Robot Santa said, December 23, 2008, 07:01:05 pmQuoteSNK released SNK vs. Capcom: Match of the Millennium and SNK vs. Capcom: Card Fighters Clash on the Neo Geo Pocket Color. Combined, both sold an unremarkable 50,000 copies. SNK closed all American operations in the summer of 2000.EPIC PHAIL
P.o.t.S. said, December 23, 2008, 07:07:09 pmGod's Anger said, December 23, 2008, 07:03:35 pmIdentity theft! And so what ?! I'm God ! You will all suffer in order to know peace !Sniper said, December 23, 2008, 07:06:30 pmMake a char based on HACKED sprite from any videogame is illegal in any countries.It's tolerated because it's considerated as retrogaming.It's not considered as retrogaming, but as fanart. Whatever ...The sprites weren't hacked, but ripped. Whatever ...Yuri Cat said, December 23, 2008, 07:09:39 pmdamn frenchies.Yeah, they suck !!!KOD : your link doesn't work.
Sniper said, December 23, 2008, 07:06:30 pmShamrock,don't f*cking explain what is legal and what is illegal.Make a char based on HACKED sprite from any videogame is illegal in any countries.It's tolerated because it's considerated as retrogaming.But tolerated not mean legal.Ethic...You speak to me about ethic and i am patiently working to respect it, because i said i am working to obtain chars maker agreement.But your ethic is not in conformity with the law, except for ORIGINALS creations, knows it.And if you know philisophy basics, you know that ethic, like moral are subjectives notions.Check the rules threads, capcom and snk have both stated that mugen is FANART.If you went and started trying to sell fanart it would be immoral, if you went and started trying to sell fanart you found over the internet made by others but cleaned and put together it would still be immoral and illegal.
What is just as hilarious (if less so) is that this guy somehow believed Capcom bought SNK out and believe them to still be Capcom's property to this day or whatever. A quick trip to Wikipedia could clear that up faster than an email. And yeah, its one thing to demand money for fanart, and its another to sell fanart made by others without their permission. I take it he has not heard of "copyright infringement?" Maxime is Ryanide's personal creation, his "copyright" if you will. Using it without his permission will only serve to make you look less credible than beforeStill, at least this topic didn't become a deabte on whether Sniper's permission-less usage of Evil Ryu, E Ken and Dragonclaw was effectively graverobbing or not.
Damn it, we had gone for like one year without having the retarded copyright arguments.Mugen Guild: 0 days since last copyright argument
Wit that "Capcom owns SNK legally" slip up (If it WERE a slip up) as well as the "is it graverobbing" ciscussion, it may even go BEYOND that.
Sniper said, December 23, 2008, 07:46:47 pmI m' sorry to have been agressive, but i was busy to be attacked by people who doesn't know what is LAW.Quote253/ Capcom agreement254/ Mugenguild rulez255/ My concierge opinionMaybe some of you have noticed, but i have let Mugenguild rulez BEFORE my concierge opinion What are you a Lawyer. LOL. For all you know I am one. Assumption is the mother of all fuck ups. And I got to say you Assume way to much.
