I second the motion that I'm BITCHIN'.

Well let's set that straight real quick.  First off my point is that Anita is bitching about objectivization of feminine beauty doing a moral disservice to gamers.  She herself is clearly moderately attractive (if she weren't there would have been no chord struck or argument to be hadPOINT A ), and her being objectivized as attractive, whether consciously or not, I'm arguing worked out to her advantage.POINT B  People claimed beauty was purely subjective (obviously bullshit), and that her being attractive had nothing to do with her popularity.  I linked to two wiki articles that clearly illustrate A) the fact that beauty is not completely subjective, and B) How being objectivized as attractive works to a persons advantage in garnering credibility and popularity.

These fuck stains were already too knee deep in trying to argue against those to points to even bother reading the articles, and have thus done nothing but claim that they were irrelevant from the get go.  Despite my urging them to at least read what they were arguing against, I would still be surprised if even one of them had.      POINT C

---

      Posted: April 18, 2013, 01:09:52 am

Titiln said, April 18, 2013, 01:08:24 am

lol rmh is oblivious to sarcasm and blatant mockery

Idiot.

RobotMonkeyHead said, April 18, 2013, 01:09:36 am

She herself is clearly moderately attractive

As I gay man I think I have the authority to declare that she is totes uggo and thus all your points are moot. Now c'mon, help me close up so we can go get some pizza.

RobotMonkeyHead said, April 18, 2013, 01:09:36 am

Idiot.

can you please bring up byakko's LOL I WAS TROLLING ALL ALONG post again like he was being serious

RobotMonkeyHead said, April 18, 2013, 01:09:36 am

her being attractive had nothing to do with her popularity.

No one said it had nothing to do with her popularity. You just seem to think it was almost the only reason she garnered popularity.

Now get back to making your tutorials instead!

Jmorphman only become a mod because titiln thought he was pretty hot, true story.

@Iced and Rajaa, I'll get to your points in a minute.

Sure. And the one's where I slaughtered your opposition to my points after you told me to, wait what was it... "your stop typing complete nonsense"  in your typical poor grammar, lack of punctuation and ironic self defeat, which caused you to scan every one of my posts for a single grammatical error you could try and save yourself with?  I think you came up with a your instead of you're mistake, but whatevs.  Fuck it right?     

Wouldn't surprise me if he actually was trollin anyway.  Him and Rajaa seem to think that toying with the extents of someones intellect is a form of trolling, or so goes the claim now?  That would be the second time Rajaa's tried to back out of a debate with me on that same tactic.  I care! Wait no, I'm wrong? No I don't care!  Pure genius.

Sure. And the ones where I slaughtered your opposition to my points after you told me to, wait what was it... "your stop typing complete nonsense" in your typical poor grammar, lack of punctuation and ironic self defeat, which caused you to scan every one of my posts for a single grammatical error you could try and save yourself with?  I think you came up with a your instead of you're mistake, but whatevs.  Fuck it, right?     

Wouldn't surprise me if he actually was trolling anyway.  Him and Rajaa seem to think that toying with the extents of someone's intellect is a form of trolling, or so goes the claim now?  That would be the second time Rajaa's tried to back out of a debate with me on that same tactic.  I care! Wait no, I'm wrong? No, I don't care!  Pure genius.

Anika Sarkewhatever is ugly.

Rajaa said, April 18, 2013, 02:01:30 am

All in all, I think it's pretty clear that RMH's little "experiment" (AKA He's trolling and not really serious) of testing people's intelligence levels has made him malfunction because he wasn't prepared for how much smarter other people are compared to him. Even 12-year-olds can detect obvious sarcasm and make arguments without linking to Wikipedia.

For the, what's it, the 4th time?  I'm not trolling.  I'm having fun taking you all apart, because really you have no point, other than that I have no point, where my point is actually scientifically proven as likely, and is still clearly stated as just my opinion.  Your own insecurity is probably the only thing preventing you from pulling your head out of your own ass for long enough to see that your ideas about beauty being entirely subjective are Completely disproven by the 'irrelevant' wiki articles I linked your ignorant ass to. 

RobotMonkeyHead said, April 18, 2013, 02:08:31 am

in your typical poor grammar, lack of punctuation

That's only because it's common knowledge that Titlin doesn't give a fuck.

Backing out of a debate with you is something of which someone should be proud. Because (1) you're insane and socially incompetent; (2) you're a a sexist bigot and a hypocrite; and (3) you're really not smart and you lack basic understanding of simple things like sarcasm, as proven by your most recent posts.

Also, that debate you're talking about wasn't even a debate, it was you blowing up like a moron over perceptibly being hinted at being a pedophile. You overreact to simple things and send threats to people because your undeveloped ego gets bruised -- yeah, you're definitely a horrible person. Seek help.

Yes, it is a good thing I backed out of a "debate" with you. I'm proud of myself.