayvon had been on top of him, Trayvon would reasonably have done so while intending to defend himself because Zimmerman was clearly following him as Trayvon mentioned in the phone call to his friend.

Take these scenarios:
- A person follows you in a city for about half an hour and you know they're following you. You duck behind buildings and that person keeps tailing you. You shoot that stranger precisely because you fear for your life and have no idea why that person has been following you. A jury could reasonably find you not guilty precisely because that person was following you making you fear for your life.

- A person follows you for 20 minutes and you know they're following you. You hide behind a pillar and the pursuit continues. You eventually stand off with then fight the the person following you. If you're arrested and charged with assault you could reasonably be acquitted because the person was following you making you fear for your life.

The added element that makes Trayvon's case so bad is that, He was visiting his step-dad who lived there, Trayvon was extremely familiar with the neighborhood and had been there many times before, to which I'm like come on!

you know I live in a country where that is very likely to happen/has already happened to me and I run the fuck out if I suspect someone is following me; first step is just to cahgne from my suual walk routes, if the person is still following me I run fast, that either makes it really obvious that the other person is following me or the person is just  left behind.
Re: Fergurson-missouri
#284  December 05, 2014, 09:48:50 pm
  • *****
  • Are you pondering what I'm pondering?
This happened in 2013, but has been making the rounds of social media lately

"Ethan, who had Down syndrome, enjoyed the film so much that he decided to go back to his seat for a second showing while his aide went to get the car to take them home. When he refused to buy another $12 ticket, off-duty police moonlighting as security guards allegedly tackled him in an attempt to eject him from his seat.

An hour later, the young man was dead from "asphyxiation by homicide," according to the medical examiner's report.

The case went to a grand jury, which declined to indict the three sheriff's officers involved in the Jan. 12 incident, according to the Washington Post.

Saylor said when the mall officers pulled Ethan from his seat he panicked and then screamed for his mother.

When the aide, whom Saylor would not identify, returned to witness the police asking Ethan to buy a ticket or leave, she told them he didn't like to be touched and would "freak out." The family alleges officers ignored her pleas as Ethan was handcuffed and dropped to the floor, then stopped breathing."

source
I think so, but isn't Regis Philbin already married?
Re: Fergurson-missouri
#285  December 05, 2014, 11:29:51 pm
  • ***
  • YouTube has ruined me.
    • Skype - Buff Swaggerton
more than overkill, more like a heinous cold blooded murder. killing people isnt part of their job description of protecting and serving

Police nowadays don't protect and serve, they neglect and swerve.

They enforce laws--that's it.
NO MORE CPS2;

I only use it for project-specific purposes.
Re: Fergurson-missouri
#286  December 07, 2014, 06:51:22 pm
  • avatar
    • USA
    • joeseph.scho@yahoo.com
To put this in perspective for anyone who thinks that officers automatically act rationally, understand that most police forces are made up of people who didn't necessarily do very well in school. When you actually go into police stations, especially in densely populated areas, this fact becomes all the more clear, minus the fact that those stations and the conditions officers have to work in while there tend to be ridiculously shitty.

Anyway, I guess that some people assume that officers are automatically right because they're a group? Tea Partiers are also a widespread group and in Nazi Germany people were educated about what to believe was good and were told that the people getting arrested by their officers were detained on the basis of their crimes when that wasn't true. Much of the time American police forces are made up of people who, when given an ounce of power, go way overboard.

Last Edit: December 07, 2014, 06:53:34 pm by RyoSazaki
Re: Fergurson-missouri
#287  December 08, 2014, 12:19:57 am
  • ***
  • YouTube has ruined me.
    • Skype - Buff Swaggerton
To put this in perspective for anyone who thinks that officers automatically act rationally, understand that most police forces are made up of people who didn't necessarily do very well in school.

 Much of the time American police forces are made up of people who, when given an ounce of power, go way overboard.



+1
NO MORE CPS2;

I only use it for project-specific purposes.
Re: Fergurson-missouri
#288  December 08, 2014, 12:28:13 am
  • ******
  • [The only one worthy of my love!]
    • USA
I like how you only +1'ed part of the post and left out the part about cops being comparable to Nazis.

Now if you'll excuse me I'm gonna go practice my Hitler walk.
Re: Fergurson-missouri
#289  December 08, 2014, 01:21:55 am
  • avatar
    • USA
    • joeseph.scho@yahoo.com
and left out the part about cops being comparable to Nazis.
Now if you'll excuse me I'm gonna go practice my Hitler walk.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WPxBjIuNIto
Not sure whether this is an innocent misinterpretation or a deliberate misrepresentation.
Just to clarify, I was providing examples for why those who presume that police officers are innocent, or believe that people in groups are always right, need to understand that the same thought process was applied by those who "innocently" believed that Nazi officers were arresting people because they had broken laws. Before you argue, know that in the initial phases of the Final Solution some Jews surrendered their own kind presuming that the authorities were detaining and "questioning" them for having committed crimes. Long story short, don't presume that the officers are automatically right to use such overwhelming/deadly force.

V
Amen Xan. I agree.
Last Edit: December 08, 2014, 06:03:20 am by RyoSazaki

Xan

Re: Fergurson-missouri
#290  December 08, 2014, 01:28:26 am
  • ******
    • Skype - Istillhasnoname
Much of the time American police forces are made up of people who, when given an ounce of power, go way overboard.
The same applies to nearly anybody in any position of power. Power goes to peoples' heads, whether they were reasonable beforehand or not. It's human nature, and it's far more broad than is being stated here.
MY YOUTUBE || MY TUMBLR

Xan is always lovable
Is finding MUGEN to be more enjoyable to play when you're not wearing clothes an underrated opinion?
Re: Fergurson-missouri
#291  December 09, 2014, 06:31:53 pm
  • ******
  • does this look like the face of mercy?
Re: Fergurson-missouri
#292  December 09, 2014, 07:56:33 pm
  • ****
  • I bite the faces of people who don't wanna be cool
I actually did not know what furtive meant so upon looking it up
* done in a quiet and secret way to avoid being noticed
* done by stealth
* obtained underhandedly
....You know what forget it the guy ain't getting charged anyways

I'm also under the impression that people keep neglecting data from the game, do you guys know how PotS made his original characters? He actually studied every single game he referenced, down to the core. Doing this properly requires understanding how the original system was made, not just winging it.
Re: Fergurson-missouri
#293  December 09, 2014, 08:14:17 pm
  • *****
  • Most dangerous person in Mugen
    • USA
    • caddie.smeenet.org
hands up and surrounded by religious leaders

shot because he was acting furtive

You misread the article. The sheriff holding the press conference was surrounded by religious leaders. The guy who was shot was in a stolen vehicle and is still alive.
Re: Fergurson-missouri
#294  December 09, 2014, 11:24:21 pm
  • ******

  • Online
don't let the facts get in the way of my outrage
Re: Fergurson-missouri
#295  December 10, 2014, 01:03:20 am
  • ******
  • does this look like the face of mercy?
Re: Fergurson-missouri
#296  December 15, 2014, 06:56:48 pm
  • ******
  • does this look like the face of mercy?
Re: Fergurson-missouri
#297  December 15, 2014, 07:22:08 pm
  • *****
  • Are you pondering what I'm pondering?
And it was protested soon after:


“We came here armed. We are proponents of open-carry. This case is clearly a case related to open carry. Maybe John Crawford wasn’t carrying a real firearm but he was carrying what seemed to be a real firearm, and the over-reaction of the police in this instance is completely outrageous,” Virgil Vadura told WDTN.

Source
I think so, but isn't Regis Philbin already married?
Re: Fergurson-missouri
#298  December 15, 2014, 07:53:03 pm
  • ******
  • ALE ALEJANDRO
America's "how much shooting another human being can we get away with" social experiment sure is delivering some interesting results.

I, for one, am absolutely stoked not being a part of it.
"We live in a world of perpetual outrage"
Re: Fergurson-missouri
#299  December 15, 2014, 07:55:15 pm
  • ******
If I struggled to the end of my determination, to the end of my way of life with my followers, if the result is ruin, then this ruin is inevitable. Grieve. Shed tears. But you cannot regret.
Re: Fergurson-missouri
#300  December 15, 2014, 08:39:27 pm
  • ******
  • [E]
    • Mexico