YesNoOk
avatar

Warnings v2 (Read 2943252 times)

Started by Valodim, February 07, 2010, 09:40:57 pm
Re: Warnings v2
#1001  April 10, 2012, 10:12:31 pm
  • ******
  • 日本は素晴らしい国です。
jm, his posting in the cosplay thread is not what is up to debate, but his cussing , since it earned him the ban.

In his last post he challenged me to ban him or whatever, and so I did. I dont really believe that for someone that is as "internet" active as he claims to be a week would even be "felt", thats why i went with something longer when I reduced it. im willing to lower it further ( but not unban him right out ) , but I would want to hear others oppinions on it.
Re: Warnings v2
#1002  April 10, 2012, 10:14:44 pm
  • ******
  • If you’re gonna reach for a star...
  • reach for the lowest one you can.
    • USA
    • network.mugenguild.com/jmorphman

OZ

Re: Warnings v2
#1003  April 10, 2012, 10:15:08 pm
  • ******
  • ಠ_ಠ
he tried to call iced's 'bluff' and messed up

as i remember, it was not just a single 'fuck you', but several spread over a couple posts


he fought the law, and the law won
ಠ_ಠ

Mog

Re: Warnings v2
#1004  April 10, 2012, 10:16:20 pm
  • avatar
  • *****
I will once again state, except for special circumstances, no ban should be longer than 6 months and staff should discuss any ban longer than 3 days.  That gives a little time for things to cool off.
Re: Warnings v2
#1005  April 10, 2012, 10:27:26 pm
  • *****
  • Lazy spriter
  • Demon in heaven gotta carry a knife
    • Bolivia
    • network.mugenguild.com/thedge/
Yep, cut gbk's ban, what he did was stupid, the formspring thing, then, when you look at what he did the way Rajaa is putting it, it's not that bad.
I mean, he is not one of those who you can't talk, he does understand, he's sometimes just too impulssive.
That’s when I thought, “good grief”
Just ain’t my belief
Until I saw the holes
Inside his hand
Re: Warnings v2
#1006  April 10, 2012, 10:32:05 pm
  • ******
  • If you’re gonna reach for a star...
  • reach for the lowest one you can.
    • USA
    • network.mugenguild.com/jmorphman
I mean, he is not one of those who you can't talk, he does understand, he's sometimes just too impulssive.
I think the formspring question shows that he DOESN'T understand. At all.
Re: Warnings v2
#1007  April 10, 2012, 10:32:14 pm
  • *****
  • Most Dangerous Mugen
    • USA
    • caddie.smeenet.org
GBK's ban has only got 23 days left on it. I think that's appropriate for what he said to Iced.

OZ

Re: Warnings v2
#1008  April 10, 2012, 10:33:15 pm
  • ******
  • ಠ_ಠ
ಠ_ಠ

GOH

Re: Warnings v2
#1009  April 10, 2012, 10:34:12 pm
  • ******
  • Pure radge
    • Portugal
staff should discuss any ban longer than 3 days.  That gives a little time for things to cool off.
Not exactly. Atleast I don't think so. It depends on what user we're talking about. Do you think that SBZ would care if we banned him for 3 days? It's not like he would be one of those people who would "cool off" anyway because he annoys people for fun.

OZ

Re: Warnings v2
#1010  April 10, 2012, 10:36:49 pm
  • ******
  • ಠ_ಠ
i mean, the staff should discuss(or at least announce) any ban

it's just good procedure
ಠ_ಠ

GOH

Re: Warnings v2
#1011  April 10, 2012, 10:38:56 pm
  • ******
  • Pure radge
    • Portugal
Yeah I meant the last sentence. Discussing bans is good.

Mog

Re: Warnings v2
#1012  April 10, 2012, 10:45:48 pm
  • avatar
  • *****
Well right now there is discussion on reducing the length of bans given quite a while AFTER they were given.  It's way too easy for someone to be banned forever here with no discussion, and it puts the staff person who did the banning in the position to have to admit they were wrong.  What I'm saying is a 3 day ban is a timeout thats allowing things to cool off for the moderator who did the banning as well.  If you announce you banned someone for 3 days and say you want to make it a month or 3 months or whatever, it gives the others a chance to agree, disagree or say they don't care either way.

GOH

Re: Warnings v2
#1013  April 10, 2012, 10:49:43 pm
  • ******
  • Pure radge
    • Portugal
If you announce you banned someone for 3 days and say you want to make it a month or 3 months or whatever, it gives the others a chance to agree, disagree or say they don't care either way.
Ah, okay that sounds good.

OZ

Re: Warnings v2
#1014  April 10, 2012, 10:50:20 pm
  • ******
  • ಠ_ಠ
you're suggesting we start with a short preliminary ban and increase the length after discussion, as opposed to the often used opposite

as long as the ban can still be increased even if some disagree, i can't say i disagree with the idea
ಠ_ಠ

Mog

Re: Warnings v2
#1015  April 10, 2012, 10:57:52 pm
  • avatar
  • *****
^ yeah that.  I'm not gonna throw a hissy fit at every ban and insist no one miss out on more than 3 days of fun here at the guild, I promise.  I just think it's better to take the time to reason it out first.

OZ

Re: Warnings v2
#1016  April 10, 2012, 11:07:04 pm
  • ******
  • ಠ_ಠ
i've brought this up in another thread

let's discuss it there
ಠ_ಠ
Re: Warnings v2
#1017  April 11, 2012, 05:49:12 am
  • avatar
  • ******
    • Thailand
For all of you spectators, no we are not falling apart as staff, we're just coming to terms with the new ideas of the new moderators!

:ninja:
Re: Warnings v2
#1018  April 15, 2012, 12:06:28 pm
  • avatar
  • ******
    • Thailand

Mog

Re: Warnings v2
#1019  April 15, 2012, 04:01:41 pm
  • avatar
  • *****
The first one is kind of immature.  I'm not even sure what the second one is.

:bow:

Edit:  OK, I now know what it is.  Showing photos of controlled substances isn't the same as trying to sell them. Once again, kind of immature considering this isn't a stoner forum.

Last Edit: April 15, 2012, 04:14:59 pm by MissBHaven
Re: Warnings v2
#1020  April 15, 2012, 11:24:06 pm
  • ******
  • If you’re gonna reach for a star...
  • reach for the lowest one you can.
    • USA
    • network.mugenguild.com/jmorphman
MDD's avatar+sig is only offensive to good taste.

seriously it's terrible