YesNoOk
avatar

Okay who's the genius who decided that no form of trans text be allowed? (Read 2932 times)

Started by Shwa, January 11, 2012, 11:50:25 pm
Share this topic:
Okay who's the genius who decided that no form of trans text be allowed?
#1  January 11, 2012, 11:50:25 pm
  • *****
  • Put 'er there.
  • y u free doe
    • Canada
    • Skype - shwacgl

  • Online
[BLUE TEXTBecause this is fucking stupid.[/color]
See what I mean?

The people who complained about transparent text only did so because of insecurities of "essential post information" that is usually unrelated/unimportant/humorous post material or a quip that doesn't need the space-taking or HEY LOOK AT ME NIGGA noticing factor of a spoiler tag, that you would see anyway if you reply the the post by quoting anyway.

Transparent tags off? Yeah okay that's dumb. Removing the WORKAROUNDS?
Not to sound offensive but you just went full retard. Is MFG supposed to be synonymous to NO FUN or something, jesus christ.

You can come around and say "it's just stupid" but it's your own fault for missing it and having some sort of post checking OCD.
Re: Okay who's the genius who decided that no form of trans text be allowed?
#2  January 11, 2012, 11:52:50 pm
  • ******
  • I'm a fuffy.
    • USA
    • www.trinitymugen.net
As I've said time and time again, we're not trying to be funny or anything like that. It has legitimate uses. To ban it because maybe one or two people tried to "be witty" by adding some pejorative text (and couldn't even do so properly, I mean white text? there's transparent right in the fucking drop box) is seriously stupid.


Also didn't Val implement that mod? Seems like he's more fun than the rest of you.
Re: Okay who's the genius who decided that no form of trans text be allowed?
#3  January 11, 2012, 11:59:29 pm
  • ******
    • Bolivia
    • www.justnopoint.com/dshiznetz
Yea fuck the guild lets all go to infantry
I wouldn't consider that a infinite since you have to make your opponent bounce of the wall and if you do it on the wrong side of the stage the stage interaction would activate.
Re: Okay who's the genius who decided that no form of trans text be allowed?
#4  January 12, 2012, 12:02:30 am
  • ******
  • :^
    • USA
    • sites.google.com/site/zetryou/
Oh no, not again. D:
Re: Okay who's the genius who decided that no form of trans text be allowed?
#5  January 12, 2012, 12:06:43 am
  • ******
    • Canada
    • Skype - templovesu
Legitimate uses such as...?
Re: Okay who's the genius who decided that no form of trans text be allowed?
#6  January 12, 2012, 12:07:04 am
  • ******
  • Complicated.cns
  • No, I've never played a Zelda game before, shut up
    • Argentina
In 5 years I've never seen a single person around here using the transparent text in a legitimate way so is not a big loss for me :P

I thought bluetext was the same as the blue font color tho

I expected this color to be banned before the other workarounds to be honest, too 4chanish
pls
Re: Okay who's the genius who decided that no form of trans text be allowed?
#7  January 12, 2012, 12:08:42 am
  • ******
  • I'm a fuffy.
    • USA
    • www.trinitymugen.net

OZ

Re: Okay who's the genius who decided that no form of trans text be allowed?
#8  January 12, 2012, 12:11:08 am
  • ******
  • ಠ_ಠ
 :drummer:
[invisible text]faggot[/invisible text]
ಠ_ಠ
Re: Okay who's the genius who decided that no form of trans text be allowed?
#9  January 12, 2012, 12:11:23 am
  • ******
  • Complicated.cns
  • No, I've never played a Zelda game before, shut up
    • Argentina
you know what I mean, stop it  >:(
pls
Re: Okay who's the genius who decided that no form of trans text be allowed?
#10  January 12, 2012, 12:12:08 am
  • ******
  • I'm a fuffy.
    • USA
    • www.trinitymugen.net
No, because you clearly haven't seen the legitimate uses.
Re: Okay who's the genius who decided that no form of trans text be allowed?
#11  January 12, 2012, 12:12:29 am
  • ******
    • Guatemala

  • Online
In 5 years I've never seen a single person around here using the transparent text in a legitimate way
... that's the idea, yeah.

...and is also why Titiln got rid of it. You know, the point of communicating is to let others know what you think.

I liked it as a more... 'subtle' replacement for spoilers that doesn't break the sentence. That's like the only legitimate use for transparent text.

OZ

Re: Okay who's the genius who decided that no form of trans text be allowed?
#12  January 12, 2012, 12:12:59 am
  • ******
  • ಠ_ಠ
ಠ_ಠ
Re: Okay who's the genius who decided that no form of trans text be allowed?
#13  January 12, 2012, 12:13:52 am
  • ******
  • I'm a fuffy.
    • USA
    • www.trinitymugen.net
I can't really think of any examples that I've done (but I know I've used it once or twice in Diepod's thread), but it's basically points that I'd like to get across to some, but not like leave myself open because it's just a mere hopeful thought or an aside remark. Again, it doesn't have to be negative.
Re: Okay who's the genius who decided that no form of trans text be allowed?
#14  January 12, 2012, 12:15:54 am
  • ******
  • Q.E.D.
    • USA
    • network.mugenguild.com/jmorphman

  • Online
I can't really think of any examples that I've done (but I know I've used it once or twice in Diepod's thread), but it's basically points that I'd like to get across to some, but not like leave myself open because it's just a mere hopeful thought or an aside remark. Again, it doesn't have to be negative.
But why does it have to be transparent? There is literally no reason it needs to be transparent.

If you don't want people to see what you wrote DON'T WRITE IT
Re: Okay who's the genius who decided that no form of trans text be allowed?
#15  January 12, 2012, 12:16:18 am
  • ******
    • Guatemala

  • Online
But no one is going to read it unless they highlight all your posts in search of hidden messages. Or quote them, but if you hide part of the message then people are less likely to care about them.
Re: Okay who's the genius who decided that no form of trans text be allowed?
#16  January 12, 2012, 12:17:50 am
  • ******
  • Complicated.cns
  • No, I've never played a Zelda game before, shut up
    • Argentina
But why does it have to be transparent? There is literally no reason it needs to be transparent.

If you don't want people to see what you wrote DON'T WRITE IT

Obviously to force us to highlight the text of every single post on this forum, just to waste more time on something that doesn't deserve it.
pls

OZ

Re: Okay who's the genius who decided that no form of trans text be allowed?
#17  January 12, 2012, 12:18:01 am
  • ******
  • ಠ_ಠ
bring it back
it made me feel like a detective
ಠ_ಠ
Re: Okay who's the genius who decided that no form of trans text be allowed?
#18  January 12, 2012, 12:19:31 am
  • ******
  • I'm a fuffy.
    • USA
    • www.trinitymugen.net
If you don't want people to see what you wrote DON'T WRITE IT
I only want people who care to see.

But no one is going to read it unless they highlight all your posts in search of hidden messages. Or quote them, but if you hide part of the message then people are less likely to care about them.
Sometimes it's a bit obvious it's there. Like, you'll see the little "box" a bit wider than what it ought to be... so there are clues. It's up to you (who care) to pursue them. If you don't care, fine, but just let us go about our business unless the hidden comment was just THAT offensive to you, but again, it's only to those who care.
Re: Okay who's the genius who decided that no form of trans text be allowed?
#19  January 12, 2012, 12:21:23 am
  • ******
  • Q.E.D.
    • USA
    • network.mugenguild.com/jmorphman

  • Online
Re: Okay who's the genius who decided that no form of trans text be allowed?
#20  January 12, 2012, 12:21:54 am
  • ******
  • does this look like the face of mercy?
If you don't want people to see what you wrote DON'T WRITE IT
I only want people who care to see.

But no one is going to read it unless they highlight all your posts in search of hidden messages. Or quote them, but if you hide part of the message then people are less likely to care about them.
Sometimes it's a bit obvious it's there. Like, you'll see the little "box" a bit wider than what it ought to be... so there are clues. It's up to you (who care) to pursue them. If you don't care, fine, but just let us go about our business unless the hidden comment was just THAT offensive to you, but again, it's only to those who care.

im sorry, but that doesnt really make much sense. You are writing it, either its to be seen or not. The only uses ive seen of stuff like that are the "FAGGOTS" and "NIGGERS" or the random " OH THIS IS SO GOOD [transparent text]unlike all of your STUFF!!!! [/transparent text] kind of stuff. I remember it got dealt away with on one of those occasions, although i wouldnt be able to point out where now.
Re: Okay who's the genius who decided that no form of trans text be allowed?
#21  January 12, 2012, 12:22:39 am
  • ******
    • Guatemala

  • Online
Re: Okay who's the genius who decided that no form of trans text be allowed?
#22  January 12, 2012, 12:23:28 am
  • ******
  • I'm a fuffy.
    • USA
    • www.trinitymugen.net
I only want people who care to see.
"People who care" does not mean the same thing as "people who highlight every single post because there might be a hidden insult in it somewhere".
You're again only focusing on the negatives. I said before, it doesn't have to be an insult.

im sorry, but that doesnt really make much sense. You are writing it, either its to be seen or not. The only uses ive seen of stuff like that are the "FAGGOTS" and "NIGGERS" or the random " OH THIS IS SO GOOD [transparent text]unlike all of your STUFF!!!! [/transparent text] kind of stuff. I remember it got dealt away with on one of those occasions, although i wouldnt be able to point out where now.
Then call them out on it when they do it, what's the problem?

OZ

Re: Okay who's the genius who decided that no form of trans text be allowed?
#23  January 12, 2012, 12:24:21 am
  • ******
  • ಠ_ಠ
if we can't be passively aggressive we're going to start being overtly aggressive.

is that what you want?
for all of us to be like shamrock?
ಠ_ಠ
Re: Okay who's the genius who decided that no form of trans text be allowed?
#24  January 12, 2012, 12:25:11 am
  • ******
  • Q.E.D.
    • USA
    • network.mugenguild.com/jmorphman

  • Online
Re: Okay who's the genius who decided that no form of trans text be allowed?
#25  January 12, 2012, 12:26:28 am
  • ******
  • I'm a fuffy.
    • USA
    • www.trinitymugen.net
At the very least, give an exception for the Entertainment and gaming sections so that we can hide spoilers within text ala TVTropes, because there ARE some times where you'd want to give SOME, but not ALL information, and spoiler tags alone just can't do that.

Exhibit A, which you ruined
Re: Okay who's the genius who decided that no form of trans text be allowed?
#26  January 12, 2012, 12:27:41 am
  • ******
  • Q.E.D.
    • USA
    • network.mugenguild.com/jmorphman

  • Online
At the very least, give an exception for the Entertainment and gaming sections so that we can hide spoilers within text ala TVTropes, because there ARE some times where you'd want to give SOME, but not ALL information, and spoiler tags alone just can't do that.

Exhibit A, which you ruined
How are spoiler tags not applicable in that scenario?

OZ

Re: Okay who's the genius who decided that no form of trans text be allowed?
#27  January 12, 2012, 12:28:43 am
  • ******
  • ಠ_ಠ
sorry, this whole debate is dumb
ಠ_ಠ
Re: Okay who's the genius who decided that no form of trans text be allowed?
#28  January 12, 2012, 12:28:55 am
  • ******
  • I'm a fuffy.
    • USA
    • www.trinitymugen.net
Try taking my TRANSPARENT TEXT statements and placing them all in spoiler text, see how messy that looks.
Re: Okay who's the genius who decided that no form of trans text be allowed?
#29  January 12, 2012, 12:29:13 am
  • ******
    • Guatemala

  • Online
Re: Okay who's the genius who decided that no form of trans text be allowed?
#30  January 12, 2012, 12:29:43 am
  • ******
  • does this look like the face of mercy?
im sorry, but that doesnt really make much sense. You are writing it, either its to be seen or not. The only uses ive seen of stuff like that are the "FAGGOTS" and "NIGGERS" or the random " OH THIS IS SO GOOD [transparent text]unlike all of your STUFF!!!! [/transparent text] kind of stuff. I remember it got dealt away with on one of those occasions, although i wouldnt be able to point out where now.
Then call them out on it when they do it, what's the problem?
Having to be
"people who highlight every single post because there might be a hidden insult in it somewhere".
i.e. Iced


? Nobody is paying me enough to be paranoid over when someone is getting away with throwing insults at someone face and then bragging about getting away with it or similar discord. And its not like being pussies that cant insult someone to their face is a banneable offence either. I dont really want to get to the point where it would be.
Its a pretty shitty atmosphere if some force others to be paranoid, and the mods are not going to be searching everything to tell them to knock it off either. still waiting for legitimate uses.

holy shit seven replies, hope i havent missed anything
Re: Okay who's the genius who decided that no form of trans text be allowed?
#31  January 12, 2012, 12:35:33 am
  • ******
    • USA

  • Online
It's gone, and if Iced's word is anything to go on it's staying gone.  Thank God.  Good riddance.
Re: Okay who's the genius who decided that no form of trans text be allowed?
#32  January 12, 2012, 12:36:33 am
  • ******
  • I'm a fuffy.
    • USA
    • www.trinitymugen.net
Whiner.

EDIT: And before you call us out on it, it's considerably less than you whined to get it taken away.
Re: Okay who's the genius who decided that no form of trans text be allowed?
#33  January 12, 2012, 12:37:30 am
  • ****
  • Yeah... I'm done.
    • Canada
    • Skype - do.not.even.ask
    • randomselect.piiym.net/
Only filthy bronies use trans text anyway.
Re: Okay who's the genius who decided that no form of trans text be allowed?
#34  January 12, 2012, 12:43:37 am
  • ******
  • [E]
    • Mexico
just ctrl+A whenever you are reading guild.
Re: Is viagra the answer?
#35  January 12, 2012, 12:46:20 am
  • ******
  • Complicated.cns
  • No, I've never played a Zelda game before, shut up
    • Argentina
I dont remember people complaining about transparent text and asking it to be taken away. It was all Titiln's idea. No one did a thread about it in the feedback section requesting that feature to be taken away  :wiseguy:
pls
Re: cocks cocks massive amounts of cocks
#36  January 12, 2012, 12:52:00 am
  • ******
  • [E]
    • Mexico
if you say so.
Re: Okay who's the genius who decided that no form of trans text be allowed?
#37  January 12, 2012, 11:18:31 am
  • *****
  • Unity of Hearts
    • Spain
I understand transparent, and possibly white too (though it doesn't do a great job at making it transparent), but why blue? I don't see how it can make a text transparent, which is the reason both that colours were removed. Or am I wrong here?
Re: Okay who's the genius who decided that no form of trans text be allowed?
#38  January 12, 2012, 01:23:15 pm
  • ******
the useful uses (hardly useful) for transparent/white were far outweighed by people making dumb side comments. that "But when            realized what he did to                     he decided to go to                    and then kill himself" tvtropes shit is terrible to read. please use normal spoilers. thank you

also blue was not removed what the hell are you talking about
Re: Okay who's the genius who decided that no form of trans text be allowed?
#39  January 12, 2012, 01:34:21 pm
  • ******
Suggestion : have transparent text switch to normal on hover ? Would make it a lot easier, and it would even be possible to make it visible "on accident" if you're moving your mouse around, without needing you to consciously think you need to do ctrl+A. Would that make dumb abuses harder to pass unnoticed ?
If I struggled to the end of my determination, to the end of my way of life with my followers, if the result is ruin, then this ruin is inevitable. Grieve. Shed tears. But you cannot regret.
Re: Okay who's the genius who decided that no form of trans text be allowed?
#40  January 12, 2012, 01:38:01 pm
  • ******
you could still hide comments that way. i'd rather have black text on black background if anything
Re: Okay who's the genius who decided that no form of trans text be allowed?
#41  January 12, 2012, 01:45:36 pm
  • ******
  • I hang out tough. I'm a real boss.
    • USA
    • litotichues.com/
Not to be offensive for the fun of it, but I read the first post and it seemed like a joke post. :P

I cannot think of ONE reason that transparent text can be useful or intuitive in any way. Either say what you have to say, don't say what you have to say, or put what you have to say in a spoiler.

"Fun" is not a useful or legitimate reason, as the original post suggests.
Re: Okay who's the genius who decided that no form of trans text be allowed?
#42  January 12, 2012, 02:18:55 pm
  • ******
    • Germany
    • valodim@gmail.com
I don't see the problem. No color is filtered at this point, and I don't think we need to discuss a [transparent] tag.
Re: Okay who's the genius who decided that no form of trans text be allowed?
#43  January 12, 2012, 04:42:15 pm
  • ******
  • does this look like the face of mercy?
I understand transparent, and possibly white too (though it doesn't do a great job at making it transparent), but why blue? I don't see how it can make a text transparent, which is the reason both that colours were removed. Or am I wrong here?
blue as in the backdrop of guild, it looked invisible .
The only passable way to make spoilered alt text would be that black background outline thing where you see a row of black squares and you need to highlight it to read, imo.
Re: Okay who's the genius who decided that no form of trans text be allowed?
#44  January 12, 2012, 05:15:03 pm
  • ****
  • Mother Fucking Money!
    • www.mugenfreeforall.com
the only use I can think of would be to announce spoilers but we have spoiler tags for it so... why does it matter.
You'll fix chuchoryu ? Sounds like a plan. How about you code him from scratch instead ?
Star Fucker said:
Do you often run naked in the streets screaming "YOU STUPID ASS FAGGOT NIGGA BITCHES WHY YOU NO HELP ME WITH MY MATH HOMEWORK !!!!???!!!!"
Re: Okay who's the genius who decided that no form of trans text be allowed?
#45  January 12, 2012, 05:18:15 pm
  • ******
  • [E]
    • Mexico
line breaks and clicks.
Re: Okay who's the genius who decided that no form of trans text be allowed?
#46  January 12, 2012, 05:23:20 pm
  • *****
  • Unity of Hearts
    • Spain
the useful uses (hardly useful) for transparent/white were far outweighed by people making dumb side comments. that "But when            realized what he did to                     he decided to go to                    and then kill himself" tvtropes shit is terrible to read. please use normal spoilers. thank you

also blue was not removed what the hell are you talking about

It's strange, it didn't work before, it was filtered. Did someone solved it?
Re: Okay who's the genius who decided that no form of trans text be allowed?
#47  January 12, 2012, 05:47:16 pm
  • ******
  • [E]
    • Mexico
dude, titiln's text is even transparent when I paste it in notepad  o_O
Re: Okay who's the genius who decided that no form of trans text be allowed?
#48  January 12, 2012, 05:48:12 pm
  • ******
  • does this look like the face of mercy?
the useful uses (hardly useful) for transparent/white were far outweighed by people making dumb side comments. that "But when            realized what he did to                     he decided to go to                    and then kill himself" tvtropes shit is terrible to read. please use normal spoilers. thank you

also blue was not removed what the hell are you talking about

It's strange, it didn't work before, it was filtered. Did someone solved it?
different blues =P
For the record, if people keep using colours that make them unreadable i plan to keep adding those to the filter list.
Re: Okay who's the genius who decided that no form of trans text be allowed?
#49  January 16, 2012, 08:04:52 pm
  • ******
  • I'm a fuffy.
    • USA
    • www.trinitymugen.net
I don't see the problem. No color is filtered at this point, and I don't think we need to discuss a [transparent] tag.
Admin powers?


Val is still funner. And no, Rajaa, he is completely serious. We've been discussing this for a while.
Re: Okay who's the genius who decided that no form of trans text be allowed?
#50  January 16, 2012, 08:43:19 pm
  • ******
  • Q.E.D.
    • USA
    • network.mugenguild.com/jmorphman

  • Online
Whiner.

EDIT: And before you call us out on it, it's considerably less than you whined to get it taken away.
ahahahahahahahahahahahaha
are you fucking serious

Nobody, and I mean NOBODY was whining about your passive aggressive transparent text use. Meanwhile all you've done since it's gone is complain about how you've lost some vital tool that's absolutely necessary for you to continue posting.
Re: Okay who's the genius who decided that no form of trans text be allowed?
#51  January 16, 2012, 08:45:42 pm
  • ******
    • Germany
    • valodim@gmail.com
Re: Okay who's the genius who decided that no form of trans text be allowed?
#52  January 16, 2012, 08:46:28 pm
  • ******
  • I'm a fuffy.
    • USA
    • www.trinitymugen.net
Whiner.

EDIT: And before you call us out on it, it's considerably less than you whined to get it taken away.
ahahahahahahahahahahahaha
are you fucking serious

Nobody, and I mean NOBODY was whining about your passive aggressive transparent text use. Meanwhile all you've done since it's gone is complain about how you've lost some vital tool that's absolutely necessary for you to continue posting.
You were saying?
Re: Okay who's the genius who decided that no form of trans text be allowed?
#53  January 16, 2012, 08:51:08 pm
  • ******
  • Q.E.D.
    • USA
    • network.mugenguild.com/jmorphman

  • Online
Re: Okay who's the genius who decided that no form of trans text be allowed?
#54  January 16, 2012, 08:51:22 pm
  • ******
    • Germany
    • valodim@gmail.com
What is this I don't even

Colors are not restricted, never were. Unless Iced is more capable of ninja adminship than I imagined. What are you gus even yapping on about??
Re: Okay who's the genius who decided that no form of trans text be allowed?
#55  January 16, 2012, 08:52:07 pm
  • ******
  • does this look like the face of mercy?
GROAN
goddamnit val


Ive restricted some colours, you are showing them one that I hadnt!
Re: Okay who's the genius who decided that no form of trans text be allowed?
#56  January 16, 2012, 08:55:17 pm
  • ******
  • I'm a fuffy.
    • USA
    • www.trinitymugen.net
yep, val, he restricted a few colors. for whatever reason.
Re: Okay who's the genius who decided that no form of trans text be allowed?
#57  January 16, 2012, 08:56:08 pm
  • ******
  • does this look like the face of mercy?
Because you were using them as transparent text, its not for "whatever" reason, that was said in this thread several times.



Re: Okay who's the genius who decided that no form of trans text be allowed?
#58  January 16, 2012, 09:01:56 pm
  • ******
    • Germany
    • valodim@gmail.com
how did you ooohh you used word filters? hahaha, that's great.

took me the better part of a minute fiddling around from #EEEEFF to find an almost-invisible color that isn't restricted :lugoi:
Re: Okay who's the genius who decided that no form of trans text be allowed?
#59  January 16, 2012, 09:34:21 pm
  • ******
  • I'm a fuffy.
    • USA
    • www.trinitymugen.net
see this is why censorship doesn't work
Re: Okay who's the genius who decided that no form of trans text be allowed?
#60  January 16, 2012, 09:37:10 pm
  • ******
  • does this look like the face of mercy?

OZ

Re: Okay who's the genius who decided that no form of trans text be allowed?
#61  January 16, 2012, 09:39:11 pm
  • ******
  • ಠ_ಠ
ಠ_ಠ
Re: Okay who's the genius who decided that no form of trans text be allowed?
#62  January 16, 2012, 09:43:06 pm
  • ******
  • I'm a fuffy.
    • USA
    • www.trinitymugen.net
Transparent text is great. God knows how many times people have missed messages I've had hidden.
I like surprises and easter eggs. Don't you?


... of course you don't.


see this is why censorship doesn't work

i say we protest and suggest a forumwide blackout
hey val, if you're game just knock out the site in about 20-24 hours
This. 8AM-8PM EST on January 18,2012, total blackout.
Re: Okay who's the genius who decided that no form of trans text be allowed?
#63  January 16, 2012, 10:15:35 pm
  • ******
    • Germany
    • valodim@gmail.com
Re: Okay who's the genius who decided that no form of trans text be allowed?
#64  January 16, 2012, 11:09:26 pm
  • ******
good news you can use transparent text again! except it will be preceded by highlight-> text. this might not be the best solution but at least it's not as crippling as the previous wordfilter.

suck a bag of dicks
Re: Okay who's the genius who decided that no form of trans text be allowed?
#65  January 16, 2012, 11:17:00 pm
  • ******
also be careful when you're editing or quoting a post because color=transparent is going to be wordfiltered again so you're going to get two highlight-> text instances. if this bothers you then don't transparent text.

also if i find anyone using a hard to read color code to hide some dumb message i'll probably delete or edit that post well see ya

OZ

Re: Okay who's the genius who decided that no form of trans text be allowed?
#66  January 16, 2012, 11:27:37 pm
  • ******
  • ಠ_ಠ
this will work great

ಠ_ಠ
Re: Okay who's the genius who decided that no form of trans text be allowed?
#67  January 17, 2012, 12:20:13 am
  • ******
  • I'm a fuffy.
    • USA
    • www.trinitymugen.net
where're my smokes
Re: Okay who's the genius who decided that no form of trans text be allowed?
#68  February 04, 2012, 07:11:30 pm
  • ******