the one who attacked the towers are TERRORISTS so burn TERRORISTS not the Koran stupid mother fuc*ing idiots.
地狱的花 said, August 07, 2010, 05:15:16 amthe one who attacked the towers are TERRORISTS so burn TERRORISTS not the Koran stupid mother fuc*ing idiots.bumper sticker waiting to happen.
Racist pricks like these need to shut the fuck up and get on with their damn lives rather than trying to "fix" their country.
roundup:The daily show about building playgrounds near catholic churcheshttp://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/mon-august-16-2010/mosque-eradeGOP strategists call President Obama's comments about freedom of religion for Muslims "probably the dumbest thing that any president has said"http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2010/08/15/ftn/main6774692.shtmlwhere there are mosques, there are Muslims, and where there are Muslims, there are problems.http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/brooklyn/new_yorkistan_don_rule_it_out_bc8AbFztnOFKtaFWMTyohL#ixzz0wwfFN8TnGround Zero Mosque is actually just an office building containing a gym, a mosque, and a 9/11 memorial. Why do 9/11 memorials hate America?http://politics.usnews.com/opinion/blogs/robert-schlesinger/2010/08/16/the-ground-zero-mosque-is-not-a-mosque-or-at-ground-zeroislam is against everything america stands forhttp://www.nwfdailynews.com/news/panama-32000-america-stands.htmlnot to mention there are closer mosques, that have been open for longer.
I'm not really in support for this all that much, we are talking about people that lost their families, friends, and children in that attack and it would take decades to recover. They know that it's going to make a lot of people uncomfortable in the first place, they know it's going to cause controversy. Why would they pursue it so much? It's like building a statue of you're child's rapist on their grave, you just don't do it. It is insensitive and disrespectful for people that work or lived near. Of course it's not a big deal to you but it is for ones who witnessed it first hand.The only reason why it's being supported NOW is because I think they're going to patch and bug the hell out of that place. Isn't their an extremest Muslim group that sent threats to South Park executives?I don't see things going well anytime soon when it's built.
LostTruth64 said, August 19, 2010, 05:45:18 amI'm not really in support for this all that much, we are talking about people that lost their families, friends, and children in that attack and it would take decades to recover. They know that it's going to make a lot of people uncomfortable in the first place, they know it's going to cause controversy. Why would they pursue it so much? It's like building a statue of you're child's rapist on their grave, you just don't do it. It is insensitive and disrespectful for people that work or lived near. Of course it's not a big deal to you but it is for ones who witnessed it first hand.The only reason why it's being supported NOW is because I think they're going to patch and bug the hell out of that place. Isn't their an extremest Muslim group that sent threats to South Park executives?I don't see things going well anytime soon when it's built.Muslims died during 911 too. It's not like the entire religion attacked us, just the extremists. There's no reason to be hostile towards the entire religion. No good reason anyway. And it shouldn't cause controversy for that reason, they (the group trying to build) didn't do anything nor were they associated with the group behind 911. Not to mention the Muslim group trying to build there OWNS the property, so it'd be extremely bad on Everyone else's part if we told someone what to do with their property.
on the other part of the world, people are not allowed to build a church on their own land using their own money too, while they shove a bucket to your face asking donation for yet another new mosque or something. So world is pretty fair.
LostTruth64 said, August 19, 2010, 05:45:18 amIsn't their an extremest Muslim group that sent threats to South Park executives?yes, if a couple of retards on a blog are to be considered an Muslim group.
navetsea said, August 20, 2010, 02:18:32 amon the other part of the world, people are not allowed to build a church on their own land using their own money too, while they shove a bucket to your face asking donation for yet another new mosque or something. So world is pretty fair.so you saying that new yorkers should be assholes too ? oh wait...
http://www.fark.com/cgi/vidplayer.pl?IDLink=5569975Video of protesters attacking a "supposed" muslin because he is black.Bonus, one of them screams afterwards "THEY ARE TRYING TO MAKE US LOOK RACIST" this mail has been making the rounds on republican foruns, apparently.Quote"Islamophobia" is as old as Islam itself. The Muslim was a liar, an insurgent, an exploiter, a troublemaker, a poisoner of the blood and a terrorist from the beginning. The non-Islamic peoples thus responded to this people of criminals throughout history with contempt and rejection.Over the centuries, repeated attempts were made to eliminate the Islamic danger. Under the assumption that the Islamic question was a religious matter, African nationas attempted to render Muslims harmless by forcing them to be baptized. It did not take long for people to realize that this was an entirely false solution. The conversion of Muslims to Christianity was only on the surface. The Muslims became "Christian" only to carry on as Muslims.Another way to solve the Islamic question was for the numerically superior non-Islamic population to absorb the Islamic minority. People believed that close contact between the Muslims and the host peoples would, through equality, intermarriage and the mixing of blood, gradually "water down" the Islamic race and lead to its disappearance. The results of this mistake were catastrophic. The Islamic race was not "watered down"and rendered harmless, but rather the opposite: the blood of the non-Islamic peoples was poisoned in a grave way.Experience showed non-Islamic peoples that incorporating the foreign Islamic element into their community not only did no good, but caused positive harm. Gradually people realized that there was only one effective method of dealing with Islam: consistent separation from their own racial body.Even during the Middle Ages numerous governments required Muslims to distinguish themselves from their non-Islamic host peoples by wearing special clothing such as pointed Islamic hats, yellow symbols, rings, etc. As well-intentioned as these measures were, they had only limited success. Sometimes the Muslims wore these symbols with pride. They were pleased that the "stupid whites" themselves saw to it that only the "people of Allah" wore such outward symbols. But other Muslims whose business interests were not advanced by making the fact that they were Muslims plain continued to go about the country as "non-Muslims."Another way of separating the Muslims from the non-Islamic peoples was to force them to live in certain areas.But this method also failed to achieve its goal. Some Muslims welcomed the creation of the ghetto. Once again they had their "community abroad!" In the ghetto, Islam's secret plans were forged! In the ghetto the Muslims had their "staff." Those Muslims who carried on their mischief among the non-Muslims received their commands from the ghetto. The Islamic danger was greater than ever before.Realizing that separating the Muslims into their own quarter was not sufficient led various peoples to go still further. They expelled the Muslims from their countries. This for the first time aroused the Muslims. Now they saw a real danger! Now they had to act before it was too late!Islam is thousands of years old. Thanks to its devilish cleverness, it has often found a way out of nearly hopeless situations. Here too! The Muslims let themselves be expelled without much fuss. They gathered on the other side of the border and waited and waited and waited. They waited for years and decades. They waited for the moment in which the knowledge of the Islamic danger gradually disappeared from people's minds. Then the Muslims came back. Then they laid waste to the land more terribly than before.Today the Western World is ready to solve the Islamic question once and for all. It is thus good to learn from past mistakes and remember what history teaches. And what does history teach us? It teaches:The Islamic question is not only an American matter!It is also not only an American problem! The Islamic question is a world question! Just as North America is not safe from the Muslims as long as even one Muslim remains in North America, so The Western World cannot solve the Islamic question as long as Muslims live in the rest of the world.Islam is organized world criminality. The Islamic danger will be eliminated only when Islam throughout the world has ceased to exist.Do you agree?
http://www.boingboing.net/2010/08/26/next-media-animation.htmlkorean video about the whole thing, I still would like to know thoughts about that email being spread around on my last post =p
Hm, I disagree. Islam is a religion, and therefore needs not to be a "race" as well as ambiguate and further discriminate other races and ethnic groups.Other than that, true. It's human nature to either overcome the adversity or simply do not comply to it if there's no enforcing the standard, case in point: this community.It's also human nature to, when feel like they are being oppressed, either live with it, knowing that there's a group of people that support them or fight to gain what they feel is a right: to walk with the same respect as any other human being.If anything, that email is stating that Islam is evil and all who supports it is evil and needs to leave, at what extent. It wasn't on the quote, but it clearly said that everything was tried to suppress or remove it except one. It disgusts me to believe that one would be so carnally hating. I say carnal because it's animal instinct to be afraid of the unknown, it's animal instinct to react to the unknown, and it's human nature to hate what they cannot understand.