well i wasnt trying to attack you, i just think your opinions are bad bro
in the case of biased divorce courts and marriage being a "risk", you post one ridiculous fringe story as your evidence when the evidence points otherwise (custody is easier to attain for men on state and national levels, alimony is actually rarely adequate for women who are almost always worse off financially post-divorce)
Study 1: MASS
2100 cases where fathers sought custody (100%)
5 year duration
29% of fathers got primary custody
65% of fathers got joint custody
7% of mothers got primary custody
Study 2: MASS
700 cases. In 57, (8.14%) father sought custody
6 years
67% of fathers got primary custody
23% of mothers got primary custody
Study 3: MASS
500 cases. In 8% of these cases, father sought custody
6 years
41% of fathers got sole custody
38% of fathers got joint custody
15% of mothers got sole custody
Study 4: Los Angeles
63% of fathers who sought sole custody were successful
Study 5: US appellate custody cases
51% of fathers who sought custody were successful (not clear from wording whether this includes just sole or sole/joint custody)
http://amptoons.com/blog/files/Massachusetts_Gender_Bias_Study.htmon the alimony, thats probably the only place where i can say family courts are biased towards woman in good faith. but in the end there are stats like this that should make you feel better about being male:
http://dspace.library.cornell.edu/bitstream/1813/14235/2/KristenReillyFinalThesis1.pdfso all in all, i dont agree with your idea that feminists have made the US a country where men are greatly at risk when getting married. idk about france, but maybe you should be careful around french girls rajaa, assuming theyre fighting for you among the rest of girls that are.
and im flattered youd compare me to titiln, i was going for my own thing, but that gives me a boost since he is cool. not as cool as you, considering your massive ego, but getting there.
