since along time without do anything I did this because some friends suggested and requested..I did it but I was busy for conclude it...:here with my friends(the big guy Sonsen 3000 and the small chick Carrie, wanted sign an autograph,I know how do what they request..Spoiler, click to toggle visibilty There are new characters (I will do, if the things don't go wrong for Mugen) Amanda Brooke and Hazel Stocks:there are more drawings,but they are explicit in hot terms,I knew that stuff can't be posted here (the NSFW is for softer stuff like nudity but H-content...),if you want to see it(Spoiler, click to toggle visibiltythat is a gangbang which includes me,Claudilla and the new girls you can pm me.otherwise I would post it.
I honestly don't know what to do here as a moderator.She put the NSFW tag so that should be okay...Iced, what should I do here?
QuoteMild nudity ("boobs + butt") and more aesthetic stuff is ok clearly marked as NSFW, preferably put into a [spoiler] tag.Anything "hardcore" is obviously out of bounds.Zero tolerance towards "shock" images, animations and links. This includes stuff bluntly meant to disgust, filmings of suicide and the like.No nudity in profiles or images linked using [img] tags.Does not mention genitals but... eeeehhhh, I personally don't consider it mild nudity.I also believe that image is just in poor taste.
I remember reporting someone with a .jpeg of a stage using a open vagina and one of the mods got on that quickly. In this case I'm not too sure but I reported it anyways.
i've seen people post vaginas before. i don't know if vaginas dripping with cumsies are allowed. the rules aren't specific enough
Pretty sure the first spoilered image goes beyond "tasteful" nudity (it looks like a kid is groping the woman and that's a bit much imo). The rest I don't really have an opinion on.
All girls in the pic are 18+ and up,just she is a small girl,she is a friend who I talked to do that drawing, and I think that would be posted because I read the Nude Crazy Joe post was famous and it showed him with spoiler....
I'm... I'm not too sure what to say to this either. I'm with Titiln. But I'd rather have Iced chime in or another mod with a lot more time under their belt to make a firm decision. If it wasn't for that hesitation, I'd pull that spoilered image in a heartbeat.
Naked Crazy Joe was just a Joe with a dick.This is including fingering and womanly fluids.There's a bit of a difference there.(BTW everyone else: Smoke is only posting stuff like this so he can get a reaction)
Tacky certainly, but mildly shocking at worst.Even with that said, isn't the minimum age here 13? Yeah most everyone here is beyond that but probably best to enforce on those lines.
Orochi Gill said, October 29, 2014, 04:42:42 am(BTW everyone else: Smoke is only posting stuff like this so he can get a reaction)And that's what puzzles me.
Orochi Gill said, October 29, 2014, 04:42:42 am(BTW everyone else: Smoke is only posting stuff like this so he can get a reaction)smoke identifies as a she please respect gender pronouns
I saw this thread right when it was created and until now I still can't see any of the pics (They appear as broken images here). Hope I'm not missing that much lol.
Orochi Gill said, October 29, 2014, 04:42:42 amNaked Crazy Joe was just a Joe with a dick.This is including fingering and womanly fluids.There's a bit of a difference there.naked crazy joe's release thread included pictures of joe jerking off his massive pecker and shooting a healthy load of cumsies in front of ino. both images involve genitals and fluids. explain the bit of a difference
basically i think theres nothing actually wrong with this thread since it is properly marked, its bizarre tho.Titiln said, October 29, 2014, 05:46:46 amcumsieslmao every time i read this i cringe visibly
if you're going to draw comparisons to a thread that is really easy to find without even looking at it then maybe you shouldn't bother
-Red- said, October 29, 2014, 05:42:38 amI saw this thread right when it was created and until now I still can't see any of the pics (They appear as broken images here). Hope I'm not missing that much lol.A bunch of badly-drawn people. But the image in question I can describe as follows: it has 3 people standing in what appears to be a photoshop filtered high school gymnasium to make it look drawn. One person appears to be an adult male, standing to the left and behind what appears to be Smoke's OC, who is crumpling a piece of paper in her left hand, her pants down, her vagina dripping fluids, and her shirt up with her left breast being groped by what appears to be a female child to her right since she's half the size of the other two people in it.In case you are wondering what Smoke's style looks like, if you saw it 8 years ago, well get ready for this shocking bit of information! The style has not changed one bit. The proportions, faces, and shading are just as awful now as they were 8 years ago. Just like Smoke's reading comprehension skills, English, and desperate need for attention.Did I sum that up correctly?Titiln said, October 29, 2014, 05:46:46 amOrochi Gill said, October 29, 2014, 04:42:42 amNaked Crazy Joe was just a Joe with a dick.This is including fingering and womanly fluids.There's a bit of a difference there.naked crazy joe's release thread included pictures of joe jerking off his massive pecker and shooting a healthy load of cumsies in front of ino. both images involve genitals and fluids. explain the bit of a differenceit was funny therewhat? you said bit.
I think the main difference is that Joe's sprites were no where near detailed as that. I thought he meant NSFW by some slightly erro stuff but damn, isn't that too much?
yeah, a lot of people coudl find smoke's drawing funny and that completely neutralizes the previous point.
not taking in consideration how gross this looks, I talked it out with val just to make sure and we think it falls within what we allow. Its still hella weird anyone would try to draw stuff like that about themselves.
Iced said, October 29, 2014, 10:28:15 pmnot taking in consideration how gross this looks, I talked it out with val just to make sure and we think it falls within what we allow. Its still hella weird anyone would try to draw stuff like that about themselves.then all replies except for this one should be deleted
But if it involves what appears to be a child... isn't that illegal in some countries?Then again maybe it has to be saved? IDK.
the girl is a real friend of me,she requested it, and she is small and is 18+...About my style, people can dislike or like it, I feel fine because people in mugen hentai world requested,commisioned me to contribute drawing for them....and I think the bad things that some people talked me influenced to say "my style is the most horrible thing in the world"....and I posted the softer drawings, others that did are really explicit...like you can see in anything named "Hentai".
Nobody is saying your style is the worst thing in the world. From what I understood, your style stood the same for over six years, and looking at how the proportions are done for the characters, I can't say it is at it's finest. Instead of taking this as an offense, the best thing you could do is trying practicing for yourself for better results, rather than just trying to get reactions.
Imo Its pretty horrid, it looks like coloured pencil drawings by someone sex starved. I dont know how she managed to spend so long doing those tihngs and wasnt able to improve. Theres zero sense of anatomy and objects are drawn with neither perspective or relation to one another. While artistic nudes arent verboten from being posted with warnings and spoilers its still the kind of material I personally would advise against posting, specially taking in consideration how they are supposed self portraits consisting of "her" being abused beaten stabbed and raped.I am not entirely sure what kind of reaction would be expected from a fan game dev forum by sharing that kind of stuff with them.
Iced said, October 30, 2014, 03:34:43 pmImo Its pretty horrid, it looks like coloured pencil drawings by someone sex starved. I dont know how she managed to spend so long doing those tihngs and wasnt able to improve. Theres zero sense of anatomy and objects are drawn with neither perspective or relation to one another. While artistic nudes arent verboten from being posted with warnings and spoilers its still the kind of material I personally would advise against posting, specially taking in consideration how they are supposed self portraits consisting of "her" being abused beaten stabbed and raped.I am not entirely sure what kind of reaction would be expected from a fan game dev forum by sharing that kind of stuff with them.Honestly, it's quite disturbing.
