YesNoOk
avatar

Replying to PM's (Read 927 times)

Started by Jesuszilla, August 30, 2014, 03:01:34 am
Email this topic
View printable version
Share this topic:
Page 1 of 11   Go Down

Jesuszilla

Replying to PM's
#1  August 30, 2014, 03:01:34 am
  • ******
  • I'm a fuffy.
    • USA
    • www.trinitymugen.net
... is really annoying. Why should I have to specify a recipient if I'm sending a reply to their PM?

Jango Hakamichi

Re: Replying to PM's
#2  August 30, 2014, 03:09:38 am
  • ******
  • [The only one worthy of my love!]
    • USA
That usually happens if you try to send a PM to someone who blocked you.

Just No Point

Re: Replying to PM's
#3  August 30, 2014, 03:10:40 am
  • ******
    • www.justnopoint.com/

  • Online
If it was me I didn't block him. I have no one blocked =p I thought you couldn't send a PM to a blocked person at all though?

I've never encountered this issue btw as long as I hit reply or quote the previous PM

Titiln

Re: Replying to PM's
#4  August 30, 2014, 03:11:21 am
  • ******
the To: field is empty but the recipient is under it. it looks confusing at first

Jesuszilla

Re: Replying to PM's
#5  August 30, 2014, 03:12:29 am
  • ******
  • I'm a fuffy.
    • USA
    • www.trinitymugen.net
Has nothing to do with whether or not they're blocked. Asks me to specify a recipient no matter who it is I reply to. It's really annoying.

Just No Point

Re: Replying to PM's
#6  August 30, 2014, 03:13:16 am
  • ******
    • www.justnopoint.com/

  • Online
Can you post a screenshot?

Iced

Re: Replying to PM's
#7  August 30, 2014, 03:13:28 am
  • ******
  • does this look like the face of mercy?
only happens to me when i press quote.

Just No Point

Re: Replying to PM's
#8  August 30, 2014, 03:15:00 am
  • ******
    • www.justnopoint.com/

  • Online
Just tested it and both reply and quote put the recipient's name under the TO: field.

Jesuszilla

Re: Replying to PM's
#9  August 30, 2014, 03:16:23 am
  • ******
  • I'm a fuffy.
    • USA
    • www.trinitymugen.net
OK NOW it's doing it? What the fuck?

Hold on... I think it may have to do with responding to a PM through checking notifications?


EDIT: Yep, it only happens when you respond to a PM through checking notifications:

Jango Hakamichi

Re: Replying to PM's
#10  August 30, 2014, 03:23:09 am
  • ******
  • [The only one worthy of my love!]
    • USA
Just No Point said, August 30, 2014, 03:10:40 am
I thought you couldn't send a PM to a blocked person at all though?
Yeah, you can't. But if you're replying to someone and you push "Reply," you get an error message stating that you need to specify a recipient. I thought that's what happened. N/m, as you were.

Bastard Walt

Re: Replying to PM's
#11  September 01, 2014, 06:06:41 pm
  • ******
  • ALE ALEJANDRO
For the record, it happens when you QUOTE a PM. Recipient (author whose Msg you're quoting) gets removed.

Edit: And yes, it's annoying as fuck. It's one of those limitations you need to cope with and work around, not exactly a valuable feature.

"We live in a world of perpetual outrage"

DKDC

Re: Replying to PM's
#12  September 01, 2014, 07:27:50 pm
  • ******
I just tried quoting a PM of mine and the sender's name was in the recipient field, then it disappeared and it was below it with a red cross - as in, it was confirmed as a recognized user's name and waiting for another recipient. In short -> not having this problem.
If I struggled to the end of my determination, to the end of my way of life with my followers, if the result is ruin, then this ruin is inevitable. Grieve. Shed tears. But you cannot regret.
Page 1 of 11   Go Up